• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Tesla Model X Spotted by California Photographer


    • Spy shots reveal the general shape of the coming Tesla Model X Crossover

    Tesla's hotly-anticipated Model X continues testing in California and Los Altos shutterbug hushypuppy has snapped half a dozen photos of the electric carmaker's crossover rolling down city streets. The company has yet to reveal photos of the production vehicle.

     

    The vehicle is vital to the Palo Alto-based carmaker's future. The twice delayed Tesla Model X has attracted over 21,000 pre-orders and is predicted to push Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) shares up 70%. Deliveries are expected to begin in Q3 2015.

     

    High definition photos can be viewed at VWVortex.
    Source: VWVortex; HybridCars.com

     

    post-1376-0-25360600-1432930367_thumb.jp

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    Tesla definitely needs these sooner rather than later.  They have to expand their portfolio if they want to get into that wonderful realm known as profitability.  I really like what they're doing, and want to see them succeed, but the slow speed at which new models are rolling out is concerning.  They also need to get that upcoming lower-priced more mass market vehicle into production.  If they want to survive as a separate entity that will be a must.  If they hope to continue operating as an independent company they will need these models to hit the roads and really take off.  If they keep going as they have, mostly catering to a smaller niche due to their pricing and exclusivity they will eventually need to become part of something bigger as have companies like Lamborghini, Ferrari, and oh so many others.  I don't want to see that happen, I want to see Tesla get some new things out there and really take off, for there to be a big 4 American car companies, but they have a lot of work to do.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No gull-wing doors I'm guessing?

     

    Falcon-wing doors are still slated to be on the production vehicle. One of the engineering hangups was properly sealing the doors and the body, which has since been overcome. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No gull-wing doors I'm guessing?

     

    Falcon-wing doors are still slated to be on the production vehicle. One of the engineering hangups was properly sealing the doors and the body, which has since been overcome. 

     

    I do love some crazy doors on a car.  Maybe they're just for show and less about functionality, but I don't care, non-traditional doors are just awesome.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's like a BMW X6 or Mercedes GLE Coupe sort of style, or a crossover coupe; but I'll admit it. I think even with the little camo, it looks halfways decent.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It [bMW model] looks like a [any other BMW model].  They didn't change much of anything.

     

    It [Audi model] looks like a [any other Audi model].  They didn't change much of anything.

     

    It [Porsche model] looks like a [any other Porsche model].  They didn't change much of anything.

     

    It [VW model] looks like a [any other VW model].  They didn't change much of anything.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am allfor GM buying Tesla, but while I loved the Mocha colored Version, this white one is rather plain ugly.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Hotly anticipated"  LOL!  :rolleyes:

     

    What other vehicles currently have 21,000 or more pre-orders which require a substantial down payment?

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    "Hotly anticipated"  LOL!  :rolleyes:

     

    What other vehicles currently have 21,000 or more pre-orders which require a substantial down payment?

     

    I'm more interested in this thing's release to the public than the Ford GT at this point, and that is one beautiful car that is going to be very rare.  That GT will be an amazing car, I'm certain, but Tesla models will have more impact on the future of the automotive industry.  Even if you don't care for them, they are pushing the boundaries of what you can do with an electric vehicle, helping to validate EVs as an option for the average consumer, and are allowing others to copy their patents which could result in better EVs from any number of manufacturers.  Whether you are in the market for their vehicles or not you should be anticipating whatever Tesla does next because it is a sign of what may very well be the future for whichever brands you do like.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    "Hotly anticipated"  LOL!  :rolleyes:

     

    What other vehicles currently have 21,000 or more pre-orders which require a substantial down payment?

     

    It is hotly anticipated... by his parents.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    "Hotly anticipated"  LOL!  :rolleyes:

     

    What other vehicles currently have 21,000 or more pre-orders which require a substantial down payment?

     

    It is hotly anticipated... by his parents.

     

     

    It's not a terribly expensive vehicle compared to the competition. It helps that I made a mint investing in recession-era Ford stock and don't purchase a new vehicle every year. 

