Drew Dowdell

At the most, I would like to see Cadillac offer the 3.6TT from the XTS in the XT5... that is sufficient without going overboard. And they don't have to reengineer the engine to transverse.

I can see how Cadillac is happy though... they're the second best selling in their market after the RX. I'm sure all five GLE AMG Coupe drivers feel so good feeling superior though....

This is an all new Enclave. New platform and everything.

US - by whoring out their name on FWD cars shared with Nissan, and chasing cheap leases. EU - not if you remove the Crown Vic spec livery market

Trump is tilting at windmills. Just because the EPA standards are relaxed doesn't mean automakers can start putting V8s in everything again. They still have to build vehicles for a global market. Manufacturers would rather not build multiple variations of the same car. The engines in the meat of the market are going to be the same. So the same 4-cylinder that powers an ATS in the US is going to power an ATS in Europe and an ATS in China.

I also prefer the V8 myself and am still not a fan of the EB 3.5 after a 1000 mile trip in an Expedition EL last week.... however, the point was that people still want better fuel economy even from their trucks and are willing to take a swing with new technology to get it.

The crossover replaced the uncool wagon and minivan... That's all. People want the ability to haul all the their crap. In 1977, you got a Colony Park. In 1987, you got a Mercury Sable Wagon while the Missus got a Town and Country. In 1997, you got a Mercury Mountaineer and the Mrs got an Windstar. In 2007, you're in a pair of Explorers. In 2017, you're in a crossover explorer and she in an edge.

EcoDiesel is currently not for sale, when sold is sold in limited quantities, and is never offered at discount or special pricing like the hemi is. GM is selling every diesel Canyonado they can build, even at the substantial price increase over the V6. How about another comparison.... 2.7 EB or 3.5 EB verse 5.0 in an F150? Ford is selling the crap out of the Ecoboost trucks with the promise of better fuel economy (even if I personally find the validity of the claim to be dubious)

What consumers don't want better fuel economy? Even truck buyers want to squeeze an extra mpg out of their vehicles when they can.

It's an early production model on a brand new platform without any direct predecessor. I wouldn't get too hung up on a sunroof issue. Similarly, my 2004 CTS had a faulty sunroof switch that had to be replaced early in its life but that was literally the only warranty repair I had in 48k miles of ownership.

Spotted this today.

I think it will be Traverse size.

The key thing about the avalanche was it's versatility. It is a full 2ft shorter than any crew-cab pickup with an 8ft bed. That means it can fit in places those bigger trucks can't, but still has all the utility of them. The only thing it couldn't be was a crew-cab with an 8ft bed both at the same time. But how often is that really needed if you're not a contractor? No, GM done messed up when they cancelled that truck. They still have crazy good resale and they haven't been in production for 4 years now.

Both. Since January 24th I've been zig zag going all over the country with very long hours in each location. I've been ill since mid February. At the moment, I still can't breathe properly from the chest pain, so cardio is out.

I really want to get back to it. I'm so worn down lately from a intense work schedule and being ill. I feel like a phone with 2% battery left.

The main problem I see with this plan is that it means that GM might be moving away from models that only sell in one market (like the US) in favor of models that sell globally. While that might work for something like a Cruze or Encore, some models are very market specific... like Suburban and Tahoe. The fascination with high volumes at the expense of variety greatly hurts consumer choice. Yes... I'm still stewing about the cancelation of the Avalanche.... it still makes no sense.

The XTS and Impala being on the chopping block is fairly obvious. If the XTS goes, so does the Impala... and probably Lacrosse next time around. Think about it, the Epsilon chassis can't have that much life left to it. It's solid, but exceptionally heavy for the class even after the latest round of weight cutting, and too narrow for the cars they are trying to use it on. This is my own conjecture but, I'd expect one last refresh for the Impala and XTS, while the Lacrosse is already on it's last iteration on this platform before all three head off to the great used car lot in the sky. After that, who knows? Maybe greater use of the next generation of Alpha or Omega?

Nissan has been dumping to rental fleets like crazy the past few years. I wouldn't be surprised to hear of Infiniti doing the same. I drove the Q50 and Q60 back to back and they seemed to be very different cars... the Q50 as you described while the Q60 was substantially better. They're on the same FM platform, but there seems to be a significant difference in development work between the two.

This wasn't a press car, but @Anthony Fongaro can correct me if I'm wrong.

Good write-up. I think the start-stop button being on the wheel was due to the relationship Alfa-Romeo and Ferrari had while this vehicle was being developed. A lot of Ferrari went into this vehicle before Serg sold off that brand. It was probably 97% done by the time of the sale.

Well congratulations on getting married at least! I've done this drive many many times all the way down to Key West from my parent's place in Miami. It is, unfortunately, not a sporting drive at all. Cars I've had on this drive: Sebring Convertible (both 2nd gen and 3rd gen) Mustang Convertible (more than a few) Challenger Lincoln MKS Chrysler 300 Cadillac DTS Mercedes GL (supplied by Benz, not a rental) Jeep Wrangler soft top

What was the new technology in a spring of insufficient tension in an ignition switch? Even the Toyota unintended acceleration wouldn't have changed things had the car had a physical throttle cable instead of drive by wire.... a floormat certainly isn't high tech.

They are, by far, the norm. You don't see a manufacturer throwing a bunch of new technology at a vehicle and then have it end up less safe than its predecessor. The only time you see a vehicle with less power, the engine has been drastically downsized. Sure, the Mitsubishi Mirage may not be all that safe nor powerful... but even then, it is leagues better than the Mirage of 15 years ago which was rated one of the worst vehicles in its day in crash tests.

and safer, and more efficient, and quieter, and more powerful, and cleaner, and more reliable

I was going through old pictures today and found this one of GM's new 9-speed fwd auto.... With my cocktail for size comparison. Look how small it is.