Jump to content
Create New...
  • đź’¬ Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • Blake Noble
    Blake Noble

    Impala Leaping Out of NASCAR, Unnamed Model Taking Its Place


    G. Noble

    Editor/Reporter

    CheersandGears.com

    March 14, 2012

    Here’s a big chunk of unexpected news for you; the boys over at Chevrolet announced yesterday that the Impala will be bowing out of the grid for the 2013 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series. That’s certainly interesting given that the Impala has earned Chevrolet 79 wins since 2007 after the Monte Carlo went out of production. As Jim Campbell, vice president of Chevrolet Performance Vehicles and Motorsports, said in Chevrolet’s press release yesterday, “The Impala has been a critical part of Chevrolet’s success in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series.”

    That’s only the tip of the iceberg, though. When Chevrolet returns to NASCAR next year it says it “will be racing a vehicle based on a new nameplate to the brand’s lineup.” And like the recently redesigned Ford Fusion and Dodge Charger stock cars, Chevy says the new racecar will “closely resemble the production version.”

    Monte Doran, a Chevrolet spokesperson, also mentioned that the new vehicle would specifically debut at the 2013 Daytona 500 and would be in production sometime during next year.

    Evaluating the news at face value, it means Chevrolet won’t be racing the new Malibu and it certainly isn’t considering entering the Cruze. That means that either the Cadillac XTS-based next-gen Impala, which is set to debut next year, may be renamed or — fingers and toes crossed — the current rear-drive, police duty-only Caprice PPV will be repurposed for civilian buyers.

    Sources: Chevrolet, Motor Trend, The Detroit News

    Hit page 2 for Chevrolet's press release.


    DETROIT – The countdown to the debut of Chevrolet’s next NASCAR Sprint Cup Series racecar is underway. Chevrolet announced today that for the 2013 season, Team Chevy will be racing a vehicle based on a new nameplate to the brand’s lineup.

    Taking advantage of the new NASCAR rules, which allow manufacturers to display more of their brand identity in their racecars, the new Chevrolet racecar will closely resemble the production version. Both cars will be unveiled in the coming year.

    “We are keeping the wraps on the new car for now and will continue to prepare for next season by testing camouflaged vehicles,” said Jim Campbell, vice president, Chevrolet Performance Vehicles and Motorsports. “We know that Chevrolet fans are eager to see the new racecar and we hope that the prospect of being able to own one just like it will make the wait a little more bearable.”

    The current Chevrolet racecar, the Impala, took three out of top five spots at the Las Vegas Motor Speedway on Sunday including the win by Tony Stewart. Since 2007, the Impala has dominated the series, taking the checkered flag 79 times. Chevrolet drivers have also won five NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Manufacturers' Championships, and Jimmie Johnson (4) and Tony Stewart (1) have collected five NASCAR Sprint Cup Series driver's championships in the Impala.

    “The Impala has been a critical part of Chevrolet’s success in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series and we are confident the new racecar will allow us to remain the most successful name in NASCAR Sprint Cup Series history,” Campbell said.

    A legacy of racing competition runs deep in Chevrolet’s 100-year history, dating to co-founder Louis Chevrolet’s passion for racing automobiles. Chevrolet has won the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Manufacturers’ Championship 35 times. Chevrolet Corvette Racing has taken seven class trophies at the 24 Hours of Le Mans. A Chevrolet-branded V-8 racing engine won the Indianapolis 500 seven times between 1988 and 2002.

    As Chevrolet continues to define itself as a 21st Century global automotive leader, motorsports remain integral to the plan. The racing version of the Chevrolet Cruze, which since its 2009 debut has become the bowtie brand’s best-selling car globally, claimed the World Touring Car Championship (WTCC) Cup in 2010 and 2011, and is the first ever General Motors-branded vehicle to win such honors in a FIA-organized series.

