Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

oldshurst442

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,759

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    230

 Content Type 

Everything posted by oldshurst442

  1. oldshurst442
    Yes. I agree to the XT5-V not being much of an interest and therefore not a money maker or at the very least, getting people in the showroom. Soccer moms, suburban housewives, scrawny yuppie middle managers that think they got a clue but really dont, dont really buy into performance vehicles of any kind really. And they dont get excited when the sales rep talks to them about high performance either. They dont go out of their way to visit a showroom based on the fact that Model XYZ won the 24 hours of Lemans or the Nascar race on Sunday and want to buy the baby version of that car or any other car in the showroom...and the XT5 or the RX or the X1 from BMW are just vehicles with luxury intentions that makes them feel good... The Escalade...now that would be something of an interesting footnote in automotive history if Cadillac engineered and offered something wild in powertrain and in sporty suspension demeanor options. "If it aint broke dont fix it" would not apply here as the Escalade aint broke and it sells just fine. But "why the phoque not???!!!" would do wonders in getting people in the showrooms just to look at one and see for themselves how stupendously nutty the vehicle might be and you never know, they may just drive off in a brand new CTS-V instead because they would deem the Escalade ESV-V too crazy and weird to explain to their neighbours...
  2. oldshurst442
    Well, of course. But where is that XT5-V? Or any other performance oriented CUV from Cadillac? The Germans are pumping out all kinds of models. Sure, they are pumping them out at an insane rate and its more akin to see what sticks rather than business savvy, but still. The models are there. Cadillac makes concepts that has the planet salivating, ALL THE PLANET, and are afraid to build it. (minus the couple that they did build, but failed miserably in the market-place, but that was because of their piss-poor execution than anything else, which means that Cadillac product planners got no clue of what is going on in the market place...)
  3. oldshurst442
    Yeah...but about that... Could it also be that Audi interiors are, like awesome, and when people actually sit inside an Audi CUV or SUV or sedan above the A4 car, are impressed and when are cross shopping with other brands like Acura, Buick, Infiniti, Cadillac and the like, are less impressed and go on to buy that Audi instead?
  4. oldshurst442
    Yup. And I dont talk cars with them. Ive stopped conversatin' with people like that. IA while ago. Not too long ago though but I made it a rule that I wont be wasting my time with folk like that...on any subject, not just cars. When I see the entourage near me be filled with cluelessness and clueless people, I stop being the person to enlighten and I have become the person to flee. I enjoy the parties and get-togethers I go to much more now.
  5. oldshurst442
    Im sorry for that. Drew made that case loud and clear that idiots are in fact everywhere! Sorry.
  6. oldshurst442
    Well, yourself and Drew just now has proved to me that there are many idiots around. I too have met idiots like that. But those idiots are not car people to begin with. So...all kinds of shyte comes out of their mouths. Im basing my statements calling them out as trolls to the people that ARE car people and have an inkling of what is actually happening in the automotive world. In Quebec, the furthest place in North America that one could call it being a car enthusiast place, and I have yet to meet a car person that would be THAT dense....(non-car people aside...) THAT is how Im basing my statement.
  7. oldshurst442
    This much I agree. So..Drew, THIS would be a HUGE plus for a RWD CUV for Cadillac. Albeit the XT5 is still needed. And needed to be FWD based. There NEEDS to be high performance/high end RWD/AWD CUVs and SUVs for Cadillac...
  8. oldshurst442
    From what I gather...there wont be any "re-badged" Chevy stigma... (I cant believe Im still reading trolly responses like that in 2018...)
  9. oldshurst442
