Audi: Part One

[Cory Wolfe]

[FAPTurbo]

The graffiti artists in that area are lacking in their penis drawings, and what's that about 'your tits?'

Oh, and nice car, I guess.

[Blake Noble]

The third image in the set is my favorite.

So, what's the deal with this BV? Are you going to college to become a photographer?

[ocnblu]

He has an interest, and he shows talent, so yes, he should go to school for photography. But what do I know?

[siegen]

Excellent car, excellent photos.

[regfootball]

those are indeed some excellent photos.

[Intrepidation]

The first two are a bit static and kinda meh, but the rest are quite nice. Only issue is that the one with the two Audis. The 5 is out of focus, which may be intentional, but the two cars are rougly on the same plane, and your eye isn't really drawn more towards the TT. Also, the TT's lighting is off and so it becomes hard to make the the shape of the roofline...almost looks like a convertible with the top down.

I would say #3 and the last two are the strongest photos, particularly how the last two make use of the lighting.

[Intrepidation]

By the way, did you use your SX10 IS for these photos? If so, what settings did you use for the dusk shot? I've only done a sunset shot once with ISO at 80 and I gave the sunset mode a try, but it came out pretty grainy, which yours didn't.

[ocnblu]

In the second photo, the TT shows off its nice, muscled ass to great advantage.

[Cory Wolfe]

DF: Yes, I did and that was back in May, so I don't quite remember.

Also, the quality of the first two pictures is off from the original files to a bigger degree than with the rest, if that's what you meant by 'static'. I'm not sure why those didn't upload to Facebook as cleanly as the others.

[Intrepidation]

The file should contain the information about what settings were used to take it.

[Cory Wolfe]

I wasn't aware that such information was. Exposure: 1/25. ISO: 80. Aperture: 4.6.