Jump to content
Create New...

surreal1272

Members
  • Posts

    6,608
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by surreal1272

  1. Fallacy argument as the Z06 (as well the last gen. ZR1) are $100K and GM had no problem selling them. A mid engine will not change that.
  2. No. Because the Cadillac fans have a LT4 in the CTSV. Not only that.. The ATS-V is a car in and of itself. For your constant instigating questions I pose this.. f@#kin C63AMG or M3 fans have an issue that the ZL1 will have 200 more Hp than they?But it's in a Chevy not a Cadillac is what he's getting at. Cadillac should be number 1 then Chevy number 2 not vise versa. I also doubt C63 or M4 fans care about anything Chevy because most likely their head is too far up their ass or nose too high in the air to notice. Then you're both missing the point. The ATS-V still has the luxury quotient that the Camaro will never have and a more usable cabin. That is what most Caddy buyers are concerned with and I don't think any of them are complaining about the performance of them unless someone here can show evidence to the contrary. SMK is, yet again, trying to create a negative scenario that only he is concerned about and only brings up because it's not a Benz we are talking about.
  3. The 2015 Z/28 and ZL1 have virtually identical 0-60 and 1/4 miles times and trap speeds (per road and track on both cars) so I'm not sure how a ZL1, which is heavier than the Z btw, would hand the Z it's breakfast anywhere, much less the track. The only real advantage, other than HP, of ZL1 is it much better riding on normal roads and easier to drive but that's about it.
  4. Not picking a side on the comparo argument but what exactly makes one publication an "expert" over another?
  5. Exactly the point of my post and I'm sorry for contributing that narrow BS by doing that. I'm man enough to admit it.
  6. If the numbers are true, then the GT350R may have a short reign as top pony car. It is a comparo I certainly want to see regardless.
  7. GM full size trucks-76,000 Ford F series-64,000 Big yikes! I would still take the Challenger over the other two any day of the week.
  8. Agreed about the Malibu. I have been seeing those everywhere around Phoenix. Wondering why such a bug drop in one month (aside from the fact that Chevy was fire selling them at this time last year). The Camaro is still taking a beating though without a real explanation.
  9. Oh I know where you were going with it. No worries. Anything that gets a little eye candy on here is a bonus as well.
  10. If Bong, Surreal and Mr. Fordcosworth somehow look like this: Then I wont mind any further Mustang versus Camaro pillow fights. Ill let my fantasies run wild. But Sadly...THIS is the reality of these Mustang versus Camaro Pillow Fights... I merely gave the facts. No drama on my part and no skin off my back if some here have a problem with the facts.
  11. Jesus yourself. Pay attention to what is actually being said. This was about cars equipped with MRC and the 2SS is the cheapest one out there with that.
  12. Yes. Tomorrow, tomorrow...Like the ZL1 and 1LE And unlike the SS, the MR will be standard and not an option. On a near $50K car, it damn well better be standard. As it stands, you can get MRC cheaper on a 2SS than you will be able to get on the 2017 GT350. Yes the MR should be standard equipment on 50k + cars like the GT350 and Corvette. Nice to Ford rectify this. Of course Chevy gives it to you for $42K on the 2SS package.
  13. Yes. Tomorrow, tomorrow...Like the ZL1 and 1LE And unlike the SS, the MR will be standard and not an option. On a near $50K car, it damn well better be standard. As it stands, you can get MRC cheaper on a 2SS than you will be able to get on the 2017 GT350.
  14. Saw this and thought "well, at least they got some fresh air and exercise" (sarcasm wholly intended here). http://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/arizona-news/183993920-story
  15. It really needs to rain here already.
  16. Reduce the dependence on fleet/rentals and profits will pick up. Again, these are the exact same things that some stockholders here criticized GM for just a few years ago. They may forget that fact but it doesn't change it from being a fact. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, they have convenient excuses that they sure as hell did not offer GM during those years.
  17. Well these were the same group of folks who derided GM for doing the exact same thing just a few years ago. The silence, now that the tables have turned, will be deafening.
  18. Definitely not good for their stockholders.
  19. I have had this song stuck in my head for the last few days now. Henry Rollins 2016! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=awY1MRlMKMc
  20. Spot the Pokemon Go user.
  21. Didn't know you lived in that county (since you want to make an obvious insult). It's not always about you... My aunt, uncle and 2 cousins live in Coronado. So you're telling your cousins about those job openings at the fair? I guess they are posters here as well, hence you mentioning this here? Just curious. I used to work right up the road from Biltmore, at MoMoney Pawn at 12th and Indian School. Jess will work at it again. Daniel, doubt it, as hes 14yrs old and still in 4H ( probably participate in that aspect though ) And no neither my cousins post here. Not sure why that matters either. Interesting.
  22. Didn't know you lived in that county (since you want to make an obvious insult). It's not always about you... My aunt, uncle and 2 cousins live in Coronado. So you're telling your cousins about those job openings at the fair? I guess they are posters here as well, hence you mentioning this here? Just curious. I used to work right up the road from Biltmore, at MoMoney Pawn at 12th and Indian School.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search