Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Under Consideration: Full-Size SUV for Ram

      Ram Looks At A Full-Size SUV To Take On GM and Ford

    Ram is putting serious thought into building a full-size SUV to take on the likes the Chevrolet Suburban, Ford Expedition, and GMC Yukon XL.

     

    Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO Sergio Marchionne expressed his interest during a call announcing the third-quarter financial results.

     

    The large SUV segment is “the near-exclusive use of some others. We have a reasonable chance of getting at least part of that market,” said Marchionne.

     

    Marchionne explained that Ram begins to redesign its pickup lineup and add production, space for such a vehicle begins to open up.

     

    “I think we have a unique opportunity with renewal of the pickup line, with the powertrains we selected, to significantly increase output. We will also be exploring, as a result of that investment, some other segments.”

     

    Now there is a slight issue to this vehicle for Ram. Jeep is currently working on three-row SUV named the Grand Wagoneer that has been pushed back till 2019. Marchionne says the possible Ram SUV will not compete with the Grand Wagoneer as the latter model will take on the likes of the Range Rover.

     

    “I don’t think anybody who buys a large SUV is confusing it with a Range Rover,” said Marchionne.

     

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted

    ^

     

    Well, it is not cheap by any means either. You still need an all new frame and suspension, and mostly new body.  Some shared components, but you still have to develop and tool it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^

     

    Well, it is not cheap by any means either. You still need an all new frame and suspension, and mostly new body.  Some shared components, but you still have to develop and tool it.

     

    That depends. Any reason it couldn't ride on the same frame as a crew cab pickup? might need stiffer springs but nothing drastic in the suspension.  Front clip, doors, dash, seats, ... everything forward of the backside of the second row could all carry over. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    ^

     

    Well, it is not cheap by any means either. You still need an all new frame and suspension, and mostly new body.  Some shared components, but you still have to develop and tool it.

     

    That depends. Any reason it couldn't ride on the same frame as a crew cab pickup? might need stiffer springs but nothing drastic in the suspension.  Front clip, doors, dash, seats, ... everything forward of the backside of the second row could all carry over. 

     

    Full Size SUV that would have a Diesel, something us GM fans have wanted like FOREVER!

     

    They could get my business if they did it right with a Diesel. That would truly take business from GM and Ford.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm more interested in where Sergio is planning to get the production capacity. Right now they're desperate for it, never mind a few years down the road.

    And yes, I could definitely see the appeal of a turbodiesel large SUV. Figure even 2-300 pounds of weight savings off my current truck for a Tahoe-sized jobbie, and keep the air suspension.

    Hmmmm.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm more interested in where Sergio is planning to get the production capacity. Right now they're desperate for it, never mind a few years down the road.

    And yes, I could definitely see the appeal of a turbodiesel large SUV. Figure even 2-300 pounds of weight savings off my current truck for a Tahoe-sized jobbie, and keep the air suspension.

    Hmmmm.

    Like This?

     

    post-12-0-74879200-1446172043_thumb.jpg

    post-12-0-05560700-1446172045_thumb.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know what the cost would have been to certify it for sale in Canada or the US. You'd probably have to do crash regs and whatnot. I'm not sure what the rules are like in Mexico. I do know that they have had a bunch of stuff that is not available elsewhere. But these days I dunno.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know what the cost would have been to certify it for sale in Canada or the US. You'd probably have to do crash regs and whatnot. I'm not sure what the rules are like in Mexico. I do know that they have had a bunch of stuff that is not available elsewhere. But these days I dunno.

    There was a 2dr Ramcharger exclusive to Mexico in the late 90s, but nothing since then.  Those more recent 4dr ones above are aftermarket conversions or Photoshop fun...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll have to disagree with you on that one, although it might take time. After all, Ram was in pretty dire straits with pickup sales figures not so long ago. If they base it off their next truck and that truck is similarly innovative, capable, and good-looking then it will work. Actually, they may already have a ready-made customer base of current Ram truck owners. I could see them carving out a reasonable chunk of the marketplace (15-20%) with Gen 1.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll have to disagree with you on that one, although it might take time. After all, Ram was in pretty dire straits with pickup sales figures not so long ago. If they base it off their next truck and that truck is similarly innovative, capable, and good-looking then it will work. Actually, they may already have a ready-made customer base of current Ram truck owners. I could see them carving out a reasonable chunk of the marketplace (15-20%) with Gen 1.

     

    I think they'd immediately jump to 3rd place knocking the Titan Armada and Sequoia down. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll have to disagree with you on that one, although it might take time. After all, Ram was in pretty dire straits with pickup sales figures not so long ago. If they base it off their next truck and that truck is similarly innovative, capable, and good-looking then it will work. Actually, they may already have a ready-made customer base of current Ram truck owners. I could see them carving out a reasonable chunk of the marketplace (15-20%) with Gen 1.

