Jump to content
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Lordstown Sold to Lordstown Motors Corp

      ...Soon to build Workhorse Endurance truck...

    GM's Lordstown facility has been sold to startup Lordstown Motors.  Lordstown Motors will produce the Workhorse Endurance pickup truck, an all-electric truck, at the site. 

    The Endurance has all-wheel drive via 4 motors, one for each wheel.  It also has outlets to allow for the use of power tools. Workhorse is also in the bidding to make plug-in mail trucks for the U.S. Postal Service.  Workhorse has 6,000 orders for a truck based on the W-15 Prototype, and those orders would be moved to Lordstown for production. Workhorse is targeting fleet buyers. With fewer moving parts and lower fuel costs, it could translate to lower cost-to-own for fleet operators. 

    Lordstown Motors still needs to go through several more rounds of fund raising in order to continue development, conduct safety testing, and retool the plant for production. 

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    This sounds to me like GM unloaded an expensive property to keep mothballed and will write off a loss against profits to help minimize a tax bill.

    I question Lordstown Motors ability to get capital and restart this plant. To me both Lordstown motors and Workhorse are dead companies walking.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    36 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    This sounds to me like GM unloaded an expensive property to keep mothballed and will write off a loss against profits to help minimize a tax bill.

    I question Lordstown Motors ability to get capital and restart this plant. To me both Lordstown motors and Workhorse are dead companies walking.

    Depends if they can snag that post office contract or not. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If GM were really smart, it would sell EVs on the cheap to reclaim market share and build their way to dominance again.  Lordstown is currently unnecessary so I am all for the sale.

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    That is the problem though.  SELLING them to a disinterested public.

    The public is disinterested because 87 regular is about $2.50/gallon.  Also most pure EVs are too expensive for normal people to ignore the used car market given how expensive a lot of NEW ICE cars are these days.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 11/8/2019 at 1:21 PM, dfelt said:

    This sounds to me like GM unloaded an expensive property to keep mothballed and will write off a loss against profits to help minimize a tax bill.

    I would think GM paid off/depreciated Lordstown long ago; plant came online in 1965.
    Any monies exchanged would have to go on the income side, no?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    43 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    I would think GM paid off/depreciated Lordstown long ago; plant came online in 1965.
    Any monies exchanged would have to go on the income side, no?

    What about the investments for new tools, robotics, updates to manufacture auto's at that plant location. Would those capital investment costs not need to be put against the income side?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sure, if not written down already.
    But the bulk of the value has to be the property & buildings over any equity left in tooling (a lot of which is probably not applicable to Workhorse's needs).

    Lordstown is 6.2 million square feet on 905 acres

    For some comparison, Baltimore Assembly was 182 acres with 3.1 million SF when it sold for $27M in 2005.

    Plant half the age, twice the SF, 4 times the property, 15 years later? I’m going to guess the price was $125M.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well... if nothing else, I wish an American manufacturer the best of luck. I hope they create many jobs to help replace those which were lost. 

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Well... if nothing else, I wish an American manufacturer the best of luck. I hope they create many jobs to help replace those which were lost. 

    So we all hope.  I am sure that Lordstown needs those jobs in the area.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, USA-1 said:

    Good Lord somebody tell them to stay with a private workforce...wouldn't the recent GM UAW Strike be any kind of warning?! Wake up Workhorse Board of Directors!! 

    I can't see that flying in NE Ohio..still a pretty strongly unionized region, albeit in much smaller numbers than it once was. 

    Edited by Robert Hall

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    They aren't going to get the salaries they got from GM though. 

    Of course not, but the upper echelon at the union they join won't be any better. I think we all can agree with that.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 11/9/2019 at 12:37 PM, balthazar said:

    I would think GM paid off/depreciated Lordstown long ago; plant came online in 1965.
    Any monies exchanged would have to go on the income side, no?

    39 years is the amount of time a business can amortize/depreciate the expense. That's both property and building(done individually, obviously). 

    On 11/9/2019 at 1:21 PM, dfelt said:

    What about the investments for new tools, robotics, updates to manufacture auto's at that plant location. Would those capital investment costs not need to be put against the income side?

    Depending on the equipment itself, they're depreciated over 5-7 years. 

