• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Rumorpile: What Will Corvette Stingray Z06 Produce Power Wise?


    By William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    February 19, 2013

    With the introduction of the new Corvette Stingray, everyone is wondering what will be in store for the Z06 and ZR1. Motor Trend has some early indications of what to expect.

    The Z06 will stick naturally aspirated 7.0L engine with the power output possibly reaching 600 horsepower. The power output for Z06 will not be made till they get the final power output for the ZR1. If the ZR1 produces 700 HP, then the Z06 will have 600 HP. If the ZR1 produces somewhat less than 700 HP, expect the Z06 to be somewhere in the mid 500s.

    The ZR1 will use a variation of the Stingray's LT1 V8 with a supercharger.

    Source: Motor Trend

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    This is my prediction:-

    ZR-1 goes on a hiatus and will not return until 3~4 years into the C7's life cycle. When it does, it gets a supercharged version of the LT1 6.2 -- let's call it an LT9 -- making about 700 bhp.

    Z-06 goes on a hiatus until the 2nd model year, returning with a stroked version of the LT1 -- let's call it the LT5 -- displacing 6.8 liters and making about 550 hp naturally aspirated. The reason I believe that it'll be 6.8 liters in particular is because this is what you get from using the LT1 bore with the LS7 stroke. This allows them to not have to redesign the piston or remodel the combustion chamber; shorter rods will allow the chamber geometry to be identical to the LT1 at top-dead-center while increasing compression ratio to 12.7:1 (right about where it needs to be and where it can be tolerated with 91 octane). Getting to 550 hp isn't hard. The displacement increase alone gets you from 450 to about 493 lb-ft, a 1.2 point bump in compression alone is worth about 30~35 lb-ft for a total of about 525. If that torque peaks at about 4800 rpm and with the same fall off as a the LS7 you get about 550 bhp. Bump the torque peak slightly to ~5200 rpm and you actually get closer to 575 bhp. Not bad for an engine that's 485 lbs dressed and wet.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Problem starts to become how do you put all that power to the ground on a rear drive car that isn't very heavy and it still has leaf springs too doesn't it? Unless you have all wheel drive.

    -1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dwight, we are assuming all the lt1's "bells and whistles"? maybe not AFM?

    The LT1 doesn't really have a lot of bells and whistles. They decided against cam-in-cam independent VVT. They decided against a variable valve lift system (which would have displaced AFM).

    So, yes, I expect any of the LT1's derivatives to have DI and synchronous VVT. AFM is a maybe. AFM limits revs because of the mass it adds to the actuated valve train. Eliminating AFM gets you the ability to go maybe 500~600 rpm higher on the redline. But, you don't need that to make 550 or 575 bhp out of 6.8 liters. In fact, if you look at the LS7 (which revs to 7100 rpm) most of the upper rev range doesn't contribute to a faster car -- power peaks at 6300 rpm and falls off quite rapidly after that. Short shifting that engine probably get to better acceleration.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This car will be very soon and the ZR1 will not be far behind.

    The is also some speaking of a base sub Stingray Corvette that may have a 5.3 in the low 400 HP range. This car would have a fixed roof and not be loaded up. The intent of this car is one to give the club racers and modifiers a cheaper car to base a race car or play car on. The second intent is to attract younger buyers that they sorely lack.

    The Corvette is much like Cadillac and needs to attract new and non traditional buyers that will lower the average age of the buyer.

    The future lies in the hands of those now buying these cars now.

    Also the HP on these cars is expected to be spaced out once the ZR1 is locked in. GM intends to make the 700 HP mark and if so insiders expect the Z06 to fall in the 600 ranger and the ZL1 and CTS V to slot in near 600 HP also.

    Getting the power to the ground is not an issues with electronic controls. The present ZR1 engine can do all of GM's Warranty test and emissions test up to 725 now so a DI version should have no problem. The simple fact is there is no need for this much power as few will ever come near to using it all. Even the race cars from Pratt and Miller are not even this high but it sells cars to have large magic numbers. The Vette team wishes the automakers would come to a limit on power and work in other areas to increase performance but they know that is not going to happen.

