Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    2012 Volkswagen Beetle Turbo

    The 2012 Jetta GLI went back and we were supposed to get a Passat in its place. However, the Passat encountered some unfortunate incident in the hands of another journalist so instead Volkswagen sent us this 2012 Beetle Turbo with DSG and Navigation.

    So far I've done almost entirely city driving in the Beetle and while the DSG is very smooth above first, I'm finding it a little jerky in stop and go city traffic. After you get it out of crawling speed, the DSG opens the Beetle's wings and allows incredibly smooth and fast shifting in either direction. In regular drive mode and normal city speeds, the DSG does its best to keep the RPM below 2,000 at all time. Switching to sport mode raises the imaginary line to 3,000. You can rev the engine higher than that, but in normal driving, it is completely unnecessary. When prodded, the Beetle will break its front tires loose pretty easily in first and second gear.

    I was seeing some pretty great highway economy numbers out of the Jetta GLI with this same engine but a 6-speed manual. During my time with the Beetle, I will be driving 90% of the route that I took the 2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco on and again I will be loaded down with gear. Because the Beetle has a larger engine with 62 more horsepower and 52 more lb-ft of torque, I don't expect the Beetle Turbo to match the Cruze's 51mpg I saw on that trip. The Beetle Turbo is rated at 22/30 city/highway but my guess is that I'll be able to beat that number after seeing what the Jetta GLI was able to do.

    The looks are far more masculine than the first generation Beetle, and I'm getting a lot of stop and stare as I drive by.

    But now I have to get on the road. Leave your questions in the comments section for this 2012 Volkswagen Beetle Turbo.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Not sure if you've ever driven a first-gen New Beetle, but the new car seems to be packaged noticeably better, with the flatter windshield and shallower dash perceptibly taking up less passenger space. I sometimes felt like I was driving from the back seat in mine.

    How's the driving position and the visibility out of the new, flat windshield and low roof?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    According to the trip computer, I did 35.5mpg over 375 miles. That was fairly well loaded down as you'll see in the picture below.... the trip back will be just me and my luggage.

    I find the driving position to be very agreeable. It was absolutely fine for the 7 hours I spent behind the wheel yesterday. I find that I do sit more upright than other cars, but not in any way that is uncomfortable. There is also actual legroom in the back when the front seat is adjusted for me. It's no DTS back there, but I'm not squished in.

    I'm getting a rattle from the right rear of the car inside the passenger compartment. My suspicion is that the package shelf isn't securely fastened since I was monkeying with it to get all of these laptops in. I will investigate later as I have finally unloaded the car.

    Reactions have all been positive with lots of people giving thumbs up as the drive past.



    The car was able to handle 9 laptops with all of the accessories plus my luggage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think I'd go with the Beetle, but I'd get it in a manual instead of DSG. However, the GLI is a full $3k cheaper than this Beetle, so if money were an object, the Beetle isn't worth $3k more than the better equipped GLI. I was close. it's a $2,500 difference, so my point stands.

    GLI Manual - $26,445

    GLI DSG - $27,545

    Beetle Turbo Manual - $28,995

    Beetle Turbo DSG - $30,095

    The GLI has automatic climate control, bluetooth, and iPod controls for less money.

    Handling wise, the GLI only seems marginally better... and I think that has more to do with the Beetle's relatively tall stature on a 5 inch shorter wheel base.

    I really really am enjoying this car. It is fun to drive, easy to park, easy to get in and out of, more commodious than one would think, and relatively fuel efficient for a car that has a lot of scoot.

    So my problem? For $30,000, one has to *really* want a Beetle equipped like this... because at that price, one's mind can quickly wander to things like a Regal Turbo, which handles better (or at least more reassuringly) and is still pretty quick, and I keep thinking how much Verano $30k will get you keeping in mind the turbo version of that car will have 50 more horsepower and 50 more ft-lb of torque along with the other niceties.

    Edit: I just realized I screwed up on the price comparison because I compared a 6-speed manual GLI to a 6-speed DSG Beetle. Let me look up the price differential and fix it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With the prices you listed above, you showed my problem with Beetle. For the same money or close to it, I can jump into a GTI Three Door when equipped as the same.

