Sign in to follow this  
William Maley

Chevrolet News:Rumorpile: What Will Corvette Stingray Z06 Produce Power Wise?

8 posts in this topic

By William Maley

Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

February 19, 2013

With the introduction of the new Corvette Stingray, everyone is wondering what will be in store for the Z06 and ZR1. Motor Trend has some early indications of what to expect.

The Z06 will stick naturally aspirated 7.0L engine with the power output possibly reaching 600 horsepower. The power output for Z06 will not be made till they get the final power output for the ZR1. If the ZR1 produces 700 HP, then the Z06 will have 600 HP. If the ZR1 produces somewhat less than 700 HP, expect the Z06 to be somewhere in the mid 500s.

The ZR1 will use a variation of the Stingray's LT1 V8 with a supercharger.

Source: Motor Trend

William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

Click here to view the article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my prediction:-

ZR-1 goes on a hiatus and will not return until 3~4 years into the C7's life cycle. When it does, it gets a supercharged version of the LT1 6.2 -- let's call it an LT9 -- making about 700 bhp.

Z-06 goes on a hiatus until the 2nd model year, returning with a stroked version of the LT1 -- let's call it the LT5 -- displacing 6.8 liters and making about 550 hp naturally aspirated. The reason I believe that it'll be 6.8 liters in particular is because this is what you get from using the LT1 bore with the LS7 stroke. This allows them to not have to redesign the piston or remodel the combustion chamber; shorter rods will allow the chamber geometry to be identical to the LT1 at top-dead-center while increasing compression ratio to 12.7:1 (right about where it needs to be and where it can be tolerated with 91 octane). Getting to 550 hp isn't hard. The displacement increase alone gets you from 450 to about 493 lb-ft, a 1.2 point bump in compression alone is worth about 30~35 lb-ft for a total of about 525. If that torque peaks at about 4800 rpm and with the same fall off as a the LS7 you get about 550 bhp. Bump the torque peak slightly to ~5200 rpm and you actually get closer to 575 bhp. Not bad for an engine that's 485 lbs dressed and wet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem starts to become how do you put all that power to the ground on a rear drive car that isn't very heavy and it still has leaf springs too doesn't it? Unless you have all wheel drive.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dwight, we are assuming all the lt1's "bells and whistles"? maybe not AFM?

The LT1 doesn't really have a lot of bells and whistles. They decided against cam-in-cam independent VVT. They decided against a variable valve lift system (which would have displaced AFM).

So, yes, I expect any of the LT1's derivatives to have DI and synchronous VVT. AFM is a maybe. AFM limits revs because of the mass it adds to the actuated valve train. Eliminating AFM gets you the ability to go maybe 500~600 rpm higher on the redline. But, you don't need that to make 550 or 575 bhp out of 6.8 liters. In fact, if you look at the LS7 (which revs to 7100 rpm) most of the upper rev range doesn't contribute to a faster car -- power peaks at 6300 rpm and falls off quite rapidly after that. Short shifting that engine probably get to better acceleration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This car will be very soon and the ZR1 will not be far behind.

The is also some speaking of a base sub Stingray Corvette that may have a 5.3 in the low 400 HP range. This car would have a fixed roof and not be loaded up. The intent of this car is one to give the club racers and modifiers a cheaper car to base a race car or play car on. The second intent is to attract younger buyers that they sorely lack.

The Corvette is much like Cadillac and needs to attract new and non traditional buyers that will lower the average age of the buyer.

The future lies in the hands of those now buying these cars now.

Also the HP on these cars is expected to be spaced out once the ZR1 is locked in. GM intends to make the 700 HP mark and if so insiders expect the Z06 to fall in the 600 ranger and the ZL1 and CTS V to slot in near 600 HP also.

Getting the power to the ground is not an issues with electronic controls. The present ZR1 engine can do all of GM's Warranty test and emissions test up to 725 now so a DI version should have no problem. The simple fact is there is no need for this much power as few will ever come near to using it all. Even the race cars from Pratt and Miller are not even this high but it sells cars to have large magic numbers. The Vette team wishes the automakers would come to a limit on power and work in other areas to increase performance but they know that is not going to happen.

Edited by hyperv6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my prediction:-

ZR-1 goes on a hiatus and will not return until 3~4 years into the C7's life cycle. When it does, it gets a supercharged version of the LT1 6.2 -- let's call it an LT9 -- making about 700 bhp.

