• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    New Compact Crossover From Cadillac Coming In 2018


    • Cadillac Has More Crossovers Coming

    The Cadillac XT5 will be the first model in a new crossover lineup for the brand. Next up is a compact crossover to take on the likes of the BMW X3 and Lexus NX according to Cadillac President Johan de Nysschen. But don't expect it anytime soon. de Nysschen said it would coming out in 2018.

     

    Following the compact crossover will be a large crossover that would take on the likes of the Audi Q7 and Volvo XC90. This model is expected in either the second half of 2018 or 2019. Wrapping up the crossover lineup could be a subcompact model that would compete with the BMW X1 and Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class. No word on when we could see that model.

     

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    Yes I see value in having a Large, medium and compact CUV, I question if they really need to have a subcompact CUV at Cadillac. This is the overlap where I think leave the subcompact market to Buick.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes I see value in having a Large, medium and compact CUV, I question if they really need to have a subcompact CUV at Cadillac. This is the overlap where I think leave the subcompact market to Buick.

     

    If they can get people to pay $30k for a Cadillac subcompact CUV the size of the Encore, more power to them.  the Encore starts at $24k and tops out at around $34k.  That leaves some room for a Cadillac to start at $29,995 + destination.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Using a Sonic platform, Gamma to make a Cadillac... I thought we've been here before, Cadillac doesn't have to dilute itself, it can leave this to Buick.

     

    Unless they use Delta. The new Delta platform can accommodate AWD sub-frames, so that makes wayyy more sense. It'll give a slightly more vehicle to work with too.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yes I see value in having a Large, medium and compact CUV, I question if they really need to have a subcompact CUV at Cadillac. This is the overlap where I think leave the subcompact market to Buick.

     

    If they can get people to pay $30k for a Cadillac subcompact CUV the size of the Encore, more power to them.  the Encore starts at $24k and tops out at around $34k.  That leaves some room for a Cadillac to start at $29,995 + destination.

     

    I see the point you are making and as Suaviloquent has stated, if they use Delta and only have it as an AWD version so it truly is a nicer product than the Encore than more power to them to have it and sell. Just do not use the current Encore or a Chevy product rebadged. I still think the market is small for a Full Blown Luxury SubCompact but I have been wrong before. :)

     

    Happy Thanksgiving to you all.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Encore is far smaller than the X1, no?

     

    Externally, yes. Internally, no.  That is more a reflection of the excellent packaging of the Encore rather than a knock on the X1.

    Using a Sonic platform, Gamma to make a Cadillac... I thought we've been here before, Cadillac doesn't have to dilute itself, it can leave this to Buick.

     

    Unless they use Delta. The new Delta platform can accommodate AWD sub-frames, so that makes wayyy more sense. It'll give a slightly more vehicle to work with too.

     

    I would gather that it will be a Delta.  There are new Delta crossovers coming.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    XT1 on Gamma, XT3 on Delta and XT7 on the next gen Lambda platform.  Clone all those Chevy and Buick crossovers into Cadillacs so they can be like Lincoln.   Sounds like a viable plan.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The thing is, not ideal from an enthusiasts perspective as it can be, I'm not sure any kind of crossover should be really be made to emulate a good sports sedan. People don't buy them for that reason. Alright I concede enthusiasts might, but they're just as endangered as dead-tree media. I'll readily concede I am not an enthusiast either. I just like finger-licking good cars.

     

    Then again Mercede's Metris and Sprinter (Vans of all things) has better steering than a CLA, equal to the C-Class, but I digress no more.

     

    Okay maybe some more digression, Lincoln crossovers might have a head start but Cadillac's got overall much more cachet, so therefore Cadillac will catch up, unless an inverse of that inter-relation of the two brands is imminent, okay it might be feasible, but realistic, absolutely not.

     

    And has anyone not noticed the weight loss of these new GM products?

     

    Give'em the steering of a Fiesta, heck cannibalize as many Mazda and Ford compacts as you have to (speaking to GM here), give'em GKN's new AWD system and you have a formula for an awesome FWD/AWD Crossover. And you don't need RWD.

     

    Besides, because of Audi's Quattro AWD configuration, it's defaulted to giving more power to the front wheels even with a longitudinal setup for the commoner models. So here's some eccentric polarization of a North/South setup to give you FWD packaging, at the expense of weight distribution.