    Edited by hyperv6
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is my prediction:-

    ZR-1 goes on a hiatus and will not return until 3~4 years into the C7's life cycle. When it does, it gets a supercharged version of the LT1 6.2 -- let's call it an LT9 -- making about 700 bhp.

    Z-06 goes on a hiatus until the 2nd model year, returning with a stroked version of the LT1 -- let's call it the LT5 -- displacing 6.8 liters and making about 550 hp naturally aspirated. The reason I believe that it'll be 6.8 liters in particular is because this is what you get from using the LT1 bore with the LS7 stroke. This allows them to not have to redesign the piston or remodel the combustion chamber; shorter rods will allow the chamber geometry to be identical to the LT1 at top-dead-center while increasing compression ratio to 12.7:1 (right about where it needs to be and where it can be tolerated with 91 octane). Getting to 550 hp isn't hard. The displacement increase alone gets you from 450 to about 493 lb-ft, a 1.2 point bump in compression alone is worth about 30~35 lb-ft for a total of about 525. If that torque peaks at about 4800 rpm and with the same fall off as a the LS7 you get about 550 bhp. Bump the torque peak slightly to ~5200 rpm and you actually get closer to 575 bhp. Not bad for an engine that's 485 lbs dressed and wet.

    Thanks for this very cool insight.

    Question for you and everyone else. If the 6.8 can get you 550HP and about 525Lbs of torque, why not use it to supercharge rather than the 6.2? Seems you can get allot more out of this 6.8 than the 6.2 based on what I have been reading?

    Second question, what about reliability and long life using 6.8 versus the 6.2?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is my prediction:-

    ZR-1 goes on a hiatus and will not return until 3~4 years into the C7's life cycle. When it does, it gets a supercharged version of the LT1 6.2 -- let's call it an LT9 -- making about 700 bhp.

    Z-06 goes on a hiatus until the 2nd model year, returning with a stroked version of the LT1 -- let's call it the LT5 -- displacing 6.8 liters and making about 550 hp naturally aspirated. The reason I believe that it'll be 6.8 liters in particular is because this is what you get from using the LT1 bore with the LS7 stroke. This allows them to not have to redesign the piston or remodel the combustion chamber; shorter rods will allow the chamber geometry to be identical to the LT1 at top-dead-center while increasing compression ratio to 12.7:1 (right about where it needs to be and where it can be tolerated with 91 octane). Getting to 550 hp isn't hard. The displacement increase alone gets you from 450 to about 493 lb-ft, a 1.2 point bump in compression alone is worth about 30~35 lb-ft for a total of about 525. If that torque peaks at about 4800 rpm and with the same fall off as a the LS7 you get about 550 bhp. Bump the torque peak slightly to ~5200 rpm and you actually get closer to 575 bhp. Not bad for an engine that's 485 lbs dressed and wet.

    Thanks for this very cool insight.

    Question for you and everyone else. If the 6.8 can get you 550HP and about 525Lbs of torque, why not use it to supercharge rather than the 6.2? Seems you can get allot more out of this 6.8 than the 6.2 based on what I have been reading?

    Second question, what about reliability and long life using 6.8 versus the 6.2?

    Lengthening the stroke while shortening the rods increases the piston side loads. You can avoid that by raising the deck, but that'll be a new block architecture and basically uneconomical. You can also raise or lower the crank height which creates and offset at TDC and accomplishes the same goal, but again that's a new block design. The 101.6mm stroke is tolerable up to 7100 rpm as shown in the LS7 so I guess that have "proven" that they can get away with it.

