Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Mustang with Extra Ecoboost Coming to NY?

      ...more boost for your bucks...

    Last month we reported that Ford was apparently working on another version of the Mustang with a more powerful Ecoboost 4-cylinder. Well apparently Ford is preparing to show that Mustang at an event during the New York International Auto Show. 

    The new Ecoboost Mustang could possibly wear an SVO badge, going back to the days when one of the hotter Mustangs was also powered by a Turbo-4.

    Ford is looking to fill a gap in the Mustang lineup. Currently, there is a 125 horsepower gap between the current Turbo-4 powered car and the V8 Powered GT.  Chevrolet fills that space with a 335 hp V6 in their Camaro, while Ford's base powerplant offers just 310 hp only when using 93 octane.  Over at the Focus desk, Ford has tuned the same 2.3 liter turbo to 350 hp, so we know the drivetrain can handle the extra boost. 

    We expect, if this SVO does come to pass, some suspension and chassis adjustments to handle the extra power. Possibly even an updated fascia like the original SVO had.  

    We'll find out on April 17th. 

    Related:

     

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    26 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Hmmmm I would certainly hope they beef up the internals so it could handle a ton of hp with a stock block/crank/pistons. 

    Naturally. 

    The suspension would want a little bit of a firm up too. The base model suspension is tuned more for comfort. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Naturally. 

    The suspension would want a little bit of a firm up too. The base model suspension is tuned more for comfort. 

    Not necessarily. It isn't like the 2.3 is currently well known for being able to throw massive power at it now even in its 350hp version. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Not necessarily. It isn't like the 2.3 is currently well known for being able to throw massive power at it now even in its 350hp version. 

    The suspension could use a firm-up either way.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The suspension could use a firm-up either way.

    Yeah, I assume it would get a similar upgrade as the PP or PP2 got, like the 1LE Camaros. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Had a 2.3 Turbo 10-speed automatic 2019 Mustang Premium convertible for a month and 2k miles. Loved it. Month long average of 26+ mpg no matter how I drove it, and perfect crisp, refined, driving dynamics with a powertrain that could be an animal or just civilized cruising.

    Really great setup and drivetrain. After 5k miles in a Challenger Hemi, 2k in a Challenger V6, and combined 2500 miles in (2) different 2017-2018 Camaro 1LT RS V6's, the Mustang is definitely the most polished and on point drive. Out of them, it also had the worst front seats and I could never get comfortable in the cockpit, which was a shame. Combine Challenger interior...with Mustang everything and dynamics...and Camaro looks...and win.

    These dynamics in a new Explorer? Sign me up. I couldn't stand the sound of the 2.3T the first 2 days, then after I got used to it, the level of refinement and power mixed with great mileage from it with the 10-speed was just impressive in every way.

    Edited by caddycruiser
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    CAFE

    Wouldn't an eco boost V6 use less fuel than an N/A V8?

    An Ecoboost V8 shouldn't use that much more gas than a regular V8, even more so if they used a 4 or 4.6 liter V8 instead of a 5 liter.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Wouldn't an eco boost V6 use less fuel than an N/A V8?

    An Ecoboost V8 shouldn't use that much more gas than a regular V8, even more so if they used a 4 or 4.6 liter V8 instead of a 5 liter.

    The V8 isn't going anywhere, Mustang fans won't allow it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Drew Dowdell said:

    The V8 isn't going anywhere, Mustang fans won't allow it. 

    I am not saying get rid of it, I am saying Ecoboost the V8.  Every engine Ford makes now, or almost all of them are turbo, but the V8 isn't.  They should turbo the V8.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I am not saying get rid of it, I am saying Ecoboost the V8.  Every engine Ford makes now, or almost all of them are turbo, but the V8 isn't.  They should turbo the V8.  

    Does a supercharged version count? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well a V8 Mustang is 16/25 mpg, a S560 is 17/27 mpg and a 750i is 18/26.  And 2 of those V8s have an extra 1,000 lbs to pull around.  So I don't think CAFE is a reason to not use a turbo V8.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about a supercharged version?

    The reason why I ask is because Ford just released a supercharged version as you know. You mentioned it. 

    The Mustang has 3 flavours of V8s  in the Mustang.  

    1. Over 700 horsepower on a supercharged 5.2 liter V8 . Possible torque? Maybe Im hoping over 600 ft.lbs because this flavoured Mustang is not only a Chevy Camaro ZL1 competitor for track and hp numbers alike, but Hellcat muscle car competitor as well...and torque is needed for that.

    2. A 520 horsepower 5.2 liter "flat plane crank" V8 for track. Naturally aspirated. The torque might be a little lower on this, but its a high revver. This flavoured Mustang really has no equal because this particualr Mustang is more European flavoured than the other two pony cars. 

