Jump to content
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Tesla quietly raises Model-S and Model-X prices by $15,000 or more

      Dropping the base 75D, the new entry-level for Model-S and Model-X is the 100D. 

    Tesla is moving further into exotic car territory with the Model-S and Model-X.  Elon Musk announced in a tweet on January 9th that after January 13th, the 75D versions of both vehicles would no longer be available for order and the new entry-level model will be the 100D.

    The starting price for Model-S 75D is $76,000. That gets you an AWD EV with 259 miles of range that can do 0-60 in 4.2 seconds. Telsa's AutoPilot is available for an additional $5,000. Moving to the 100D is an increase of $18,000 to $94,000. That increases the range to 335 miles and cuts a tenth of a second off the 0-60.

    The Model-X 75D starts at $82,000 with a range of 237 miles. With that gone, the new base Model-X 100D results in a $15,000 increase in Model-X base price to $97,000 with an increase of range to 295 miles. 

    These price increases come on the back of the reduction in federal tax credits that begin this year, from $7,500 to $,3750.  That brings the total effective price increases for the Model-S and Model-X to $21,750 and $18,750 respectively. After June 30th of this year, the tax credit will fall further to $1,875.

    The Model-S and Model-X have been selling well against such heavyweights as the Mercedes S-Class and BMW X5. However, Porsche, Jaguar, Mercedes, and Audi, as well as upstart Rivian , are all releasing competitors to the Telsas in the coming months. Whether Tesla can maintain that momentum with $20,000+ price increases remains to be seen.

    Hat tip to reader @balthazar for pointing us to this story.

    • Upvote 1


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    WOW, While the technology is great and the speed is equally as great, for that price, I am still not impressed with the interiors of the Tesla S and X.

    Plus, while I can drive the auto's, no one can fit behind me as there is only 3 inches of room from the back of the front seat to the back seat, so no leg room. 

    I acknowledge that I am not average size, but still for an EV, I am disappointed in the interior room of the Tesla S and X.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    WOW, While the technology is great and the speed is equally as great, for that price, I am still not impressed with the interiors of the Tesla S and X.

    Plus, while I can drive the auto's, no one can fit behind me as there is only 3 inches of room from the back of the front seat to the back seat, so no leg room. 

    I acknowledge that I am not average size, but still for an EV, I am disappointed in the interior room of the Tesla S and X.

    Which fits you better. Model S or Bolt?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The interior materials don't impress either for the price.  I've ridden in a Model S a couple times a few years ago, they don't seem overly luxurious...a big German sedan or big Cadillac is way nicer inside, IMO. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, Robert Hall said:

    The interior materials don't impress either for the price.  I've ridden in a Model S a couple times a few years ago, they don't seem overly luxurious...a big German sedan or big Cadillac is way nicer inside, IMO. 

    Definitely.  The luxury is all in the powertrain, not in the interior.

    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, balthazar said:

    "luxury powertrain" - what does that even mean? :P

    The most technologically advanced, fast, efficient, capable, minimal maintenance, and free fillups availabe..... all in one package.  No ICE powered car can match that.

     

    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tesla has a lot of demand, so they can drop those base models that probably don’t sell well anyway and not lose any customers.  The challenge for Tesla will be if someone like Porsche or Mercedes has Tesla level performance and price but with Porsche/Mercedes interiors and fit and finish.  

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, smk4565 said:

    Tesla has a lot of demand, so they can drop those base models that probably don’t sell well anyway and not lose any customers.  The challenge for Tesla will be if someone like Porsche or Mercedes has Tesla level performance and price but with Porsche/Mercedes interiors and fit and finish.  

    That's where I see Tesla getting (back?) into trouble. If Mercedes EQ comes out with the same EV performance as a Model-X but still has a Mercedes interior for the same price, where does Tesla go then? At that point, the only thing they have left is a name-brand advantage (even over Mercedes, it is slight, but it is there). 

    The next refresh of the Model-S needs to focus heavily on the interior quality. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    27 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Which fits you better. Model S or Bolt?

    As I posted when it was in Seattle 2 years ago, I actually fit better in the BOLT than the Tesla S. My wife says I look funny in the Tesla S with my knees by my shoulders.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, dfelt said:

    As I posted when it was in Seattle 2 years ago, I actually fit better in the BOLT than the Tesla S. My wife says I look funny in the Tesla S with my knees by my shoulders.

    you just do better in more upright vehicles then...  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    you just do better in more upright vehicles then...  

    Yes, I have never really even as a Teen fit well in cars. Just to damn big :P 

    Was 2016 when I was able to fit in the production BOLT at the Seattle Auto Show.

    IMG_1580.JPG

    IMG_1579.JPG

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, dfelt said:

    Yes, I have never really even as a Teen fit well in cars. Just to damn big :P 

    What about a Model-X?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    What about a Model-X?

    I can fit into a model X and look fine but unlike the BOLT where I can leave the seat as is and get into the back still and sit for short trips, the Tesla X only has about 3 inches of leg room from the back of the front seat to the back seat cushion. No one can really sit behind me. I was very suprised by this, I will say, I was sold on the Tesla X when I test drove it, it is wicked fast even in base model and so smooth to drive.

    IMG_1577.JPG

    The whole can I fit in the front and get out and sit in the back is why I am so excited about the Rivian and Atlis EVs. Something that can handle big people.

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Elon says the Tesla Roadster will be capable of vertical lift off, so advantage Tesla there.  Mercedes cars can’t lift off the ground.

    • Haha 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Tesla has a lot of demand, so they can drop those base models that probably don’t sell well anyway and not lose any customers.

    Model S was down 5% last year as it is, 'raising' the price by EIGHTEEN THOUSAND surely will cut into that model's sales quite deeply.

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    9 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Model S was down 5% last year as it is, 'raising' the price by EIGHTEEN THOUSAND surely will cut into that model's sales quite deeply.

    Maybe they think that will help boost Model 3 sales. 

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Model S was down 5% last year as it is, 'raising' the price by EIGHTEEN THOUSAND surely will cut into that model's sales quite deeply.

    Not if they weren’t selling the 75 kw cars anyway.  Plus they have a backlog of Model 3 orders they still haven’t filled.  I think sales demand or pricing are the least of Tesla’s worries.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Model S was down 5% last year as it is, 'raising' the price by EIGHTEEN THOUSAND surely will cut into that model's sales quite deeply.

    Tesla had the "least bad" in sales results aside from Lexus (LS was way up due to the prior model being a partial year in 2017) and the Porsche Panamera. A8 was down nearly 50%, S90 was down 19.4%, Q70 was down 22.7%, 7-series was down 10%, E-class was down 9.5%, S-Class was down 5.7%.

    I'm thinking that Tesla is hoping to make it up in Model-3 Performance volume. 

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Raising the prices?  By 18 thousand?  By just eliminating the lowest trimmed Model S and Model X one could buy previously?

    I think that statement is misleading...

    The price of admission for a Model S got more expensive because the lowest trim available got nixed. Not because the Model S and ModelX 100D got 18 thousand higher, but because the cheaper Model S by 18 thousand is no longer available for sale...

    NOT THE SAME THING...

    Besides, the 75kwh battery is available in the highest level Model 3. 

    Why create overlap with two of your cars? Streamline...This creates an even more separation between Model 3 and Model S. And when the Model Y comes along, the same for it and the Model X.  Which was done once before with the Model S when the Model S ditched the 60kwh battery and forced people to buy the 75 one...but kept the option open for 60kwh when they "detuned" the 75kwh battery that was in it...and then killed that option all together...

    No harm done. 

    But, yeah. The Model S is fast becoming...scratch that, already is long in the tooth. Like Drew said, they need to fix the interior and make it worth the 100Gs plus one pays for one... 

     

     

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Raising the prices?  By 18 thousand?  By just eliminating the lowest trimmed Model S and Model X one could buy previously?

    I think that statement is misleading...

     

     

    The entry price for a Model-S just went up by $18,000... I don't think that is misleading. It's not the first time it has happened either has Telsa has previously raised prices by dropping the entry models without lowering the prices on the models above it.