    Traditionally, they used the 6.2 instead of the 7.0 because of the thicker cylinder walls which are more tolerant of forced induction's extra heat and pressures. With the 6.8 having exactly the same wall thickness (in fact it can be the same exact block) they can supercharge the 6.8 instead of the 6.2. The reason I don't think they will is because of the presumption of a 700 hp target -- there is no need to increase the displacement. Besides, with forced induction -- within reasonable limits -- increasing displacement and running lower boost has the same power result as not increasing displacement, running higher boost with lower compression. With turbocharged engine the latter produces more lag. With superchargers there is zero lag so it really doesn't matter except that higher displacement with higher static compression and lower supercharger pulley ratios is probably slightly more fuel efficient at cruise.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bandit '79
      Bandit '79
      (44 years old)
    2. Ur_pimp
      Ur_pimp
      (27 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      If it weren't for focus groups, the design of the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox could have looked so much different.
      Speaking to Automotive News, chief engineer of the 2018 Equinox Mark Cieslak revealed that focus groups weren't not impressed with the first designs of the redesigned model. They described the design as being bulky, 'not compelling', and looking a bit odd. If this was old GM, they would have gone forward with the design.
      "Back in the day, we would have probably just kept going," said Cieslak.
      "What we had on paper we felt was not going to win."
      But this being the new GM where bean counters lost a fair amount of influence, the decision was made to go back to the drawing board. At the time, GM was scrambling to fix the Malibu as its redesign earned poor reviews and a drop in sales which likely played a part in this decision. They needed to get the Equinox redesign right as the model it would replace was very popular. There were concerns that this could cause the new Equinox to be delayed. But in the end, the team were able to design a new Equinox without falling off schedule.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      If it weren't for focus groups, the design of the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox could have looked so much different.
      Speaking to Automotive News, chief engineer of the 2018 Equinox Mark Cieslak revealed that focus groups weren't not impressed with the first designs of the redesigned model. They described the design as being bulky, 'not compelling', and looking a bit odd. If this was old GM, they would have gone forward with the design.
      "Back in the day, we would have probably just kept going," said Cieslak.
      "What we had on paper we felt was not going to win."
      But this being the new GM where bean counters lost a fair amount of influence, the decision was made to go back to the drawing board. At the time, GM was scrambling to fix the Malibu as its redesign earned poor reviews and a drop in sales which likely played a part in this decision. They needed to get the Equinox redesign right as the model it would replace was very popular. There were concerns that this could cause the new Equinox to be delayed. But in the end, the team were able to design a new Equinox without falling off schedule.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Last week, we reported on comments made by Volkswagen NA CEO Hinrich Woebcken on wanting to expand the number of crossovers in their lineup. It seems there is another crossover possible destined for the U.S.
      According to a source, Volkswagen is planning to launch the T-Roc compact crossover for the U.S. beginning in 2019. First shown as a concept back at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show, the production model will launch this summer in Europe. The decision was made by Volkswagen once dealers in the U.S. gave a firm commitment to the company they would be able to sell enough T-Rocs to make a profit. It also appears this decision was made only last week judging from a comment made by VW brand chief Herbert Diess.
      "It was only yesterday that we decided on an additional SUV for 2019," Diess told reporters when asked about product strategy for the U.S.
      There are still a number of items up in the air, however. For one, Volkswagen needs to decide where it will build the T-Roc. It could import the model from Volkswagen's Portugal plant, build it in Puebla, Mexico, or have it in the same assembly plant as the Atlas in Chattanooga, TN.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: Newspress

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Last week, we reported on comments made by Volkswagen NA CEO Hinrich Woebcken on wanting to expand the number of crossovers in their lineup. It seems there is another crossover possible destined for the U.S.
      According to a source, Volkswagen is planning to launch the T-Roc compact crossover for the U.S. beginning in 2019. First shown as a concept back at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show, the production model will launch this summer in Europe. The decision was made by Volkswagen once dealers in the U.S. gave a firm commitment to the company they would be able to sell enough T-Rocs to make a profit. It also appears this decision was made only last week judging from a comment made by VW brand chief Herbert Diess.
      "It was only yesterday that we decided on an additional SUV for 2019," Diess told reporters when asked about product strategy for the U.S.
      There are still a number of items up in the air, however. For one, Volkswagen needs to decide where it will build the T-Roc. It could import the model from Volkswagen's Portugal plant, build it in Puebla, Mexico, or have it in the same assembly plant as the Atlas in Chattanooga, TN.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: Newspress
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt - Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.cheersandgears.com
      Tesla Officially in Trouble, Business Insider Says!