    Founded in 1911 in Detroit, Chevrolet is now one of the world's largest car brands, doing business in more than 140 countries and selling more than 4 million cars and trucks a year. Chevrolet provides customers with fuel-efficient vehicles that feature spirited performance, expressive design and high quality. More information on Chevrolet models can be found at www.chevrolet.com

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Interesting to hear about it being based on a new nameplate...I had assumed it would be the '13 Malibu. The '13 Focus and Charger NASCAR prototypes that have been shown look pretty good, a big improvement over the current generic COT bodies...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While I am suprised buy the news of the Impala being replaced in NASCAR I am not supriced by the news of a new RWD Sports Sedan.

    This is the car Al Oppenhiser spoke of a while back and said would arrive in 2013 as a 2014 model.

    Based on past statments from Al and others at GM this is kind of what to expect.

    Zeta based but updated and a little lighter.

    DI V8 as this is why it has not already arrived as Chevy has been waiting for the new engine.

    It will be the short wheel base car.

    It will be more like the G8 GXP and be a V8 performance sedan with no V6 option.

    I have heard all the names like Chevelle, Monte Carlo, Bel Air and others. Al said a while back the name was already chosen and ready to be used. I expect a traditional name and I hope it may be retro but I hope it is a suprise.

    Some in GM have been calling this the 4 Door Camaro so that should give an idea of the performance. Imagine it with the magnetic shock!

    Do not expect a Coupe, Wagon or Ute unless they have really changed their thinking here.

    Also expect the production to be limited. I had heard at one point they only planed around 10,000 and no more than 20,000 units. This could be changed since that was stated a long time ago. Either way I don't see this selling in numbers larger than the G8 if gas remains high.

    Now this is a guess on my part but if they are having issues getting the police package here and the poor exchange rate could this car finally be Canadian? The Camaro line is set up to where they can build more than one car. The only real issue is if the 2015 Camaro is on time where will that one be built? This sedan could take the old Camaro line and keep working too. THe police package also could be moved there.

    As for Nascar this is no more production than the present car. While it will have a few features and decals to make it look closer they all will still be of similar profile and changes will be made to keep the aero numbers close. But they will look a lot better on the track than the present cars.

    I am really shocked GM is going with a more performance like car of lower volume vs the high volume cars like they have been using. This car also may be part of the reason they kept the Camaro out of NASCAR. Just one look at the Nationwide Mustang tells me they made the right choice.

    I am very happy to see that the car remained on track to make it to production. With GM going dark on the car made wonder if it had been killed or if they were just remaining quiet. It is hard to read GM's moves anymore.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thought about Chevelle, but that would have to be a 2-door, and I can't see Chevy offering another 2 door when they have the Camaro and Corvette. I wonder if Caprice is back for public purchase not just police sale. I wondered too if the Epislon 2 sedan to replace the Impala may get a new name, because the Impala brand name is pretty shot at this point. They dumped Cobalt and Aveo pretty quick, I could see Impala going away and them calling the replacement something else, and that is what the NASCAR is.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A couple people close to the tooling and config at Oshawa confirmed to GMI that the Impala nameplate continues for the new Epsilon II Sedan. I don't think GM wants two cars in that big size class under Chevrolet even if one of them is niche which is why I would say Commodore instead of Caprice. It's more similar in size to a BMW 5-Series than a 7-Series and as such likely more easily marketable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really don't see a conflict with a Impala FWD V6 and a limited RWD sport sedan in a short Zeta platform. They are two different cars for two different kinds of buyers. It is a win win to me when offered like this.

    As for the Chevelle name they made more 4 doors than two doors back in the day. You just see so few as no one restores the sedans. While it may have never been offered in a 4 door SS there is no reason it could not be today since 4 door sport sedans dominte the market. Besides do you really need another Zeta coupe at Chevy?

    The extra bulk of a Caprice in a performance car that is already heavy would be a turn off to most enthusiast. God knows we hear it enough on the Camaro alone. The smaller platform would be the way to go and the G8 GXP is the pattern. Imagine a more powerful DI V8 with VVT and the magnetic shocks. Either way this will be a $38-50K car. Yes it will be expensive but it will come loaded and I suspect it to be a lot more car than the GXP was. Trust me it will be priced where no Impala will go. It will be between the Camaro SS and the ZL1 in price. Think of it as a CTSV at Chevy value.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't see Chevy offering a sedan at $38-50k, that is Cadillac CTS price, and above any Buick sedan. If the Epsilon 2 car remains Impala and the W-body one is killed, I am not use what this NASCAR vehicle is supposed to be. The G8 didn't sell very well, imagine the volume if it the V6 wasn't offered and it was only V8. I just can't see GM offering a V8 only Chevy sedan, they won't even make a V8 Cadillac sedan aside from the CTS-V. The next Impala and CTS will get 4-cyldiner power, GM is in engine downsize mode.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't see Chevy offering a sedan at $38-50k, that is Cadillac CTS price, and above any Buick sedan.

    Why not? The Dodge Charger R/T and SRT8 (which would be the target of a RWD V8 Chevy sedan) are in that price range more or less... Chevy sedans don't have be only cheap FWD volume appliances. Chevelle SS would be a good name for the model.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    another thing about the chevelle nameplate not being 4dr sounding... ever see a 4dr charger before the '99 concept? there are few nameplates that are safe from being inappropriately attached to vehicles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't see Chevy offering a sedan at $38-50k, that is Cadillac CTS price, and above any Buick sedan. If the Epsilon 2 car remains Impala and the W-body one is killed, I am not use what this NASCAR vehicle is supposed to be. The G8 didn't sell very well, imagine the volume if it the V6 wasn't offered and it was only V8. I just can't see GM offering a V8 only Chevy sedan, they won't even make a V8 Cadillac sedan aside from the CTS-V. The next Impala and CTS will get 4-cyldiner power, GM is in engine downsize mode.

    Boy, do you have that all wrong! The G8 actually sold quite well and it was the V6 cars that sat on lots.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't see Chevy offering a sedan at $38-50k, that is Cadillac CTS price, and above any Buick sedan. If the Epsilon 2 car remains Impala and the W-body one is killed, I am not use what this NASCAR vehicle is supposed to be. The G8 didn't sell very well, imagine the volume if it the V6 wasn't offered and it was only V8. I just can't see GM offering a V8 only Chevy sedan, they won't even make a V8 Cadillac sedan aside from the CTS-V. The next Impala and CTS will get 4-cyldiner power, GM is in engine downsize mode.

    Boy, do you have that all wrong! The G8 actually sold quite well and it was the V6 cars that sat on lots.

    SMK getting facts and details wrong? smiley_fainting1.gif

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't see Chevy offering a sedan at $38-50k, that is Cadillac CTS price, and above any Buick sedan. If the Epsilon 2 car remains Impala and the W-body one is killed, I am not use what this NASCAR vehicle is supposed to be. The G8 didn't sell very well, imagine the volume if it the V6 wasn't offered and it was only V8. I just can't see GM offering a V8 only Chevy sedan, they won't even make a V8 Cadillac sedan aside from the CTS-V. The next Impala and CTS will get 4-cyldiner power, GM is in engine downsize mode.

    Boy, do you have that all wrong! The G8 actually sold quite well and it was the V6 cars that sat on lots.

    SMK getting facts and details wrong? smiley_fainting1.gif

    Maybe it is part of the whole Aussie thing since it is a world away from us. ;) Remember they are down under and upside down from the US. :P

    Edited by dfelt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Highly doubt wagon and ute would be part of the equation.

    Do not expect a Coupe, Wagon or Ute unless they have really changed their thinking here.

    All I said was - That would be pretty cool, especially if the Ute and Wagon were offered too - I didn't say GM would be out of their mind if they didn't offer the wagon or ute, nor did I say GM sucks for not bringing over the wagon and ute too. I was having a moment of hope, especially for the ute (though I would dump the Envoy for a wagon in a heartbeat! :smilewide: ). I know and don't expect the wagon or ute to arrive on our shores any time in the near future :(

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Highly doubt wagon and ute would be part of the equation.

    Do not expect a Coupe, Wagon or Ute unless they have really changed their thinking here.

