Sign in to follow this  
!!!TED!!!

2007 Sierra pictures

16 posts in this topic

!!!TED!!!    3

Here are a few pictures taken Sunday night of the new Sierra. This dealership has a 50's truck, and they stood them side by side. GMTruckGuy74 is gonna love this!

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ocnblu    733
That's a good looking new truck, no doubt. The old one... is it a '58? '59? Nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GMTruckGuy74    228

Here are a few pictures taken Sunday night of the new Sierra. This dealership has a 50's truck, and they stood them side by side. GMTruckGuy74 is gonna love this!

212515[/snapback]

Very nice pictures TED, very nice pictures. The old red GMC is a 1958 model, as it has the bumper bullets (which went away for 1959). It's also a Canadian-built and sold GMC, as the grille shows the id number 9310 (which is basically the same as the US series 100 model). I love when GM dealerships have a restored GM make in their showrooms.... there's a stand-alone Buick store in Levittown/Bristol, PA (Dieckhaus Buick) that has a '54 or '55 Special convertible in theirs. I just love the new 2007 Sierras and can't wait to see one in person. Thanks for posting the pics of both GMC trucks! :) Edited by GMTruckGuy74

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Northstar    11

The Sierra looks great in these real-world pics. The Silverado my dealership had also looked very good, though I like the GMC more.

That "sport" (or whatever it is) Tundra looks terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sciguy_0504    0

Both are damn good looking trucks.

Makes it all the more apparent how much better the GMT900s look than the Tundra

Posted Image

212548[/snapback]

You mean the Sierra. The Silverado looks worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Intrepidation    846

You mean the Sierra.  The Silverado looks worse.

212647[/snapback]

Nope, every truck looks better than it besides maybe the Titan...and the new Super Duty. IMO of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AxelTheRed    0

when you compare real-life pics of the SIERRA to the Tundra, suddenly the Tundra looks very dated....

216407[/snapback]

You're absolutely right...but along with looking dated, I think the Tundra looks really pretentious too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw my first Sierra today, a 1500 SLT 4x4 crew cab in Steel Gray Metallic that cost a whopping $44,544 and looked much cheaper. It was just as disappointing in person as it was on paper and online (just like the Chrysler Sebring I saw yesterday), it looked kind of puny, pathetic, and cramped. The floor to roof interior height looked tiny (the dealer was closed, so I didn't get to sit in it). Too narrow, too low, still too Chevy-like-I really wish the mighty 2000 Terradyne concept was used as a template for the Sierra because it looks weak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bowtie_dude    0

Saw my first Sierra today, a 1500 SLT 4x4 crew cab in Steel Gray Metallic that cost a whopping $44,544 and looked much cheaper. It was just as disappointing in person as it was on paper and online (just like the Chrysler Sebring I saw yesterday), it looked kind of puny, pathetic, and cramped. The floor to roof interior height looked tiny (the dealer was closed, so I didn't get to sit in it). Too narrow, too low, still too Chevy-like-I really wish the mighty 2000 Terradyne concept was used as a template for the Sierra because it looks weak.

220347[/snapback]

I don't think I've known anyone harder to please than you. The two Sierra's at the closest GMC dealer look anything BUT cheap, especially the white crew cab they've got and anything BUT puny and pathetic.

My biggest beef is that the Sierra looks like a carbon copy of the outgoing F-series super duties. Other than that, they're fantastic.

I think you just need to get off your high horse.

Edited by bowtie_dude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just prefer the Dodge Ram, Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra-they scream style to me-these scream "same rehashed stuff." Maybe I was a little off when I typed it, sorry. I'll have to take another look at the Chevy and GMC when I get a chance, but I'm sorry, I just don't like either truck from what I've seen so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bowtie_dude    0

I just prefer the Dodge Ram, Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra-they scream style to me-these scream "same rehashed stuff." Maybe I was a little off when I typed it, sorry. I'll have to take another look at the Chevy and GMC when I get a chance, but I'm sorry, I just don't like either truck from what I've seen so far.

220583[/snapback]

If you don't like them, fine. But the crew cab I saw dwarfs the Titan in size and I didn't get anything of a puny or pathetic vibe from it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GMTruckGuy74    228

Here's a couple of shots of the new Sierra's that my local Pontiac/GMC/Buick dealer has:

White SLT Extended Cab 4WD:

Posted Image

Steel Gray SLE-1 Crew Cab 4WD:

Posted Image

Sport Red Metallic SLT Extend Cab 4WD:

Posted Image

Now, for comparison's sake - 2007 all-new vs. 2007 Classic:

1/2 ton Classic SL (W/T) 1500 4wd vs. 1/2 ton All-New SLT 1500 4wd:

Posted Image

3/4 ton Classic 2500 HD SLT 4wd vs. 1/2 ton All-New SLT 1500 4wd:

Posted Image

Enjoy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this