Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Ford Slices and Dices Their Car Lineup

      And there would be two

    Ford is serious about cutting costs and that means cars will be cut. During the company's first-quarter earnings, it was announced that Ford would be killing off the Fiesta, Focus Sedan/Hatch, Fusion, and Taurus in North America. The only vehicles that will remain are the Mustang and the upcoming Focus Active in 2019. This will save Ford $11.5 billion and up their cost-cutting goal to $25.5 billion by 2022. This is a sizeable increase from $14 billion projected by CEO Jim Hackett in October.

    “Everything is on the table. We can exit products (and) markets. We will do that. That work (started in October) has really gained traction. We have looked at every single part of the business. It’s a very complex endeavor. We are determined to turn this business around right throughout the whole company. There’s more work that’s underway,” said Ford Chief Financial Officer Bob Shanks.

    The move to reduce Ford's passenger car lineup is not shocking. Sales of Ford's passenger cars have been tanking for the past couple of years as trucks/SUVs have taken off. We've also be reporting on the death of Ford's car lineup in the rumorpile within the past year. It is unclear the timeframe as to when the various models will end production for North America. Our guess would be Taurus, Fiesta, Focus, and Fusion.

    Ford is also not planning "next generations of traditional Ford sedans for North America.”  Instead, the company will focus on what it calls “white space” silhouette vehicles - models hat combine attributes from cars and utility vehicles (A.K.A. crossovers) Also in the cards are hybrid powertrains for various models and 16 electric vehicles by 2022. By 2020, the company expects 90 percent of their North American lineup will be comprised of pickups, SUVs, and commercial vehicles.

    For the time being, other markets will continue to get the Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, and Taurus.

    One item that is still up in the air is what will happen to the Lincoln models that share platforms - the Continental and MKZ.

    Source: FordAutomotive News (Subscription Required), Bloomberg, The Detroit News

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    11 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Wowza.  They've given up, admitting defeat in cars against the Asian brands.  

    Yep, this sounds like a Rick Wagoner "cut your way to profitability" plan and all that got GM was bankruptcy  I think it makes sense to cut the Taurus globally, because it doesn't sell much here and you can sell a long wheel base Fusion in China if you have to.  

    This does seem like a give up, and these cars do sell like 400,000 combined sales a year probably, that is a lot to just give away to other brands.

    • Upvote 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I bet Lincoln drops all cars except Continental, and even that I wonder how long it will stay.  Since they can sell a full size sedan in China, and use it for livery purpose here, I think they find a business case, and then Lincoln has at least one sedan in the showroom.

    I could see a recession coming soon too, I have read how average credit card balances are at all time highs, interest rates are starting to rise so home buying and car buying gets a bit hard and will slow down, this tax cut is going to saddle the government with even more debt (not too with rising rates) and peoples wages aren't rising, most of those tax cuts went to corporate stock buy backs and executive bonuses.  And we are due for a stock market correction which seems to be happening.  

    That being said, if you go into recession and/or gas prices rise, do you really want to kill every car and focus (no pun intended) on higher priced thirstier trucks?

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    13 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    This is a terrible idea..... but if they can't make a profit on 500,000 Fusions a year globally, maybe they deserve what seems to be coming to them.

    On a related note, I'm even more convinced than ever that we're heading for a recession soon.  Maybe this is Ford's hedge against that like they pulled off last time to avoid bankruptcy.

    good point about recession.  but don't small hatches and sedans get great mpg when gas prices go up like they always do?

     

    methinks cutting the Fusion is very drastic.  even if sedan sales continue to tank, they can easily sell 100,000 - 200,000 fusions and look at the great mpg's midisizers get now.  you can justify a new fusion IMO ..  Seems to me an automaker the size of Ford should be able to easily spit out a focus and fusion built off of one flexible platform.  But we can bring back low volume broncos and blazers.  yup.

     

    thing is, they know they can make more money selling crossovers, this is partly because they can't get transaction prices for this stuff like other vehicles.

    we all know too, they kill these vehicles, they can end using the plants they make these vehicles in in the USA.  wait awhile and bring em back from India and mexico and stuff

    ford better add more crossovers, the escape and edge alone can't cover sales volume.  and the ecosport is a cruel joke.

     

     

    Edited by regfootball
    • Upvote 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Ford is just cutting the classic sedans for now, but I can totally see them coming out with a FusionCross, FocusActive, Taurus X.... oh.. wait.... , etc.

    The EcoSport will take up the mantle of the Fiesta ones the recession is in full swing. Three cylinder Ecoboosts with Start-Stop will be the answer for fuel economy.