    Brand image? Cant get away with the "re-badged" Chevy stigma? Where is that stigma present in those 4 photographs? You are barking up the wrong tree in all 4 of those segments...albeit the GMC, Buick and Cadillac are in the same market niche fighting for the same market dollars...but nothing says that they cannot co-exist. In fact...they MUST co-exist to ensure their respective brands get sales... What you may want to say, is that Cadillac needs RWD sporty oriented CUVs and SUVs with V Series badging to ensure enthusiasts are well represented for the brand... CUVs and SUVs to go up against these machines from BMW and Mercedes Because either you are trolling with this statement... because a CTS was NEVER an Impala based car....EVER... never looked like the CTS could even BE an Impala. So...either these guys you bumped into are trolls...much like yourself, or just cant stand Cadillac and/or GM and NOTHING that Cadillac and/or GM will do will EVER change that. Because quite honestly, NOBODY is THAT moronic and clueless to confuse a CTS of any generation with that of an Impala of any generation. Maybe if we went and compared a 1980s Caprice with a 1980s Fleetwood...but I doubt your entourage were old enough to remember those cars...
  10. oldshurst442
    The Infiniti Q60 has got to be the most prettiest car in its class. Its got lines that only Italian car designers could only achieve. And that is definitely a good thing.
  11. oldshurst442
    I dont need or want a 6000 lbs SUV. I do however want a 6000 lbs sedan or coupe. I dont need that either. But I want one. But Ill take a small convertible if anybody offered me one. *SIGH* Cadillac does NOT offer a car like this Benz though, so my choices are limited if I wanted to spend a good chunk of my money on a small convertible and I wanted a luxury oriented convertible. Sure there is the Camaro convertible, but I want to buy something from a luxury brand.... Yup...Benz it is! So yeah...I too call bullshyte MR. DFELT on the C Class convertible lacking passion! PS: It dont matter if the dash "looks" cheap... The 3 pointed Star up front is what counts...THAT is THE point!
  12. oldshurst442
    Or at the very least, some CUVs and SUVs that have sporty intentions... BMW and Mercedes offers those too...even though I dont like ANY CUV or SUV short of a Wrangler, I do recognize trends in the market place...
  13. oldshurst442
    More power is the only thing I like in your list there. LED lights? Cool, I guess. Neat feature. Like chrome trim was back in the day. But it aint something that makes or breaks a deal for me. Bigger screens? The only bigger screen I want is bigger windows so I could see where the phoque Im driving...because I actually...um...drive. I like to look out the damned window when I.....um....drive. Im not into TV screens on my console. I prefer buttons. No...I dont talk to my car to turn on the heat. I talk to my wife to turn HER heat on if you know what I mean... So...the more power part is the only thing I like. The only thing I get excited for. That and when I get my wife excited...SHE still turns me on!
  14. oldshurst442
    At 84 at the youngest, and assuming they are still alive and in health without them NOT being able to drive or medical bills stealing their life savings away...if an 84 year old was to buy a Lincoln today, Im assuming he/she would be sliding into one of these Lincolns... MKC and MKX. And if Im not mistaken, these are selling well. Now, are 84 year olds buying these? Yes...as a hater of SUVs, there is one thing I do understand, is that CUVs are easier to get in and out of compared to their sedan counterparts these days...so...I agree with you 100% Drew about the Continental! The Continental had to show people WHY they should buy it over other cars in this segment. All that was said by everybody stating their reasons why the Conti failed are ALL VALID reasons and in my opinion...ALL REASONS GIVEN IN THIS THREAD ALL CONTRIBUTED TO THAT FAILURE one way or other!
  15. oldshurst442
    True. But... The Continental then was not a huge hit amongst the young-uns. The Lincoln LS, however, was. So...Drew is right about that. OK...that statement was a tad over the top admittedly, doesnt change the fact that what he said is not true, and what he said is:
  16. oldshurst442
    I would say exactly that about the new CT-6. But knowing me. It be about 1000 words long. So I will spare you folk the unnecessary wastage of words and space. So...what Blu said!
  17. oldshurst442