    3. 480 horsepower and 420 ft.lbs on a 5.0 liter naturally aspired.   

     

    These are 3 DISTINCT and UNIQUE V8 versions of the Mustang. Unlike the same ole shyte V8s from GM and Dodge offerings but just add a supercharger on the V8 and let the horsepower and torque fly difference on their versions. 

    Mopar and GM go about it differently in distinguishing the "personalities"  of their different versions of the Challenger and Camaro respectively, but the engines in these trims are basically the same "personality, but with a steroid approach to distinguish them.

    Ford's approach to the engine versions are truly different from one another.

    How would a turbo benefit Ford's V8 hierarchy the way it is now? 

    To add it to the Voodoo?  Well, the "flat plane crank" at 5.2 liters the way Ford has done it might have reach its potential and that is why they chose the more conventional American way of doing a V8 with the supercharged 5.2 on the GT500.

    To ecoboost the 5.0?  That would probably increase the horsepower rating beating out the Voodoo. But what benefits that approach?

    The GT350 is special for many reasons. And 520 NATURALLY ASPIRATED horses is but one (of many) of those reasons. (European flavoured is another) 

    I agree, an ecoboosted V8 SHOULD have been made by Ford...but for the Ford GT...

    Ford wanted to toot toot toot the ecoboost banner, maybe an ecoboosted V8 would have been ideal. Maybe not.

    Maybe Ford should have put an ecoboosted 2.7 liter V6 or take the tranverse 3.5 ecoboosted Taurus SHO, make, it  longitude  and sell the  ecoboost V6  moniker BOTH on GT AND the Mustang...and make that engine into a 450 V6 horsepower affair.  In other words, a DETUNED Ford GT motor for the Mustang...

    And had they did that, increase the 5.0 to 480 HP as it is now for 2019 back then 2-3 years ago...

    But I dont see how an ecoboosted V8 would benefit Ford for the Mustang as of now.  If Ford decides to stop producing the GT350, then and only then would I see a need for a turbo V8.

