Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    2020 Karma Revero Gets Updated Battery And Regenerator

      .... courtesy of BMW....

    Karma Automotive is preparing to release the 2020 refresh of the Revaro.  The current car uses GM's 2.0 liter 4-cylinder as a regenerator to charge the 21.4 kWh battery while underway. The battery then powers a pair of electric motors in the rear that produce a combined 403 horsepower letting the Revero dart to 60 in just 5.4 seconds. Range in full EV mode is about 37 miles, so says the EPA.

    teaser-for-2020-karma-revero-debuting-at-2019-shanghai-auto-show_100695320_l.jpgIn a press release, Karma has announced that the the refreshed Revero will now move to a 1.5 liter BMW 3-cylinder to support a new, more powerful NMC lithium-ion battery pack.  The rear drive unit is being replaced as well with a new twin-motor rear drive module.  In the 2020 car, naught to 60 will drop by nearly a full second to 4.5 seconds. 

    The refreshed Revero will sport updated body work to go along with its technological upgrades. 

    Karma will be unveiling the 2020 Revero at the Shanghai Motor Show on April 16th along with two other concepts. 
     

    2020 Karma Revero Teaser (Click to Enlarge)

    Related:

     

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Nice to hear, how about actual production. We have yet to see anything since the ownership change. I wonder when they actually will start building auto's for sale?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Nice to hear, how about actual production. We have yet to see anything since the ownership change. I wonder when they actually will start building auto's for sale?

    They go into production in a few weeks and will be on sale by the summer. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why is this company still around?  It was a cool looking car in 2012 or whenever it came out, but that is old news.  And who really wants to pay top dollar for some unheard of brand with a parts bin car when  you can buy a Tesla or one of a dozen German luxury cars.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ Some would say the Tesla was a cool looking top-dollar car from an unheard of brand when it came out in 2012 or whenever.

    But I think it's the potential shake-up / unseating of the Germans fraternal triplets that Tesla (& perhaps Karma) that's the threat. MB/BMW's electric efforts to date have been pathetic and they are a decade behind Tesla.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If Karma was a viable company they wouldn't have to buy their engine off BMW.   I feel like they are buying BMW i8 powertrains and putting it into an old sedan shell they have and trying to sell it.   This company seems less viable than Saab was 10 years ago.

    As for the Germans they have plenty of EV's coming, and the market really hasn't demanded them yet.  Tesla is a bit of an anomaly, with how quickly they were able to find success.   I do think EV is the future, but won't hit it big until the 2025-2030 time frame.  Karma is no Tesla.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What kind of F-d up metric is that?
    Let's see : 'If Rolls Royce, Ferrari & Jaguar were viable companies, they wouldn't have to have bought their transmissions off of General Motors.'

    How's that work for you?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, balthazar said:

    What kind of F-d up metric is that?
    Let's see : 'If Rolls Royce, Ferrari & Jaguar were viable companies, they wouldn't have to have bought their transmissions off of General Motors.'

    How's that work for you?

    Well BMW bought Rolls.  Ferrari is viable due to their price point and merchandise sales.  Jaguar has bled money from one owner to the next.

    Those were all established brands though.  Fisher went bust, Karma will do the same.  Why would buyers trust a brand that might not be able to honor a warranty or be in business for repairs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    If Karma was a viable company they wouldn't have to buy their engine off BMW.   I feel like they are buying BMW i8 powertrains and putting it into an old sedan shell they have and trying to sell it.   This company seems less viable than Saab was 10 years ago.

    As for the Germans they have plenty of EV's coming, and the market really hasn't demanded them yet.  Tesla is a bit of an anomaly, with how quickly they were able to find success.   I do think EV is the future, but won't hit it big until the 2025-2030 time frame.  Karma is no Tesla.

    That's some faulty logic there. They are attempting to be an all electric company eventually, so why put money into developing and building a gas motor when there are plenty out there that can be bought.  The BMW choice give an air of premiumness to it... but they would have been suited equally well with something from Honda Motor Company. 

    The market hasn't demanded EVs? Telsa is 1/3rd of the entire luxury sedan market at this point. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    ...BMW bought Rolls.  Ferrari is...  Jaguar has...
    Those were all established brands...

    What's worse- a established brand having to go to it's competition to source components/parts, or a start-up doing so?

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    That's some faulty logic there. They are attempting to be an all electric company eventually, so why put money into developing and building a gas motor when there are plenty out there that can be bought.  The BMW choice give an air of premiumness to it... but they would have been suited equally well with something from Honda Motor Company. 

    The market hasn't demanded EVs? Telsa is 1/3rd of the entire luxury sedan market at this point. 

    Then why not just build EV’s?  

    I am all for EV’s and I think what Tesla has done to get market share and not use the old dealer model and all that is great.  Part of the Tesla appeal is you are buying the future, that luster may wear off when a lot of people have autonomous EV’s.

    I don’t see Karma building a better car than Tesla, Audi or Mercedes, so what is the point, especially with the $100k type money they will want for it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I saw a fairly new C-Class this morning and the lug nuts were rusty. Makes one wonder about the tag "Best or nothing at all!" I wonder if this marketing ever comes to mind when they cut corners on quality.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hey...this body shell is still sexy AF.  I like the Model S and all, but the Model S is really showing its age right about now.  The Model 3 is fresher. Even if its smaller and similar looking to the Model S, the Model S is long in the tooth the design department. And that is even if you like the Model 3 design or not...

    But the Karma Fisker/Revero still looks good.   Both came out about the same time, non?

     

    The new body shell  would be a great idea for Bob Lutz to use and update his company's model for a Blackwing V8.  

    Or really go medieval and ditch GM and get a Hellcat crate engine. Or really really go bat$h! crazy and get the Hellephant crate engine for it...

    But I wished the Revero was a 100% battery electric vehicle more than anything less at this point...

     

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/8/2019 at 7:53 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    Hey...this body shell is still sexy AF.  I like the Model S and all, but the Model S is really showing its age right about now.  The Model 3 is fresher. Even if its smaller and similar looking to the Model S, the Model S is long in the tooth the design department. And that is even if you like the Model 3 design or not...

    But the Karma Fisker/Revero still looks good.   Both came out about the same time, non?

     

    The new body shell  would be a great idea for Bob Lutz to use and update his company's model for a Blackwing V8.  

    Or really go medieval and ditch GM and get a Hellcat crate engine. Or really really go bat$h! crazy and get the Hellephant crate engine for it...

    But I wished the Revero was a 100% battery electric vehicle more than anything less at this point...

     

     

     

    Agree entirely. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings