Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

surreal1272

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,652

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    51

 Content Type 

Everything posted by surreal1272

  1. surreal1272
    I am talking about their current crop of cars. Overall, they are just as troublesome as they were in the 70s and 80s, even if the reasons are different. FCA overall spends a lot of time at the bottom of a lot of reliability charts. For the record, I'm not just taking smack to talk smack about FCA. I owned my Dodge for eight years and it was the best car I've ever owned overall but I'm not so delusional about it to think that all Dodges are trouble free just because mine wasn't. They have gotten better overall, but so has the competition and that's the problem here.
  2. surreal1272
    Or it could be based off of a solid history of unreliable products. Sorry, but Alfa and Fiat earned their reputations for very good reasons and it doesn't appear to have changed much. One look at its problems overseas tells me that.
  3. surreal1272
    Maybe it would be a better idea to scrap Alfa altogether.
  4. surreal1272
    Such a perfect day outside today. Even better than yesterday. Now, if only I didn't have to work today.
  5. surreal1272
    That's good but it does seem like Toyota is pulling the Ford treatment (the current Expy) and letting it languish by not giving a fresh re-design on the outside as well. BTW, where are these other pictures? I'm guessing that it probably matches what's in the Tundra now?
  6. surreal1272
    Many Canadians are unaware that Canada continues to carry an anti-blasphemy law in the criminal code. Criminal Code Section 296 is the law which has remained on Canadian books since 1892. Blasphemy laws are, by their very design, contrary to the idea of secularism – the separation of church and religion from the state and laws which govern people. Source: http://centreforinquiry.ca/canadas-blasphemous-libel-law/ So my question is, if this law has been in Canada for over a century, why is it only now that certain folks are concerned?
  7. surreal1272
    Still cannot get around the fact that they ripped of Ford so bad with those tail lights and that interior. Just pointless.
  8. surreal1272
    Welcome to the perfect version of winter in my view.
  9. surreal1272
    Go read your status, look at your past status claims of rigged elections by Soros, check all the negative votes you gave a few months back (right before your buddy was banned), your insults towards other posters here (I am not talking about just myself here) and try to convince me that you are not the biggest snowflake here. In fact, you remind me of this. Be careful. There may be a bad old Muslim knocking on your door. And you have the stupidity to call others "snowflakes". ------------- Back to a random thought, Saw this yesterday (only in black) and wished I hadn't.
  10. surreal1272
    Says the "man" calling others snowflakes when most conservatives are the biggest snowflakes around, including yourself. Again, you are not that slick or cunning so stop pretending to be.
  11. surreal1272
    Agreed. That was the first thing I noticed. Save for the wheel well (btw who cares what they're shaped like) that profile is Tahoe/Suburban all the way. Sorry but it is that obvious. It is still light years better looking than the current Expy though.
  12. surreal1272
    No one here has been unreasonable. We are all just speculating at this point.
  13. surreal1272
    True on the sunroof but we don't know that their weight claim includes that.
  14. surreal1272
    It is dimensionally bigger than the outgoing model too so that could be a small factor there.
  15. surreal1272
    Three features the GM twins don't have 10 speed auto 3.5L Ecoboost V6 aluminum. Thats all I could find (although there may be more that I'm missing) making it's extra weight even more of a mystery.
  16. surreal1272
    Are you kidding me? At this point, a blind one armed chimp could do a better job than Sergio.
  17. surreal1272
    Which seem to be the same as what's available on the Tahoe. In fact, the only thing the Expy has is a turbo V6 and aluminum while still being 200lbs. heavier (probably missed one or two features I'm sure but the gist is there). Regardless, it is still a much better model than the aging one it replaces.
  18. surreal1272
    Very much an improvement over the current Expy and using the new F-Series interior helps a lot but that profile screams Suburban and the nose makes it look like a full size Explorer, which is already a few years old.
  19. surreal1272
    Maybe it's because you're not slick, cunning, or smart enough to mean anything else or in any other way. Even if it is not about me, the comment stands because you are assuming that about others here, like it is somehow an insult. It is right up there with calling folks "snowflakes" when most conservatives are the biggest snowflakes around (like the conservative snowflakes who want to boycott Starbucks because they dared to offer a helping hand to refugees around the world). Your intent was as obvious as every other "veiled" post you make regarding anyone that doesn't agree with you. It's the same line of "rationale" that got your buddy banned from here for a second time. How's that for an ASSumption?
  20. surreal1272
    No because again you haven't the foggiest what I'm referring to so maybe your best course of action is to not assume my intentions on anything.
  21. surreal1272
    I believe it is high time to take FCA out back and bury it deep in the ground with a shovel and Lyme. There is nothing from them that needs saving here (speaking of Fiat and Alfa in general, not Dodge, Jeep, RAM, and Chrysler).
  22. surreal1272
    Honestly ccap41, you haven't the foggiest what you're talking about and it tells me a lot about your hobbies. Have fun on your date. So how was your head when a white Canadian killed six muslims in Quebec City? Did the double standard hurt much? And here's a thought. Instead of offering meaningless one liners about your assumptions of other folks (like somehow assuming that I'm a "lefty" even though I have never voted democrat in my life) how about actually debating the posts that you wait daily to down vote? Back up your thoughts with reason and facts for once in your life.
  23. surreal1272
    Don't put words in my mouth. I did not accuse you of calling me stupid. When you tell someone they haven't done their homework because their view doesn't align with yours, you are most certainly insulting ones intelligence. You further that by sidestepping the fact that we share intel with a at least a few of those countries, including the one WE invaded like Iraq. You have hung your hat on the lists exclusions based on the fact that they share intel with us (like Chechnya). Well so does Iraq, even more so in fact since they have spent the last 13 years fighting along side our troops and sharing vast amounts of intel. The fact that this is ignored is very telling and shows that maybe it was you who did not do your homework. Again, my stand is that this ban is nothing more than a glorified PR stunt and his tactics the first two weeks of office have shown his complete disregard for the checks and balances of the three branches of the US government (one of which he has spent a considerable amount or Twitter time insulting). Oh and thanks again coward (and no I'm not talking about you Hyper).
  24. surreal1272
    Some things are better left alone. This is proof of such things.
  25. surreal1272
    We also shared (and continue to share) a ton of intel with three of those countries on the list but we will just ignore that simple little fact.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search