    All I said was - That would be pretty cool, especially if the Ute and Wagon were offered too - I didn't say GM would be out of their mind if they didn't offer the wagon or ute, nor did I say GM sucks for not bringing over the wagon and ute too. I was having a moment of hope, especially for the ute (though I would dump the Envoy for a wagon in a heartbeat! :smilewide: ). I know and don't expect the wagon or ute to arrive on our shores any time in the near future :(

    How about if they do start selling the caprice, then pick up an Older station wagon you like the body of, cut off the body from behind the driver door back and graft it onto a modern suspension / drive train and nose and end up with your own custom one off modern wagon. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Highly doubt wagon and ute would be part of the equation.

    Do not expect a Coupe, Wagon or Ute unless they have really changed their thinking here.

    All I said was - That would be pretty cool, especially if the Ute and Wagon were offered too - I didn't say GM would be out of their mind if they didn't offer the wagon or ute, nor did I say GM sucks for not bringing over the wagon and ute too. I was having a moment of hope, especially for the ute (though I would dump the Envoy for a wagon in a heartbeat! :smilewide: ). I know and don't expect the wagon or ute to arrive on our shores any time in the near future :(

    OK, I'll say those things then.

    They are out of their minds and they do suck! :duck:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Highly doubt wagon and ute would be part of the equation.

    Do not expect a Coupe, Wagon or Ute unless they have really changed their thinking here.

    All I said was - That would be pretty cool, especially if the Ute and Wagon were offered too - I didn't say GM would be out of their mind if they didn't offer the wagon or ute, nor did I say GM sucks for not bringing over the wagon and ute too. I was having a moment of hope, especially for the ute (though I would dump the Envoy for a wagon in a heartbeat! :smilewide: ). I know and don't expect the wagon or ute to arrive on our shores any time in the near future :(

    OK, I'll say those things then.

    They are out of their minds and they do suck! :duck:

    As a business case goes, GM probably figures it's not cost effective to bring the ute and wagon to the US if they are only likely to sell in the double or triple digits...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM has been mishandling the potential for these cars for at least a decade and a half, so I think "suck" is an apt description of their track record.

    Maybe it is too late now to get it right, but that they blew some great opportunities is indisputable.

    They've been screwing this up for so long that it is cliche.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Highly doubt wagon and ute would be part of the equation.

    Do not expect a Coupe, Wagon or Ute unless they have really changed their thinking here.

    All I said was - That would be pretty cool, especially if the Ute and Wagon were offered too - I didn't say GM would be out of their mind if they didn't offer the wagon or ute, nor did I say GM sucks for not bringing over the wagon and ute too. I was having a moment of hope, especially for the ute (though I would dump the Envoy for a wagon in a heartbeat! :smilewide: ). I know and don't expect the wagon or ute to arrive on our shores any time in the near future :(

    I know what you ment my comment was for the less sane here.

    I will be shocked if the CTS wagon makes it to the next gen. I read raves on them in the magazines but I see so few on the road.

    The Chevelle was just as much a sedan or wagon as it was a coupe. The fact is they already have a Zeta coupe at Chevy so why duplicate the product again? If your have to do another coupe send it to Buick.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    hmm, it could be a production version of the TRU 140 concept car. or they could be bringing back the Monte Carlo based on the Epsilion, or they might be bringing back the Pontiac G8 badged as a Chevy. probably one of the three.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I highly doubt this car would be assembled in austrailia. It will be built in an existing plant in the USA, Canada or Mexico. and I wouldnt doubt that production of the Caprice PPV will be shifted to the same assembly plant.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I highly doubt this car would be assembled in austrailia. It will be built in an existing plant in the USA, Canada or Mexico. and I wouldnt doubt that production of the Caprice PPV will be shifted to the same assembly plant.

    With the import issues they have had the PPV could find its way to Canada very easy. It also would keep the volume up on the Camaro line since they could share lines.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    hmm, it could be a production version of the TRU 140 concept car. or they could be bringing back the Monte Carlo based on the Epsilion, or they might be bringing back the Pontiac G8 badged as a Chevy. probably one of the three.