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ford just may be ahead of the sedan curve vs. the Asian brands.

    Nissan ~ Versa: down 12%, altima: down 18%, Maxima: down 28%. Leaf is only up 1%.
    Further: Quest is dead, juke is dead, xterra is dead, NV: down 14%, titan: down 11%, pathfinder down 36%... it ain't all roses over there on the CUV/truck side, either.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I could see cutting the Fusion sedan if they still had a Focus sedan with some upgraded trim and features that sort of fill that void, but they killed the Fusion sedan too.  I find it hard to believe Ford won't have 1 sedan when sedan is the #2 selling body style still.

    And things are tends too, station wagons had big market share once, minivans had a lot of share once, and a lot of people didn't want that because "it was their parents car" well now.  What if crossovers start to fade in popularity, then Ford is screwed.  I don't think crossovers will fade, but anything is possible. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    This is a terrible idea..... but if they can't make a profit on 500,000 Fusions a year globally, maybe they deserve what seems to be coming to them.

    On a related note, I'm even more convinced than ever that we're heading for a recession soon.  Maybe this is Ford's hedge against that like they pulled off last time to avoid bankruptcy.

     

    Already agree with you there...think you and I might see the same writing on the wall....

     

    Problem is is that it cost GM dearly when they stopped caring for theirs....Ford has nowhere near the lineup GM had to reverse the mistake. This is going to cost them.....bad.

    23 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I could see cutting the Fusion sedan if they still had a Focus sedan with some upgraded trim and features that sort of fill that void, but they killed the Fusion sedan too.  I find it hard to believe Ford won't have 1 sedan when sedan is the #2 selling body style still.

    And things are tends too, station wagons had big market share once, minivans had a lot of share once, and a lot of people didn't want that because "it was their parents car" well now.  What if crossovers start to fade in popularity, then Ford is screwed.  I don't think crossovers will fade, but anything is possible. 

     

    It's a trend like anything else....people will grow tired of them (or the cost) at some point. Basic transportation will make a comeback...sooner or later.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Could also be part of the strategy for getting ahead of the curve with autonomous ride sharing vehicles.   Autonimous electric CUVs--wouldn't be bought or leased by individuals but be fleet vehicles...they wouldn't need to build a lot of normal cars as aecuvs become mainstream. Future shock. 

    (I know, too soon for that, but I see that is where things are going..and probably sooner than we think).

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ford killing off their entire sedan line is crazy and radical.  Then again, Chrysler may need to do the same (excluding the 300 Charger Challenger) if they haven't already, especially since FIAT sales are crap and Alfa Romeo does not sell well either.  If much higher gas prices and a recession hit at the same time, F-series sales will go in the tank and then what will Ford do?

    Dearborn has some tough decisions ahead.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I believe like Drew that we are headed for a recession. I also believe that no matter what, Ford should still have a couple cars as not everyone wants a CUV/SUV/Truck and have them in a Hybrid or EV as there are those like some I know that hate all things Hybrid / EV.

    Future wise, Ford would be smart to still keep a couple pokers in the fire.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My thoughts from another car site:

     

    Bringing things down here..

    Sadly, Ford is being quite short sided here. Simply put, you can't cut your way to prosperity. Wiping out a whole line is going to lose you both more money and customers. The C max was already gone. Keep your core: Fusion(family) and Focus (entry level) The other two Fiesta (too small) and Taurus( too close to the Fusion) could be the ones to go. Worst yet-now you are going to have to fire sale these (like GM's exiting brands) to get rid of them...

    GM will go the smarter way (slight cuts),as will the others (Honda, Toyota, etc.)Most cuts are going to be either the sub Compacts and the large extra cars....no need to go off the deep end here.

    Thinking Ford has more problems than they let on...but I hope and wish the best for Ford right now..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Shocking.  Radical.  Stark.  We haven't heard anything about direct replacements for Fusion, Focus and Taurus, except for the "white space" comment.  We've seen the "white space" filled before by Subaru, Volvo and Maybach with their "sport utility sedans".

    Yes the current Ecosport is not suited for North America, it is a rush to enter a fast filling segment.  I do like the Focus Active.  But there is suddenly no real entry level vehicle at Ford... Ecosport base at $19,995?  The new normal?  A new Ecosport is already past due, one that can cover the emerging markets and be suited to American and Chinese customers... or else build something else for emerging markets.  Ford can say the Ecosport is a replacement for the Fiesta in North America, but it is a different type of vehicle, it just isn't the same.

    We've heard about the new RWD/4WD Explorer/Aviator, the Ranger-based Bronco, the "baby Bronco" which is on what platform?

