Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    2012 Buick Lacrosse with eAssist

    The North American International Auto Show starts tomorrow and for the trip up to Detroit, Buick has provided me with a 2012 Buick Lacrosse with e-Assist. For 2012, the Lacrosse has a standard a 4-cylinder engine with a light electrical assist and automatic stop.

    The e-Assist system is somewhere between BMW's Efficient Dynamics auto-stop/brake regeneration system and Honda's Integrated Motor Assist in terms of the level of hybridization. E-Assist offers a 15 horsepower and 79 ft-lb of torque electrical boost to the gasoline engine where Efficient Dynamics offers none. The Honda IMA system adds 23 horsepower and 78 ft-lb of torque.

    So how does it drive? Having driven a 2011 Lacrosse 4-cylinder without e-Assist the very first thing I noticed was the extra torque in the low RPM range. You won't be pulling stumps with your Lacrosse, but the electrical boost at low RPM gives the 4-cylinder a more V6 feel in terms of take off. The gear ratios are also tuned well to get you rolling up to speed swiftly. It is still a 4-cylinder, but in normal city and suburban driving, it will feel like a V6. Speaking of city and suburban driving, according to the computer, I'm averaging 26.6 mpg in that combination.

    The transmission will keep the RPM higher when needed and Buick's QuietTuning does its job keeping engine noise out of the cabin. Full throttle acceleration isn't swift, but the tach will swing nearly all the way to 7,000 rpm without protest. Refinement of the 2.4 coupled with the electric motor is excellent, continuing with the nearly V6 feel displayed in city driving.

    Those wishing for more power for drag racing would do best to check off the box for the 303 horsepower 3.6 liter V6 and be on their way, but the 2.4 with e-Assist will satisfy 90% of buyers out there who are more concerned with fuel economy than pink slips.

    I have yet to test out the long distance highway fuel economy, but as soon as I click save on this post, I am getting in the car to start my 250 mile trip to Detroit where I'll pick up our friend Z-06. Send me your questions in the meantime.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Apparently the gear ratios, or rather, final drive ratio, are tuned for fuel economy rather than acceleration. The addition of eAssist allowed GM to keep the RPMs lower than before while still allowing for adequate acceleration.

    Sounds like the electric assist more than made up for the reduced engine power to the wheels... nice. How often does it downshift on the highway? eAssist is supposed to reduce the need for that as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you have a chance and the inclination, check it with pen and paper as well. My Cruze had an optimistic DIC.

    28.9 on the first 1/2 tank (pen and paper) the first 1/2 of that was my city/suburban cycle

    what is your average speed? 36.1 mpg= nice.....

    I didn't look on the DIC, but I did 65 - 70 most of the way.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Apparently the gear ratios, or rather, final drive ratio, are tuned for fuel economy rather than acceleration. The addition of eAssist allowed GM to keep the RPMs lower than before while still allowing for adequate acceleration.

    Sounds like the electric assist more than made up for the reduced engine power to the wheels... nice. How often does it downshift on the highway? eAssist is supposed to reduce the need for that as well.

    under steady cruise, only under a steep hill, but it will downshift twice when it does.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Lacrosse goes back to GM in about 2 hours... and I'm really sad to see it go. I filled up the car the night before I left Detroit. A full tank gets you over 500 mile crusing range but I was a bit more hurried coming home and averaged 33mpg which cut the range back a bit.

    Power is softer than one might hope under hard acceleration, but in normal situations, it still rolls with a V6-like feel.

    The car that GM will be dropping off to replace it will be good for the Nor'easter that is predicted to hit here in the next 24 hours. Any guesses as to what it is?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You're not getting a Nor'easter. You might have a blizzard coming, but not a Nor'easter... a Nor'easter is like a weak winter hurricane... where the center of the storm is mostly over the ocean, and it heads northeast with the gulf stream. You're too far inland to get much Nor'easter weather.

    You scared me, though... I had to drop my lunch and pull up the weather.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A diesel LaCrosse would be less complicated, more long-lived, more torque-heavy, and get much better fuel mileage while having an uncompromised luggage area.

    Modern diesels are pretty complex these days, arguably more so than most hybrids. You've got variable-geometry turbochargers, high pressure fuel pumps, twin balance shafts, particulate filters, SCR, etc. Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive and Ford's PowerSplit powertrains are among the most reliable out there; lots of taxis with 250K+ miles still going strong.

    Passat TDI gets 4 MPG more on the highway, but it's also 600 lbs lighter. More NVH, too. Modern, downsized petrol engines with direct injection, turbocharging, and variable valve timing are closing the efficiency gap with diesels.

    Edited by pow
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Posts

    • Yeah, it doesn’t pass the sniff test at all. No vehicle, not even a full size SUV, takes even 10 minutes to fill up much less 22. That doesn’t even qualify as making sense to believe it takes 22 minutes to fill up ANY vehicle that only has four tires on it. 
    • I've literally timed myself AND posted it here at one time. I don't know if your PNW nozzles are the size of a drinking straw, but it never takes more than 5 minutes at a pump.  You have lost your mind if you think you'll convince any human that you've stood at a pump for TWENTY-TWO MINUTES just filling up an Escalade. There a 100% chance you're lying if you're saying it took you 22 minutes to fill-up an Escalade from E every time.  Damn. 14 minutes. That's a good 9-10 minutes longer than it would take to fill-up most anything with a gasoline engine.  @Drew Dowdell, your Avalanche probably has the same or very similar size gas tank of an Escalade, right? Do you stand there for 20 minutes or more regularly? 
    • FUD - Unless your driving a subcompact, 5 minute fueling is not true. Compacts to Midsize to Full size can take from 8 to 22 minutes to fuel. If the filters of the gas station are dirty, it can take longer. Yes I realize not everyone drives an Escalade ESV, but that is 22 minutes of standing and fueling at Costco, longer at other stations it seem to be. Yes, I spent a few minutes waiting, but over all I got all my shopping done, so a few minutes was no different than at a gas station. I charged this morning for the wife, was 52 degrees outside and the 350kW Electrify America charger did the 80% charge from 14% in 15 minutes and then I left to go get the grandkids and drop them off at school, so the 10 to 80% charge is fast as my Escalade.
    • You just said you still had to wait a few minutes after you were done shopping. That few minutes is all it takes to go from E -> F in an internal combustion vehicle. Until you're charging at home, overnight, there is no real savings or convenience involved. Once your free trial period of public charging has expired, it costs about the same to charge publicly at those fast chargers.  At home charging is really the only way to save money and time with an EV, when it comes to fuel costs. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings