• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    End Of 'Government Motors', U.S. Treasury Sells Final Shares Of GM


    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    December 9, 2013

    'Government Motors' is no more. Today, the U.S. Treasury sold its remaining shares of General Motors, ending a four-year ownership of the automaker. The Treasury says it recouped $39 billion of its original $49.5 billion investment into GM.

    “The U.S. Treasury’s ownership exit closes just one chapter in GM’s ongoing turnaround story. We will always be grateful for the second chance extended to us and we are doing our best to make the most of it. Today is not dramatically different from the hundreds of preceding days during which we have worked to make GM a company our country can be proud of again,"said GM CEO Dan Akerson in a statement.

    “Continued investments, innovation, and job creation are just some of the “returns” of a healthy GM and domestic auto industry. Our work continues uninterrupted, and we will keep our sights squarely on our customers and transforming the way we do business.”

    GM's North American President, Mark Reuss told reporters that this could help bring more customers into the showroom and help improve the company's image.

    “I think probably some people will begin to consider us right away, maybe the next day.”

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), General Motors

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    Sad, I wish the GOV had a long term interest in the growth of GM and held onto the shares as it would have paid back 100% if not more eventually.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sad, I wish the GOV had a long term interest in the growth of GM and held onto the shares as it would have paid back 100% if not more eventually.

    I disagree. Remember when FORD tried to harp on the fact that they never got bailed out and the federal government told them to back off?

    There are some people who think that GM and Chrysler should have died nearly five years ago. GM is much better off having no financial relationship with Treasury.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sad, I wish the GOV had a long term interest in the growth of GM and held onto the shares as it would have paid back 100% if not more eventually.

    I disagree. Remember when FORD tried to harp on the fact that they never got bailed out and the federal government told them to back off?

    There are some people who think that GM and Chrysler should have died nearly five years ago. GM is much better off having no financial relationship with Treasury.

    I agree that any business is better off not having a relationship with the gov, but if you take a bail out, it should be paid back penny for penny, not at a loss.

    I also do not think FORD is better off for going the route they went. They have many quality problems still and they still have a large amount of debt that will make it much harder down the road. I still see large executive payout and only a token payment onto debt. I have to question FORD long term thinking.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The biggest evidence that not all at Ford is what it appears to be: The failure to do anything with Lincoln.

    The Government will get far more back than that loss in the long run via income taxes from employees of a living GM, its dealerships, its suppliers, and so on. Had we let GM fail, the loss to the taxpayers and throughout the economy would have been far greater than $10 billion.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sad, I wish the GOV had a long term interest in the growth of GM and held onto the shares as it would have paid back 100% if not more eventually.

    I disagree. Remember when FORD tried to harp on the fact that they never got bailed out and the federal government told them to back off?

    There are some people who think that GM and Chrysler should have died nearly five years ago. GM is much better off having no financial relationship with Treasury.

    I agree that any business is better off not having a relationship with the gov, but if you take a bail out, it should be paid back penny for penny, not at a loss.

    I also do not think FORD is better off for going the route they went. They have many quality problems still and they still have a large amount of debt that will make it much harder down the road. I still see large executive payout and only a token payment onto debt. I have to question FORD long term thinking.

    GM did not hold a gun to government's head seeking to sell the shares at a loss. So I would leave it out of the picture of paying back penny for penny. Theoretically it paid penny for penny to the government.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Whew!

    Glad that's over.

    When does the Pontiac revival start?


    Oh, and I saw figures of something like $100 Bn. that a GM failure would have cost the government without the bailout.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, bring back Pontiac!

    Now would be a good time to restart G8 production (as a Grand Prix), unveil a new Trans Am and show off the new ATS-based "G6" selling for $20K. Oh, and bring out the G8 ST!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I disagree that GM is boring, plenty of exciting products. I do think they could via the GMC/Buick dealerships have a Performance based set of auto's that could get a Pontiac name.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I disagree that GM is boring, plenty of exciting products. I do think they could via the GMC/Buick dealerships have a Performance based set of auto's that could get a Pontiac name.

    Well, I'm afraid that I find the current lineup to be quite boring.