    Let me gather these together for my own mind:

    Ecosport

    Focus Active (needs option of AWD)

    "Baby Bronco"

    Mustang

    Bronco

    Escape

    Ranger

    Transit Connect Wagon

    Edge

    Flex (?)

    Explorer

    Expedition short and long

    F-Series

    They will need something else that is not "rugged and outdoorsy" between the Focus Active and the Escape in North America, I feel.

     

     

    Edited by ocnblu
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Ford just may be ahead of the sedan curve vs. the Asian brands.

    Nissan ~ Versa: down 12%, altima: down 18%, Maxima: down 28%. Leaf is only up 1%.
    Further: Quest is dead, juke is dead, xterra is dead, NV: down 14%, titan: down 11%, pathfinder down 36%... it ain't all roses over there on the CUV/truck side, either.

    That's Nissan, though...perennial also-ran.   I doubt if the core 4 sedans (Accord, Civic, Camry, Corolla) and their Hyundai/Kia counterparts are going anywhere soon..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I dunno- over at honduh, the CRZ is dead, the insight is dead, no one is buying the clarity, the fit is down 14% and the accord is down 13%. And the civic is flat (-0.3%). Accord sales aren't bad at 24K/mnth, but the trend is still toward dwindling numbers. It may well turn out that there are the 'Coke' & 'Pepsi' of family sedans and no other volume players. Camry is still moving 35K/mnth; it and the accord used to be neck & neck.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The bread & butter are the civic/accord, obviously. Accord is having atypical volume problems, maybe it's the polarizing design (I thought via initial pics it was kinda bizarre, but after looking out on the road, they're fine in appearance). Perhaps a quick MCE is in order, tho.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    I bet Lincoln drops all cars except Continental, and even that I wonder how long it will stay.  Since they can sell a full size sedan in China, and use it for livery purpose here, I think they find a business case, and then Lincoln has at least one sedan in the showroom.

    I could see a recession coming soon too, I have read how average credit card balances are at all time highs, interest rates are starting to rise so home buying and car buying gets a bit hard and will slow down, this tax cut is going to saddle the government with even more debt (not too with rising rates) and peoples wages aren't rising, most of those tax cuts went to corporate stock buy backs and executive bonuses.  And we are due for a stock market correction which seems to be happening.  

    That being said, if you go into recession and/or gas prices rise, do you really want to kill every car and focus (no pun intended) on higher priced thirstier trucks?

    They are going to drop the Conti also.  No way that is going to survive, I think.

    10 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    I dunno- over at honduh, the CRZ is dead, the insight is dead, no one is buying the clarity, the fit is down 14% and the accord is down 13%. And the civic is flat (-0.3%). Accord sales aren't bad at 24K/mnth, but the trend is still toward dwindling numbers. It may well turn out that there are the 'Coke' & 'Pepsi' of family sedans and no other volume players. Camry is still moving 35K/mnth; it and the accord used to be neck & neck.

    They are doing a better job marketing the Camry IMHO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    The bread & butter are the civic/accord, obviously. Accord is having atypical volume problems, maybe it's the polarizing design (I thought via initial pics it was kinda bizarre, but after looking out on the road, they're fine in appearance). Perhaps a quick MCE is in order, tho.

    The front end isn't doing it any favors.   The previous generation was a better looking car overall, IMO. 

