Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    55,895
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    532

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. If the payment was right, I could see doing this myself. I'm not sure they picked the right markets to test it in though.
  2. The 7G-Tronic is a longitudinal transmission, not a transverse transmission. If Mercedes couldn't design and build a decent front wheel drive transmission, they should have contacted the experts over at GM.
  3. An older Lincoln will just be a Ford with nicer leather and a fancy grille. If the interiors of the Town Car weren't so painfully "geriatric taxi cab", I'd totally own one.
  4. You're absolutely right that I am making assumptions here. I think I'm justified though. GM is already starting from a great position with the 9-speed, so any adjustments are likely to be minor. Plus, front wheel drive automatics are a GM specialty. They've been doing it, and doing it well, for longer than just about anyone in the business.
  5. The 9-speed has largely been fine in everything I've driven with it. I highly doubt that it will be less good than the Terrain 2.0t. Cadillac has to do literally nothing to the GMC tuning to make it top notch. If there is anything about this engine has a question mark next to it, it would be the active fuel management.
  6. Really? You don't know why they didn't use the automatic from the 2003-2018 era? Put on your deerstalker cap there Sherlock..... maybe you'll figure it out. The question was never and is never about raw performance in these crossovers. It is about drivability around town the way 99.9999999% of people use them. A jumpy, laggy engine transmission combo is not going to be as satisfying as one with low lag and no jumpiness. The XT4 will do better than the GLA there and still have plenty of scoot.
  7. The NVH of the old 2.0T in the Cobalt was actually pretty good for its day. Again, you don't need to take my word for it... look at all the articles regarding the turbo lag in that car AutoWeek - CLA Turbo Lag - Whether sport or economy mode is selected, the Mercedes always seemed to be a half-gear shy of where it should have been, and the combination of turbo lag and wonky clutch take-up makes smooth low-speed driving difficult. Once on the road there's plenty of power to get into trouble, so it's not a fundamental output issue -- rather it's a lack of refinement between the engine and transmission. Cars.com - CLA Turbo Lag - Despite the turbocharged four-cylinder engine's stout 208 horsepower and 258 pounds-feet of torque, excessive drivetrain lag sullies the CLA250. A sustained toe on the gas can induce gratifying low-end punch, where the little Benz surges ahead even at 2,000 rpm. The problem, however, is getting to all that. MercedesBlog.com CLA AMG45 Turbo Lag - To obtain the high power of 381 HP and the high torque of 475 Nm, relatively small Mercedes turbo engine operates with a big turbo which delivers a maximum pressure of 1.8 bar. But a big turbo means a high inertia and a big turbo lag which you feel at full throttle. Car and Driver - GLA Turbo Lag - In its default Comfort mode, sluggish shifts accentuate the engine’s turbo lag Consumer Reports - GLA Turbo Lag - But the seven-speed dual-clutch automatic is unrefined and, combined with the engine's turbo lag, makes the GLA feel lethargic despite its quick acceleration times. So yea, you could use sport mode all the time, but that will kill your fuel economy. The reviews above tell me that Mercedes is still a long way off from perfecting this engine into something that is satisfying to drive on a daily basis. I would be disappointed in Cadillac if the XT4 came out with reviews like what you see above on the GLA/CLA. All Cadillac needs to do is tune it similar to the GMC Terrain and they have already beaten Mercedes. Car and Driver - GMC Terrain Turbo Lag - Our all-wheel-drive turbocharged 2.0-liter test vehicle achieved the top acceleration figures among its competitive set. Credit the Terrain’s minimal turbo lag and plentiful power, as well as the nine-speed automatic transmission’s ability to drop down a couple of gears quickly with a simple boot of the throttle. TruckTrend - GMC Terrain Turbo Lag - With 252 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque, its output lags behind the 3.6L V-6 that was optional in the previous Terrain, but you’d never know it from behind the wheel, thanks in part to that nine-speed auto. With fleet off-the-line reflexes, minimal turbo lag, and excellent passing power, the 2.0 is a surprising engine to find in the competent—but rarely fun—compact SUV segment. Mercedes-Benz... the best or is there a GMC in the comparison? Who cares? It is a dealer installed option fully supported by GM and covered by warranty. It allows the buyer to choose a higher performance model that would require 92 octane or the more standard SS that can run on regular. Same goes for the Mustang. It is functionally the same choice as a CLA 250 or a CLA 43... Benz just makes two models out of it while GM lets you upgrade an existing model. (yes I know there are other upgrades on the 43 over the 250.)