Z-06 goes on a hiatus until the 2nd model year, returning with a stroked version of the LT1 -- let's call it the LT5 -- displacing 6.8 liters and making about 550 hp naturally aspirated. The reason I believe that it'll be 6.8 liters in particular is because this is what you get from using the LT1 bore with the LS7 stroke. This allows them to not have to redesign the piston or remodel the combustion chamber; shorter rods will allow the chamber geometry to be identical to the LT1 at top-dead-center while increasing compression ratio to 12.7:1 (right about where it needs to be and where it can be tolerated with 91 octane). Getting to 550 hp isn't hard. The displacement increase alone gets you from 450 to about 493 lb-ft, a 1.2 point bump in compression alone is worth about 30~35 lb-ft for a total of about 525. If that torque peaks at about 4800 rpm and with the same fall off as a the LS7 you get about 550 bhp. Bump the torque peak slightly to ~5200 rpm and you actually get closer to 575 bhp. Not bad for an engine that's 485 lbs dressed and wet.

Thanks for this very cool insight.

Question for you and everyone else. If the 6.8 can get you 550HP and about 525Lbs of torque, why not use it to supercharge rather than the 6.2? Seems you can get allot more out of this 6.8 than the 6.2 based on what I have been reading?

Second question, what about reliability and long life using 6.8 versus the 6.2?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my prediction:-

ZR-1 goes on a hiatus and will not return until 3~4 years into the C7's life cycle. When it does, it gets a supercharged version of the LT1 6.2 -- let's call it an LT9 -- making about 700 bhp.

Z-06 goes on a hiatus until the 2nd model year, returning with a stroked version of the LT1 -- let's call it the LT5 -- displacing 6.8 liters and making about 550 hp naturally aspirated. The reason I believe that it'll be 6.8 liters in particular is because this is what you get from using the LT1 bore with the LS7 stroke. This allows them to not have to redesign the piston or remodel the combustion chamber; shorter rods will allow the chamber geometry to be identical to the LT1 at top-dead-center while increasing compression ratio to 12.7:1 (right about where it needs to be and where it can be tolerated with 91 octane). Getting to 550 hp isn't hard. The displacement increase alone gets you from 450 to about 493 lb-ft, a 1.2 point bump in compression alone is worth about 30~35 lb-ft for a total of about 525. If that torque peaks at about 4800 rpm and with the same fall off as a the LS7 you get about 550 bhp. Bump the torque peak slightly to ~5200 rpm and you actually get closer to 575 bhp. Not bad for an engine that's 485 lbs dressed and wet.

Thanks for this very cool insight.

Question for you and everyone else. If the 6.8 can get you 550HP and about 525Lbs of torque, why not use it to supercharge rather than the 6.2? Seems you can get allot more out of this 6.8 than the 6.2 based on what I have been reading?

Second question, what about reliability and long life using 6.8 versus the 6.2?

Lengthening the stroke while shortening the rods increases the piston side loads. You can avoid that by raising the deck, but that'll be a new block architecture and basically uneconomical. You can also raise or lower the crank height which creates and offset at TDC and accomplishes the same goal, but again that's a new block design. The 101.6mm stroke is tolerable up to 7100 rpm as shown in the LS7 so I guess that have "proven" that they can get away with it.

Traditionally, they used the 6.2 instead of the 7.0 because of the thicker cylinder walls which are more tolerant of forced induction's extra heat and pressures. With the 6.8 having exactly the same wall thickness (in fact it can be the same exact block) they can supercharge the 6.8 instead of the 6.2. The reason I don't think they will is because of the presumption of a 700 hp target -- there is no need to increase the displacement. Besides, with forced induction -- within reasonable limits -- increasing displacement and running lower boost has the same power result as not increasing displacement, running higher boost with lower compression. With turbocharged engine the latter produces more lag. With superchargers there is zero lag so it really doesn't matter except that higher displacement with higher static compression and lower supercharger pulley ratios is probably slightly more fuel efficient at cruise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      The news isn't getting any better at General Motors' CAMI plant where workers have been on strike for a month after the automaker and Canadian union Unifor were unable to reach an agreement. Already, the strike has caused GM to make adjustments and idle some of their plants in North America, and there are concerns about the shrinking stock of Chevrolet Equinoxes. 
      But now the stakes have been raised. According to Reuters and Automotive News, General Motors issued a warning to leaders at Unifor that it will start winding down production of the Equinox at CAMI unless the strike is called off. Unifor leader Jerry Dias was told by GM officials that the automaker would begin ramping up Equinox production at the San Luis Potosi and Ramos Arizpe, Mexico plants if the strike was not called off.
      "GM just told us today that they are going to ramp up production in Mexico. They have declared war on Canada," Diaz told Reuters.
      GM had no immediate comment on Dias' statement when reached by Reuters.
      According to a source at GM, the discussions between them and Unifor have been going nowhere and there is "a high degree of frustration." Because of this, GM is planning to study how quickly key suppliers for the Equinox could move their operations down to Mexico. No final decision on CAMI's fate has been decided according to the source, but the time frame for getting a deal done is narrowing.
      Mexico has been the dividing point between GM and Unifor. The union objected to GM's decision to lay off 600 workers at CAMI when it moved production of the GMC Terrain to Mexico. Unifor wants CAMI to be the lead plant for Equinox production by "giving it more production if Equinox sales rise and making it the last to scale back production if sales fall." But GM has invested $800 million into the plant for retooling to build the new Equinox. The automaker believes this should be enough commitment and putting it into writing isn't necessary. According to the source, there is no such language in any of the other union contracts.
      The strike has gotten so bad that the Government of Ontario has stepped in, urging both groups to resolve this rift.
      “I feel like we’re engaged in a poker game, but the interests of Ontario are sitting on the table right now,” said Brad Duguid, Ontario's Economic Development Minister.
      “It’s an uncomfortable place to be, obviously, and we’d really like to urge the parties to find a resolution to this as quickly as possible before permanent damage is done.”
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Reuters