    As for the rest of your post - yes please!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I disagree that GM is boring, plenty of exciting products. I do think they could via the GMC/Buick dealerships have a Performance based set of auto's that could get a Pontiac name.

    Well, I'm afraid that I find the current lineup to be quite boring.

    As for the rest of your post - yes please!

    I understand to each their own. I feel that you could have some hot auto's. The success of the Terrain should make GMC do a Typhoon edition of it with a turbo'd V6 AWD. I think they should also bring back the Syclone. Same with the Chevy side of the family, I believe you could have some true hot SS models in the new mid size truck and small to mid CUV category.

    I think Buick should have a performance set of Auto's tied into the Pontiac naming as a Package.

    I feel that Hummer should have never been a stand alone name plate but a Extreme Off Road Package for Professional Grade trucks & SUV's by GMC.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I always thought that Pontiac could be mostly a division for GM performance vehicles that are not otherwise available in the US. Such as when they had the GTO, and then the G8. But with Holden vehicles not being made in Australia for much longer the possibilities would be reduced.

    All that would really be needed to start is: a small AWD Sedan and Hatch with a 225ish H.P. turbo 4 (Sonic sized) or 275ish H.P. (Cruze sized). A Malibu sized Sedan and Coupe with a 325ish H.P. Twin Turbo V-6 and AWD. A Sedan, Coupe, Wagon and Ute with a V-8 450+ H.P similar to current Holden options (also available with a V-6 Diesel). And if they really wanted to get crazy try to collaborate with Suzuki for a Pontiac branded motorcycle just to surprise people. If they went and worked with Lotus again for engineering help and a shared Twin Turbo V-6 that would be even more awesome in my opinion.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    December 9, 2013

    'Government Motors' is no more. Today, the U.S. Treasury sold its remaining shares of General Motors, ending a four-year ownership of the automaker. The Treasury says it recouped $39 billion of its original $49.5 billion investment into GM.

    “The U.S. Treasury’s ownership exit closes just one chapter in GM’s ongoing turnaround story. We will always be grateful for the second chance extended to us and we are doing our best to make the most of it. Today is not dramatically different from the hundreds of preceding days during which we have worked to make GM a company our country can be proud of again,"said GM CEO Dan Akerson in a statement.

    “Continued investments, innovation, and job creation are just some of the “returns” of a healthy GM and domestic auto industry. Our work continues uninterrupted, and we will keep our sights squarely on our customers and transforming the way we do business.”

    GM's North American President, Mark Reuss told reporters that this could help bring more customers into the showroom and help improve the company's image.

    “I think probably some people will begin to consider us right away, maybe the next day.”

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), General Motors

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Click here to view the article

    So they still owe 10.5 billion and got off the hook....

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...



  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. swgforthefence
      swgforthefence
      (58 years old)
    2. trevormac98
      trevormac98
      (33 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      The seemingly never-ending diesel heavy-duty truck war is back in force with Ford announcing the power figures for the F-Series Super Duty back in the summer. We were wondering when either FCA or GM would strike back. Well GM did this over the weekend by accidently and then subsequently deleting the figures for the next-generation Duramax V8 diesel.
      Truck Trend got screenshots of GM Powertrain's website where the details of the L5P 6.6L Duramax turbodiesel are there to see: 445 horsepower and 910 pound-feet of torque. Compared the 6.7L PowerStoke V8 found in the 2017 F-Series Super Duty, the updated Duramax produces 5 more horsepower but is slight behind in torque (15 down from the PowerStroke's 925 pound-feet).
      We know for sure that the new Duramax will debut a new air intake system (you can see the new hood scoop in the picture above). More air is a good thing as it means better cooling and more power.
      The Texas State Fair is this week and it has become a showplace for the various truck manufacturers to make big announcements. We wouldn't be shocked if General Motors debuts the new Duramax there.
      Source: Truck Trend