     

    I see this as a cost-effective way of pushing models out. All GM has to do is make sure there is a clear separation between brands. They are now among the best at doing it. And the ones that do make the platform sharing as inconspicuous as possible result in gloriously expensive vehicles for what they give you (Germans, dammit that is one way to make a ton of money. Wrap cheap bones in succulent meat. Just don't look at the marrow).

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    XT1 on Gamma, XT3 on Delta and XT7 on the next gen Lambda platform.  Clone all those Chevy and Buick crossovers into Cadillacs so they can be like Lincoln.   Sounds like a viable plan.

    That isn't for sure at the moment. There are conflicting rumors saying it could use next-gen full-size crossover platform, or the Omega platform for the CT6. I wouldn't be surprised if its the former.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    But Wait There's More!

    Uwe Ellinghaus, Cadillac CMO, on the brand and the industry’s crossover craze.

    Ellinghaus confirmed what we already knew, saying the 2017 Cadillac XT5 will be flanked by a larger crossover vehicle, to bridge the gap between XT5 and Escalade, and a compact crossover to do battle with the BMW X3 and the like.

    Adding to the report of four new crossovers coming by 2020, which includes the likelihood of a subcompact Cadillac crossover, are Ellinghaus’ words of what he envisions could make for five crossovers.

    “We can envisage an even more compact [model] but we can also envisage something between a three-row SUV/crossover-derived car and the Escalade,” he said.

    Yes, that would bring the lineup to a subcompact crossover, a compact crossover, XT5, a large crossover, this envisioned SUV/crossover and, finally, the Escalade. Though, Ellinghaus is quick to point out the Escalade is treated much differently, seeing as it is derived from a truck, rather than a car.

    “The Escalade is so huge, and it’s different because it’s truck-based, that if the growth of the SUV segment continues, I really think there is space for maybe even two smaller cars than the XT5 and maybe even two larger ones.”

    Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2015/11/uwe-ellinghaus-talks-cadillac-and-the-crossover-craze/#ixzz3sMaNigDU

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac got money at their disposal and a whiteboard open to anything that will ensure success. 

     

    That means they can make the products they need and the ones they want. Commitment. It isn't easy to make when the going isn't so easy, but Cadillac has real commitment. 

     

    I mean seriously, Cadillac is entrenched as being American. 

     

    This is on top of everything sedan being redesigned, and 2 new halo sedans. That's up to 8 new products. Nice.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac should use Alpha and Omega for crossovers, but they probably will go the cheaper route and just build them off the Chevy and Buicks.  So we get that Chevy is the main stream.  But then Buick and GMC are both supposed to be premium or entry lux crossovers, and Cadillac a luxury version?  How do those not all over lap if they all have the same chassis and engines.  

     

    And where are the V-series crossovers?  Cadillac has aspirations of having higher performance than the Germans, yet they have 2 performance products (ATS and CTS).  Shouldn't there be a 575 hp XT5 to compete with the GLE63 and X5M?  A 465 hp  XT3-V to compete with the coming GLC63,  An Escalade-V? etc.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    XT1 on Gamma, XT3 on Delta and XT7 on the next gen Lambda platform.  Clone all those Chevy and Buick crossovers into Cadillacs so they can be like Lincoln.   Sounds like a viable plan

     

     

    Cadillac has done an excellent job in making their vehicles their own when they are shared with other GM products and vice versa.  Sharing some under-bits with the Suburban clearly hasn't hurt the Escalade since they can't even build them fast enough.  No one will ever mistake a Camaro for an ATS or CTS.... and using the Alpha for Camaro was the best possible solution available to GM.

     

     The SRX was one of the best handling FWD based crossovers out there and the new platform the XT5 uses is only going to improve on that.   I have no problem with Cadillac using a new Lambda platform replacement as long as it rocks the segment.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac should use Alpha and Omega for crossovers, but they probably will go the cheaper route and just build them off the Chevy and Buicks.  So we get that Chevy is the main stream.  But then Buick and GMC are both supposed to be premium or entry lux crossovers, and Cadillac a luxury version?  How do those not all over lap if they all have the same chassis and engines.  

