Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    2013 Lexus GS 350 F-Sport

      The German automakers' worst nightmare has come to fruition.

    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    October 16, 2013

    Last year, I had the great fortune of going to the Midwest Automotive Media Association's Spring Rally. The rally brings automotive media and manufacturers together for a couple days of driving new vehicles. During my time there, I had the chance to slip behind the wheel of the recently launched Lexus GS 350. But this wasn't any ordinary GS 350. It happened to be the new GS 350 F-Sport model. When I wrote my wrap-up of the event, I said this about the GS:

    "Has Lexus created a vehicle that can give everyone in the midsize luxury sedan class something to worry about? Oh very much so."

    Bit of a bold proclamation. I wanted to find out if that would hold true after an extended stay on the roads I drive on and Lexus obliged by handing over a 2013 GS 350 F-Sport for a week's stay.


    Polarizing. That's the word I would use to describe the GS 350 F-Sport's exterior design. To start, there is Lexus' spindle grille in the front. This is either a love it or hate it relationship. Personally, I love the spindle grille on the GS, especially when it has the mesh-grille insert. There is also a set of LED daytime running lights running along the inner edge and a more aggressive front bumper with vents to feed air to the massive brakes. Along the sides are a high belt line, side skirts, and a set of nineteen-inch alloy wheels in a graphite finish. Towards the back, a rear lip spoiler and valance finish off the sporty touches. It's shock and awe in one complete package.

    Heading inside, the GS 350 F-Sport looks and feels like a sporty sedan. You have loads of black leather and soft-touch materials that contrast very well with the grey trim pieces used in the dash. The front seats are well-bolstered and provide a wide range of adjustments such as adjustable side bolsters and power thigh support for the driver. Heat and ventilation are included for both seats. The ventilation was much appreciated during the week as it was pretty warm.


    The back seat isn't as big as you might think. A large transmission tunnel means it's only really comfortable for two passengers. Also headroom comes at a premium due to a sloping roofline.

    Techwise, the GS 350 comes with a large 12.3-inch screen that houses Lexus' Enform infotainment system. The screen is divided up into two parts. The majority of the screen is dedicated to navigation, media selection, climate and information. The remainder of the screen is used for telling you what's playing and a overview of the climate system. I like this layout since I can have the navigation and what's playing on my iPod at the same time. Well done, Lexus!

    To move around the system, there is Lexus Remote Touch. The system uses a joystick to navigate around the menus and select functions. I'm not a fan of Remote Touch since the system is a bit touchy and you have to take your eyes off the road to make sure you are going into the selection you want.

    Enough about the design and seating arrangements, lets dive into how it drives.

    Powering the GS 350 F-Sport is a 3.5L V6 with 306 horsepower and 274 pound-feet of torque. A six-speed automatic transmission is the sole choice. The 3.5L is very Lexus-like at the low end, quiet and smooth. Surprisingly, it also packs a bit of punch as well. Keep the revs climbing the 3.5L emits a very lovely engine note. The six-speed automatic never put a gear cog wrong. It somehow knew what gear the vehicle needed to be in.


    The GS also comes with Lexus Drive Mode Selector which offers four different configurations for the powertrain and suspension. The modes are as followed:

    • Normal: Standard throttle mapping and suspension tuning, gearshifts tuned for comfort.
    • Eco: Slower throttle mapping, reduced operation of the climate control
    • Sport: Quicker throttle mapping, stiffer suspension tuning
    • Sport+: Much quicker throttle mapping, even stiffer suspension tuning, heavier steering, number of powertrain enhancements

    During the week, I found myself cycling though all of the modes and using them for their respective needs. Normal worked very well in the city and in the suburbs. Eco did great on the freeway and the long rural roads of Northern Michigan. Sport and Sport+ were left to the curvy roads as the engine could be worked.

    The GS 350 F-Sport comes with Adaptable Variable Suspension (AVS). The suspension can be adjusted by a driver via the Drive Mode Selector to either be stiff or soft. The same is true for the steering as it can be adjusted to provide a heavier feel. Do they work? In short, yes.

    Flicking the Drive Mode Selector into Sport and Sport+ transforms the GS into something of a road demon. Moving along on one of the test roads I use, the GS felt much more agile than I was expecting. Body lean was kept to a minimum. Steering was excellent with good feel and weight when it was being pushed.

    Switching back into Normal and Eco mode, the GS 350 F-Sport becomes a very sensible luxury sedan. The suspension softens up and provides a very smooth ride. Sound deadening is excellent with wind and road noise kept to a minimum.


    Fuel Economy for the GS 350 F-Sport is rated at 19 City/28 Highway/23 Combined. During the week, I got an average of 26 MPG.

    Going back to beginning of this review, I was wondering if I could stand behind the verdict I gave to GS 350 F-Sport when I briefly drove it last year. The answer is a resounding yes. I don't how Lexus was able to pull this off, but somehow it has created a midsize luxury sedan that is very much fun to drive and provides many luxuries for its occupants.

    The GS 350 F-Sport should make everyone in midsize luxury sedan class a bit nervous and worried. Especially if Lexus engineers take what they learned from the GS F-Sport and applies it onto a GS-F.


