Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,766

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    Probably why a 640 hp CTS-V does 0-60 in 3.6 seconds and a 444 hp Audi S6 does 0-60 in 3.8 seconds, and the Audi weighs more.
  2. smk4565
    Cars don't get cheaper, but EVs will to some degree and they will add range and power. The problem with most EV's now is poor range. If a Nissan Leaf starts at $30k now with 125 mile range or whatever it is, supposed in 5-to years it is still $30k but has a 350 mile range. By that point in time an Altima will be $30k also, and the Leaf looks like a good buy. The shell and interior of the car are going to cost the same, once you can build batteries and electric motors for the same price of a gas engine and transmission, the EV takes over.
  3. smk4565
    Rear drive crossover sales are booming! You can see the end of coupes coming, the 4-series is dropping fast
  4. smk4565
    640 horsepower isn't any good if you can't put it on the ground. The Hellcat has 707 hp, doesn't make it a better car than a CTS-V. The E-class will crush any mid-size sedan in interior, refinement, interior noise, luxury amenities, etc. The new E63 is going to surprise some people on it's performance data. Credit to the CTS V-sport for being 2nd place in C&D's recent comparison, it had good performance numbers and handling, but again, Cadillac build quality plagues it. Until they fix their refinement, interior and build quality issues, doesn't really how much power they put into the CTS or ATS V-series.
  5. smk4565
    C, E, S all up, and at a time when people don't buy cars. The red flag is the GLC, it is still pretty new and in a booming segment, they should move at least 4,000 of those a month, especially if they can sell 5,000 of the more expensive GLE.
  6. smk4565
    $2,500,000 hyper car to be fair. I was looking at the CTS line overall, CTS is not a high end car. E-class isn't either, it is the mid-level Mercedes, they have a CLS, S-class, SL, AMG GT, and G-wagen above it. Escalade starts near $75k so even if it tops out at $99k, there isn't a low end model out there. Escalade is the top level Cadillac right now. The E43 AMG starts at $72k yes, and it did just win a Car and Driver comparison beating the CTS V-sport, 540i and A6. But the E63 which isn't on sale yet will probably start at $100k. Looking at CTS sales numbers though, how much longer will the car even be around? E63 not on sale yet, goes on sale this summer. The E43 should be compared to the CTS turbo V6. E63 S is on sale now in UK for £88,295 for whatever that is worth.
  7. smk4565
    It won't whoop up on an E63 S, and AMG has several offerings above the E-class with the 65 series cars and the GT series. Plus they have the Project 1 Hyper car that will beat everything, LaFerrari included, however at a crazy price.
  8. smk4565
    By high end I mean cars with base price of $80 or even 100k. CTS-V is like a $90k car but based on a $46k car. it is still a mid size luxury segment car. Cadillac lacks the S-class, SL, Porsche 911, Audi R8, BMW i8, M760iL sort of cars in the $100-200k range.
  9. smk4565
    I could see Police departments going to Edge and Acadia size vehicles, even Escape and Equinox for city use when you don't really need highway acceleration power. Even an Explorer is pretty large and thirsty; Police cars will downsize in time just like every thing else. Holden could be gone soon too. EV will rise, it hasn't hit that tipping point yet. EV is still too expensive, but when the price eventually drops, it could replace gas cars in a hurry, so car makers have to be ready. All the more reason for Cadillac to be on board with EV's and this product plan doesn't include any.
  10. smk4565
    That is an interesting take, it probably would spur sales a lot, but would be a different direction for Cadillac. There is a good argument for that plan, or you could argue raising prices by $10,000 across the board and putting in more content and power. Even the current price structure undercuts BMW and Mercedes, so undercutting by a little clearly doesn't work.
  11. smk4565
    They don't have anything high end except the Escalade though. That has always been a struggle since the Allante in the 80s, they can't crack into that top tier of high end cars.
  12. smk4565
    But if they can make $4000 profit on a Cadillac Traxx vs $700 profit on a Chevy Traxx, what do you think GM will want to do? Cadillac needs more volume because selling 1 Cadillac can make as much money as selling 5 Chevy and GM wants profit at the bottom line. That was said about luxury sedans in the 80s and 90s also. Front drive was better in snow, etc, and by the time Cadillac switched to a rear drive heavy line up aroun 2004 it was too late.
