Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Fiat Expects To Lose $10,000 On Every 500e Sold

    Sign in to follow this  

    By William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    April 22, 2013

    Fiat and Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne disclosed during a speech at SAE World Congress in Detroit last week that for every Fiat 500e sold, the company expects to lose around $10,000.

    “For every 500 electric that we produce even after all the subsidies we will lose about $10,000 bucks a car. Doing that on a large scale would be masochism to the extreme,” Marchionne said.

    Marchionne disclosed the figure to make a point. He believes that electric vehicles won’t be enough for automakers to meet the new ambitious fuel economy regulations set for 2025 by the U.S. Government. The regulations say automakers have to reach a fleet average of 35.5 MPG by 2016 and then reach an average of 54.5 MPG by 2025. Automakers can earn government credits, which help get an automaker closer to the average, by building hybrids, plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles. Marchionne sees this as a problem since the Government is saying hybrids, plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles are the only solution to this problem.

    “A number of governments around the world including the U.S. have provided incentives for consumers to purchase plug-in electric vehicles and have provided direct incentives to manufacturers.My fear is that regulators are rushing precipitously into embracing electric vehicles as the only technological solution,” Marchionne said.

    Instead, Marchionne is urging for “technological neutral” regulation should be encouraged.

    Source: Detroit Free Press

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    The whole subsidy for electric cars is a joke. Electric cars are no where ready for mass transit, road trips, etc. Even with building a so called electric highway as they did in washington, Oregon and california with I5 having all these level 1-3 chargers, you still have excess days to get from state to state. You cannot go from say seattle to redding california in 1 day with an electric car.

    We should stop wasting millions on these charging stations and electric car purchases as we are only wasting tax dollars and burdening the future with debt and interest for the few that actually drive them.

    If they want to get greener, then they should put these subsidy in CNG as a logical next step away from Petrol.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's not whether electric cars are ready for the road. It's that there is no economic need to go electric at this juncture where fossil fuel is still the best source of portable energy -- best meaning most available, economical and storable. The entire push to go "green" with electric cars, wind power and solar is completely misguided. It is misguided for three reasons...

    The first being that there is no economic need to do so for another 50 years, perhaps longer. Gas has to be in the neighborhood of $20 a gallon in 2012 dollars for the alternatives to make economic sense. And, oil is not disappearing fast. In fact, the USA has more reserves than the entire middle east combined and the USA and Canada has more than the rest of the world combined if only will explore, extract and refine. In fact, the maturing of mining and refining of tar sands has completely redefined the energy map of the planet. But, when 95% of federal lands is off limits to exploration and extraction, when we chase all the oil rigs off the gulf to brazil and elsewhere, when we haven't built a new refinery in over 30 years and when Canda wants to sell us their oil if only we'll built a pipeline to get it to where our refineries are we said "NO", our problem is not energy supply it's people that needs to be thrown out of Congress and the White House.

    The second being the "environmental" justification for the drive towards electrification. Nobody is for dirty air hand water here, but CO2 is not a pollutant of any consequence, it is not a problem and it should not be controlled or restricted. All the emissions mankind has made since the beginning of the industrial age has not made a statistical dent in the climate of this planet. We don't have a warming problem (in fact we are cooling right now) and all the fluctuations in past 200 years is not abnormal compared to what has historically been the case in interglacial times in the planet's history. Global warming, climate change and the targeting of carbon emissions this the biggest scam in the history of climate science and it is about time we tell the Europeans that they are idiots and that we will not regulate or control carbon emissions. And, that if they want to dig their own economic graves they can go ahead and we'll use all the cheap energy they don't want.

    Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, is the claim that all this rubbish is going to create jobs. Well, when in history has forcing higher energy prices and operating costs on an economy ever netted any jobs? Sure, you gain a few wind mill technician jobs and a few solar salesmen jobs. But you lose entire factories and industries who relocate to states and countries where there is cheap power and no cap-n-trade.

    ---

    Now... having said all that. I am not oblivious to the fact that fossil fuel is finite. And, that at some point of time in the future -- perhaps 50 or 100 years from now -- electric propulsion, grid distribution and and battery storage will be the best solution for the resources and economics of that time. But that day is not today, it is not next year or even 20 years from now. And, before we get there, we need to also realize that electricity is not an energy source -- it needs to be generated from something somewhere. Right now, 90% of it comes from burning fossil fuel anyway. And, wind, solar and hydroelectric -- exploited to their fullest -- cannot ever account for more than about 15~25% of today's needs much less tomorrows. So, before you go electric you need the capacity to generate it from something other than fossil fuels. That means Nuclear Power. Until you are ready to talk about 500 new reactors for the America you are not ready to talk about electrifying the economy. Also, if you make so much more power you need to move all that from the powerplant to the socket. This means increasing the capacity of our grid by a factor of three to four. So until you are willing to talk about a massive power lines and substation construction program, you are not ready to talk about electrification of the economy. These are all serious questions and they need serious, committed answers! Why are we talking about windmills, carbon credits and giving $6000 of taxpayer dollars to people who want to try the novelty of an electric car?

