Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

oldshurst442

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,801

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    234

 Content Type 

Everything posted by oldshurst442

  1. oldshurst442
    Sure...and maybe by 2017...a power bump and possibly a mild refresh to keep things current. Id wait until 2017 to buy one...sure I dont get to flaunt Hell at my fingertips...like NOW...but its well worth the wait money wise. "Good things come to those who wait" I believe is the saying. Especially for my pockets... On the other hand...707 HP and 650 ft/lbs torque and driving it NOW is well worth the price of admission...because you own the Hellcat...NOW!!! You dont have to wait 2 years to experience...HELL...What a ride that is I bet!!! If you really wants this car...and you see this video...and there are other videos that are much better than this one...honestly...could you actually wait 2 years to own one? I know if I had the money and space...and the weather to cooperate with me...I wouldnt want to wait 2 years....I WOULD WANT THIS CAR....LIKE...YESTERDAY!!! I know I contradicted myself in this post regarding the timeline of waiting to own this machine...I honesty would be amongst the first to buy the Challenger Hellcat had I had the money and not lived in Montreal...weather and gas prices...so yeah...Id be one of those fools to pay the premium for one...however...Id be a very happy fool...and possibly a dead one...or at the very least...divorced with no legal drivers license from all the speeding tickets and demerit points Id inherit with this car. If I had Jay Leno money with a Jay Leno car garage...Id make myself a spot for a few cars...Id name that spot...Hades Corner...and I would spotlight all the Devil themed cars... Challenger and Charger Hellcat Lamborghini El Diablo 1958 Plymouth Fury....several different vintage Furys actually 1970 Dodge Demon 2009 Corvette ZR-1 (Blue Devil), etc...
  2. oldshurst442
    That is soooooooooo false!!! Not to take away from your post in sympathizing for the loss of Thed's dog, but... 1. Your mom. A mother (usually) will ALWAYS love their children no matter what. A mother's love is not measurable. 2. Your dad. OK...there are some dads...deadbeat dads...but....usually...a dad's love is not measurable. 3. Your children. Your children, no matter what...unless you are a deadbeat dad or deadbeat mom...will ALWAYS look up to you...you...as a parent to your children...are a God to them...your children will ALWAYS love you...your child's love to you is not measurable... So...sure...a pet like a dig or cat or horse....will always love their master...but that is the key word right there...master... Mother's love, Father's love, child's love...unconditional love is the the ultimate...and because you have missed that...I dont know if Im opening up a pandora's box with you...
  3. oldshurst442
    ^^^ Yup...it is odd...that is why I mentioned my oh sooooo great height that I have... Also...if the salesman did his job properly that day, Id be driving a 2012 VW CC R-Line 2.0T as we speak instead of the Acura TL as I was hooked on the car. (The 2013s were on their way in...actually, the CC that I test drove was his last 2012...it was a R-Line...and the 2013s were gonna be shipped later that week or so...) Except the idiot was harping on the fact that I have children and kept pushing the Passat on me...and I did not want the Passat...too stale...I WANTED the CC...I LUSTED after the CC... Its hard for a salesman to "close" me as I KNOW what I want and I rarely get influenced by emotions when I buy a car...actually...I have to LUST over a car in order for me to buy it in the first place so that statement I made is not entirely correct...however, on that particular day I was test driving the CC, if he used his special magical salesman powers on me...he would have had a sale that day....for the CC...not the Passat...because like I said...if he took a notice how my emotions were on the CC, he would have seen a very vulnerably fellow...but alas...my better judgement finally won out and I resisted to buy...because he kept on pushing Passat...Anyway...I left for vacation with my family later that month and when we came back shortly thereafter...I test drove the Buick Regal and the Acura TL....the TL SH-AWD won out...
  4. oldshurst442
    Yup CP... Your post summarizes other reasons why I feel the CC is long in the tooth.