    Disclaimer: Lexus Provided The GS, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas.

    Year: 2013

    Make: Lexus

    Model: GS 350

    Trim: F-Sport

    Engine: 3.5L DOHC 24-valve VVT-i V6

    Driveline: Rear-Wheel Drive, Six-Speed Automatic Transmission

    Horsepower @ RPM: 306 @ 6,200

    Torque @ RPM: 274 @ 3,600

    Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 19/28/23

    Curb Weight: 3,795 lbs

    Location of Manufacture: Tahara, Aichi, Japan

    Base Price: $46,900.00

    As Tested Price: $55,869.00* (Includes $875.00 destination charge)


    F-Sport Package - $5,690.00

    Navigation Package - $1,735.00

    Blind Spot Monitor System - $500.00

    Trunk Mat - $105.00

    Cargo Net - $64.00

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.comor you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    excellent article again!

    this car deserves props and Lexus is improving a lot. But I can't help but think I would pick the new CTS over this car 99 times out of 100, even as good as it may be.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Toyota Camry of Mid-Size Luxury Cars..... It has everything it needs to have on paper, but fails to excite me in any way.

    At $55k, I would pick any of the Germans, the 2014 CTS or even XTS, the Infiniti Q70 (M45), the Jaguar XF 3.0 AWD.... or if I was feeling particularly American that day, the 300C John Varvatos and still have change in my pocket for another classic Oldsmobile.

    The only cars I can think of that the GS would beat on my "buy" list would be the Genesis, MKS and the RLX.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    WOW, this was a great write up but the car leaves me dead on arrival. Just a rebadge of the Toyota and non inspiring. So many other auto's that are far more inspiring than this is.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Toyota Camry of Mid-Size Luxury Cars..... It has everything it needs to have on paper, but fails to excite me in any way.

    At $55k, I would pick any of the Germans, the 2014 CTS or even XTS, the Infiniti Q70 (M45), the Jaguar XF 3.0 AWD.... or if I was feeling particularly American that day, the 300C John Varvatos and still have change in my pocket for another classic Oldsmobile.

    The only cars I can think of that the GS would beat on my "buy" list would be the Genesis, MKS and the RLX.

    I would be with you before I drove the GS. But after driving it, I would be my top pick. The XTS is too soft (although I do love it), Q70 is getting up there age, XF gets pricy (though that would be my alternate), 5-Series has gotten dull, E-Class has gotten ugly, and the A6 looks like a stretched A4.