     

    And where are the V-series crossovers?  Cadillac has aspirations of having higher performance than the Germans, yet they have 2 performance products (ATS and CTS).  Shouldn't there be a 575 hp XT5 to compete with the GLE63 and X5M?  A 465 hp  XT3-V to compete with the coming GLC63,  An Escalade-V? etc.

     

    I think Drew mentioned this before.

     

    There are core vehicle platforms. Then there are body styles. Then there are variants of the body styles. Variants are the last step in defining a product lineup.

     

    It's not so simple to say that GM is just building cars off of Chevys and Buicks. If anything, it looks like all of the recent platforms are using trickle-down from Cadillac. It's evident, not always everywhere, but you do get consistent themes. Weight-reduction is among them. All of GM carmaking is getting lessons learned from state-of-art Corvette and new generation Volt development programs. And styling is really maturing, and GM is one of the few automakers that still makes great, original designs.

     

    Your concerns are valid though. I have been adamant as always, the El Miraj was begging to be built when they unveiled it. It was the best 50-50 chance to glory I'd ever seen for Cadillac recently. They missed a big one, and they will regret it, because opportunities like that will only come again when something they make suggests a radical departure from Art and Science and still resonates with fans and critics.

     

    Cadillac very recently did do parity in pricing, like for like in options and they were trounced. So they had to increase standard equipment. Even the old CTS Wagon and its departure were a sign then as it is now, Cadillac cannot be reasonably expected to have exactly equivalent counterparts to the German competition within the decade. The market does not want extreme Cadillac crossovers just yet. They're not out of the realm of possibility though,

     

    They cannot intentionally build vehicles that are not profit-centres. The ELR I think of now as the cross between an i8 and an Audi TT. A car that with any other German make as its creator could have been easily justified among a very large portfolio. 

     

    I'm not going to excuse them for not being ahead of the curve, but I do say, build up your core vehicle platforms. Then get the right power-trains to power the vehicles based on those platforms. Get each brand styling formula right.

     

    Make the body styles you can sell. Then, at the very end see if it aligns with core competencies to make variants. The things with BMW and Mercedes is that they are just one core brand. They don't have other complete brands that aren't restricted to a niche. So they have to make variants as their filler for showrooms. It's different, but it aligns with core competencies.

     

    Cadillac could over-stuff its showrooms, but the rest of GM certainly can't. It'd be an utter waste. 

     

    There are glaring holes right now at Cadillac - heck even Lincoln is ahead by default. What Cadillac has to do, is to make sure their future crossovers are revolutionary in their own right, in a way that pushes them ahead of the league. They are capable of doing it. Being ahead for once in one area, will bide them time to build variants to complete the brand. Heck, some vehicles might just be lost in the process too. And the Germans makes are not immune to this either.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac should use Alpha and Omega for crossovers, but they probably will go the cheaper route and just build them off the Chevy and Buicks.  So we get that Chevy is the main stream.  But then Buick and GMC are both supposed to be premium or entry lux crossovers, and Cadillac a luxury version?  How do those not all over lap if they all have the same chassis and engines.  

     

    And where are the V-series crossovers?  Cadillac has aspirations of having higher performance than the Germans, yet they have 2 performance products (ATS and CTS).  Shouldn't there be a 575 hp XT5 to compete with the GLE63 and X5M?  A 465 hp  XT3-V to compete with the coming GLC63,  An Escalade-V? etc.

    No what you are going to see is more of the products being made for Cadillac and then trickled down to Chevy and Buick. Cadillac got it ass backwards for too many years where a share platform was made a Caprice then dumbed up to be a Cadillac. Today it is a Cadillac first and then trickled down to a Chevy and they all benefit.

    Cadillac for once not just has the money but the independence to do things unthinkable 5 years ago.

    I think you may find that there may not be a need to use an Alpha or Omega as there may just be another platform lurking out there yet to be seen. With the profits in the Crossover segment there is no need to go the cheap route out and base a RWD car platform for a CUV that could base 3-4 different models.

    The benefits of doing it right and making a new RWD/AWD platform for a CUV is that there would be less compromise better weight reduction and more ability to adapt it to different models. there is enough of a business case to do this and I think you may just see it.