  5. oldshurst442
    Thed: τα συλλυπητήριά μου. Translation. My condolences. Jack is in Greek doggy heaven. Unlike this guy...this guy guards the gates of Hades. His name is Cerberus. I think Hades was the first to put up a sign like this one in front of his home...
  6. oldshurst442
    The CC is a 4 door coupe in the same vein as the M-B CLS is and the Audi A7, on a smaller package. The rear space is tight and if you are a tall person, you will have a hard time getting in the back as the roof line slopes real fast to provide that 4 door coupe silhouette. the first and second year of its production, the back seats were bucket style. In 2012 VW started offering bench seats for the back. And by reading the article...I am to understand that VW has deleted the bucket seat arrangement all together. Mr. William finds the leg room to be sufficient...I on the other hand, when I was looking to buy a VW CC in 2012, I was not satisfied with the leg room. And I am 5'6" tall. I really really LOVED the CC in 2012, I found it to be very well built, with premium levels of quality. I found the CC to be at a Premium car level. I also found the Buick Regal to be equally the same. All positives and negatives are the same between the Regal and CC. I bought a 2012 Acura TL SH-AWD instead. Primarily because the back space is much much more in line as a family car. I find the CC to be a car for the single executive who does not want a BMW 3 Series coupe....or sedan and does not want to compromise with a 1 Series Bimmer either. The CC is/was a very nice alternative. In my opinion, the CC is now long in the tooth. I am awaiting for its replacement. This is what VW proposed not too long ago...and this is the reason why I thing the current CC is long in the tooth
  7. oldshurst442
    1994 or 1995... I gave my dad $5000 and he matched it and we financed and bought together a 1994 Pontiac Grand Am GT 4 door after I totaled my 1989 Firebird and his 1986 Celebrity...why I mention that? Its because I remember liking that Audi A4 in 1994...or it could have been 1995. Whatever. But yeah...
  8. oldshurst442
    Yeah...Im most liking this reversal of weight in vehicles too.
  9. oldshurst442
    http://www.imsa.com/sites/default/files/race_result_files/2015_TUSC_WGI_ProvisionalResults.pdf I believe that is correct. I remember the top three and they are the same as that list so hopefully it is correct. thanx.
  10. oldshurst442
    How did the Corvettes do? Both the Tudor Series Vettes and the C7-R Vettes...
  11. oldshurst442
    Its still a handsome car never-the-less. At least some of the mechanicals were upgraded and improved. It will continue to sell. If it aint broke dont fix it approach to the exterior design has been working out for the A4...since its introduction in 1994...like I said...it is what it is.
  12. oldshurst442
    As far as the new look is concerned. IT IS WHAT IT IS!!!
  13. oldshurst442
    LOL!!! Fix It Again Tony. Sometimes I could be very ditzy.
  14. oldshurst442
    Whose Tony?
  15. oldshurst442
    If Benz did anything in 1885, he copied it from American James Hill, who invented this in Fleetwood PA in 1868 : Ohhhh, so sad! It was late last night when I posted my response to him....but I wanted to include steam powered vehicles...in Europe...horseless carriage steam powered vehicles were being produced about a decade before Karl's invention... Wikipedia has pegged M-B to the first INTERNAL COMBUSTION horseless carriage... So many things he has to learn...
