I think you need to find out how Airbus is funded. It may be lassiez faire but it's the European version of lassiez faire. We're talking tons of subsidies and loans to finance the company. After all, a number of countries started Airbus, it wasn't started by a group of entrepreneurs. I'm sure Boeing gets some government help, too, especially in the face of Airbus receiving it.
Airbus' "superior" product is not that superior. The Boeing 777 costs less to run and is much more preferred among long-haul travellers than its Airbus counterpart. The new Boeing 787 really caught Airbus off-guard with its combination of specs (long range, high capacity, 20% less fuel) and the technology used to produce it. It's the fastest selling jet in history and allowed Boeing to gain more orders than Airbus in 2005 (over 1,000). Airbus is dumping so much money into the overweight and logistical nightmare A380 that it had to slap some new wings and tail on an existing airframe in order to compete. The Boeing 737 is the world's best selling jet and is preferred over its Airbus competitor by all but European airlines.
The business model of both companies couldn't be any more different. Airbus believes people want to fly from major city to major city (hub and spoke system, layovers) with hundreds of other people on the same plane, dealing with the requisite baggage and embarking/disembarking headaches that accompany large aircraft like the A380. Boeing thinks people want to fly from their departure point directly to their destination without layovers on a midsize plane. Ask any industry rep and they'll tell you the hub and spoke system used by the major airlines since the start of jet travel is quickly falling out of favor due to traveller preference and airport congestion.
Not to write a book on the subject, just to explain. I just think it's kind of weird that you support foreign aircraft manufacturers but not foreign car manufacturers, especially since Boeing and Airbus' parent company EADS do more than just make commercial aircraft.