    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      It's no secret that Mini's fortunes have not been good lately. In the first half of this year, Mini has only moved 17,583 cars of its five model lineup in the U.S. Parent company BMW needs to do something. Last month, Mini unveiled the all-electric version of the Mini-Cooper with a range between 146 and 167 miles.  Now, a report out from Automobile Magazine says that Mini has canceled the internal combustion engine versions for the entire model range in the next generation of cars. 
      Starting in 2023, Mini will use a skateboard style chassis to underpin the entire lineup.  There will be a new downsized mini... a MiniMini, a more compact 3-door version, and a Mini crossover.  All would be front-wheel drive and offer 35-kWh or 50-kWh battery packs.  Part of the development is being done by China's Great Wall Motors. 
      The electric Minis will be built in China with no word on other manufacturing locations.  This follows Daimler's strategy on SMART to make it an all EV brand and build it in China for Chinese consumption. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      It's no secret that Mini's fortunes have not been good lately. In the first half of this year, Mini has only moved 17,583 cars of its five model lineup in the U.S. Parent company BMW needs to do something. Last month, Mini unveiled the all-electric version of the Mini-Cooper with a range between 146 and 167 miles.  Now, a report out from Automobile Magazine says that Mini has canceled the internal combustion engine versions for the entire model range in the next generation of cars. 
      Starting in 2023, Mini will use a skateboard style chassis to underpin the entire lineup.  There will be a new downsized mini... a MiniMini, a more compact 3-door version, and a Mini crossover.  All would be front-wheel drive and offer 35-kWh or 50-kWh battery packs.  Part of the development is being done by China's Great Wall Motors. 
      The electric Minis will be built in China with no word on other manufacturing locations.  This follows Daimler's strategy on SMART to make it an all EV brand and build it in China for Chinese consumption. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      It hasn't even been officially unveiled yet, but the Porsche Taycan has already secured more than 30,000 pre-orders, 10,000 more than the initial estimates. Porsche initially set production at 20,000 per year but later raised it to 40,000 per year. The extra €2,500 deposits support this raise in production.  Porsche has been recruiting for 1,500 new positions to support the manufacturing process.  If Porsche does sell 40,000 Taycans in the first year, it will eclipse Porsche's famous 911 in sales.
      The Taycan is Porsche's EV rival to the Tesla Model S. Porsche is installing fast chargers at all of its dealerships in the U.S. and Europe that can add 62 miles of range in just 4 minutes. The Taycan's total range is around 310 miles.  In addition, the first 3 years of charging will be free at Electrify America charging stations.
      The Taycan's starting price is expected to be arount $90,000. 
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      It hasn't even been officially unveiled yet, but the Porsche Taycan has already secured more than 30,000 pre-orders, 10,000 more than the initial estimates. Porsche initially set production at 20,000 per year but later raised it to 40,000 per year. The extra €2,500 deposits support this raise in production.  Porsche has been recruiting for 1,500 new positions to support the manufacturing process.  If Porsche does sell 40,000 Taycans in the first year, it will eclipse Porsche's famous 911 in sales.
      The Taycan is Porsche's EV rival to the Tesla Model S. Porsche is installing fast chargers at all of its dealerships in the U.S. and Europe that can add 62 miles of range in just 4 minutes. The Taycan's total range is around 310 miles.  In addition, the first 3 years of charging will be free at Electrify America charging stations.
      The Taycan's starting price is expected to be arount $90,000. 
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      We first saw a rendering of the forthcoming Fisker SUV back in March of this year.  Now Fisker is releasing some photos of the concept and a few more details. The front end of the Fisker SUV looks mildly like a Land Rover if you stare at the headlights long enough.  Along the side are retracting door handles and an interesting D-Pillar turn-signal repeater.  Fisker has previously shown the SUV with a solar roof to help with charging. 
      Fisker says the SUV will start under $40,000 and have a range over 300 miles per charge.  They are also claiming that the vehicle will be the most sustainable vehicle available with many of the parts being made from recycled materials.   For now, the look of the interior is a secret until its official unveiling later this year.  Fisker hopes to have the SUV on the road in 2021. 
       


  • Posts

    • Standard Adaptive cruise is a Toyota thing currently.  It seems like Ford and Nissan are not far behind on it. 
    • GM needs to fix that STAT.  Something like adaptive cruise control should actually come standard.
    • Electrify America is working hard to build up the largest network of electric chargers in the US.  They have already partnered with Chargepoint, so that if you have an account with one company, you can use your account at either company's charging stations without additional fees.   Now the network has gotten even larger as an interoperability agreement has been reached with EVgo, one of the largest charging networks out there.  So now, if you have an Electrify America account, you can charge your EV with at least three different providers on a single account with no additional fees.  Electrify America is the company that was formed from Volkwagen's dieselgate scandal and is hard at work deploying EV charging stations around the US, including 350-kW stations for fast charging. They are also working towards "plug and charge" capability which would allow the car to be charged without the need for a card at all.  The current Electrify America map before adding EVgo or ChargePoint: Related: Porsche Offering Three Years Free Charging with Taycan View full article
    • So true, the average is 1 to 2 people per Bolt, Lyft, Uber ride. The number of large rides is usually covered by a van type of service. Some interesting info on Lyft. https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/lyft-statistics/ https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/uber-statistics/  
    • Most of my ride-share rides have been done in vehicle the Bolt would be equal or larger than. I've only rode with more than 2 people twice in which we needed 5 or 6 seats.  Yeah, the Bolt can't cover the complete spectrum of Uber or Lyft "packages" but the entry price compared to an EV Mercedes is probably only 2/3 the price or less. I think it is safe to assume it would pay itself off quicker than the Mercedes even if you can't "Uber Black". 
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Howard
      Howard
      (63 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...