  8. Read my post after that. GM was doing 340 lb-ft from a 2.0T 10 years ago.
  9. There were engineering reasons for that. They added balance shafts to smooth out the previously rough engine. Once they got that sorted out they started increasing hp again. Also, about 10 years ago... "In December 2008, GM released a Turbo Upgrade Kit for the LNF engine which increases horsepower to 290 hp (220 kW) and torque to up to 340 ft⋅lb (460 N⋅m), depending on the model. The kit retails for $650 and includes remapped engine calibration and upgraded MAP sensors. The kit is covered by the cars' existing GM warranties." And before you try to play the CLA/GLA43 card SMK... It took MB 10 years to catch up to and exceed the power output of a 2008 Cobalt SS. A tuning decision is a tuning decision. It is not a indicator of engineering ability when a company has already proven itself able. Power delivery also matters and nearly every review of the CLA complains of turbo lag. So a fat lot of good that extra lb-ft is doing when it takes an extra 3 clicks of the mouse to get it.
  10. Still GM? ATS 2.0T -295 lb-ft Will you ever stop being a troll? A tuning decision is not indicative of engineering ability.
  11. This will actually be the third all-new 2.0t from GM. This new one has AFM. As we see displacements congeal around even numbers, we'll see this happen more often.
  12. If you were placing bets on who is more likely to get it right, would you bet on the 100+ year old company who has built suicide doors before or would you bet on the 15 year old company which still is using humans to manually drive the robots on their production line because they can't get them programmed correctly? THAT is all I'm sayin..
  13. We really need to dispense with the horsepower as a benchmark thing. It's not doing any of us any favors to be fixated on it. Lots of torque, way down low, is the best, way to go.
  14. Panel gaps and door alignment have been an issue for telsa for a while. I can spot them when I'm sitting in traffic.
  15. I bet Ford could actually make them able to close and align properly. The trim piece on the front part of that door looks lovely also.
  16. This 2.0T is all new and for now is a Cadillac exclusive. More details will be released on it later, but I have an in with Cadillac and plan on getting the information ahead of time so I can release as soon as embargo is lifted. What he did tell me is that the engine is tuned heavily towards favoring low end torque (258lb-ft at 1500rpm!!) and they plan on making full use of the 9-speed gearbox. It should feel plenty fast. Just like my Encore has a rather pathetic 138 lb-ft but with very low gearing in first and second, it feels just as peppy in suburban driving as cars with 160 - 180 lb-ft. An additional 120 lb-ft and 3 additional gears with only marginally more weight... it'll be fine. Plastic Cladding.... only acceptable on European cars I guess. Look at all this plasticy plastic plastic.
  17. it seems like we might have a winner then
  18. What does everyone think about the 3rd version?
  19. Atlas EXT. With Ridgeline not doing all that well, I wonder how an even lesser known truck would do in the market when Toyota, GM, and Ford are all battling it out with "real" trucks in this segment with Jeep joining in shortly. The Atlas base price is $30k today and I doubt VW would make the truck version cheaper. For reference, the Ridgeline starts at $30k itself.
  20. Because it was built and designed to be a Scion. It will probably be renamed Corolla SportCross or some BS during the next refresh.
  21. I'd have to look, but I think this 2.5 liter is all-new and supposed to have some ridiculously high MPG numbers for even the non-hybrid version
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search