    I love the new Beetle. I had the chance to sit in it and found it very enjoyable. The price tag though has me wondering why I shouldn't go with the GLI and pocket the $2k in savings.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What other impressions do you have with this car? How is it in city driving? and also...how well does it stack up to the Cruze in your opinion as a commuter cr? How well does it stack up against other cars you have driven?

    May very well be in the market soon....also...how does Albert like this thing? Has he driven it or ridden in it?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Even the base model is terrific, and it will be even sweeter when the 1.8L takes over from the 2.5... although the 2.5s I've driven have been fine, with a swell of torque that's reassuring.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Per this latest story: Tesla Production Sites By Model Assignment, Capacity: October 2022 (insideevs.com) Based on the above numbers before any expansion that would need to be done at the plants per the story, Tesla at maximum capacity now would only be able to produce 1,900,000 or about 100,000 shy of @smk4565 statement of producing 2 million autos in 2023. The bigger issue is that Tesla Fit n Finish has gotten more attention and many Tesla fans are leaving Tesla due to the CEO and going with other companies EVs. Tesla will grow, but not as fast as I think some here believe. Especially without expanding existing plants which is not something they can do overnight. Perfect example is their German plant where each time they want to increase production and hours of operation they have to file a request with the local Government and that take 90 to 180 days. They cannot just flip a switch for increase production and they still have their other projects to deal with.
    • Further proof that Tesla is going to have problems is that very large drop in Used EV prices now on par with ICE auto's. The Pandemic is over and prices are no longer going up. Tesla Model 3 leads a nosedive in used EV prices (greencarreports.com) 21.5% drop in prices since September 2022 and still dropping. This is the same problem many other auto companies have had where new car price is hit with a large drop in value in only months. Currently the average price of a new Tesla 3 is $44, 990 and with a 21.5% price drop in 6 months means your new auto is worth $35,317.15 or a drop of $9,672.85 value drop in 6 months. Tesla Model 3 Costs Much Less Than Average New Car, Sans Incentives (insideevs.com) Economy of scale does not always mean value price is kept and as we are seeing, Tesla is now dropping just as fast as other brands.
    • 1.31M in 2022. That's about 33% off of 2 million.  Do we know if they have the capacity to add 33% more in 2023? That's a pretty massive amount. 
    • Nope, nope, and more nope. You can scream that price until the cows come home but Tesla has yet to meet any original price point brought up by them. Hell, VW has ready beat them to the punch in the sub-$30K game so where is their advantage two years from now when said factory will actually be done (hypothetically)? Answer, there isn't one. Only fanboy talk.   Tesla is building this. Tesla is building that. It is baffling how you post this like they are the ONLY ones doing any of this. They aren't but I'm sure you will be there to believe whatever price point promise nonsense that Elon tweets. 
    • First off, Lincoln does have sales decline as they killed off their cars and then the Pandemic hit and the 3,000 roughly decline between 2021 to 2022 is on par with the whole auto industry decline due to the global pandemic. They have their stable of luxury SUVs and this year will truly show if their 5 star rated auto's along with all the reviews show an increase or not. Genesis is growing and paying attention but then they are more car centric than SUV and their SUVs are fairly new. People are realizing that Genesis gives so much more value than many other luxury brands. Lets STOP THE BS on Tesla. They have announced that they are looking to build a Mexico factory, they have not done anything and the government has not approved anything. The biggest reason for this is the water shortage the area that Tesla wants to build in and while as the latest news below states that Musk has verbally agreed to use recycled water and be non water user based company. They have not submitted any documentation yet, plans, etc. as such this is as Musk has said so many times, VAPORWARE.  Tesla to build plant in Mexico | CTV News Same with your comment, Tesla HAS NO $30,000 auto. Nothing has been shown, just words that they are working on such a car. Said the same thing about Tesla 3 that is VAPORWARE. In regards to your value play, GM, Ford have been offering leases with insurance, etc. for years before Tesla started offering this. They are late to the party. GM and Ford both have offered this on their EV models from the start.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

This is the Call To Action(CTA)

  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search