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Daimler CEO Källenius announced on Twitter yesterday that there would be a zero-emission EV version of the Mercedes-Benz G-Class on the way. He continued, "In the past there were discussions whether we should eliminate the model, the way I see things now I'd say the last Mercedes to be built will be a G-Class".
      The G-Class is already one of the most expensive models sold under the Mercedes-Benz brand. The EV version of the G-Class will likely be sold under the EQ brand. 
      An electric G-Class already exists though as Arnold Schwarzenegger and Kreisel Electric have already converted a G-Class to an EV.  It packs dual battery packs for 80-kWh of capacity good for a range of about 186 miles.
      No further details have been released as to when the EV G-Class would be launched. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Daimler CEO Källenius announced on Twitter yesterday that there would be a zero-emission EV version of the Mercedes-Benz G-Class on the way. He continued, "In the past there were discussions whether we should eliminate the model, the way I see things now I'd say the last Mercedes to be built will be a G-Class".
      The G-Class is already one of the most expensive models sold under the Mercedes-Benz brand. The EV version of the G-Class will likely be sold under the EQ brand. 
      An electric G-Class already exists though as Arnold Schwarzenegger and Kreisel Electric have already converted a G-Class to an EV.  It packs dual battery packs for 80-kWh of capacity good for a range of about 186 miles.
      No further details have been released as to when the EV G-Class would be launched. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Ford teamed up with Webasto to build a new Ford Mustang EV concept car for the SEMA auto show in Las Vegas.  The car is a showcase for what is possible with electrification and emerging technologies in that field.
      The show car comes with more than 1,000 lb.-ft of torque and 900 horsepower routed through a 6-speed manual transmission. The car has been lowered an inch and sits on 20-inch staggered forged wheels. Under the hood is a dual-core electric motor with dual power inverters. Power comes from an 800-volt Webasto battery system that can discharge a mega-watt of electrical energy.  At 800 volts, the Mustang Lithium runs at twice the voltage that most electric cars on the road today use. That allows the system to be lighter, more powerful, and generate less heat. 
      The transmission is a drag-strip version of the Getrag MT82 6-speed with billet internals to handle the huge torque.  
      Mustang Lithium features a unique set of drive modes that apply a controlled amount of torque for different driving scenarios including: Valet, Sport, Track and Beast, and are instantly available on demand via a custom in-dash 10.4-inch touchscreen display.
      Ford is investing $11.5 billion in electrified vehicles by 2022, including an all-new Mustang inspired EV SUV and a Ford F-150 BEV.


      View full article
  • Posts

    • Yeah but...cramped interior. Especially for such a larger vehicle than the Fusion. The Fusion I believe, has about the same interior volume. Maybe just a minuscule amount less.  
    • What if...a potential customer does not want or need AWD even if they live in snow country. AWD should be an option, but it shouldnt be forced upon a client to buy it if the customer chooses to want the highest trim of that vehicle.  Take like me for instance. I bought in 2012, an Acura TL SH-AWD. I did not buy it for the AWD. I bought it for the extra horsepower and torque available on the SH-AWD trim versus the lower trim.  Although the AWD system is trick and awesome, I dont need it, or even want it 7 years later.  Yes, the car seems nimbler when all those trick SH-AWD stuff kick in, but, its still unnecessary heft on my TL that I do NOT appreciate...  And yes, now that Quebec has made winter tires mandatory since like...20 yeas now or something, I really do not need AWD to get me through Quebec winters.  In other words,  make all the goodies and highest horsepower ratings available with FWD or RWD only and AWD should be an option on top of that as the final option.  Not as the highest possible trim includes AWD...    
    • Well there was the AWD Taurus.....
    • GM knows they can’t sell a 40k AWD Malibu but they certainly sell a 40k equinox.  GM doesn’t want to give the buyers a chance for cheap AWD if they can force them to buy an expensive suv to ultimately get it.  Now though a basic ct5 AWD is actually an option I guess   .....  
    • Nope, It's dead- coming quite soon..... Think this could be the shot in the arm that the sedan market needs to keep going...maybe even grow. People want the year round safety....and may not want to spend 50k to do it. And they wonder why Subies sell so well.... Another car that would benefit from AWD - Ford Fusion. OH wait, that's gone too......
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. BB_454
      BB_454
      (38 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...