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By David
      Since Ford Motor Company reported a complete Q4 / 2020 fiscal year report with a loss of $2.8 Billion but a doubling of R&D on EVs to $22 Billion from $11 Billion and a $7 Billion for EV Autonomous driving, the auto reporters are asking this very question: Is this a Shot across gm's bow or is it targeted more broadly across the whole industry as everyone wants to take sales away or greatly slow down Tesla.
      Tesla's valuation appears to be based on investors putting money with new technology seems to be driving changes of the future. 
      gm has now committed to moving into the technology camp with a solid date of when new ICE auto's will no longer be produced as the whole portfolio will change over to EV's. Ford also is now committing to this same strategy. This now makes one wonder about the rest of the auto industry.
      Stellantis CEO did an interview with Forbes that has put cold water on Peugeot coming to the US in the near term future as he wants to invest in the existing US name brands and grow their 12.7% market share. He also said that Stellantis has the manufacturing power and EV technology, but getting it into the hands of everyone is the concern at reasonable prices. Stellantis CEO says this is in the hands of the various global governments as he wants cleaner air and believes diesel the dirtiest of fuels will die off before regular petrol and where dictated by governments such as China and Europe will see a faster change over than other countries. Yet with the change in administration in the US, he says this could move the Stellantis brands to move into the full EV camp at a future date.
      Then we have small countries that have decided to make a major change in moving the country into EVs way sooner than other places and killing ICE sales like Thailand. This will allow local Thai startups to compete for the first time with international companies that also do not have anything in the market yet. 
      With a large range of battery plants coming online over the next 18 months, the move to EVs could happen at a pace that took decades for ICE in the early 1900's.
      So this brings this back to the original question, Is Fords Doubling commitment to EV's and moving ICE into the last generation like GM a shot across GM's bow or a shot at the whole industry to say, look at us, we are moving into a Technology driven auto company and our stock should be much higher like Tesla's.
      Currently gm is valued at just under $80 Billion, Ford is valued at $40 Billion, Tesla is valued at $807 Billion, Toyota is valued at $155.5 Billion, Stellantis is valued at $50.5 Billion, Daimler is valued at $71 Billion, BMW valued at $46 and VW is valued at $90.7 Billion and while there are plenty of other auto companies, one has to wonder what Ford is focused on with the drastic change and speeding up of moving to EVs as a complete global portfolio.
      Sound off and discuss how, what, where and when you think this will have it's big affect.
      Charged EVs | Is Ford’s increase in EV investment a shot across GM’s bow? - Charged EVs
      Stellantis CEO Reveals Peugeot U.S. Fate, Job Security, EV Conflict (forbes.com)
      Future Toyotas, Stellantis, batteries and EVs - the week | Automotive Industry Comment | just-auto (just-auto.com)
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club


      View full article
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club

    • By William Maley
      Jim Hackett's tenure as Ford CEO will be coming to a close on October 1st as he will retire from the position. His replacement is Jim Farley, currently Ford's Chief Operating Officer, a role he took on at the beginning of this year. In a press release, Ford said the two will be working together over the next two months on the transition. Hackett will stay on as "special advisor" for some time after.
      “I am very grateful to Jim Hackett for all he has done to modernize Ford and prepare us to compete and win in the future. Our new product vision – led by the Mustang Mach-E, new F-150 and Bronco family – is taking shape. We now have compelling plans for electric and autonomous vehicles, as well as full vehicle connectivity. And we are becoming much more nimble, which was apparent when we quickly mobilized to make life-saving equipment at the outset of the pandemic,” said Ford executive chairman, Bill Ford.
      Hackett became Ford's CEO in 2017 after the ousting of then CEO Mark Fields. His short tenure brought forth some major and controversial decisions such as Ford killing off most of their passenger car nameplates to focus on trucks and utility vehicles; spending $11 billion in electric vehicles by 2022, and the introductions of the Mach-E, 2021 F-150, and Bronco. He has also dealt with a lot frustration from various groups as The Detroit News outlines,
      Hackett admitted that his tenure did cause a fair amount of friction, but said his efforts are starting to show.
      "I aimed for moving ahead versus just moving fast. Could we aim for a longer-arc kind of reward. In this case, for the three years it takes to get products to market, you're starting to see the fruits of our labor."
      Farley, who has been with Ford since 2007, knows he has a tough road ahead. Aside from realizing the various paths laid out by Hackett, he also has to deal with the issues of the COVID-19 pandemic and hopefully launch two of Ford's key product without any issues.
      Source: Ford
      Press Release is on Page 2