    I'll have to disagree with you on that one, although it might take time. After all, Ram was in pretty dire straits with pickup sales figures not so long ago. If they base it off their next truck and that truck is similarly innovative, capable, and good-looking then it will work. Actually, they may already have a ready-made customer base of current Ram truck owners. I could see them carving out a reasonable chunk of the marketplace (15-20%) with Gen 1.

    Next truck isn't due for years. Word is 2021.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If that's true then perhaps they should just take the plunge and do it ASAP. After all, it's not like the segment doesn't have its fair share of fossilized platforms. Really low-hanging fruit for conquest sales, right?

    Edited by El Kabong
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll have to disagree with you on that one, although it might take time. After all, Ram was in pretty dire straits with pickup sales figures not so long ago. If they base it off their next truck and that truck is similarly innovative, capable, and good-looking then it will work. Actually, they may already have a ready-made customer base of current Ram truck owners. I could see them carving out a reasonable chunk of the marketplace (15-20%) with Gen 1.

     

    I think they'd immediately jump to 3rd place knocking the Titan Armada and Sequoia down.

    Definitely those. I could see them putting a scare in Ford as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If that's true then perhaps they should just take the plunge and do it ASAP. After all, it's not like the segment doesn't have its fair share of fossilized platforms. Really low-hanging fruit for conquest sales, right?

    It's well know that fossilized platform, which beat a brand new offering ( see C&D comparo ) is being replaced soon - before this might be Ram SUV would make its debut. And an like its Yukon/Suburban competition, that fossilized SUV is not on a Least Reliable List either.

    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Uh... did you ever think I, like Drew, was referring to the Nissan?

    LOL@troll dragging brand of choice into argument

    Then why speak plural ( fossilized platforms ) if talking about Nissan?

    Edited by Burnt Valve LS7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Uh... did you ever think I, like Drew, was referring to the Nissan?

    LOL@troll dragging brand of choice into argument

    Then why speak plural ( fossilized platforms ) if talking about Nissan?
    Why you save quote, man? All you're doing is saving proof that you were putting words into my mouth. That's trolling, no ifs, ands, or buts.

    Also, Toyota platform? Kinda ancient too, wot?

    Yeesh

    Edited by El Kabong
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Uh... did you ever think I, like Drew, was referring to the Nissan?

    LOL@troll dragging brand of choice into argument

    Then why speak plural ( fossilized platforms ) if talking about Nissan?
    Why you save quote, man? All you're doing is saving proof that you were putting words into my mouth. That's trolling, no ifs, ands, or buts.

    Also, Toyota platform? Kinda ancient too, wot?

    Yeesh

    Save quote because it's proof of what was said and cannot be edited to show words were not put in your mouth.

    Do like how your story changes now to now include Toyota.

    Yeesh

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So, Kreskin plays the semantics game. You're just disappointed that my post didn't involve your brand of choice.

    Fail of epic proportions :D :D :D

    " No I was talking about Nissan. No wait, I was talking about Nissan and Toyota.."

    Yes, your changing of story while throwing in a name call jab is an epic fail.

    Edited by Burnt Valve LS7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Look.

    Bottom line: YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHO I WAS REFERRING TO.

    Reason being: I decided to try and play nice. There were PLENTY of brands it coulda been. I made good and sure of that when I posted what I posted.

    Then you decided to put words in my mouth. Because all you're here to do is force a one-brand agenda.

    We all know what's what. Now we all use that knowledge for our own ends :D

    Edit: the downvote is just further proof of your agenda :D

    Edited by El Kabong
    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Look.

    Bottom line: YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHO I WAS REFERRING TO.

    Reason being: I decided to try and play nice. There were PLENTY of brands it coulda been. I made good and sure of that when I posted what I posted.

    Then you decided to put words in my mouth. Because all you're here to do is force a one-brand agenda.

    We all know what's what. Now we all use that knowledge for our own ends :D

    Edit: the downvote is just further proof of your agenda :D

    Conversing with me. Throws out a few name calls while conversing with...wait for it...me. And now says " YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHO I WAS REFERRING TO. "

    HA!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So, Kreskin plays the semantics game. You're just disappointed that my post didn't involve your brand of choice.

    Fail of epic proportions :D :D :D

    " No I was talking about Nissan. No wait, I was talking about Nissan and Toyota.."

    Yes, your changing of story while throwing in a name call jab is an epic fail.

     

    So you're a mind reader now and you knew exactly what he was talking about when he said it, even though there are five players in the full size game, and three of those are all on older bones? Man, that's impressive. Bravo!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hey Burnt Valve: I cannot help it that you just got pantsed. I didn't tell you to out yourself as a troll.