    If they make one of those concepts they showed this year, it will be the Code 130R, not the warmed over Mitsu Eclipse methinks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    hmm, it could be a production version of the TRU 140 concept car. or they could be bringing back the Monte Carlo based on the Epsilion, or they might be bringing back the Pontiac G8 badged as a Chevy. probably one of the three.

    If they make one of those concepts they showed this year, it will be the Code 130R, not the warmed over Mitsu Eclipse methinks.

    I must say this is the most popular NASCAR thread I have ever seen here. Give em a shot a new RWD model and it brings in the comments. LOL!

    Where is Blu? Someone mentioned the130 and he did not chime in how much he liked it. Is he sick or in jail? LOL!

    Edited by hyperv6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Where is Blu? Someone mentioned the130 and he did not chime in how much he liked it. Is he sick or in jail? LOL!

    I've wondered the same thing this week... maybe he's part of the focus group for this car, seeing as how he had an Impala demo recently :lol:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Where is Blu? Someone mentioned the130 and he did not chime in how much he liked it. Is he sick or in jail? LOL!

    I've wondered the same thing this week... maybe he's part of the focus group for this car, seeing as how he had an Impala demo recently :lol:

    I heard they are testing for three new colors as the major changes for next year. Also they are looking at choosing the correct "Classic" emblem to use.

    Edited by hyperv6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ahem ... who else actually read &/or noticed the wording in Ch#$r%*et's press release?

    The press release states that it will be "a NEW NAMEPLATE to the BRAND'S LINEUP" ... which means ... it CANNOT be a Caprice, Chevelle, Monte Carlo or Camaro, since all of those are old heritage nameplates!

    Warned ya'll my "big heart" is gone....

    Cort | 38.m.IL | pigValve + paceMaker + cowValve | 5 MCs + 1 Caprice Classic

    CHD.MCs.CC + RoadTrips.hobbies.RadioShows.us66 = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort

    * rNw-CC+event: http://rdwhl-capriceclassic.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=whatsgoingon *

    "What is done in vain, truth is hard to swallow" __ Kevin Rudolf __ 'Let It Rock'

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ahem ... who else actually read &/or noticed the wording in Ch#$r%*et's press release?

    The press release states that it will be "a NEW NAMEPLATE to the BRAND'S LINEUP" ... which means ... it CANNOT be a Caprice, Chevelle, Monte Carlo or Camaro, since all of those are old heritage nameplates!

    Warned ya'll my "big heart" is gone....

    Cort | 38.m.IL | pigValve + paceMaker + cowValve | 5 MCs + 1 Caprice Classic

    CHD.MCs.CC + RoadTrips.hobbies.RadioShows.us66 = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort

    * rNw-CC+event: http://rdwhl-caprice...rd=whatsgoingon *

    "What is done in vain, truth is hard to swallow" __ Kevin Rudolf __ 'Let It Rock'

    Boy fix that Heart andyou get Frisky! Go get em!!! :P

    What ever it is, It will still be nice to have a nascar that actually is almost identical to a real thing being bought on the lot. The old Fiber glass shells are a pathetic joke.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ahem ... who else actually read &/or noticed the wording in Ch#$r%*et's press release?

    The press release states that it will be "a NEW NAMEPLATE to the BRAND'S LINEUP" ... which means ... it CANNOT be a Caprice, Chevelle, Monte Carlo or Camaro, since all of those are old heritage nameplates!

    Depends on how they are using 'new'.. I read it as a nameplate not in the current lineup, so Chevelle would fit.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ahem ... who else actually read &/or noticed the wording in Ch#$r%*et's press release?

    The press release states that it will be "a NEW NAMEPLATE to the BRAND'S LINEUP" ... which means ... it CANNOT be a Caprice, Chevelle, Monte Carlo or Camaro, since all of those are old heritage nameplates!

    Warned ya'll my "big heart" is gone....