    300 and Genesis are in a different category for me. Also, I need to get my hands on a CTS for review (still not sold on the styling though).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • @smk4565 @surreal1272 @oldshurst442 Let's not forgot an important point, Mercedes has AMG! AMG SUVs, AMG cars, AMG Performance! SMK you like to point out that they have performance on every model and lead the world in performance. We do not know for sure if GM will do a Virtual Direct sell of a Corvette family which is not covered by state dealerships or more likely keep it at the Chevrolet dealership level. What we do know is that Chevrolet has had varied success with their performance SS lineup.  From a business standpoint, it makes sense to have Chevrolet have a complete lineup of trucks, SUVs, CUVs, cars from base entry level to platinum or High Country and various LT/LTZ levels in between. RST is the current performance level for their full-size SUV/Trucks. This would be no different than Mercedes is doing with cars and SUVs, they have only failed to figure out a lineup of trucks. Now, Corvette is a well-known history of Performance at a common man's affordable price based on each person's viewpoint. Corvette has performance head-to-head with the Italian supercars, German Supercars, etc. without the crazy 300,000 dollar price and above. What is wrong with making it clear that Corvette is Chevrolet's Top Performance level of autos! Corvette EV (2 door Ultimate Sports Car) Corvette EV Sedan (4 door Ultimate Sports Car) Corvette EV SUV (2 and 4 door Ultimate Sports SUV) Corvette EV Truck (4 door Ultimate Sports Truck) This is a 4-product family or 5 depending on the doors of the top performance performing auto in Cheverolet. The Corvette EV family would not have any low-level versions that would be in price point with Chevrolet badged autos.  How is this any different than what Mercedes has done across the entire product portfolio! I call it what I see it as, FEAR!!! @smk4565 You fear your beloved brand will lose out even more when folks see a performance family of autos that outperform German Performance autos at a much lower price point. Everyone knows I love Performance but due to my size, a traditional 2 door corvette sports car is DOA for me. Give me a Corvette 4 door EV SUV and Truck that would be the top end of Performance for GM and I am there to buy! END OF LINE
    • Now...to the Corvette http://www.superiorglassworks.com/v/vspfiles/assets/images/side-by-side%20web%20size.jpg   The Corvette, BEFORE it was dreamt up to be a mid-engined affair, and THAT was in 1959...  It was also dreamt up to be a snazzy people haulin' station wagon.  And THAT was in 1954.  Corvette ultimately did not spawn that trim, it did however, have factory backed hatched to emulate station wagon-ess. http://www.stingray.nu/aften/16.jpg   People obviously have spent money converting their Corvettes this way.   So...again, while YOU dont think so, many others do and while GM is in the business of making money,  and IF GM succeeds in engineering PROPER Corvette models into a Corvette brand making sure these other models fit in a Corvette kinda way, there is really nothing to add here. Not form me, not from you.  Corvette is what makes it Corvette. And THAT is up to the engineering team alongside the marketing team.   And THAT all there is to it!  Good Bye.  
    • And more talking out of your ass... Are you sure that a 911 is NOT an SUV? I WILL prove it wrong to you.... Much like the General purpose "Jeep" we like to talk about, the 911 has strange beginnings and endings. The 911 started out as a VW Beetle.  Hilter's and Nazi Germany's people's car.   Hence the name Volkswagen.  Porsche, the dude, designed the Beetle.  It had a different name when it was Nazi's people's car. But the Beetle was ALSO a troop carrier. It wasnt a 4x4 machine like the Jeep was, but it WAS an offroader troop carrier for the Geramn Army. Oh...it also floated   Why all this? Because the 911 was ultimately a Beetle.  After the war, Porsche for reasons, and for a long story short, the 911 was born from a troop carrrying off roaded military vehicle that was designed to also be used on the water, people's car.   The Jeep was truly a SUV while the Beetle had to be massaged into one, but it WAS sold to civilians AS a SUV. But THIS is where it gets interesting as a 911.  Forget about VW dune buggies, Porsche 911s raced in the dunes   But most phoqued up thing is that Porsche...just released, by their OWN engineering a 911 offroader...   And THAT is as close to a 911 SUV that we have.  So when you say that 911 is NOT an SUV...well,  STOP talking out of your ass... A 911 is many a thing, and it was ALWAYS a SUV deep down inside.  Complete with 4x4.  Unlike the Kubelwagen/VW Thing before it.    
    • What double standard? The Escalade did NOT need a high performance version up until THIS year. The Escalade got one, THIS year.   So you mention Escalade as a sports car and not as a high performance model. You threw in a Tahoe for good measure. I gotcha I gotcha.  Problem is, Chevrolet tried the truck as a car based truck and as a muscle car and several times with several different body sizes across 5 decades.   With various degrees of success in each decade. With the last one actually replacing a legit sports car.  The SSR tried to replace the Camaro.  And in Australia, when the Camaro came back with the Zeta platform along with its platform mate the Pontiac G8, in Australia, the Maloo was born.  A true sports car as the Zeta platform sedan was a great sports sedan that the final version of it, the Chevy SS that we got here, is considered by MANY Eurosnobs to be the REAL spiritual successor to the E39 BMW M5.  Eurosnobs of all people think that... And some Australians even swapped the front end for a Camaro nose... Chevrolet done this Tahoe sports car you say plenty of times...  So...yet again, you just talk out of your ass... And...more talking out of your ass The phoque are you talking about? Jeep was a fast way condensed made up word that WW2 American G.I.s used to call their troop carrier. It was a general purpose vehicle affectionectly known as JEEP.  General purpose became Jeep.   Which became a phoquing brand. Which begat station wagons Which branched out to    But...this also And had AMC NOT gone bankrupt, a legit JEEP platform mate to that Eagle would have been sold side by side in that time frame. But ultimatley, it DID lead to this eventually.  and this but was ALWAYS there, though.  BUT became a BRAND    But... it DID start out ONLY as a MILITARY troop transport and support vehicle.  General purpose was its name.  and AFTER the war was sold to civilian farmers http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/aaa527894a8a41c93d8ce192d1488018c3d414d7/r=500x326/local/-/media/2018/06/03/YorkDailyRecord/wp-PPYR-Yorkspast-8806-FarmJeepB.jpg?width=660&disable=upscale&format=pjpg&auto=webp     You dont get it...  But I showed you with the Jeep.  It dont matter if YOU dont like it.    It only matters if OTHERS, MANY others like it.  And with the Mustang, PLENTY of others LOVE it. To the tune of 50 000 untis per year sold.   And with the Mustang, the Mach-E is NOT just an SUV, its an ELECTRIC SUV.   And a very EXPENSIVE EV at that. Starting price of 47 thousand US dollars.  A FAR cry from the secretary straight line 6,  two door coupe based on an econobox Falcon waaaaaaaaaaay back in Nineteen Sixty Four (and a half).      
    • And I showed you, using actual history here, that your Escalade reference was dumb in comparison. You remark about the Mach-E but clearly it has not hurt the Mustang brand at all, which is NOW your main issue with the Vette name. The Mustang is still a top seller in its class and they keep upgrading it with every passing year. Clearly adding the Mach-E Mustang to its stable has done ZERO to hurt it. Thank you for providing a real world example, although I don't think you meant for it to be used against you lol. All you have shown here is that it is your "opinion" that they are not right and that you don't like them. None of that suggests failure of the brands in question whatsoever.    And I am sorry but you, of ALL people, don't get to talk about names and brand equity. If GM doesn't use a name for a car, it is wrong to you. If they over use a name, it is wrong to you. Sorry, but you do not get to have it both ways here. Just skip the fact that these types of "stipulations" of yours have NEVER been extended to your favorite brand. Again, you really want to bring up double standards here?
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search