    Imagine if Chevy stopped offering all trims of Camaro under the SS.... wouldn't you say that they raised the price of entry?

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    26 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The entry price for a Model-S just went up by $18,000... I don't think that is misleading. It's not the first time it has happened either has Telsa has previously raised prices by dropping the entry models without lowering the prices on the models above it.

    Imagine if Chevy stopped offering all trims of Camaro under the SS.... wouldn't you say that they raised the price of entry?

    I said that: 

    30 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    The price of admission for a Model S got more expensive because the lowest trim available got nixed. Not because the Model S and ModelX 100D got 18 thousand higher, but because the cheaper Model S by 18 thousand is no longer available for sale...

    Price of admission for a Model S got higher...sure...but NOT because Tesla raised the prices for it.  Tesla nixed the lower trimmed model. 

    A person that wanted to buy the 100D Model S a week ago will more or less buy it the same price come Monday. 

    A person that wants to buy the Model S come Monday and he wants the 75 model, well, he will end up buying the top trimmed Model 3 instead.   

    In your scenario, if Chevy ends the 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder Camaros, well...that person ends up going to Ford or Dodge down the street...

    One could go to the Cadillac dealership to get the ATS...but the ATS is not a Camaro per se. But the Model 3 with the 75khw battery closely imitates the 75kwh battery Model S. 

    And since no other car maker has what Tesla makes...Tesla could do that without a loss of clientele.

    But in your scenario with the Camaro, Chevy will most definitely lose sales to a 4 cylinder Mustang and a V6 Dodge Challenger. 

    Tesla has the Model 3 to cater to those peeps that want a Tesla in that 50, 60 thousand dollar price range with a 75kwh battery. 

    And I do not know the price ranges between the Model 3 and Model S, but if you look it the other way, peeps get to SAVE money IF the 75kwh battery Model 3 was less expensive than a 75kwh battery Model S... 

    Besides, Ford nixed the V6 and made the 4 cylinder more expensive to obtain...nobody batted an eyelid for that manoeuvre. But lets hang Elon Musk for making a positive, calculated decision for his bottom line Tesla company...

     

    Edited by oldshurst442

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/9/18176198/tesla-75kwh-battery-model-s-x-price

     

    Quote

     

    Tesla is abandoning the 75kWh battery pack for both the Model X and Model S, CEO Elon Musk announced on Wednesday. Customers have until Sunday, January 13th to place orders if they want cars fitted with the company’s lowest-capacity (and cheapest) battery.

    The 75kWh pack is what Tesla uses in the base model of both those cars, which means they will now only be available with the higher-capacity 100kWh pack. That also means the price to buy either car is about to increase dramatically. Unless new variants are in the works, or Tesla changes its prices — something it does often, to be fair — the base price of the Model S is about to increase from $76,000 to $94,000, while the cost of the cheapest Model X is about to jump from $82,000 to $97,000.

    A spokesperson for Tesla declined to comment.

    The change should help differentiate the Model S and Model X from the Model 3, which currently starts at $44,000, but can run as high as $70,500 with options. The currently available versions of the Model 3 use a 75kWh battery pack, but it uses differently-sized cells.

     

     

    That is 6 000 dollars cheaper to get a 75kwh battery from Tesla, if one wants to see it that way...

    And Im assuming, that a top trimmed Model 3 may be even quicker and have a longer range than the lower trimmed Model S. Granted, the Model 3 is a tad smaller and in the back seat, more cramped than the Model S...

    But are we gonna be that petty for this decision?

     

    Edited by oldshurst442

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I get it, you don't like my headline, but that's the way I see it and that's the way I wrote it.  I'd say the same thing if the only CT6 available for 2019 was the 3.0TT Platinum model.  I don't think I'm being deceptive.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just regret one thing thaat I said. About the Model S needing a better quality interior. 

    I do not think it needs that at all...