     

    Of course, I think I should've put the money into selling sour grape juice. Business would be good!

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well if they cannot make a door handle work on a consistent basis, how are they going to make a reliable gullwing door assembly?  I am sure they will send out a diesel powered service truck quickly to haul it in though.

     

    Booyah, I will leave you alone on this and let you have your fun.  You are the perfect admin for the Tesla forum here.  I will never believe that an electric vehicle is practical at all, especially at Tesla prices, S or X.  I will not back down from that, but I also don't want to bite your ankles all the time.  Maybe just once in a while I will come into the Tesla section and post a devilishly clever remark, how's that sound?  :)

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am a bit underwhelmed, but then again, I kind of expected to be.

    It's pretty easy to impress with a $100K sleek sporty car....but not so easy with something like this.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just by the looks of it, it just looks like a lowly common family car. Big whoop! That is a great way to boost public appeal...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Read some 2013, company-hinted info that stated the Model X was going to be priced slightly higher than the base Model S. 

    If that's the case, the Model X is a HUGE gamble… not due to the pricing, but WRT the company's bottom (red) line.

    Model 3 is the future/ hope/ savior for the company, it should have arrived before the X and been here already.

    The clock is ticking loudly on Tesla...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Read some 2013, company-hinted info that stated the Model X was going to be priced slightly higher than the base Model S. 

    If that's the case, the Model X is a HUGE gamble… not due to the pricing, but WRT the company's bottom (red) line.

    Model 3 is the future/ hope/ savior for the company, it should have arrived before the X and been here already.

    The clock is ticking loudly on Tesla...

     Elon has billions in his bank account and his ego is on the line with Tesla.  I think Telsa will be okay for a while. 

     

    That said, one of the early pieces is apparently in place for the Model-3. From what I understand is the front motor setup in the P85D is likely to be the base rear motor in the Model 3. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If that's the case, the Model X is a HUGE gamble… not due to the pricing, but WRT the company's bottom (red) line.

    Model 3 is the future/ hope/ savior for the company, it should have arrived before the X and been here already.

    The clock is ticking loudly on Tesla...

    Why should Tesla ignore the one of the most important segments for luxury automakers? Just off the top of my head:

    • Lexus RX350: ~40% sales
    • Porsche Cayenne: ~45% sales
    • Cadillac SRX: ~ 34% sales

    Lexus' other 11 models are fighting for 60%. The Cayenne saved Porsche. The SRX is in the top three sellers of its category. Two of these brands have wide lineups, yet their crossovers constitute over one-third of sales.

    Crossovers appeal to arguably the widest demographics. Go to any auto show and you'll find new couples to retirees checking out RR Evoque's and M-Class'. At college, plenty of young men and women would be driving Cayenne Turbo's and RR Sports, instead of sport-sedans. 

    89b10b2ba.jpg

    via TheAtlantic

    The Model X is based on the Model S. It's only financially prudent to make the vehicle before the Model 3. If Tesla immediately got to work with a new platform, they wouldn't have the capital and confidence to build a necessary charging network and battery factory. I think those last two things are readily and purposefully ignored by people here.

    FWIW: Each Model X preorder requires a $5,000-upfront pledge. At last tally, that equals ~$105 million in preorders and it's still growing.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      There is no love lost between Tesla Motors and the former director of Autopilot. Bloomberg reports that the Silicon Valley automaker has sued Sterling Anderson over allegations of stealing confidential information about Autopilot and trying to recruit Tesla employees to his new venture.
      In the court filing, Tesla says Anderson began work on an autonomous-car venture, Aurora Innovation LLC back in summer when he was head of the Autopilot project. As the director of Autopilot, Anderson would have access to Tesla's semi-autonomous tech. He would leave Tesla in December. Anderson has been collaborating with the former head of Google’s self-driving car project, Chris Urmson.
      Tesla is seeking a court order barring Anderson from "any use of Tesla’s proprietary information related to autonomous driving." Tesla is also seeking an order banning Anderson and Aurora Innovation from recruiting Tesla employees and contractors for a year after Anderson’s termination date.
      “Tesla’s meritless lawsuit reveals both a startling paranoia and an unhealthy fear of competition. This abuse of the legal system is a malicious attempt to stifle a competitor and destroy personal reputations. Aurora looks forward to disproving these false allegations in court and to building a successful self-driving business,” Aurora Innovation LLC said in a statement yesterday.
      Source: Bloomberg

