Sign in to follow this  
chevelle454

1988 Trans am GTA Notchback

10 posts in this topic

Yeah, very rare.

The weird part is that aftermarket versions were everywhere back then - never quite understood that.

The after market notchback was a much LE$$ expensive way

to replace the hatchback if the glass was broken due to

stupidity, vandalism, minor accident etc. Also, a buddy of mine

had the 80% fiberglass & 20% glass "notchback" rear to save

weight since it shaved quite a few Lbs. & few ticks at the

dragway ver the heavY!!! glass.

My '83 Firebird T-top had blown struts back there and I can tell

you that damn gigantic glass weighed AT LEAST 40Lbs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mustang84    12

If they had just made a trunk on it rather than having the whole rear open like a hatchback, I think it would have looked better and maybe been more accepted. Not really my cup of tea.

hectornov99pic1_210.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Camino LS6    866
If they had just made a trunk on it rather than having the whole rear open like a hatchback, I think it would have looked better and maybe been more accepted. Not really my cup of tea.

hectornov99pic1_210.jpg

:yes:

100%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
caddycruiser    50

I've never been a big fan of that gen of Camaros/Firebirds...but I like that, I really like that 8)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
balthazar    1,732

My buddy is looking at picking one up. These aren't a 1-yr only option, are they ??

I always liked the notch because it was a refreshing change from the huge RR glass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Camino LS6    866
My buddy is looking at picking one up. These aren't a 1-yr only option, are they ??

I always liked the notch because it was a refreshing change from the huge RR glass.

IIRC, two years.

I always thought this notch looked clunky and awkward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ocnblu    719
I never cared for a coupe, that, when viewed in profile, the rear wheel arch is noticeably further back than the greenhouse. A lot of the downsized "formal roof" GM coupes committed that sin. I dunno, it gives an El Camino vibe in a bad way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this