Jump to content
Create New...
  • 🚗 Your People Are Here. Get In.

    The internet is full of car content. This is the community.

    Cheers & Gears has been bringing enthusiasts together since 2001. Join the conversation, show off your garage, and find your people.

  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Fumes: 2013 Lexus GS - Resistance

    Drew Dowdell - March 26, 2012 - CheersandGears.com

    All companies do it. They make outrageous claims about their products in an attempt to sell you something. That is advertising and I accept it. A lot of times, these exaggerations are just playful and funny attempts to sell you on an idea and no one takes the exaggeration seriously.

    Take for example the Chevy truck ad that ran during the Super Bowl this year. Chevy made the claim that their trucks are so dependable that the truck, along with a box of twinkies, could survive the apocalypse while Dave and his Ford truck couldn’t. Clearly no one is going to hold Chevy to that claim. It was just a funny commercial filled with sight gags that Ford ended up taking too seriously, which only ended up giving the commercial more attention than it might otherwise have deserved.

    In Germany, Axe runs a series of advertisements where there nerdy guy spokesmodel uses some of their douchebag-in-a-can bodyspray and in the next scene he is in an inflatable rubber duckie kiddie pool filled with soap suds and wrestling 5 bikini-clad supermodels. Not really laugh inducing, but clearly so outrageous as to not be taken seriously.

    The other kind of commercial is the informative type. These are typically filled with facts and figures with very little in the way of laughs. The advertiser may make some inflated statistical claims like “best in class”, "best ever", or “better than the leading brand”, but typically nothing that would cause anything more than a post fight on an internet automotive forum. Anything approaching deception usually gets the advertiser a tap on the shoulder from the FCC as more than a few pharmaceutical companies have found out.

    So understanding that, I’m going to pick on the 2013 Lexus GS commercial called “Resistance” for two reasons. First because Lexus keeps running the commercial over and over, and second because the claims made are disingenuous at best and deceptive at worst.

    Before we go on, watch the spot for yourself:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUEhY7D81Y4

    If you’re a car person, even if you’re a Lexus fan, the hair on your neck has to stand up at Lexus’ gumption here and their assumption of how dumb you the consumer are.

    “The draw of the past is a powerful thing” the announcer says while we watch an ancient T.V. and rotary dial telephone go skidding backwards. In the next breath, he says, “But we simply couldn’t repeat history, we had to create it.” Great! Awesome! Lexus is going to show us a car with freakin laser beams for headlights! It will run on liquid hot magma!

    “… with leading edge safety technology”. Ok.. well I guess that’s good but it is kind of boring. Still, let’s hear what this leading edge safety technology is.

    “... available blind spot monitoring”. Ok, but that’s not new. Volvo introduced that in 2008 on the S40 and it filtered to much of the Ford line for 2009. Blind spot monitoring is “available” on the 2011 Ford Fiesta, if I’m shelling out 45 thousand clams for a Lexus, something like blind spot monitoring better be made standard. What else are you going to show me Lexus?

    “....available night view”. Throw me a freakin bone here! Night vision was available on the 2000 Cadillac Deville 13 years ago, so it isn’t “leading edge technology”. This is where Lexus really insults the intelligence of Lexus owners directly. The Toyota specific NightView has been available in the Lexus LX since 2002 and in the Lexus LS since 2009. Touting this feature isn’t going to win any conquest buyers from the German brands either. BMW and Mercedes have offered night vision in their lineups since 2005 with Audi coming to the party in 2010.

    gallery_51_134_16465.jpg

    2000 Cadillac Deville NighVision promotional drawing

    Last chance Lexus, what can you show me that is new, leading edge technology on this 2013 GS? Give me a reason to buy it.

    “....and heads up display”. WHAT? That’s it!? Heads-up display came out on the 1988 Chevrolet Corvette and it quickly filtered to a lot of other GM cars. Visit any General Motors, Nissan, BMW, or even a Lexus certified pre-owned dealer, and they’ll be able to show you something with a heads up display. There are far more dead models that offered heads-up display than there are models that currently offer it. Lexus, step over here for a minute I want to talk to you privately. A good rule of thumb about making claims on leading edge technology is this: If Oldsmobile offered the technology on its cars 20 years ago, you cannot call it leading edge.

    sml_gallery_51_134_1309.jpg

    1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme dashboard and HUD

    “The all new, 2013 Lexus GS. There’s no going back”.... except to grave rob leading edge technology from cars from the past... and Lexus, what was that quote at the beginning of the commercial again? Oh yea: “But we simply couldn’t repeat history, we had to create it.” None of the technology cited in the ad was created by you.. and it is all old history in terms of automotive technology.

