Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    56,302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    567

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. Buick was a luxury brand. Pontiac still sold lots of I6es (except in '55-'60 where the base engines were relatively small V8s) Olds was maybe entry lux until '61 when they went down market and began offering a 3.5liter V8 My point being... very few of the cars sold were SS, 442, or GTOs.
  2. I'm not sure GM has fear in this segment. They were just caught a bit short by the bankruptcy. I see no problem waiting till the next redesign in 2013 for the Cruze hatch
  3. I agree on all counts Olds But I think the article is a skewed bit of propaganda to make people feel good about either choosing a 4 pot or being forced into the lesser engines by the manufacturers Chevy,Hyundia... all for the CAFE standards. Not being a V8 only guy but loved a certain flat six, turbo Ecotec, 3800 3500 & 3900's I like what I like even I3's. No one is being forced into anything. If you want 300hp+, it's out there... in a family cars even. General consumers are choosing the 4-cylinder of their own volition... and finding that it suits their needs. I think there is a bit of distorted nostalgia going on in here. In the 60's most cars weren't Impala SSes. The biggest sellers were typically the I-6es and small V8s.
  4. I'm looking forward to more electric propulsion across the board. I like my acceleration silent and instant.
  5. but I thought your mom was at Kinkos running off PFLAG fliers within minutes of you coming out......
  6. they are shortening model cycles, that's probably why they're not bothering with the hatch until the next release.
  7. What?! Two-Door Trooper II w/o any signs of rust Sorry, that was supposed to say "old style Benz grill insert"
  8. The SRX out powers both the Mercedes and BMW.... how is it limited?
  9. A new Lucerne with an old style Benz insert..... oookaaay.....
  10. Not necessarily true, otherwise we'd be using turbines. However, the testers felt the power came on too unnaturally... and the project ended. To expand on what JB said... it's the size of the boat AND the motion of the ocean.
  11. and why not? 25 years ago, V8s were the norm and they typically put out between 160hp to 240hp. 10 years ago the typical Family V6 sedan could come with horsepower somewhere in the range of 160hp to 240hp. Fast forward to 2011 and most 4 cylinders (some with turbo) are capable of .... 160hp to 240hp... with some going higher than that even. V6es have moved into the 260hp to 360hp range.... any V6 with less than 260hp gets laughed at. People buy what they need and can afford.... and the 160hp - 240hp appears to be the range that satisfies most drivers.
  12. 2012 Cadillac SRX gains the LFX July 26th, 2011 Drew Dowdell - CheersandGears.com For 2012 Cadillac is dumping the smooth but overwhelmed 3.0 liter V6 and replacing it with the new LFX 308 horsepower V6 giving it a jump of 43 horsepower over the 2011 model. While the 308 horsepower is a good marketing bump, where consumers will feel the biggest change is in the torque rating. The outgoing 3.0 V6 produced just 223 lb-ft of torque at a lofty 5,100rpm. This meant that the driver would have to keep the engine rev higher even just for regular city driving. Indeed, the lack of torque was noted in our earlier review of the 2011 Cadillac SRX 3.0 and 2.8 Turbo. Cadillac remedies this deficiency by increasing torque output to 265 lb-ft and making that torque peak available at just 2,400 rpm. In city driving, this should make the SRX feel substantially faster than the 3.0 model. In fact, this new torque rating pushes the SRX above the base engines of the BMW X3, Lexus RX350, Audi Q5 and Mercedes Benz GLK. The only luxury crossovers on the radar that offer more torque (Lincoln MKX and Acura MDX) make you rev the engine much higher to get it. Along with the new engine, Cadillac is including a revised 6-speed automatic transmission with an Eco mode that lowers the rpm for each shift point, there by increasing fuel efficiency. With all of this increased power, fuel economy does get dinged by 1mpg in each rating to 17/24 cty/hwy for the front wheel drive model and 16/23 cty/hwy for the all wheel drive one. However, my guess is that with the availability of more torque at lower rpm, achiving those numbers will be more realistic.... something that couldn't be said for last year's model. Cadillac claims that 71% of SRX buyers come from other brands. This has helped the SRX to take number 2 spot in the entry luxury crossover segment. With the above changes plus some other baubles and bright work, Cadillac is clear that they are not standing still.
  13. Well... technically... the Intrigue had a wider track than the GP.... so the Olds was the better car.
  14. The reality is this "glorified golfcart" can walk away from an Audi R8 like it's standing still. Electric motors have a distinct performance advantage over gasoline engines. Electric motors have 100% of maximum torque at ZERO rpm. Some of the fastest objects on land use electric motors for propulsion. The Volt was never intended to be a performance car, however it's performance is quite respectable for what it is.
  15. I don't really see the "hyundai" interior in the new Malibu. I felt much higher quality than the Sonata when I checked it out in NY.
  16. My most frequent issue is with people who tailgate. Typically a large SUV with the driver yapping on a cell phone. I am pretty good about keeping to the speed limit.... but I also frequently feel the need to check my brakes... you know.. just in case. More than once I've seen the person drop the cell phone to grab the wheel with both hands. Then my sun roof opens and the finger goes up and out.
  17. I agree with your assessment, however, you keep suggesting cars that are 1.) way over the size limit. and 2.) some of the biggest maintenance nightmares around. I sat in the Kazashi today.... it is a serious contender.
  18. If the engine is as mechanically sound as he claims it is, there is nothing wrong with a fully operational 8-6-4
  19. Twas the Fiesta. The CR-V is fixed (mostly) for now.
  20. 2013 Chevrolet Sonic
  21. When I'm heading your direction, I usually find someone with NJ plates going at a high rate of speed and fall in behind them. I've done this before with a new (at the time) Corvette and I followed in my CTS from Pittsburgh to Lancaster at triple digit speeds. The oddest convoy I ever got into was also partially my doing. S-type - C-Class - with me in the FrankenWagen following close behind. Then there was also the day I brought my Toronado home. It doesn't get much more "birds of a feather" than this:
  22. I will be there both days. My car isn't really show worthy, but since I'm going both days, and parking is a $10 "donation" I figure I'd just register it for $25 and then be right on the show field rather than having to take the parking shuttle. I'll look for you on Sunday.
  23. We've been looking at the Equinox and he does really like it, but to buy one new... well, Chevy rightfully isn't discounting at the moment. Heated seats + AWD is typically over $25k. If I could find a Vue Green-Line, that would probably be ideal if they come in AWD. The Cruze diesel announcement put a kink in things. I may try to pursued him to keep the CR-V as a backup vehicle (since it is nearly paid off) and use the Cruze diesel as his daily driver. The CR-V would still be around for winter driving and I could get a set of snow tires for the oil burner since I'm not afraid of driving in snow without AWD.
  24. Start thinking back to Compass/Impreza sized. SRX will be a tough sell for size as it is. There's no way he'll go for an LX car. C-class 4matics?
  25. Cool. You making any money off it yet?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search