    I will be sad to see it go too. No...I DO NOT understand the reasons... Why the Fusion prolly makes no money... Well...my wife's Fusion, built in June of 2013, so it missed the 1 or 2 recalls the Fusion had from the get-go, has had, I dont KNOW how many my wife's recalls has had. Honestly I dont remember how many. I could easily count them using my TWO hands for sure though. Plus there is one more I just got a week or so ago plus another one that I know is on the way... That is too many recalls....recalls cost $$$. A lot of $$$. Maybe if Ford was more careful in engineering it and launching it properly, it stick around much longer. Ford could have done many an interseting things with the Fusion. The Fusion Sport is but one tiny example... Seeing that the Fusion also shares a platform with the Edge and Lincoln products...many many interesting things...and they probably be winners at the sales department... Its a shame.
  18. oldshurst442
    PRECISELY! THAT is why I like them! And the performance of course. They are good looking cars. They have to performance to back up the bravado talks of their owners. They could EASILY be tuned for MORE performance. They have a history that is EQUALLY interesting as our very own muscle cars! Dfelt called them pony cars... I see them as a tad more than pony cars. I see them as their version of the American Muscle car. The Skyline did begin from family car intentions. And grew to be its own model... Plus if Im not mistaken....the early Skylines were cheap speed. EXACTLY like how the muscle cars began!
  19. oldshurst442
    I never knew you had such a collection! NICE!
  20. oldshurst442
    I have 3 models that I like. The very 1st one that I saw in a Car and Driver mag and they tested a Corvette C4 that was legally transformed to be driven in Japan and the R33. Then a few years went by I learned about the successor to the R33....the R34. I preferred the R33 but I was into the R34 as well. Then the internet happened in my household and I researched its history when I fell in love with the 3rd gen Skyline. The generation just before the one you like.
  21. oldshurst442
    True. But those and so-called Godzilla aint exactly what "real" Skylines are all about. Godzilla tries to pass off as such, and the Teriyaki and Sushi rice burner boy fan club likes to think so But nope! Godzilla is an artificial, Playstation/Nintendo/X Box like muscle car. Those Infiniti cars are GORGEOUS, but they got no bite. Metrosexual like if we are gonna go the Skyline replacement route for them. A tad better than what the late 70s and 3rd gen Camaros were in relative to what originated. But on the same level...ie. Shadow of their former selves!
  22. oldshurst442
    Yes. In disbelief. One wonders on how one could be soooo...odd???!!! Hey Mr. Blu Venkman...(Peter's long lost cousin)
  23. oldshurst442
    I wanted to say this.... But I did not know how to say it...without the post being a 2 book/part novel. You kept it nice and short and To. The. Point. Bra...vo!
  24. oldshurst442
    Lost in translation is what I think was the problem with this car. It dont really matter on what platform FoMoCo decided to do this car on .... What done this car in is that the car, did not keep the showcar quality dazzling details. There are a plenty. The stance. Longer wheelbase. I think the Edge is on the same platform, right? And I think the Edge might have a longer wheelbase, right? So what gives? The pristine and tight tolerances and the luxury car details. Concept down below. Look at the hood. THAT hood and front area SCREAMS luxury. Tight tolerance. The hood closure is sealed shut and is one with the whole top front end. The bottom chrome trim. The back wheel arches have a certain presence with that bulge. Muscular. Just impeccable luxurious details. What we got. And front end hood and area that is the same as in a Ford Fusion. No cleaned up chrome trim on the bottom. (That chrome trim was a helluva nice touch in my opinion.) No bulge at the rear wheel wells. The actual production car just seems like a very ordinary ride. The production car we got should have been the MKZ... Which low and behold...is what the MKZ actually is...(at least in the Continental and on the Fusion the hood area is more smoother...) Had the Continental we got be exactly like the concept, Lincoln would have had a hit on their hands...instead, it was just a more expensive MKZ (for nothing) which in turn is a more expensive Ford Fusion... Not good! (For the Continental and the Continental name plate...)
  25. oldshurst442
    Yeah...I know! I was being sarcastic with the Lexus bullet proof comment. I also know the Mustang IS bullet proof!!! But my Fusion unfortunately does have these recalls. In reality though, my wife and I are NOT upset with these recalls. Just tired of them...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search