    I don’t want to turn this into a critique of the car. I haven’t driven the 2013 Lexus GS yet, (Lexus, call me, maybe I can make it up to you) and this new GS looks like a very strong contender in the competitive mid-size luxury segment. It is entirely possible that Lexus manages to combine these technologies in such a way that makes it new and unique to the field. But in terms of advertising, Lexus needs to find a way to make its product stand out in that competitive crowd. Pointing out technology from over 20 years ago as “leading edge” isn’t going to do it.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Lol...so hit the nail on the head with this one. I was pretty much thinking the same way when I saw it as well.

    When you think about it, you really feel they are trying to push this...makes you wonder...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe the message they were intending was to show they could bundle it all together in one package which in their pea brain might be creating history.

    Then again,........... :pokeowned:

    Edited by dfelt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Did Acura really just claim to be the only one with crumple zones in front of the passenger cage?

    Yup!

    Laughed out loud the first time I saw it.

    Can't find the one where they lay claim to their version of magnetic ride control - it's just as glaring.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It would be only too funny to call them out in a proper layed out advertising. Acura proclaims this, Lexus claims this, Infiinity claims this.

    We just want to thank you for recognizing our leading technology since 1988. GM, the proud owner of Cadillac, Buick, GMC and Cheverolet. Building cutting edge technology to safely transport your most important cargo, your loved ones. Stop by a dealer today to explore your options on a Cutting edge automobile to meet your family needs.

    :D

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe they meant it was revolutionary technology to the 2013 GS, as in it never existed on a 2013 GS before--

    or maybe it's revolutionary to Lexus' audience, the blue-haired crowd, because they forgot it existed elsewhere...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac had night vision, Volvo had blind spot warmings, and various brands had HUDs, but the 3 technologies weren't previously available together in a Lexus GS..thus it is revolutionary for the GS. I guess.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When the 'others' pull this sort of chit is when I challenge those that say 'Cadillac should just advertise on it's product's merits' instead of calling out the competition. Left uncorrected, these sorts of claims slip into general acceptance.

    Didn't toyota claim to have pioneered headlights that steered with the front wheels??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you're referring to my objection to the "Go to Green Hell" ad, my only issue with it was timing. The car isn't even rolling down the production line yet for anyone to actually try out Cadillac's claim. From the time the ad aired to the time the first ATSes hit the lots, over 6 months will have passed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Independent Automotive Journalism

    25 years of honest automotive coverage — because someone has to do it.

    Cheers & Gears has never been filtered by manufacturer relationships or driven by algorithm. Just real people, real opinions, and a genuine love of cars. Subscribers keep the lights on and get an ad-light experience starting at $2.25/month.*

    View subscription options

    *A small number of ads feature member-exclusive coupon deals and will still appear.

  • Posts

    • Having looked at all the images online, I have to say that the interior and exterior other than the color which I like is a let down and I would even say for a Luxury brand looks cheap.
    • Due to my tradeshow season, do not have the time till June to do any writeups, but Lexus has released their Luxury version 3 row SUV EV that Toyota released as the Highlander and Subaru also has. Clearly not connected to the ICE Spindale grill or as many of us called the Predator mouth. https://pressroom.lexus.com/all-electric-three-row-luxury-the-all-new-2027-lexus-tz/ The press release says 300 miles of range on Select Grade. Look at the fine print, this is a sea level level road, anything else is 250 to 280 miles of range. FAILURE Lexus / Toyota along with the 400V system.
    • After doing a bunch of research on this, it isn't so much Honda/Acura are limiting charging speeds as it is the battery pack total size directly correlates to the rate of charge they can accept. The Prologue and non-SS Blazer EV have 85kWh batteries at 288 total volts and the ZDX/Lyriq/Blazer EV SS all have the larger 102kWh battery at 345 total volts.  Because of the way the Ultium platforms have multiple pack sizes that can and are linked together to make larger or smaller packs, the total pack volts varies based on the application and why the Hummer/Silverado/Sierra EVs can charge at 800v when they're still on 400v architecture.  Because kW = amps * volts, the bigger packs have more nominal volts because they have more cells.  Below is a Prologue example and change the 288v for the Prologue to 345v for the larger packs of the Lyriq, ZDX, or Blazer EV SS and you get 190kW for the maximum (or do the math for the other chargers, as well)
    • Is there a good 4150 four barrel TBI with DBW compatibility?
    • Is it possible to fit a Holley Dual Plane Intake on an '09 lacrosse super?
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search