    Cort | 38.m.IL | pigValve + paceMaker + cowValve | 5 MCs + 1 Caprice Classic

    CHD.MCs.CC + RoadTrips.hobbies.RadioShows.us66 = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort

    * rNw-CC+event: http://rdwhl-caprice...rd=whatsgoingon *

    "What is done in vain, truth is hard to swallow" __ Kevin Rudolf __ 'Let It Rock'

    Boy fix that Heart andyou get Frisky! Go get em!!! :P

    What ever it is, It will still be nice to have a nascar that actually is almost identical to a real thing being bought on the lot. The old Fiber glass shells are a pathetic joke.

    Sorry they will look better but they will not be anything close to identical. They will all still be similar general shape and size. They will really just be sculpting the body to carry some of the lines of the real car to give them a more stock appearance and noting more.

    It will be nice that they will look better is a fair statement.

    The old cars were still steel too. The cars will still use the nose and tail from GM made of Carbon Fiber with decals for headlights and grilles.

    As for the name I take the statment that it is going to be a new name not presently being used. That would still include the old names not in production to be in the running. The name has been picked for a good while per Al's statment a year so ago.

    I expect Zeta as this will be a limited production car. If they hold to what was hinted to before it was to be a performance V8 sedan only. It was hinted to be a G8 GXP like package. With the pending future rules I don't see a performance V8 sedan being in GM's line up too long anyways. I could see an Alpha later on with a Tubo V6 replacing this later.

    Time will tell.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You guys really think it will be on Zeta and not Alpha? Zeta is not long for this world, it would be a short run car.

    I wonder if Alpha is flexible enough to build something Fusion or Charger sized, though....the only Chevy Alpha concept shown so far is the tiny Code 130R...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You guys really think it will be on Zeta and not Alpha? Zeta is not long for this world, it would be a short run car.

    I wonder if Alpha is flexible enough to build something Fusion or Charger sized, though....the only Chevy Alpha concept shown so far is the tiny Code 130R...

    Yep it is. Alpha is the platform for the next CTS

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The next CTS I am awaiting with EXCITEMENT!, I love my 2004 cts, but the back seat is a bit tight for big people.

    Overall size is said to be the same on the exterior with better packaging (read: more room) on the interior.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I had heard the new CTS was to grow just a little in length.

    The Alpha will underpin the Camaro that is already on the way. If it is on time we are looking at 2015-16. It will prove to be interesting with a coupe that could come in at 3200-3300 pounds. If they can do the Turbo ATS at 3300 a Camaro turbo coupe could see 3200? Even the V6 and V8 would come in way under the present car.

    I just hope Buick gets an Alpha too. GM needs to make good use of this platform. I would be willing to give up an ATS coupe for a Buick coupe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just minor amounts in length, within the margin of error that the 5 and E have grown.

    That is what I have heard. The size was to match them and move it up a little fromt he ATS a little more.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Boy fix that Heart andyou get Frisky! Go get em!!! :P

    LOL! But, seriously, I've warned ya'll PLENTY of times that my "big heart" is GONE ... so no excuses to not believe me.

    Depends on how they are using 'new'.. I read it as a nameplate not in the current lineup, so Chevelle would fit.

    Well, luckily, Ch#$r%*et, in its INFINITE wisdom, did NOT clarify what EXACTLY they meant. So, it's their own fault if they are caught in a lie. PERIOD.

    Cort | 38.m.IL | pigValve + paceMaker + cowValve | 5 MCs + 1 Caprice Classic

    CHD.MCs.CC + RoadTrips.hobbies.RadioShows.us66 = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort

    * rNw-CC+event: http://rdwhl-capriceclassic.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=whatsgoingon *

    "Believe half of what you see" __ Marvin Gaye __ 'I Heard It Through The Grapevine'

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The next CTS I am awaiting with EXCITEMENT!, I love my 2004 cts, but the back seat is a bit tight for big people.

    Overall size is said to be the same on the exterior with better packaging (read: more room) on the interior.

    I truly hope you are right, Sadly what has kept me from replacing my 2006 ESV Platinum with a new one is that they LOST interior room on the Escalade, even without a sun roof, I have to tilt the chair back as it does not have the ability to go as low as my current Escalade does and I have to bend my head, plus the leg room is terrible, that damn center stack between the front two seats is wider and eats up leg room for a big guy like me. The dealer where I have bought all my caddy's was shocked to see that I had to recline which I hate and bend my head down due to a lack of room. GM build a tighter quality product with the GMT900 platform, but they did this by giving up interior room. Who ever is using the measuring tape is lying about the interior room.

