Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Senators Slam The Energy Department’s Auto Loan Program

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    March 16, 2012

    This week, Senators on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee criticized the Energy Department on their handling of the $25 billion Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing initiative.

    Created in 2007, the Energy Department has only given out less than half of the funds during the four years of existence. Only four companies have gotten their loans; Ford, Nissan, Fisker Automotive, and Tesla.

    The Energy Department hasn’t given out any loans within two years and that has caused many companies to drop out.

    Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said many companies have expressed deep frustration about not getting a loan answer. She went onto say the program was "virtually dormant.”

    Energy Secretary Steven Chu defended the handling of the program,

    "We would like to see private equity invested in these companies," Chu said, adding the government wants to see evidence of private support.

    Other senators on the committee wonder why the program even exist.

    When leaving the hearing, Chu told reporters that the department was working with "many qualified applicants" to complete new auto and other green energy loans. When asked if any would be approved before the election, Chu said,

    "There's no reason not to. The conditions of the program haven't changed."

    Source: The Detroit News

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    SOB Politicians, does not matter what party they are from, they all want to use the programs as punching bags to get their butts back into office where they do nothing.

    Very sad and pathetic lack of duty to America by the folks that should represent us and cover core repsonsibilities. This does not include giving everything to everyone.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    loki

    research has shown that $1 of gov investment displaces ~$1.25 of private investment. now, if you support science, which one sounds better, your tax money at work, or someones own interest in progress?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    crash900s

    I do wish they had granted Aptera a loan. I wanted one of those even if were downgraded to motorcycle classification like the Zap Alias. I also want one of those but prefer the Aptera. I wouldn't drive any of the X-prize winners except maybe x-tracer and that literally is just a motorcycle.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    riviera74

    They could just cancel and defund the program entirely, but that would require taking action rather than complaining all the time. The only thing worse are the tax breaks for non-conventional vehicles, which should also be repealed for the same reasons: waste of taxpayer dollars and an excessive distortion of the auto markets.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×



  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • ccap41
      EV Home Charging: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly

      By ccap41 · Posted

      A good example of how much cheaper charging at home is versus gasoline: I've since driven my Navigator 4801 miles, averaging 16.6mpg and have spent a total of $927.59 (averaging $3.20gal).  ~1/4 of the miles and 124% of the cost.  I know these aren't the same "class" or size of vehicle, but that's a very significant amount of savings. By the time I drive 19,204 miles (for simple math's sake I just multiplied 4801 by 4), I will spend roughly $3710 to your $757. That's 4.9 times more expensive for me than you.  This also goes to show how quickly one can recoup money when buying an EV and the installation cost alone is paid for in one year.  Just for fun I want to compare your EV9 to a Telluride AWD at 20mpg (the rated combined MPG). At 20mpg and $3.20/gal and 19,000 miles of driving, that's $3040. That's still a very significant amount of money in one year.  Granted, for somebody like myself who isn't driving nearly 20k miles a year, the savings wouldn't pile on nearly as quick but, we all still get the point across. Also, my electricity rates are a little higher at 11-13c/Kw.   
    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Very cool that Hyundai is nailing it for playing in the dirt. A decent competitor to the Mache Ralley edition. Hyundai IONIQ 5 XRT Named Best U.S.-Built Sports Vehicle of the Year by American Cars And Racing - Hyundai Newsroom
    • G. David Felt
      EV Home Charging: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      I think it has more to do with the vendor and their software improvements. Tesla used to have huge variance between what they estimated miles of a battery pack was and what you actually got and as they improved the software and had more real-world driving data, they tweaked the software to be far more accurate. Kia has had their quarterly updates since we got the EV9 and it was pretty consistent on the old numbers. Just had a major quarterly update and this time it clearly stated that the software that manages the battery pack and predicts the range on a charge was getting more accurate due to miles driven by owners. As such, I think one of two things has happened, either A) they improved the estimation of range based on driving style or B) like Tesla and others, they are allowing less reserve battery pack and more actual driving from the battery pack based on efficiency of the whole EV in regard to how one uses the heat pump, electrics, etc. I think like anything, the first few years will not see any degradation and afterwards there will be some based on charging style DC versus slower home AC charging, driving style and feature/functions that are used.
    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      This is less about politics and more for a laugh. You know how when you deplane at the end of the flight, the captain may be there at the front of the cabin along with a few flight attendants?  A lot of these guys look like clones of each other.  So, I often wonder which way they vote, at least in the U.S.  I wonder if there's a token one or two who vote(s) for 'the road less traveled' in the privacy of the voting booth.
    • ccap41
      EV Home Charging: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly

      By ccap41 · Posted

      Okay, this is coming from a very unbiased source. I'm sure there's MORE battery life a year later than from the factory... 

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search