Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Porsche Mission E To Cost Less than Panamera

      Porsche's chairman says Mission E will cost less than the Panamera

    Porsche's upcoming Mission E is an important vehicle for the brand and they want to give the best shot of succeeding. To do this, the German sports car builder is planning to price it to compete in a "segment below the Panamera".

    This information comes to us from Porsche's chairman Oliver Blume. Speaking with Drive.com.au, Blume says the model will be offered in various power outputs (something akin to other Porsche models like the 911 and Cayenne).

    "We're thinking of different options. There will be more than one model, with different levels of power." said Blume.

    Considering the Panamera begins at $85,000, we wouldn't be surprised if Porsche prices the Mission E around the $65 to $75,000 mark.

    Previously, Porsche has said the initial Mission E would have an output of 600 horsepower and a range of 300 miles. 

    Source: Drive.com.au

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Have to say this is the first Porsche that would make me want to consider buying one. I am excited that this will spawn a whole family of products. 2 & 4 door, convertible, etc.

    MissionE1.jpg

    MissionE2.png

    MissionE3.jpg

    Love those Suicide Doors!!! :metal: This should be used in the Matrix reboot movies.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Its an interesting design- I like the octa-eye headlights and the Cadillac-esque 'tear' down from them. The car also looks incredibly smooth… are these CGI pics?

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Its an interesting design- I like the octa-eye headlights and the Cadillac-esque 'tear' down from them. The car also looks incredibly smooth… are these CGI pics?

    Hey Balthazar, Yes these are the official released pics from Porsche. 

    Here are some actual real pics from the auto show and a video they posted to you tube.

    germany_iaa_frankfurt_motor_show_brx500_52645497.jpg

    porsche-mission-e-0431-004.jpg

    Porsche-Mission-e.jpg

    Porsche-Mission-E-rear-three-quarter-022.jpg

    mackevision-porsche-mission-e-26-980x551.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm torn with this bit of news.

     

    On the one hand, it's great that Porsche of all people is not going to price this thing exorbitantly where it only ends up in the hands of the rich. Allowing this technology to reach the masses is good to see.

     

    On the other hand, the fact that this will be so cheap causes me to worry that the concept won't make it to production very intact. It would be a huge disappointment to see the car watered down from a styling/design standpoint. 

     

    I'm w/ @dfelt in that this is a Porsche I could see myself personally interested in. Especially if there are incentives it will qualify for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ wait.
    'Less than the Panemera' (that starts at $78K) is not even an implication that it'll be priced "for the masses". In fact, the 'most affordable' Porsche starts @ $46K… which still is not 'priced for the masses'… and I will lay down money the production Mission E will be closer to $78K than $46K- meaning it'll start over $62K.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    ^ wait.
    'Less than the Panemera' (that starts at $78K) is not even an implication that it'll be priced "for the masses". In fact, the 'most affordable' Porsche starts @ $46K… which still is not 'priced for the masses'… and I will lay down money the production Mission E will be closer to $78K than $46K- meaning it'll start over $62K.

    Assuming a starting price of 62Kish, which I totally don't doubt, that's only 2x as much as the average new car cost from 2015. For a Porsche. That will likely qualify for tax incentives. That's pretty obtainable for a very large group of people.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You are incorrect IMO, sir. Starting @ $62K means most on lot will likely be solidly over $70K, maybe $75K. Even if one gets $7500 off, you are still back to $63-68K (before taxes & fees). "Very large group" and "the masses" are still 2 different groups of consumers here.

     

    Porsche only moved 6200 Boxster/Caymans in 2016- not exactly ingrained with the 'masses'.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    You are incorrect IMO, sir. Starting @ $62K means most on lot will likely be solidly over $70K, maybe $75K. Even if one gets $7500 off, you are still back to $63-68K (before taxes & fees). "Very large group" and "the masses" are still 2 different groups of consumers here.

     

    Porsche only moved 6200 Boxster/Caymans in 2016- not exactly ingrained with the 'masses'.

    Be that as is may, there's an even bigger gap between people who buy 60-75K cars and those who buy 1 million dollar 918's. :AH-HA:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am not a fan of the duck billed platypus front end.  Porsche styling usually isn't for me, but I think the 911 has always looked decent, the 928, yuck, Boxster/Cayman, odd profile view, Panamera is a disaster.  The Carerra GT and 918 look fairly good, but these guys don't build pretty cars.  I'd be interested to see what the final version looks like when on sale, and will the base model have like 300 hp, and only the tippy top have 600.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I honestly think GM is not looking global or leadership in this approach but short-term money grab in that they think people will not move to other auto makers for the tech they want and will allow GM to dictate what one can and cannot use in regard to the auto and their cell phone.
    • Unfortunate about GM and their Apple Car Play/Android Auto plans..not a smart move, IMO.   Apple Car Play and Android Auto work great in my CT6 and my sister's Equinox.    
    • Buffett Rocks imho and he is right about the Buffoon trade war Idiot47 started. While we have known he will retire his comments on the economy is the point on piece of this story. Warren Buffett Drops Bombshell in Omaha | National Circus If you have not read these, they are worth your time, but like the fall of Rome, UK empire, the U.S. is over as the world leader. I agree with this guy that the downfall started under Idiot45. American Empire Peaked 15 Years Ago, BRICS Now Ahead Of G7: Economist Richard Wolff Discussion on this here: The economist who coined the acronym BRICS talks about how his original vision evolved : NPR Thought provoking and I agree that there are things that will keep the U.S. strong but the current Idiot administration is not helping the long-term outlook for the U.S. I understand what GM thinks they can attain with the changes they are doing, but I sadly do not see them winning against the Billions who want AA/CP. It does not help that they cut tech jobs thinking they can manage a better eco system than Alphabet has done. GM sucks when it comes to keeping tech current. GM cuts hundreds of jobs at 69-year-old Midwest plant - days after bumper earnings Day of reckoning is coming and I hope it finally gets the Idiots out of the White house, the damage done is irreversible in the short term, but can be fixed for a better America. GOP Senator files Supreme Court brief with Democrats against Donald Trump
    • Requires you editing your registry, but this works. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 ; Disable Microsoft Edge MSN news feed, sponsored links, shopping assistant and more. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Edge] "NewTabPageContentEnabled"=dword:00000000 "NewTabPageHideDefaultTopSites"=dword:00000001 "EdgeShoppingAssistantEnabled"=dword:00000000 "TabServicesEnabled"=dword:00000000 "AlternateErrorPagesEnabled"=dword:00000000
    • I'm fairly out of the loop with what GM is doing.  All I know is that I sort of like the Acadia* and its price is ridiculous. * not sure if it's partly a name thing because I love Acadia National Park in coastal Maine. But I liked the one that I was recently given as a rental, and that it has a 2.5 L Ecotec engine.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search