      To quote Business Insider final comments on Tesla and the Chevy Bolt:
      "Clearly, Tesla would be in less trouble if the Chevy Bolt were a bad car. But it isn't. Teslas have always blown me away. The Bolt blew me away for different reasons. I just hope Tesla is prepared to take this into account." 
      Matthew is a Business Insider senior correspondent who covers transportation and as a fan of Tesla was excited to check out a Chevy BOLT as comparison to the Tesla. On a recent trip to california he took time to visit the closet Chevrolet Dealer to his hotel and this is what he found.
      He states that to borrow Barkley's line, "Tesla is in trouble." You have one of the world's biggest auto companies that is known for killing the electric auto stepping off the sidelines and actually committing considerable resources to building a long range EV where it can afford to lose money on it long term till the market changes. Tesla has 400,000 plus pre-orders, but is burning through cash by the billions and while the launch of the Tesla 3 is near and Tesla still has Sexy much like Apple to an iPhone. Tesla does not have the depth of customer auto experience to pull from and as the author points out, Tesla balance sheet is precarious as it is based on raising funds on a growth story. The author goes onto say that no one will cross shop a Tesla S or X with the Chevy BOLT. They will due to limited options cross shop the Tesla 3 to the Bolt.
      To pull some interesting statements from the story, the author had the following to say:
      "I found it more fun to drive than both the Tesla Model S and the Model X, but not the original Roadster, a much smaller vehicle."
      "The Bolt is plenty fast for most people."
      "GM isn't going to overwhelm Tesla with Bolt sales. I actually think the Model 3 will greatly outsell the Bolt once Tesla's car arrives. However, it's also possible that if the Model 3 is delayed or is slow to ramp up, Chevy will be preparing a mid-cycle refresh of the Bolt before Model 3 sales start to achieve some major momentum. In other words, GM will always be ahead, and the company — barring another massive financial meltdown — will never stop putting the Bolt up against the Model 3."
      BI covered the BOLT in follow stories with the next one being more of an official review that starts off with covering the auto with the following statement: "A platform, not business as usual!" 
      From ride-hailing to ride-sharing, self driving Chevy has delivered an auto for the future that gives GM options on how they build and expand their EV lineup. BI took delivery of their white Premier BOLT just before the blizzard that hit NY. Clearly a compact-crossover-hatchback look, design is what the magazine employees felt it was and is. Surprising the BI reviewers was the amount of cargo the auto can hold and how well it handled 4 people and grocery getting. BI states that GM has told them the next addition to the BOLT lineup will be a larger auto that can accommodate 5 or more people. An exceptionally well executed minimalist design that comes with an interior that feels more premium in comparison to auto's this size in the past from GM that felt clearly parts bin cheap. The review goes on to talk about how setting the front seat for a 6'4" tall driver and getting in the back with room ahead of the knees for the same size person is a nice welcome addition to such a compact auto. Heated steering wheel was welcomed by all. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto kept everyone happily connected to their phone while driving.
      The final statement to quote from the review is as follows:
      "We were impressed with the Bolt, as a car, as an electric car, and as a mobility concept. In many ways, it is GM's post-bankruptcy masterpiece, a real feather in the cap of CEO Mary Barra and her executive team, who took what the company had achieved with its ill-fated EV-1 back in the 1990s and turned it up to 11. 
      I also flat-out loved driving it. I blasted in and out of New York City twice, rocketed around the streets of Gotham, darting through traffic, and cruised along the highways of New Jersey. I also enjoyed just driving it around the quiet streets of the suburb where I live.
      The steering is quick and responsive, and the handling is sharp enough to provide the confidence you need when surfing that sweet EV torque.
      The single-pedal mode is also very cool — I dug not using the brakes at all for extended excursions in my town. After a bit of practice, you get into a kind of Zen state with it. 
      Not a single person asked me about the car, and that can be chalked up to the ho-hum design. But I didn't care. I was lovin' it. Plain and simple, the Bolt is fun."
      Here is where we have overlap between story #2 and Story #3 which covers the 7 Killer Features:
      Dual Screens- 10.2" touch screen infotainment center & an 8" drivers console display which are totally customizable. Auto's wireless charging console. BOLT App allowing you to be connected to your auto at all times. Five cameras: front, rear, side mirrors and their 360 camera. 9hr full charge time from a 240 volt charger. 25 miles per hour, faster with Level 3 DC charging. Lane Keep assist feature. Modern Seat design allowing for maximum space inside. Over all these writeups show that GM has delivered a superior auto to the Prius, Leaf, 500e, etc. The future will be bright for the BOLT as GM move the platform forward.

      BI Story #1
      BI Story #2
      BI Story #3
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)