    Even if Mercedes or Porsche have better interiors and the panel gaps are waaaay better, which they will be, Tesla has them both beat with their computer touch screen and the way they do their updates online. Couple that with Tesla's supercharging network and Mercedes nd Porsche will have a tuff time beating Tesla, not the other way around...UNLESS Mercedes and Porsche duplicate what Tesla does with their computer touch screen...they dont have a chance against Tesla. 

    I wont even mention the charging network Tesla has...but I did. 

    It may need a new body though...to keep it fresh on the outside. 

    Edited by oldshurst442

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, Drew Dowdell said:

    I get it, you don't like my headline, but that's the way I see it and that's the way I wrote it.  I'd say the same thing if the only CT6 available for 2019 was the 3.0TT Platinum model.  I don't think I'm being deceptive.

    Im not telling you how to write Drew...

    Its creative writing and I get that. Im not the one to mess with journalism. If I was a head coach of an NFL team or coach of an NHL team, Id have a problem with sports journalists doing creative writing about my team, but obviously this is not what this is.

    You are not being deceptive. Too strong of a word deceptive is. It is truth you wrote, but its creative truth...

    I just see it differently. A different truth than what you wrote...

    #fakenews is a different animal all together. 

    Now, if we had HuckaSands to tell us how SHE sees it, then we could settle this once and for all... :D

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any car with 2 (or more) side windows is a sedan, whether 2 or 4 door, whether a fixed pillar or a hardtop. 'coupe' as terminology refers to 'close coupled'; AKA a C6 Corvette. Technically a C7 Corvette would be a 2-dr sedan. Some body style terms do modify these definitions tho.
    • In regards to the third statement, that is why most charging points also have solar power panels. The ability to still work even when brown outs stop allowing gas pumps to operate.
    • Based on the photo on the homepage, I'm on board with this BMW looking like a Malibu.  It very much looks like one based on that vantage point. As an aside, that's a great color on that BMW.  Exterior color choices today are pretty bad.  Interior color choices are even worse.  "Sporty" cars or trim lines are offering terra cotta colored leather but there aren't many exterior colors on the limited color charts that go with it.  I'm talking the up-line Focuses and Malibus, among others. In defense of the BMW, I will say that the "opera window" C pillar kink is a little lower than in the Malibu ... and fleshed out with some chrome, so it looks better than does the kink at the midpoint of the arc on the Malibu. And, yes, the line along the doors is much like that in the now gone Buick Verano.  And, damn, those rear tail lamps are ugly. I just checked out what this BMW looks like inside.  The "laptop left open" info-audio center on the center stack is tamed down, so it's not bad.  The lighting effects on the doors are pimpy.  I don't like them.  The I.P. cluster is fairly cool.  The seats look comfortable.  Also, I like bucket seats with the perforation inside the headrest.  I remember them on the '97-'03 Grand Prixs. I forgot where I read this back in the day, but it was prediciting that American and foreign car design intentions would intersect in the future.  They probably did so around the New Millennium.  They sure didn't around 1986, when there were Cadillac de Villes, Olds 98 Regency Broughams, and Buick Park Avenues with loose cushion velour seats with the car's emblem etched into the seating.  Now, if we're talking by about the time the Olds Intrigue rolled out, I'd say that car started arriving at the crossing of paths (tapered front end with no hood ornament, simple dash design, simple seat design) and wouldn't have offended any European.  Upon seeing the brochure, my relatives across the pond liked it.  It was the land yachts of the '70s and '80s that they criticized. It's that the opposite of what has always happened is happening ... the Germans are looking at US / U.S. for auto design ideas!  This new BMW has borrowed a kit of parts from the Americans.
    • Question. Can you fill up your gas tank at home?  
    • I rarely ever go in the store when I get gas... pay at the pump, usually less than 5 minutes.  A quick task.  Recharging an EV at a charging station would be far less convenient.   Now a home charger, I could see that being advantageous.   And location, location, location...the nearest gas station is maybe 1/2 mile, and I probably have 1/2 dozen more within a mile or two.    The nearest ChargePoint charging station (J1772) is 7 miles, the nearest CHAdeMO station is over 6 miles.  The nearest Telsa Supercharger station is 10 miles.   Not practical in my reality context.
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...