Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    GM's Cruise Self-Driving Unit Faces Some Big Hurdles

      That 2019 goal seems so far away

    By the end of next year, GM's self-driving car unit was planning to have a fleet of self-driving taxis available those in San Fransisco, California. But a new report from Reuters casts some serious doubts on this goal.

    Speaking to a number of current and former GM and Cruise Automation employees, and autonomous vehicle technology experts, Reuters' report paints a picture of various issues that could derail Cruise's goal.

    • The driverless Cruise vehicles (Chevrolet Bolt EVs) have struggled to determine whether objects on the road are moving or stationary. Example: Vehicles have stopped or hesitated when driving past a group of parked bicycles or motorcycles.
    • Software has failed to identify pedestrians, "and has mistakenly seen phantom bicycles, causing the cars to brake erratically"
    • Sources claim that software also slows the messages between the car’s sensors and computers
    • Cruise doesn't have a data-sharing collaboration with the San Francisco Fire Department - necessary to train the cars when a fire truck is responding to an emergency.
    • Numerous milestones have been missed such as logging a million miles a month by early 2018.

    Cruise is aware of the various issues. CEO Kyle Vogt told Reuters said the next-generation of hardware and software would solve various issues. 

    General Motors' President Dan Ammann said that the 2019 goal would only move forward "if the Cruise system achieves the safety standards the automaker has established, and shown to regulators."

    At the current moment, that goal seems quite far away.

    Source: Reuters

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    7 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yet our passion to move this forward for those that need self-driving auto's will continue.

    What's the rule: if a contractor sets a date, add six months.  For this technology, add two or three years.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I guess Canada will homologate these Chinese EVs with no hesitation then.  I am not surprised by this, its just that buying a NEW car built for North America for North Americans  from an american dealership in the usa and trying to bring it over the Canadian border to drive in Canada would land you in a confiscated car unless the car would be "Canadianized".  I guess it wasnt homologized at the american dealership but these Chinese EVs will be would be the difference.  What Im trying to say now is that, having a speedometer in MPH is a danger on Canadian roads  regardless if KM/H is also on the speedometer albeit in smaller print rather than actually having the Chinese EVs really pass Canadian safety regulations...   I understand that Chinese EVs have been approved for European roads. North American safety regs are similar... But why am I whining?  I am sounding like a dumb ass republican or a conservative from Alberta  or in this case the CAW!!!!  
    • why are you surprised by this? Havent you been listening to trump's threats towards Canada? And no...those words that he used a YEAR ago were not jokes... And for CONTINUALLY threatening Canada's sovereignty and economic well being for 12 months STRAIGHT... Common man!!!
    • Safety experts and tech critics have long condemned the Ring devices for security risks and privacy violations, not to mention their role in building the largest civilian surveillance network in US history. Last summer, the Electronic Frontier Foundation warned that Ring was actively eroding civil liberties in the US for profit. Amazon subsidiary Ring, the company behind those AI doorbell cameras that have exploded in popularity over the last few years. Back in October, Ring announced that its devices would soon be looped into a network of Flock AI surveillance cameras. That network, an investigation by 404 Media found, has been available to local and federal police and enforcement agencies like ICE — leaving many worried that their Ring doorbell cams are now feeding into a government panopticon. Fury as Amazon Ring Cameras Are Hooked Up to ICE System If you have RING, time to rethink who you use for video surveillance.
    • WOW, I never thought I would ever see this kind of thing! Canada 'preparing for US invasion'
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search