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      There is no love lost between Tesla Motors and the former director of Autopilot. Bloomberg reports that the Silicon Valley automaker has sued Sterling Anderson over allegations of stealing confidential information about Autopilot and trying to recruit Tesla employees to his new venture.
      In the court filing, Tesla says Anderson began work on an autonomous-car venture, Aurora Innovation LLC back in summer when he was head of the Autopilot project. As the director of Autopilot, Anderson would have access to Tesla's semi-autonomous tech. He would leave Tesla in December. Anderson has been collaborating with the former head of Google’s self-driving car project, Chris Urmson.
      Tesla is seeking a court order barring Anderson from "any use of Tesla’s proprietary information related to autonomous driving." Tesla is also seeking an order banning Anderson and Aurora Innovation from recruiting Tesla employees and contractors for a year after Anderson’s termination date.
      “Tesla’s meritless lawsuit reveals both a startling paranoia and an unhealthy fear of competition. This abuse of the legal system is a malicious attempt to stifle a competitor and destroy personal reputations. Aurora looks forward to disproving these false allegations in court and to building a successful self-driving business,” Aurora Innovation LLC said in a statement yesterday.
      Source: Bloomberg
    • By William Maley
      Last May, Joshua Brown was killed in a crash when his Tesla Model S in Autopilot collided with a tractor-trailer. After an investigation that took over half of a year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released their findings today. 
      In a report, NHTSA said they didn't find any evidence of defects with the Autopilot system. The agency also stated that they would not ask Tesla to perform a recall on models equipped with Autopilot.
      In a statement, Tesla said "the safety of our customers comes first, and we appreciate the thoroughness of NHTSA’s report and its conclusion."
       
      NHTSA's report revealed that neither Autopilot nor Brown applied the brakes to prevent or lessen the impact of the crash. However, NHTSA cleared the Automatic Emergency Braking system as it's “designed to avoid or mitigate rear end collisions” but that “braking for crossing path collisions, such as that present in the Florida fatal crash, are outside the expected performance capabilities of the system.” 
      Speaking of Brown, NHTSA's report said that he did not any action with steering or anything else to prevent this. The last recorded action in the vehicle was the cruise control being set to 74 mph. NHTSA notes that in their reconstruction of the crash, Brown had seven seconds to from seeing the tractor trailer to the moment of the impact, giving him possible chance to take some sort of action.
      This brings up a very serious concern of how much confidence owners give the Autopilot system. Despite Tesla having statements such as that Autopilot “is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times," and that "you need to maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle” while using it," various videos showing Model Ss narrowly avoiding crashes have caused people to think that Autopilot was fully autonomous - which it isn't.
      “Although perhaps not as specific as it could be, Tesla has provided information about system limitations in the owner’s manuals, user interface and associated warnings/alerts, as well as a driver monitoring system that is intended to aid the driver in remaining engaged in the driving task at all times. Drivers should read all instructions and warnings provided in owner’s manuals for ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) technologies and be aware of system limitations,” said NHTSA.
      Tesla, to its credit, has been updating Autopilot to make drivers pay attention when using it. These include increasing the warnings for a driver to intervene when needed, and turning off the system if a driver doesn't respond to repeated requests.
      Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (Report in PDF), Tesla

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Last May, Joshua Brown was killed in a crash when his Tesla Model S in Autopilot collided with a tractor-trailer. After an investigation that took over half of a year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released their findings today. 
      In a report, NHTSA said they didn't find any evidence of defects with the Autopilot system. The agency also stated that they would not ask Tesla to perform a recall on models equipped with Autopilot.
      In a statement, Tesla said "the safety of our customers comes first, and we appreciate the thoroughness of NHTSA’s report and its conclusion."
       
