Leaderboard

Car & Driver rated the id4 an 8/10. Car & Driver rated the Mercedes EQS a 8.5/10. Guess both are "bad cars".

It's 100% vaporware, I wouldn't put much stock in a video like that saying it'll look better than *name any product*.

It just needs reprogramming, imo. There's no reason it should prioritize any 7.2kW charger or why anybody would even want that unless absolutely necessary.

Without ANY sort of corroborating evidence, I shall henceforth deem all software writers to be 'scum of the earth' because of how 'many' complaints about credit card fraud, data breaches, identity theft and private/commercial mayhem that's been caused over 'many' years. Abolish all the software people!! Only let robots write code/programs!! Man the pitchforks & torches!!

^ That's the Turbo Hydramatic 425.

@smk4565-Btw, the best or nothing EQS and EQE have top speeds of 130. Tesla Model 3 goes to 162 and the Model S goes to 171. Which company really has the bigger issue here?

Then you clearly haven’t read any actually reviews. Oh and given that going 99mpg would be illegal in this country, I’d say most folks don’t give two $h!s. Color choices, or lack thereof, do not a bad car make. You can always add different color choices over the next few years. It’s sure a hell of a lot cheaper than having to go back to the design drawing board on a $100K+ Benz disguised as a 2013 VW CC, only with a far worse view over the hood (a common complaint on both the EQS and EQE). Try again.

I'm already done with light-up emblems. Aftermarket is lousy with them, so they're not coming off as anything unique on OEM units.

It is still a great thing to see RJ properly address this and apologize unlike idiot Musk.

Sounds like there needs to be a search setting prioritizing higher wattage chargers.

A big differentiator between hackers and salespeople are one is supposedly working to sell to all people and their sales also benefit quite a few people up the line, hackers are either individuals benefitting only themselves (not profiting) for personal reasons or benefitting a small few who're paying them. I have great doubt any of these hackers are working for any company and if they're paid, it's most certainly under the table.

Looks better than any EV from Benz and it has been well reviewed overall so saying it is a “bad car” is factually wrong and just sour grapes posting since you can’t reasonably defend that polished turd that Benz produced.

Consumers have no idea & don't care what 'platform' is under a vehicle (nor how many other vehicles that same platform may be under). It's an invisible intangible.

I can honestly say that I have worked with a few honest decent salespeople and gone back to them over and over. I have more than often made auto salespeople cry, break down, etc. I set the ground rules, I demand straight forward answers and I do not accept BS approach to buying. Amazing that they are more common in sleaze than a decent honest sales person.

I must have missed the part where a $42k including (destination) compact crossover with 201 hp and 2 wheel drive, weighing 4,568 lbs with a top speed of 99 mph, 4 exterior paint colors and 1 interior color choice is "well reviewed." That sounds like an awful car.

Oh right, I forgot it is the iD4 platform, which is another bad car.