Where in the world did you get from my post that Lutz was an issue?? All I was saying was that Lutz hasn't even been given the full (minimum) 4 years to debut products, but what we HAVE seen so far is very encouraging. Now, my question to you is WHY in the world would you want Kerkorian to start DEMANDING changes?? Where is the logic in that? I fail to see it. That would be the Oldsmobile situation all over again: abandoning (most likely) a successful strategy because it didn't start working instantaneously. The Toyota question was completely sarcastic, and obviously so. Do you REALLY think I would be of the opinion that after this site and everything you would work for Toyota? You're funny.
Cool, you live in Detroit? I guess that makes you an expert. See, I live in Indianapolis, so I'm like a total expert on Eli Lilly and the pharmaceutical industry as a whole. Wait a minute. No I'm not!
Your family were all UAW workers. You have a good grasp of factory conditions and the UAW, not GM as a corporation. Your posts show a gross lack of understanding of the biggest element/hurdle of this business: time. Things take time.
Guess what? I've been going to auto shows, dealer preview events, etc for as long as I can remember, too! But that only makes you an expert on product, how dealers function (maybe), and marketing (to a limited degree). There isn't anything to be learned at these events regarding corporations.
So you've had a conversation or two with various executives. So has Buick Man.
I've seen unreleased stuff too! I guess I'm qualified to run GM now, too
I also know how many other types of corporations work, but I fail to see how this is relevant since we are talking about the auto industry, in which all the players function more or less the same, just with varying degrees of leanness. No company has yet to completely reinvent the way this industry does business.