    Note on other sights they are reporting Chevy has registered the Blazer name again for use and GM also added a AT4 name that I suspect may be a GMC name for All Terrain 4 wheel drive. These could be the trickled down models of the Cadillac bases CUV model. Not fully clear yet but bears watching.

    When I mean this segment is making them money that is clearly an understatement. Look for even more serious investment in these models in all division and see things you did not expect happen.

    Last year the CUV finally out sold the sedan and this is a trend that will last as long as the mini van or longer. It is a model that appeals to many because of the utility that they provide the truck like height to see and it is something a man will feel better being seen in. Automakers love it because they make money they sell in great numbers the Nox and Terrain alone sold over 350,000 units with the old models last year. Also they get better MPG numbers than most larger SUV models that will have to be trimmed back in the future.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The People want crossovers, crossovers they will get.  The CUV is, above all, a very functional type of vehicle... high seating position, wagon hauling capability, AWD security... what's not to like, if the thing is made to be nice to DRIVE.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sales have gone nowhere for the last several years. 

    They can surely use this product.

    This division and as I think you will see with Lincoln too that it is not about volume but profit per unit that is key anymore. Prices will climb the units sold will go down but profit per unit sold will continue to climb. In a CUV It will climb even faster.

    The HHR is the greatest proof of what a CUV can do. They took what was a Cobalt wagon, made it look like an Old SUV with a high roof and look more truck like. It sold over 100,000-150,000 units per year. People loved it. If it were a car or mini van it would have sold nothing near this.

    In todays world people want more utility as most cars can not handle much cargo wise. Yes some have large trunks but try to get a square box into it or a 60"Tv and you are stuck.

    My wife loves her Terrain and I have grown to love it too. At first I really could care less but today I am so glad we bought it. Now if it were a Mini Van I would not be caught dead behind the wheel. That is the real key here as they have made a Mini Van men love as well as women. With the market being pretty much 50/50 with men and women that is a key demo that few vehicles hit.

    Just look at the Encore. People love it as it is comfortable, and you can fold everything down and haul a lot of cargo. Then the MPG is not 15 MPG or the price is not $60K. This has hit a sweet spot with many people. Lets face it the only real complaint most have is it needed a little more power and this year it got it with little MPG penalty.

    Edited by hyperv6
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sales have gone nowhere for the last several years. 

    They can surely use this product.

    While their profit has increased for the last several years as well. Gotta suck when that happens. :gitfunky:

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Sales have gone nowhere for the last several years. 

    They can surely use this product.

    While their profit has increased for the last several years as well. Gotta suck when that happens. :gitfunky:

     

    Thanks for saving another down vote for me. For someone who trumps up profits so much when it comes to Ford, it sure is sweet irony that you would down vote the same kind of statement when it is NOT about Ford. Fact is that while volume is down, profits are up for Cadillac.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How do we know Cadillac profits are up?  Do we think the CTS is making more gross profit on 1,400 sales a month than it was on 3,800? They have been putting $6-7,000 incentives on the SRX this year, that is why the sales numbers have been good in addition to it being their only crossover in the show room.    GM doesn't break the brand profit numbers out, so we don't really know if Cadillac is making money or losing it.   GM's entire company turns less profit than BMW or Mercedes, if Cadillac is a profit machine on the level of the Germans, are we to believe that Chevy and Buick are losing money?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Profit is calculated on cost of doing business subtracted from revenue from said business.

     

    I only define this because smk seems rather unsure.

     

    SMK, why would you care how much profit Cadillac makes?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How do we know Cadillac profits are up?  Do we think the CTS is making more gross profit on 1,400 sales a month than it was on 3,800? They have been putting $6-7,000 incentives on the SRX this year, that is why the sales numbers have been good in addition to it being their only crossover in the show room.    GM doesn't break the brand profit numbers out, so we don't really know if Cadillac is making money or losing it.   GM's entire company turns less profit than BMW or Mercedes, if Cadillac is a profit machine on the level of the Germans, are we to believe that Chevy and Buick are losing money?