      NHTSA's report revealed that neither Autopilot nor Brown applied the brakes to prevent or lessen the impact of the crash. However, NHTSA cleared the Automatic Emergency Braking system as it's “designed to avoid or mitigate rear end collisions” but that “braking for crossing path collisions, such as that present in the Florida fatal crash, are outside the expected performance capabilities of the system.” 
      Speaking of Brown, NHTSA's report said that he did not any action with steering or anything else to prevent this. The last recorded action in the vehicle was the cruise control being set to 74 mph. NHTSA notes that in their reconstruction of the crash, Brown had seven seconds to from seeing the tractor trailer to the moment of the impact, giving him possible chance to take some sort of action.
      This brings up a very serious concern of how much confidence owners give the Autopilot system. Despite Tesla having statements such as that Autopilot “is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times," and that "you need to maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle” while using it," various videos showing Model Ss narrowly avoiding crashes have caused people to think that Autopilot was fully autonomous - which it isn't.
      “Although perhaps not as specific as it could be, Tesla has provided information about system limitations in the owner’s manuals, user interface and associated warnings/alerts, as well as a driver monitoring system that is intended to aid the driver in remaining engaged in the driving task at all times. Drivers should read all instructions and warnings provided in owner’s manuals for ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) technologies and be aware of system limitations,” said NHTSA.
      Tesla, to its credit, has been updating Autopilot to make drivers pay attention when using it. These include increasing the warnings for a driver to intervene when needed, and turning off the system if a driver doesn't respond to repeated requests.
      Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (Report in PDF), Tesla
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Tesla / Solarcity merger, Brilliant or Disaster?

      Tesla announced their intent to buy SolarCity and some screamed the sky is falling. Tesla moves forward with offering a complete home solution of Solar panels, battery bank and 220V charging for your Tesla and believes they have the future tied up in a single one stop shopping solution that beats all the other Auto OEMS.

      The merger final vote by Solarcity shareholders is scheduled for Nov 17th 2016. Yet with this deal not done yet, there are many that have divided into two camps, those that think this is brilliant such as reported by Barron's yesterday that ISS one of the largest outside analyst groups that advises shareholders on mergers gave it's blessing to what they believe is an outstanding tie up of two companies that can maximize return on investments. Barron's believes that Tesla has addressed all the concerns that allow for a successful merger of the two companies and a maximizing of complementary products.
      Barron's Story
      One CNBC story feels that this merger might even be a little late. They agree that Solarcity will provide about $1 Billion next year in revenue to the new merged company and add about $500 million in cash to the Tesla corporation over the next 3 years.
      CNBC Story
      Then you have the latest story also from CNBC where a different analyst believes this is nothing but one large mistake and that is due to what he sees as an impossible return on the investment. Yet even with that he also points out to strong supporters such as Ron Baron who ownes 1.5 million shares that see a 30 to 50 times return on the stock due to the merger. 
      CNBC Story 2
      Yet with all this,  “Playing Amish Paradise in my Tesla,” Musk shared with his 5.8 million Twitter followers on Sunday we have the man himself seeing a much simpler life for us all in the new EV world.
       
      So what is your thoughts on this whole merger and the new EV world Musk sees for us all?
       
  • Recent Status Updates

    • Drew Dowdell

      I have one co-worker who has been a thorn in my side for the past 6 months.... but I have to admit that when I need something done that is in his area of expertise, he goes after it like an angry rabid chihuahua and gets it done.
      · 0 replies
    • Drew Dowdell

      Me: I'll take "Shopping" for $800.
      Alex:"This shopping location is popular on Sundays for groups of gay couples, families with small children, and college kids with parents in tow to gather."
      · 3 replies
    • Drew Dowdell

      @gmc Sierra Denali with manufacturer plates and a never used snow plow. Wonder what's going on here.
      · 2 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online