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The seemingly never-ending diesel heavy-duty truck war is back in force with Ford announcing the power figures for the F-Series Super Duty back in the summer. We were wondering when either FCA or GM would strike back. Well GM did this over the weekend by accidently and then subsequently deleting the figures for the next-generation Duramax V8 diesel.
      Truck Trend got screenshots of GM Powertrain's website where the details of the L5P 6.6L Duramax turbodiesel are there to see: 445 horsepower and 910 pound-feet of torque. Compared the 6.7L PowerStoke V8 found in the 2017 F-Series Super Duty, the updated Duramax produces 5 more horsepower but is slight behind in torque (15 down from the PowerStroke's 925 pound-feet).
      We know for sure that the new Duramax will debut a new air intake system (you can see the new hood scoop in the picture above). More air is a good thing as it means better cooling and more power.
      The Texas State Fair is this week and it has become a showplace for the various truck manufacturers to make big announcements. We wouldn't be shocked if General Motors debuts the new Duramax there.
      Source: Truck Trend
    • By William Maley
      The tentative agreement between General Motors and Canadian union Unifor has a $400 million investment going to Oshawa for a new product. Unifor President Jerry Dias said at a press briefing yesterday morning that Oshawa would be the only GM plant that will build cars and trucks. Neither side is saying what that product might be.
      But Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail has learned from sources that Oshawa will be handling the final assembly of the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra. Truck bodies from GM's Fort Wayne Assembly in Indiana will travel to Oshawa to have interiors installed and final assembly. The Detroit News reports something similar, although their source says it will only be the Silverado.
      Oshawa has a history of building pickups. For four decades, Oshawa was one of the places where GM built the Silverado and Sierra. But in 2009, GM closed the truck plant due to the recession. 
      The Globe and Mail also reports that production of the XTS has been extended at Oshawa. Analysts believed previously that XTS production would end in 2019.
      Source: The Globe and Mail, The Detroit News

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The tentative agreement between General Motors and Canadian union Unifor has a $400 million investment going to Oshawa for a new product. Unifor President Jerry Dias said at a press briefing yesterday morning that Oshawa would be the only GM plant that will build cars and trucks. Neither side is saying what that product might be.
      But Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail has learned from sources that Oshawa will be handling the final assembly of the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra. Truck bodies from GM's Fort Wayne Assembly in Indiana will travel to Oshawa to have interiors installed and final assembly. The Detroit News reports something similar, although their source says it will only be the Silverado.
      Oshawa has a history of building pickups. For four decades, Oshawa was one of the places where GM built the Silverado and Sierra. But in 2009, GM closed the truck plant due to the recession. 
      The Globe and Mail also reports that production of the XTS has been extended at Oshawa. Analysts believed previously that XTS production would end in 2019.
      Source: The Globe and Mail, The Detroit News
    • By William Maley
      It came down to the wire, but a tentative deal between General Motors and Canadian union Unifor was reached before the midnight deadline. 
      “Did we achieve our objective? I would suggest the answer is clearly yes,” said Unifor President Jerry Dias during a press conference this morning.
      “We have found a solution for your facilities. To say this is a difficult set of negotiations is an incredible understatement."
      In a statement released by GM, the tentative agreement will bring wage increases to the 3,860 workers and introduce new investments and products to the Oshawa and St. Catharines plants. Oshawa was a key focus for Unifor as GM didn't have any plans for the plant after 2018. 
      For St. Catharines, GM will move some engine production from Mexico to the plant. A source tells The Detroit News the plant will also continue building the 3.6L V6 and add some transmission work. Oshawa was the big winner as GM will be investing millions into the plant to make it the only GM plant that will build cars and trucks. GM and Unifor aren't saying what the products will be. 
      “It’s a total win for Jerry Dias and Unifor. They got everything they were looking to get going into the talks; every box right now is checked,” said Tony Faria, professor emeritus, office of automotive and vehicle research at the University of Windsor’s Odette School of Business.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News, 2, GM
      Press Release is on Page 2


      General Motors of Canada Media Statement
      OSHAWA, ON, September 20, 2016 — General Motors of Canada and Unifor have reached a tentative new collective agreement, covering approximately 3,860 represented employees at just after midnight on September 20th 2016.  The agreement will enable significant new product, technology and process investments at GM’s Oshawa, St. Catharines and Woodstock facilities, placing those operations at the forefront of advanced manufacturing flexibility, innovation and environmental sustainability.  This agreement is subject to member ratification.  We will be working with government on potential support, and will provide further details on the investment at the appropriate time, while respecting Unifor’s ratification process.

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)