    Edited by dfelt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • And you actually think this scenario will exist? You guys are down a fascist road. You have been on this road for a few months now. Legalities rae ignored with fascist regimes.  Besides, Trump has been impeached before. Twice I believe and nothing has changed. Trump has been indicted and nothing has happened. France convicted their former leader and is now serving jail time for lesser crimes...   Serious crimes, but less corrupt than Trump.   He will spend time in jail despite Sarkozy appealing his verdict.    You folk better fight back for your country, you guys are slowly losing it... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp98kepmj9lo Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been sentenced to five years in jail after being found guilty of criminal conspiracy in a case related to millions of euros of illicit funds from the late Libyan leader Col Muammar Gaddafi. The Paris criminal court acquitted him of all other charges, including passive corruption and illegal campaign financing. The ruling means he will spend time in jail even if he launches an appeal, which Sarkozy says he intends to do.  
    • Peter DeLorenzo said this: https://www.autoextremist.com/ Detroit. The negative auto industry news is starting to pick up speed. For instance, the Robert Bosch company is cutting 13,000 jobs, or close to 3 percent of its global workforce, due to a difficult market, tariffs and high costs. VW is “pausing” EV production at its German facilities due to the tariffs and drastically slowing demand in the U.S. Valmet Automotive Oyj, the Finland-based contract supplier that produces various Mercedes-Benz models, is reducing its workforce by one third due to the darkening industry outlook in Europe. U.S. tariffs on Canadian parts and autos exploded to $380 million this past July. Lucerne International Inc., an auto supplier, decided against a $50 million facility in Detroit directly due to the tariffs. And GM is expected to make major cuts to its "Factory Zero" output in October. These developments represent just the tip of the iceberg, as suppliers are upending or scrapping future plans altogether due to the capriciously unpredictable nature of the tariffs. And that isn’t even getting to the automakers themselves. Product plans are being upended or cancelled altogether, as uncertainty reigns throughout the industry. All because the current occupant of the White House is stuck with an 80s mindset on everything, and is wreaking havoc on an industry that he and his minions haven’t even the first clue of understanding.   This is best exemplified given the attitude that the Dear Leader believes he can snap his fingers and that “fixes” will be immediate and dramatically positive, even though the required transformation to supply chains, factory builds and product planning will play out in years, not months.   The industry is trying to adapt to the current “finger-snap” mindset in Washington, and it isn’t going well. Short-term solutions such as Stellantis turning back the clock and going all-in on ICE muscle machines again are just that: short-term. How long Stellantis can live with that and how far it can carry that product strategy remains to be determined, although it’s clear that for a certain faction of the car-buying population, this direction is exactly what the doctor ordered.   But let’s not forget that two of the three “domestic” (I use that term purposely, as people forget that Stellantis is a foreign-owned company) automakers spent billions on top of billions on EV research and development, battery manufacturing facilities and a plethora of products. Was all of this work wasted? Not in the least, as the lessons learned in the process will prove to be invaluable going forward. But the current reality in Washington – which equates EV development as the Devil’s Work – means that those billions spent on bringing EVs to the masses will have to be tabled, except for selective instances of appropriate products for certain segments, of course. (And no, that does not mean EV pickups, which have turned out to be a fool’s errand as they don’t – or can’t – function as real working pickup trucks.)   So, Ford, GM and Stellantis are being forced to approach the next few years with a scattershot approach, cranking out ICE vehicles to stay alive and afloat, while plotting their next move to meet whatever is coming in the future, as advanced battery development – emphasizing light weight and density – continues at a torrid pace and an actual working national charging network slowly but surely solidifies.   Let me emphasize that none of these developments will be happening in a vacuum or with any degree of certainty. As long as the current administration is allowed to conduct “business” on the whims of Dear Leader, these auto manufacturers and their suppliers will be teetering on the brink of disaster for the foreseeable future.   