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The news isn't getting any better at General Motors' CAMI plant where workers have been on strike for a month after the automaker and Canadian union Unifor were unable to reach an agreement. Already, the strike has caused GM to make adjustments and idle some of their plants in North America, and there are concerns about the shrinking stock of Chevrolet Equinoxes. 
      But now the stakes have been raised. According to Reuters and Automotive News, General Motors issued a warning to leaders at Unifor that it will start winding down production of the Equinox at CAMI unless the strike is called off. Unifor leader Jerry Dias was told by GM officials that the automaker would begin ramping up Equinox production at the San Luis Potosi and Ramos Arizpe, Mexico plants if the strike was not called off.
      "GM just told us today that they are going to ramp up production in Mexico. They have declared war on Canada," Diaz told Reuters.
      GM had no immediate comment on Dias' statement when reached by Reuters.
      According to a source at GM, the discussions between them and Unifor have been going nowhere and there is "a high degree of frustration." Because of this, GM is planning to study how quickly key suppliers for the Equinox could move their operations down to Mexico. No final decision on CAMI's fate has been decided according to the source, but the time frame for getting a deal done is narrowing.
      Mexico has been the dividing point between GM and Unifor. The union objected to GM's decision to lay off 600 workers at CAMI when it moved production of the GMC Terrain to Mexico. Unifor wants CAMI to be the lead plant for Equinox production by "giving it more production if Equinox sales rise and making it the last to scale back production if sales fall." But GM has invested $800 million into the plant for retooling to build the new Equinox. The automaker believes this should be enough commitment and putting it into writing isn't necessary. According to the source, there is no such language in any of the other union contracts.
      The strike has gotten so bad that the Government of Ontario has stepped in, urging both groups to resolve this rift.
      “I feel like we’re engaged in a poker game, but the interests of Ontario are sitting on the table right now,” said Brad Duguid, Ontario's Economic Development Minister.
      “It’s an uncomfortable place to be, obviously, and we’d really like to urge the parties to find a resolution to this as quickly as possible before permanent damage is done.”
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Reuters
    • By William Maley
      We've seen spy shots of the mid-engine Chevrolet Corvette in the snow and at GM's proving grounds. Now, we have a set of spy shots of a mid-engine Corvette at a McDonalds' drive-thru.
      The pictures were captured by a Motor Trend reader in Cadillac, Michigan (northwest of Detroit). The test mule was undergoing some public road testing and it appears there was a current Corvette and what appears to be a Porsche 911. Despite the heavy amount of camouflage, you can make out some Corvette cues such as similar front-end styling as the current model and hood cutout. The double-bubble roof is present as is a set of new wheels that are presumed to be production ones.
      We'll find out what Chevrolet has in store sometime next year.
      Source: Motor Trend
    • By William Maley
      We've seen spy shots of the mid-engine Chevrolet Corvette in the snow and at GM's proving grounds. Now, we have a set of spy shots of a mid-engine Corvette at a McDonalds' drive-thru.
      The pictures were captured by a Motor Trend reader in Cadillac, Michigan (northwest of Detroit). The test mule was undergoing some public road testing and it appears there was a current Corvette and what appears to be a Porsche 911. Despite the heavy amount of camouflage, you can make out some Corvette cues such as similar front-end styling as the current model and hood cutout. The double-bubble roof is present as is a set of new wheels that are presumed to be production ones.
      We'll find out what Chevrolet has in store sometime next year.
      Source: Motor Trend

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Who's Online (See full list)