Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Rumorpile: Citroën’s DS Brand Is More Likely Coming To The U.S.

      The DS family from Citroën Is More Likely Coming to the U.S.

    Last October, we reported that PSA/Peugeot-Citroën was considering a return to the U.S.

     

    “We want to make DS a global premium brand, and you cannot be global without the U.S.,” said DS CEO Yves Bonnefont.

     

    Now a final decision as to whether or not the DS brand would come to the U.S. isn't expected till 2017 at the earliest. But Car and Driver reports that Citroën is leaning towards yes.

     

    Speaking with sources at the french automaker, Car and Driver reports that a move into the U.S. market is “necessary” and that it might take place within the next few years.

     

    But Citroën faces some huge hurdles if they decide to go forward with the DS brand. The French automaker hasn't had a presence in the U.S. since the mid-seventies and most people don't know the importance of the DS name. The original DS introduced in the fifties sent shockwaves in the automotive world. The model set new standards in aerodynamics and comfort. Citroen would produce the DS for twenty years, making it one of the most important models in automotive history.

     

    Source: Car and Driver

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    Yawnnnnnnnnn,

     

    To some this will be exciting, but after having been in these cars, they are small, tight, ok quality and very ugly. For Citroen to return to the US, they are going to have some huge hurdles to get over and they are going to have to really study the market. I see the DS as a Buick / Acura competitor than a true luxury competitor and the story is right, DS means NOTHING to the US and the tech crowd. The young new money will see nothing in this brand I believe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    well, it's European so its automatically good/better, right?  Just like Japan.

     

    No, but the Citroens seem better put together than the Fiats do.  They're probably on par with initial build quality to VW (I don't know enough about long term reliability). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    regfootball

    i've always liked Peuguot, Citroen, and some Renaults.

     

    I was being sort of facetious on the because they are from Europe thing, but what i was getting at ultimately was that so many buyers these days think if the car is German for example, that it is some sort of superior being from another planet (even though MErcs and Bimmers are cheap ass taxis in Europe).  And there is always the exotic fashion aspect of a car that's not MUHRICAN.  Euro clothes, euro car, etc.

     

    I think Citroen is trying to bandwagon onto that, regardless of whether the car is any good or not. They probably thing there is some built in market equity they can siphon off of the BMW's of the world.  Much like a lot of people think any Japanese mfr makes a great car, because Honda does and they are Japanese.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ocnblu

    I do like the Citroens, they are very confident in their weirdness.  However, the new Alfa-Romeo Guilia is a complete knockout if it proves at least as reliable as a 3-Series (which is to say, not very, but the drive experience might be enough to redeem it.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    El Kabong

    There are two problems with this scenario:

    -the cars are not French enough to distinguish themselves as French,

    -if the cars were obviously French, they would not appeal to North American tastes enough to sell (except possibly for Quebec).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    oldshurst442

    There are two problems with this scenario:

    -the cars are not French enough to distinguish themselves as French,

    -if the cars were obviously French, they would not appeal to North American tastes enough to sell (except possibly for Quebec).

    On no...even Quebecois dont like French cars...

     

    Sure...there are some...sorta like those Richard Hammond types that buy them V8 Mustangs over in England...but they definitely  dont smoke Gauloise if that is what  you mean...

     

    They might drink Stella Artois from time to time...but make no mistake about it...Molson is the way they swing if you know what I mean...I find that Quebecois...are mostly attached to Mazdas and Kias as of late...and for the classics...I think they have an affinity for Mopar Muscle...but definitely no French Cars...

     

     

    Albeit I do remember seeing many Renault 5s..or Le Car for you Yanks...back in the day...and the original DS...but that was then...

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×



  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • oldshurst442
      Beautiful Cars Appreciation Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

    • oldshurst442
      Beautiful! Recent! ... didn't happen

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

    • oldshurst442
      Beautiful Cars Appreciation Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      It's amazing how a leather wrapped steering wheel changes the experience at the wheel for the better (it seems to make for an almost different car from the model with a urethane steering wheel).
    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Another thing to think on is the evidence bullet proof? Sadly, the same type of people who have said an eye for an eye, death penalty if you took a life have convicted others with hate in their heart only to have science prove the convicted innocent.  In this regards I wish all guns had palm / finger tip readers to confirm who last fired the gun. While others might say the death penalty is cruel, how is it when the person if proved beyond a reasonable doubt took a life? What about serial killers who are sitting for life, a burden on society in jail because folks feel there should be no death penalty and yet they took multiple lives themselves. Would it not be better for society if that person was no longer around, a burden on the tax payers? Many good questions to be asked. Lets take this a step further, auto makers who due to a focus on profits take shortcuts on safety of an auto, who should be held accountable for the deaths related to their products and how do you hold them accountable? An example of profit before safety, FORD PINTO Details of the Pinto's flawed fuel system: Location and construction: The sheet-metal gas tank was placed behind the rear axle, a design common at the time, but the Pinto's tank was made with exceptionally thin walls. It was held in place by two metal straps. Vulnerable parts: During rear-end impacts, bolts protruding from the differential housing could puncture the thin-walled tank. Additionally, the fuel-filler neck could tear away from the tank itself. Internal cost analysis: Internal Ford documents revealed that engineers were aware of the risks in pre-production crash tests and considered inexpensive fixes, including adding a rubber bladder to the tank. Alternative designs rejected: Engineers considered safer alternative designs, such as placing the tank above the axle (a design used on the Ford Capri), but this was rejected due to cost and styling constraints. Final design choice: Executives opted not to make these changes after a cost-benefit analysis concluded it would be cheaper to pay out potential lawsuits and settlements than to implement the repairs.  So who do you hold accountable for the deaths?

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search