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This is too funny and I HOPE HOPE HOPE Amazon moves forward with this as all the auto's on Amazon for sale will have a TRUMP TARIFF line that shows how much TARIFF tax they will pay. Trump’s ‘Pottery Barn rule’ problem
    • I don’t know if this vehicle, a Toyota Prius Hybrid HEV, represented an upgrade.  It’s just what I was assigned as a mid-size rented vehicle for 3 days.  I had a general idea that this vehicle was recently refreshed and that it looked a lot better.  As I got closer to it and got into it, I was able to get a better look.  The new Prius looks a lot better than I recall a Prius ever looking.  It looks sleek, sporty, and even sort of low-slung.  Interesting exterior features show that they made this a priority.  The front lights and fascia are thin and understated, working well with the more unified exterior.  The rear fascia is definitely Prius’s own and it gives the car some interesting, angled vantage points.  They even incorporated gullwing handles into the sedan’s rear doors and, having once had these in the last rendition of the W-body Buick Regal coupe, I like their look and just plain using them. Its low-slung aspect can present a slight demerit.  The windshield and profile of the front doors is very raked and, as a person of average height, I had to duck a little more than usual to enter the car.  Similarly, the rear backlite borders on almost being horizontal.  This does give the rear storage area a little more usable height. Inside, the front pillars’ rake is mitigated by fixed renditions of what used to be vent windows in older cars.  However, they still seem to block an instinctive sight line compared to more upright vehicles like the current Camry and Corolla.  Inside, the feeling is more cockpit-like.  Similarly, the rear view has the thicker pillars and flatter backlite that require more proactive work – looking over the shoulder attentively and using the amber traffic monitoring warnings in the outside mirrors.  A complementary feature is the chime that assisted lane changes. The Prius has a 4-cylinder engine that seems to spend more time in EV mode than did the hybrid Camry.  That means good fuel economy and, over 3 days, I only added 6 gallons for between 200 and 300 miles of motoring.  In terms of power, handling, and roadability, the Prius gets mixed comments from me.  It does have agility when the pedal is pressed and it moves from eco to power mode.  It also eases upward to higher than anticipated highway speeds if not paying attention!  The transmission is a CVT with a “faux” first gear and it works well.  The Prius has a more noticeable wheezing sound when in reverse gear, which actually advises those inside the car and near it.  However, when pushed, the powertrain gets buzzy, as in noisy.  But at steady speed, any engine noise is not that noticeable.  The vehicle’s handling, smoothness, and quietness vary.  Handling is always nimble and, even at highway speeds, it maneuvers adeptly.  The ride is mostly smooth.  However, noise control could use some improvement.  Some of that can come from the tires they equip the car with, fitted with aluminum wheels that hearken to the ones on Tesla products.  That said, it’s hard to tell if the drone is tire thum or wind.  However, if you prioritize handling among these, I was surprised to see how well the Prius handles … on the highway, on city streets, and even in tight parking spaces, where 3-point attempts are rarely necessary. The cockpit is unusual and very different from yesterday’s Priuses, which I’ve only seen and never driven or been a passenger in one.  I remember how the first model had an oval main instrument pod set up on the cowl in the middle of the dashboard but angled toward the driver.  Today’s Prius has thin and smaller pods, almost set on ledges that seem to staircase down as the cowl approaches the driver.  The main panel looks like a small tablet that is set quite far from the steering wheel.  Depending on how the wheel is titled, there could be some visibility issues seeing all the information.  This required adjusting the wheel and the seating height.  Also, the front seat can be very far from the pedals.  So, while the door is low, taller drivers might like this potential distance.  The infotainment center sits slightly forward of the main instrument screen and is conventionally placed atop the center stack.  Thankfully, it continues with touch operation as opposed to being operated via a remote dial.  Most functions are the ones you’ve known for a while, so setting things up doesn’t take long.  I did struggle a little with the Android Auto, even though the Bluetooth pairing was quick.  Note that, while the Camry has USB-C ports, the Prius does not.  Further down on the center stack, the climate control is easy to work with (not the 3-dial type that so many exports and even domestics have) and the A/C blows colder a little quicker than in the last Camry I drove.  The console deck is about the right height and its overall dimensions, including the box, are generous.  The compactness of the shift lever is sort of fun … think of a small underpowered low-cost EV Corvette! When going into gear, it’s not about moving the selector linearly.  A quick jog to the left and up toward the instrument panel is for reverse while that same quick jog followed by a rearward move puts the vehicle in drive.  It doesn’t take long to get used to this.  Also, the park feature is easy to work with.  Just push in P when stopped and, whether in reserve or drive, the gear selector goes to park.  The only thing is that it is not forgiving when shifting the lever … your foot must be firmly on the brake, so no slipshod maneuvers.  The seating is comfortable and the buckets seem a little high, but this offers support from top to bottom.  The same is true in the rear of the cabin and the headrests do intrude with an already thicker rear sail panel / C-pillar.  Legroom in the rear also seems good and the length of the vehicle allows for that.  Space is sensibly distributed in the 3 volumes from front to back. I always thought a Prius would have something daunting or different about it.  Its look is different in that it lost its first-gen look that looked like an upright Nissan Versa of 2016 … sort of like the runt of the litter that is on the run because it has been kicked in the rump.  This Prius looks planted.  Upon pushing the prominent and easy to use “power” button on the dash, there will be no noise and the dash will literally tell you when it, and you, are “ready” to go. It's a smaller but roomy vehicle where the price isn’t a bargain, but not that steep in today’s terms.  I find there are a few things that I wasn’t crazy about – the height, the main instrument pod sitting in the distance, and not the best noises suppression – but I liked most other things about it.  With so many Priuses going the long haul, this one will probably do the same … and look a lot more presentable while doing it. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING  
    • I'm laughing.   There are always reasons why things are "discounted." With me, it's DFW and Austin that give me heartburn.  San Antonio, too, even though I don't know it as well.  I just don't like the look of the DFW area, whether natural or built.  I don't like Austin for being the governmental engine of a big red place next to a massive university with over 50,000 students that is a big blue place.  I'm more of a moderate and don't want extremes in either element.  I also don't like the "way cool" leanings in Austin. Houston has its negatives, but I'd take it for nearby Galveston, and water in general, the extensive pinewoods, the dark red brick homes, an attractive downtown, and for being America's most ethnically diverse city that has always rolled with that spirit.  There is no "you shouldn't be here" factor.  IIR, I've heard of a saying about Madrid that goes, 'When you're in Madrid, you're from Madrid.'  Having lived in various places, I pay attention to those subleties.
    • Very cool to see This Hyundai Ioniq 5 Owner Managed 413,991 Miles In Under Four Years, With One Big Catch
    • Removing tariffs that idiot47 caused so much pain with for getting nothing in return show how stupid a person can be in not understanding true business and how to negotiate.  A real man with Business sense would have put together a package of tariffs to present to China to address specific areas that are an imbalance not just attack everything and see what falls out. As such, incompetence in not understanding the long road map to building greatness shows how foolish the current administration is and now they are going to sign an exception list for the auto industry. Destroy good trading partners just to cause Chaos! Never a sound business strategy. Trump to Sign Order Later Tuesday Easing Auto Tariff Impact
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search