    All I am gong to say is this. Google is your friend. Nothing else needs to be explained to you.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Cory Wolfe
      Cory Wolfe
      (28 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Big November Gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac Keep GM the Fastest Growing Automaker
      November U.S. retail market share highest since 2009 Year to Date U.S. Retail Share up 0.5 Percentage Points November Commercial sales were highest since 2008 DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) sold 197,609 vehicles in November to individual or “retail” customers in the U.S., up 8 percent from last year. Based on initial estimates, GM once again outperformed all full-line manufacturers, led by strong retail sales gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac. GM’s November retail sales performance drove GM’s U.S. retail share to its highest November level since 2009.
      Based on initial estimates, GM’s retail market share jumped 0.3 percentage points in November to 16.8 percent.  GM has gained retail market share in 17 of the past 20 months.
      GM’s four U.S. brands posted strong retail sales results in November compared to last year.
      Chevrolet — up 5 percent for its best November since 2004 Buick — up 22 percent for its best November since 2003 GMC — up 9 percent for its best November since 2001 Cadillac — up 17 percent for its best November since 2013 GM’s total U.S. sales in November were 252,644 vehicles, up more than 10 percent from last year.   All four brands outperformed the industry in November with Buick, Cadillac and GMC posting double-digit gains.
      “GM’s November performance reflects the continued strength of our U.S. business.  We gained profitable retail share, commercial and small business deliveries were strong and we commanded the industry’s best average transaction prices,” said Kurt McNeil, GM’s vice president of U.S. Sales Operations. “We are ahead of plan selling down our 2016 model year inventory and we expect to close out December with more retail share growth. GM is heading into 2017 in a position of strength with the planned launch of key new products, like the all-new Chevrolet Equinox, into the heart of the market.” 
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average and ahead of last November. 

      Through the first 11 months of the year, GM’s U.S. retail sales were up nearly 2 percent compared to last year. GM gained 0.5 percentage points of U.S. retail market share during that timeframe, the largest retail share gain of any full-line automaker. Year to date, Chevrolet U.S. retail sales are up nearly 3 percent and the brand’s retail share has grown 0.5 percentage points to 11.1 percent. Chevrolet continues to be the U.S. industry’s fastest-growing brand.
      Year to date, Buick retail deliveries have grown more than 5 percent and Buick has gained 0.1 percentage points of retail share.
      GM continues to benefit from a strong U.S. economy and strong retail demand for its products.
      “All economic indicators show significantly improved optimism about the U.S. economy including consumer and business sentiment, which continue to drive a very healthy U.S. auto industry,” said Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist. “We believe the U.S. auto industry is well-positioned for sales to continue at or near record levels into 2017.”
      November 2016 Retail Sales and Business Highlights vs. November 2015 (except as noted)

