Dsuupr

Having collected brochures for the past 15 years from all the manufactures, I've noticed such issues every year. All the manufactures make such mistakes. The odd part is that GM, and other manufactures, don't always do a corrected version.

A V-8 product doesn't fit honda's image. I think they're smart to stick where they're at.

I'm not liking the new Subaru front ends much these days (heck I think their SUV is in the same league of ugliness as an Aztek).

So Daimler is hellbent on ruining the Jeep name? I guess they figure since Hummer is taking over the true off-roading why even try.

Looks alot like a scion type vehicle.

Teamsters treat my wife well, so I can't complain much.

I'm sure there is a GM employee getting a ticket a couple times a week.

GM is better of being bashed for a slow intro than poor quality. Good job GM about putting quality ahead of $$.

Sounds good to me. At this time I believe the Union is in the right, especially with Daimlerchrysler.

That is one car that's can't have a bad picture.

The Metro got the gas mileage that the Aveo is lacking. If they could redo a Metro / Sprint vehicle with updated quality and the gas mileage of the old generation cars I think it could be a big hit.

Who cares if it maxes out at 200 hp, especially with the terribly thin rpm range one would have to deal with to get the power. With most GM products, including the Cobalt, the HP & Torque are achieved via a broad power band. Another words it holds the upper horsepower / torque for a 3000 to 4000 rpm range, instead of a short 500 rpm range.

This explains the NW well.

Wow that's ugly.

If they are selling them for near sticker without rebates in todays market, then they've done well. With the ads just starting I do think it will pick up even in heavy "Asian" markets.

Part of the fun, probably for the guys at GM too, is keeping us guessing. Why couldn't it have been a Camaro mule?

It's about time GM started using the same radios around the world. The interior is much improved. When will GM start to introduce global platforms at the same time. If Korea gets it next year, why can't the US?

Please, please GM leave the beautiful interior alone. Please go back to being the trend setter.

Funny u say that, as I was the one that wanted a more top of the line model for those features, my wife didn't.

I couldn't agree with you more. It stands our more than any other car in it's class.

I think a V12 product is needed for Cadillac. I also understand GMs stance on the rebuild. I hope GM doesn't build little cheap cars like Mercedes and BMW. That'll only kill the brand in the long run.

I guess you never heard the story of Roach I (back in the days of the 1st generation of Cheers & Gears). To shorten it, I didn't want it, my wife did. We got a Caprice years ago because she kept banging up my Alero. It lasted 390,000 very beaten on miles at which point in time I forced her into getting rid of it. We bought her a 1999 Intrigue that she never liked so we sold it to a friend and bought Roach II. That was ok until we bought our house - a 50+ mile round trip for her to work and back. At $600 a month in gas the big ugly car had to go. She doesn't want to get rid of it until someone is willing to overpay for it, but is willing to make the Cobalt her daily driver. For the record, I've never "wanted" Roach II or Roach I in the first place. I had always hoped she would get more of a liking for minivan or something more parental like.

I noticed my post count from yesterday to today is the same.

185,000 miles 1st owner Portland Police 2nd owner Yamhill County Police 3rd owner us All records kept with county & city prior to us We've done oil changes & a/c - as typical B-body that's it LT1 My right foot can't be light on that car. I would be scared of hurting it by being to gentle. They're not made for it. I'm the one that wants to dump it, not here. I've never been a fan of the useless gas hogging style of the B-body sedan.

If they forgot Buick then they aren't on track 100%.