    You just did.

    Now. Ram SUV. Nice upside in a weak segment.

    Shall. We. Continue. :D

    Edited by El Kabong
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So, Kreskin plays the semantics game. You're just disappointed that my post didn't involve your brand of choice.

    Fail of epic proportions :D :D :D

    " No I was talking about Nissan. No wait, I was talking about Nissan and Toyota.."

    Yes, your changing of story while throwing in a name call jab is an epic fail.

    So you're a mind reader now and you knew exactly what he was talking about when he said it, even though there are five players in the full size game, and three of those are all on older bones? Man, that's impressive. Bravo!

    Nice of you to chime in. Wouldn't be complete without you sticking your nose in.

    Thanks for the input.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hey Burnt Valve: I cannot help it that you just got pantsed. I didn't tell you to out yourself as a troll.

    You just did.

    Now. Ram SUV. Nice upside in a weak segment.

    Shall. We. Continue. :D

    Hence me quoting your replies to me. Shows all where and at who you called a troll.

    Thanks for getting played like a flute.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    So, Kreskin plays the semantics game. You're just disappointed that my post didn't involve your brand of choice.

    Fail of epic proportions :D :D :D

    " No I was talking about Nissan. No wait, I was talking about Nissan and Toyota.."

    Yes, your changing of story while throwing in a name call jab is an epic fail.

    So you're a mind reader now and you knew exactly what he was talking about when he said it, even though there are five players in the full size game, and three of those are all on older bones? Man, that's impressive. Bravo!

    Nice of you to chime in. Wouldn't be complete without you sticking your nose in.

    Thanks for the input.

     

    Listen man, I'm just impressed by your mind reading capabilities. It is truly impressive to know what someone is thinking even when they haven't said anything. Again, bravo!

    Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really like the Ram as it is currently, probably my favorite of the big three.... however, I don't think it can go till 2021 without some very substantial updates in the meantime.   They can't dither in this segment like they have so far with minivans. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really like the Ram as it is currently, probably my favorite of the big three.... however, I don't think it can go till 2021 without some very substantial updates in the meantime.   They can't dither in this segment like they have so far with minivans.

    FWIW I don't think it'll be 2021 before the new one debuts. But if it takes that long it's too long.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, and they well remember what that did to their presence in the segment. Eleven years on the same platform would be a bit much. I doubt they will try it, but if they do there will almost certainly be consequences.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would guess either 2017 as a 2018 or 2018 as a 2019. 

    Anyways, i think a fullsize Ram SUV with the Ecodiesel would be a huge hit.

    Edited by Drew Dowdell
    Removed trolling
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would guess either 2017 as a 2018 or 2018 as a 2019. 

    Anyways, i think a fullsize Ram SUV with the Ecodiesel would be a huge hit.

    As I said earlier, if Ram does a full size SUV with the EcoDiesel, they will murder the competition as people would like the torque and MPG of a diesel to pull their trailers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Not so great colonnade years:  1973 and 1974 Not so great next-gen years:  1978, 1979, and 1980. Consumers had a right to be pissed.  It actually cost more to go from too much (the '77 MC) to too little (the '78 MC), and that's just one example.
    • I was joking. I think he hates the colonnades and the malaise era. More '76 or even '75 GP for me. I had trouble with the '77 lights up front (the center lamp in between) and the taillight medallion with the swoopy wedding invitation calligraphy inside it. I was also sweet on '76 and '75 GLMs for their borrowing from or sharing with the GP (still drool over their fully instrumented dash), but being more manageable in terms of size.
    • I didnt know that.  That is a cool thing to happen.  I didnt even know that electronic communication was not allowed  Hence the camera usage being "frowned" upon...  DUH... I was fooled into thinking that because in the college ranks they allowed for this, that the MLB approved it at their level but old school mentality and teams didnt want to adopt it.   As you know, I dont follow MLB as closely as I used to. Since the Expos skipped town in 2004.  I do watch NCAA womens college softball with my daughter. Religiously I might add.    Many fans feel this way I gather.  Im in tune with the Houston Astros bashing.  I know it exists.  The way I sees it though: The MLB deserves a team like the Houston Astros. 
    • Yeah... I like the Colonnades and like you said, the earlier ones had a certain style on one element that the later ones screwed up but at the same time, the earlier ones had a nicer style on another element  that the later ones screwed up.  And that would be for all Colonnades across the different brands and models.  
    • Because of the Astros, they now allow electronic communication between pitcher/catcher for calling pitches, PitchCom.  Off all the bad things covid brought upon us, the Astros not having to face live crowds after getting caught cheating, is by far the worst. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search