Vehicle prices are soaring, and the typical auto buyer will be pressed to the limit in order to afford a new (or used) vehicle. This is the ugly reality facing this industry right now.   I’ve been accused of being overly negative on the future of this industry, but frankly, I haven’t been sounding the alarm loudly enough. Suppliers are going to fall by the wayside, costing countless jobs, and the manufacturers will be forced to jettison thousands of employees too.   This is not going to end well for this industry, and for those who are unwilling to believe it I’m afraid you’re in for a very rude awakening.   The clock is ticking on the U.S. automobile industry as we know it. And the most pathetic thing is that it didn’t have to unfold this way.   But here we are.   And that’s the High-Octane Truth for this week.
    • Something interesting is happening ... at least to me. We know ITA Airways is going from Sky Team (Delta) to Star Alliance (United).  That's because Lufthansa acquired that big stake in them. When you go scout out redemption options on United, there is very little crossing of the pond on Lufthansa's if you are going to Italy ... slim to none.  United carts you on the over-the-water segment and ITA takes care of the rest from the Italian gateway.   It's almost as if they picked up ITA to be a low-cost workhorse for them.  Between the mileage redemption flyers and conventional paying passengers, the ITA planes are sure to be (close to) full. However, I'd much rather be on Lufthansa than domestic United for the longest leg. Because they haven't still disengaged, ITA segments are still being offered up on the Sky Team (Delta, specifically) website.  There will be that overlap for about 2 to 3 more months, I believe. Fleets change, alliances change, etc.  Many times, change sucks.
    • So not everyone can read the WSJ artical, but to summarize it: Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors, is adjusting the company's ambitious electric vehicle (EV) goals due to a slowdown in market growth and changing consumer demand. Market Slowdown and Production Capacity Mary Barra has recently acknowledged that the electric vehicle market is experiencing a slowdown in growth, leading GM to revise its previous forecast of producing 1 million electric vehicles by the end of 2025. At a recent event, she stated, "We’re seeing a little bit of a slowdown right now... the market’s not developing as quickly as we anticipated". This shift indicates that GM is now taking a more cautious approach to its EV production timeline, recognizing that the anticipated demand may not materialize as quickly as expected.  Consumer Demand and Affordability Concerns Barra emphasized that GM's production decisions will be guided by consumer demand. The company is facing challenges related to affordability, as many potential buyers are hesitant to invest in EVs due to high prices and limited charging infrastructure. GM plans to keep its electric car prices between $30,000 and $40,000 to stimulate demand, but this strategy may strain profit margins due to the high costs associated with EV battery production.  CBT Automotive Network Political and Economic Pressures The EV market is also influenced by political and economic factors. Changes in federal policies, including the potential rollback of EV incentives, have created uncertainty in the market. Barra noted that the regulatory environment has shifted, impacting GM's strategy and the overall pace of EV adoption. Despite these challenges, GM remains committed to its long-term vision for electrification, viewing the next decade as a transformative period for mobility.  c-suiteinsider.com Conclusion In summary, Mary Barra's decision to scale back GM's lofty EV ambitions is driven by a combination of market conditions, consumer demand, and political pressures. While GM continues to invest in electric vehicles, the company is adopting a more measured approach to align its production capacity with the current state of the market. This strategic pivot reflects the complexities of transitioning to an all-electric future amid evolving consumer preferences and regulatory landscapes. So how is this a "Joke in Clown Shoes" to use your phrase? Good CEO's adjust based on the market and political pressure all the time, so care to explain how this is any different than CEO's who are using Idiot47 and his clown administration to monopolize their profits? IQ79 aka Idiot47 is trying to stop legal voting as the population is fed up with his clown administration. At this point, he is in for a rude awakening and I hope he gets what he deserves, a Blue wave that give total control of the house and senate to the democrats so they can impeach him and his lemmings.
    • There was more troublesome talk to that speech. I just wanted to address the Canadian stuff.  What you poor suckers are going to go through come mid way in 2026 is more concerning at this juncture  before Canada has to deal with it...    
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search