  16. oldshurst442
    Invented...quite a strong word...yeah...it is a misconception though...because many...tinkered with horseless carriages...at the same time as Karl and Gottlieb... And...it took a guy named Olds to mass produce the automobile and a guy like Ford to take that further...to sell to the masses so EVERYBODY could own one...not only the stinkin' rich...and it took the Dodge Brothers along with Durant to envision many good things for the automobile...Then there is Dunbar....oh...that is on this continent... Because on the other side of the pond...their are many French and Italian guys that would beg to differ from your point of view...You mentioned Peugeot...but that is only but a small portion of what th French had to offer.. There is André-Gustave Citroën who introduced the first industrial mass production of vehicles outside the United States.., there is Renault...who you casually mention...but Renault built there first car in 1898...not too long after Karl...but Renault established itself as an automotive company in 1899...as where Mercedes-Benz was established as an automotive company in...1926...same year as...PONTIAC...Even Opel produced its first automobile in 1899... Then there is Mr. Agnelli ... After the war...Europe was in shambles... And if it wasnt for the cold war...Europe would still be in shambles...The United Kingdom and the US...the only 2 Allied countries that did not suffer any real economic damages...had to spruce up Europe...because...well...the Ruskies...had it not been for the Ruskies...Europe...Germany especially...would be WORSE off than Greece is today....this whole Ich bin ein Berliner stufff was just to put the USSR "back into its place"...West Germany was "show cased" ...propaganda....just to show the evil Commies how better the Capitalistic world is...Yes...freedom in East Germany was limited...do you blame the Russians for revenge? I dont...Remember though...West Germany was allowed to continue to produce...as with East Germany... Mr. Gorbachev...take down that wall...yeah...had the US and UK followed in the Russian footsteps...do you honestly believe Mercedes would have produced that 1955 300 SL? I dont think so! You need to learn your history...
  17. oldshurst442
    well...the 2015 Cruze is at 181 inches long, 70.7 inches wide, 58.1 inches high, and rides on a wheelbase of 105.7 inches... If your 2016 results are accurate...then yeah...I would say that the Cruze is almost as big as the Grand Am/Alero were...I was going off of the 1st gen Cruze as I did not know the 2016 Cruze grew that much bigger. So...yeah...I apologize and I agree with your view....but I think the Malibu also grew in size...especially in interior room...
  18. oldshurst442
    Actually...that 3.6 liter V6 WAS a Cadillac engine only....then it became the corporate V6... So...what is your point? I understand you cant wait for Cadillac to do its own engine thing...but you view the 3.6 V6 as a bad thing...but even fail to realize that the 3.6 V6...was a bespoke engine for Cadillac use only...but what difference does that make? Cadillac is under the GM umbrella...Once upon a time ago...all GM divisions produced their own V8s...but that tends to be super expensive... Had the US government...along with Ford, GM and Chrysler allowed Mercedes, BMW, Volkswagen to go by the way of Adolf Hitler after the war was lost...you wouldnt be here cheering for Mercedes...I hope you realize that... Had the US government closed the doors on West Germany....the way they did on East Germany...you wouldnt be here cheering for Mercedes...I hope you realize that. I also hope you realize...the reason why Mercedes climbed back on top of the world, its because the US Government pushed the West German economy to stick it to those Communists that controlled East Germany during the Cold War...I hope you realize that...
  19. oldshurst442
    I almost agree with the rest of that post...I also see too much Japanese...Korean to be more accurate in the Cruze...I dont mind though. I have an issue with what you said regarding the Grand Am/Alero... In no way does a Cruze...1st gen or 2nd gen. reach Grand Am/Alero size, width and length and interior space. . Not even close. The Grand Am/Alero were compacts...sure...but were really closer to mid-sized. The Cruze...while bigger than their compact car competitors...in no way come close to being mid-sized. Maybe the late 1980s Grand Am/Cutlass Calais/Buick Skylark-Somerset on the old N-Platform are what the Cruze is...
  20. oldshurst442
    Because the CT8 is still a phantom that doesn't exist yet, and will probably arrive with a torqueless V6. Just like your over rated world best S series BS MB Garbage! Amazing how you will always move the goalpost and have a million excuses for MB but everyone else especially Cadillac you always have to state will fail. I will be the first one to both admit that I was wrong if your so called predictions come true but also will be the first to point out how your over rated German MB crap has become nothing more than an over rated Chevrolet product line with lower and lower quality as they whore out the MB luxury badge to increase profits for the few executives at the expense of quality. Already shows in most of MB products. I am not moving any goal post or stating the CT8 will fail, no one has seen it or know anything about it, it like 4 years away still. Correct me if Im wrong...but I think Cadillac will also debut new...bespoke engines in that time frame also... So...back to that little word....I think its necessary for you to study it...