      Chevrolet
      Malibu and Volt were up 24 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Silverado and Colorado were up 5 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Suburban, Tahoe, Equinox and Trax were up 6 percent, 12 percent, 7 percent and 47 percent, respectively. Malibu had its best November since 1997. Silverado had its best November since 2003. Colorado had its best November since 2004. Trax, Volt and Equinox had their best November ever. Tahoe and Suburban had their best November since 2007. 17th straight month of year over year gains for Chevrolet full-size utilities. GMC
      Sierra and Canyon were up 14 percent and 43 percent, respectively. Acadia, Yukon and Yukon XL were up 4 percent, 22 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Brand ATP was at $43,887, the highest November on record. Highest November ever for Denali penetration, at 27.8 percent. Best November ever for Canyon and ninth month of year over year increases. Yukon and Yukon XL had their best November since 2007. Buick
      Regal and Encore were up 41 percent and 35 percent, respectively. 68 percent of sales were crossovers. Best year to date retail performance since 2005. Cadillac
      Escalade was up 24 percent and had its best month of the year. Escalade had its best November since 2007. XT5 had its best month since launch with sales up 12 percent over last month and up 27 percent over the SRX last November, the vehicle it replaced. Year to date ATP was $53,690, the highest ever in Cadillac history Average Transaction Prices (ATP)/Incentives (based on JD Power PIN estimates)
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average. In November, GM’s incentive spending as a percent of ATP was 13.7 percent, above the industry average of 12.4 percent. However, year to date, GM’s incentive spending was 11.7 percent, slightly above the industry average of 11.4 percent and well below the incentive spending of its domestic competitors and many of its global competitors. Fleet and Commercial
      Automotive Fleet magazine named Malibu “Fleet Car of the Year”. GM Fleet sales were up 19 percent versus last November. Fleet sales were 22 percent of GM’s sales for the month. Commercial deliveries were up 11 percent for the month and it was the best November Commercial sales since 2008. Malibu Commercial deliveries were up 170 percent versus last November. Small Business deliveries were up 15 percent for the month versus last November, driven by large vans, which were up 93 percent and large pickups, which were up 16 percent versus last November. Federal government sales were up 9 percent versus last November. Rental sales were up 27 percent versus last November but are down 25 percent CYTD, according to plan. GM’s outlook on its daily rental sales mix remains in the 11 percent range of total U.S. sales for 2016 and daily rental sales for the year are expected to be down about 75,000 vehicles. Industry Sales
      GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in November was approximately 17.9 million units. On a calendar year-to-date basis, GM estimates the light-vehicle SAAR was 17.5 million units.
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA
    • By ccap41
      " It's a golden autumn morning in rural upstate New York. Backpacked kids wait by mailboxes for the school bus. I'm driving through pockets of valley mist to New York state's most famous racing circuit, to witness the shakedown testing of a race car so top-secret, it's still wrapped in camouflage.
      After a 14-year absence, Cadillac is readying its return to endurance racing. The last time the American automaker competed in top-level prototype racing was 2002, when the ill-fated Northstar LMP finished 9th at Le Mans. Audi's dominant R8 prototype notched its third consecutive victory at the Circuit de la Sarthe that year.
      Wayne Taylor and Max Angelelli were co-drivers in that final Cadillac attempt at Le Mans. They'll both be at the track today. Taylor, 60, has graduated from the driver's seat to run Wayne Taylor Racing, the principal team partner in Cadillac's new motorsports endeavor; Angelelli, 49, shares co-driving duties with Taylor's sons Ricky, 26, and Jordan, 24.
      All four will be responsible for the imminent future of Cadillac endurance racing, in a program that tasks itself with making top-level sports car racing engaging and relatable again. I'm here to learn if Cadillac, and the series itself, can cut it.
      The camouflaged Caddy you see here is officially known as the DPi-V.R. It's built to IMSA's new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) formula, to compete in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship starting in 2017.
      Think of DPi as an effort to make top-level prototype racing a little more interesting, and relatable, for casual race fans. The cars share a chassis with the LMP2 prototypes that compete in the FIA World Endurance Championship and the 24 Hours of Le Mans, built by one of four approved constructors—Dallara, Onroak Automotive, ORECA or Riley/Multimatic. ..."
      http://www.roadandtrack.com/motorsports/news/a31697/cadillac-dpi-v-r-exclusive-photos/
       




    • By William Maley
      In light of the fatal crash involving a Tesla Model S and Autopilot back in May, automakers are reconsidering their plans for rolling out their autonomous technologies. General Motors was planning to introduce Super Cruise on the Cadillac CT6 sometime next year. But in light of Tesla crash, GM is rethinking their plans.
      “We aren’t putting a specific date on it,” said GM CEO Mary Barra at a cybersecurity conference.
      Officials told The Detroit Bureau later on that the feature would still appear next year. This would be corroborated by a Cadillac spokesman to Motor Trend.
      “Right now, the plan continues to be that we will introduce [super Cruise] in the Cadillac CT6 in calendar year 2017,” said Cadillac spokesman Donny Nordlicht.
      “We want to make sure it is safe for our customers to use and we’ll launch it when we’re confident in the technology,” Nordlicht said. “Our engineers have been testing and validating the technology for the past several years to make sure all of our systems are focused on providing the customer among the most intuitive and safe solutions. We’re not driven by a deadline, we’re driven to make the system customer-friendly and safe so the exact month of introduction cannot be announced at this time.”
      Insiders at GM believe that Super Cruise should be able to avoid some of the problems that plague Tesla's Autopilot. Like Autopilot, Super Cruise blends information from radar and cameras. But Super Cruise will also use a high-definition map that provides more details than what you can get on a current navigation system. This map will help the system determine where the vehicle is and whether it is safe to engage the system. There is also a retina detection system that monitors the driver and will switch off Super Cruise if it detects if the driver isn't paying attention.
      Source: The Detroit Bureau, Motor Trend

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)