      FORD ANNOUNCES JIM HACKETT TO RETIRE AS PRESIDENT AND CEO; JIM FARLEY TO SUCCEED HACKETT AS COMPANY CONTINUES TRANSFORMATION
      Jim Hackett, who has led Ford Motor Company’s transformation since 2017 as president and CEO, has elected to retire from the company Jim Farley, currently chief operating officer, becomes president and CEO of Ford effective Oct. 1. He was also elected to the Ford board of directors. He will work closely with Jim Hackett on the transition over the next two months Seamless CEO transition underscores strength of Ford’s leadership team, succession planning, and company progress over the past three years, Executive Chairman Bill Ford says DEARBORN, Mich., Aug. 4, 2020 – Ford Motor Company today announced that Jim Hackett, who has led the company’s transformation since 2017, plans to retire from the company. Jim Farley has been named the company’s new president and CEO and will join the board of directors, effective Oct. 1.
      Hackett, 65, and Farley, 58, will work together on a smooth leadership transition over the next two months.
      Under Hackett, Ford moved aggressively into the new era of smart vehicles and drove a deeper focus on customers’ wants and needs. At the same time, Ford improved the fitness of the base business – restructuring operations, invigorating the product portfolio and reducing bureaucracy.
      “I am very grateful to Jim Hackett for all he has done to modernize Ford and prepare us to compete and win in the future,” said Bill Ford, Ford’s executive chairman. “Our new product vision – led by the Mustang Mach-E, new F-150 and Bronco family – is taking shape. We now have compelling plans for electric and autonomous vehicles, as well as full vehicle connectivity. And we are becoming much more nimble, which was apparent when we quickly mobilized to make life-saving equipment at the outset of the pandemic.”
      Farley, an automotive leader with deep global experience and a successful track record, collaborated with Hackett over the past three years to develop and execute Ford’s Creating Tomorrow Together plan to transform Ford into a higher-growth, higher-margin business.
      “Jim Farley matches an innate feel for cars and customers with great instincts for the future and the new technologies that are changing our industry,” Bill Ford said. “Jim’s passion for great vehicles and his intense drive for results are well known, and I have also seen him develop into a transformational leader with the determination and foresight to help Ford thrive into the future.”
      Farley joined Ford in 2007 as global head of Marketing and Sales and went on to lead Lincoln, Ford South America, Ford of Europe and all Ford global markets in successive roles. In April 2019, Farley was chosen to lead Ford’s New Businesses, Technology & Strategy team, helping the company determine how to capitalize on powerful forces reshaping the industry – such as software platforms, connectivity, AI, automation and new forms of propulsion. He was named chief operating officer in February of this year.
      Hackett, who will continue as a special advisor to Ford through March of 2021, said the time is right to pass the mantle of leadership to Jim Farley.
      “My goal when I took on the CEO role was to prepare Ford to win in the future,” Hackett said. “The hardest thing for a proud, long-lived company to do is change to meet the challenges of the world it’s entering rather than the world it has known. I’m very proud of how far we have come in creating a modern Ford and I am very optimistic about the future.
      “I have worked side-by-side with Jim Farley for the past three years and have the greatest confidence in him as a person and a leader,” Hackett said. “He has been instrumental in crafting our new product portfolio and redesigning our businesses around the world. He is also a change agent with a deep understanding of how to lead Ford in this new era defined by smart vehicles in a smart world.”
      Said Farley: “I love Ford and I am honored by the opportunity to serve and create value for Ford’s employees, customers, dealers, communities and all of our stakeholders. Jim Hackett has laid the foundation for a really vibrant future and we have made tremendous progress in the past three years. I am so excited to work together with the whole Ford team to realize the full potential of this great company in a new era.”

      View full article
  • Posts

    • For shit like that I'd hire a landscaper, who would haul such content in a dump truck or trailer. 
    • You going to hand-shovel a ton & a half of wet stone into the back of a Suburban, trying to tarp the carpeted bottom & plastic sides of the interior to keep it from getting torn apart? Really? Re-read my post- people don't put LOOSE material of any considerable volume in a vehicle like a Suburban. Is it physically possible? Sure - but does it happen? But a lawn mower or a potted shrub or a few bags of mulch- a roofed SUV could handle as well as a 4-ft bed trucklette. The overlap in cargo capability of a 4-ft bed and a mid-size SUV is a LOT more than between a Suburban and a full-size pickup.  
    • So while a tarp for your friends Infinite was okay, is not okay for a Suburban? That makes zero sense and that is the double talk I was talking about here. What you just said about the Suburban can be applied to the Infiniti and it actually makes a case for the Hyundai in the process. Again, being hung up on the bed size caused this. 
    • Everything else (and a buttload of excuses by you) aside, I do find it amusing how you think bags of mulch don’t gets holes in them and leak everywhere like they tend to do. Quite frankly you have tried to play it both ways by touting Full size trucks on one hand while trying to say that SUVs are better suited for light work (they are not in this case) than the Santa Cruz while ignoring the fact that the SUV argument applies to full size trucks. This all started because of your “problem” with bed size which, quite honestly, seems to be your problem and your problem alone here but not everyone sees it as a problem and the positives have been pointed out in spades.     And I live in NC and have ZERO use for a snow blower. Thanks for playing though Balth but please don’t try and act like gas spillage inside a vehicle isn’t a issue (it is). Whether someone goes electric or not is 100% irrelevant and you are deflecting with that statement. And again, all of those efforts your Infiniti boy makes to accommodate loads in his SUV could by 99.9% mitigated and simplified by just having a small bed with which to carry those things without the follow up cleaning and tarp shaking lol. Seriously, stop trying to equate your needs with others here (or dropping your “friend” as an example that actually supported the need for something like the Hyundai).
    • A stylized yet generic appliance for generic people of suburbia.
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...