  21. oldshurst442
    I never thought of it that way...and I am forced to...see it the way you do as its much much logical your point of view.
  22. oldshurst442
    Because the CT8 is still a phantom that doesn't exist yet, and will probably arrive with a torqueless V6. That makes zero sense in relation to them spending so much time talking about unrelated trucks. You also know nothing about the powertrains for the CT8 but given that most of the competition also have torqueless motors, it makes your post even more irrelevant and trolling in nature. The CT8's main competitor has 516 lb-ft of torque from 2,000 rpm in base model. Cadillac loves turbo fours for some odd reason, and their V6 makes like 273 lb-ft at 5,000 rpm. I hope the CT6's weak motors aren't in the CT8. Maybe they'll make the 400 hp twin turbo V6 the base engine in the CT8. I'd make that the base engine in the CT6 if it were up to me, and get some twin turbo V8s in both those cars. And both should have some sort of plug-in hybrid, even if only to sell in California to appease the bizzaro emission credit regulations there. yet you yourself say that the CT8 is still a phantom that doesnt exist yet, but proceed...with 2 posts...to proclaim what kind of powertrains this phantom CT8 that doesnt exist yet will have as...powertrains... Here is a little word Id like for you to study.
  23. oldshurst442
    Casa...dont forget that the Lincoln interior...looks like my wife's Fusion... Ill post the Titanium Fusion interior...So....although the Fusion interior does look elegant...its ad nauseam when Lincoln just uses the same interior for all of its cars practically...the MKZ also has this same look...to boot...lesser Ford vehicles also look the same as those Lincoln's. The headlight switchgear....it looks the same...it probably is...and I know the MKZ also shares many Fusion parts... Now...I aint the one to whine about parts bin sharing...I dont care for that...those are the arguments that paid off automotive journalists and fanboyz whine about...but in this case...even though that headlight switchgear is perfectly fine for my Fusion...and lets be honest...its perfectly fine for Lincoln to use also...the thing is...I look at that Lincoln...and alls I see is the same damned interior of my wife's $26 000 base 1.6 ecoboost SE Fusion interior...what I dont get with a certain poster...is...when you are a black tea pot...I wonder why you are being racist towards the kettle?
  24. oldshurst442
    You're not the only one thinking it. I also see some 200'ishness in it, but that's no bad thing. Sharp looking vehicle and it appears that it'll be very competitive. I'm excited to see it in person. Before I get down voted...I REALLY REALLY DIG THIS NEW CRUZE....Mind you, I prefer the next gen. Volt's new design...but I like this 2016 Cruze However...I also see a Chrysler 200 in the rear...but I also see Toyota Corolla... Its probably the shade of blue that confuses me... The thing is... I also like the Corolla. I think the Corolla looks sporty. Well...other than an AE86...Corollas ALWAYS were bland...at least this one...has some ooomph to it... Back to the Chevy. I checked out the video...and the Cruze has some great little details to set it apart from the compact car segment. For a second generation in a row...the Cruze looks and feels like a class higher than its compact car competition...both in looks, quality, details....
  25. oldshurst442
    510 horsepower via a twin-turbo, V6 credited to Ferrari and Maserati. RWD @ 510 HP. AWD optional. Diesel option....for Europe only via Maserati. On paper...with its looks and the hardware...it looks like it will be a fine competitor to the Germans...but will people actually buy into this Italian dream? Both here and in Europe???!!! Mopar, if allowed to use this platform...will benefit greatly...as will FCA in general...because our continent is patiently awaiting for the next generation LX cars. And we all know that Chryco engineers do awesome things as of late when they tweak platforms for their usage. And this platform seems to be a great start for some great next generation LX cars... I say this as Mopar people really really excelled with the old M-B W211 platform. Mind you...we dont really know what is underneath this Giulia platform. But that TTV6 Quadrofoglio looks like it means business. I betcha so do the underpinnings...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search