  13. smk4565
    Tesla Model S sold like 25k units in the USA last year, 50k world wide. The Model S is also a mid size car, with a starting price $30,000 below the S-class before the $7500 tax credit. But Mercedes recognizes the threat of Tesla for sure, that is why they are launching this 10 model assault aimed directly at Tesla.
  14. smk4565
    And the CT6 range topper engine is 116 lb-ft shy of the S-class's base engine. They should have developed a CT6 exclusive V8 and made the 3.0TT the base engine for livery and rental spec cars. They brought a knife to a gun fight.
  15. smk4565
    In 2016 (in usa) Mercedes sold 158,600 SUV and 181,637 cars. Cars still make up the majority of their business. I didn't add all BMW and Audi's full year sales, but Audi puts a new SUV on sale every 6 months, and any car they make above A4 doesn't sell here. Regardless, C, E, and S class are all #1 seller in their segments, so it makes perfect sense to make electric cars of equal size, because they know how to sell sedans in those segments, and they want the Tesla Model S and Model 3 business. People buy the Tesla because it was the new thing and nothing else is like it, when Mercedes sells Tesla performance with a Mercedes interior and build quality, goodnight Tesla. And that is what this push is half about, half is about the European Eco-mentalist green movement and the other half is about taking out Tesla.
  16. smk4565
    I hope they start using Omega in a big way, however what I am seeing here is Front wheel drive XT2, XT4, XT5 and XT7, and a front drive CT2. It will be interesting to see the course they go. But Johan has been there a while, Alpha platform is 5 years old, and yet XT5 and XT4 are coming out front drive, I think Cadillac wants front drive so they can just platform share with Chevy and cut cost. It is "old GM" at it's finest. What I am not seeing in this list of new products are any coupes, convertibles, sports cars or electric cars. Shouldn't they have EV's? Shouldn't they make a sports car if they are a top tier brand? Shouldn't they make 1 freaking convertible if they are an aspirational brand?
  17. smk4565
    I agree, I don't like the names either, never did. And I will believe a CT8 when I see it in the showroom. Here is the problem with a S-class fighter, it will cost then $3 billion to do it right, that is probably more than the Silverado and Sierra's development budget and Cadillac will just never get that kind of budget. It won't happen.
  18. smk4565
    Because they need volume, and their dealers want product to sell. And GM sees dollar signs by taking a Chevy Traxx and making it a Cadillac and selling it for $30,900.
  19. smk4565
    Mercedes I believe is the only luxury brand that sells more cars than they do SUVs other than Bentley or Rolls, so they still have a large sedan business. C and E class can total over 700,000 a year globally. Making C, E, and S class sized EV sedans makes a lot of sense. Especially if they use the EV platform then put the same basic interior of the gas car in there. What Tesla lacks is cash, R&D budget and production facilities. Mercedes has all that, they can build these electric cars in any of their existing factories. And especially with electric cars, once you have a scalable platform you can build a ton of body styles rather easily because you don't have to work around the engine, drive shaft, exhaust, etc.
  20. smk4565
    That should shut down Tesla's 4 model line up. I bet an all electric SL turns up around 2020 for the new generation and that would be epic.
  21. smk4565
    Yawn, it is still an Accord, it certainly is not "precision crafted performance" because it has no performance. I just read the other week how the MDX hybrid is the most powerful Acura SUV ever and it has like 315 hp. That is a joke.
  22. smk4565
    Subaru sales have doubled I think in the past 10 years. They'll sell a bunch of these, because people want crossovers. And how long have they been selling sedans and wagons to people that now have bigger families and need more space. They used to lose those customers, now they can keep them It will probably look boring, but they need a 3 row crossover badly, and not a disaster like the B9 Tribeca was.
  23. smk4565
    I gaurentee they lose money on the B-class EV. But without it they couldn't sell cars in California which is not an option. So they have to sell it. That B-class will be dead the day the EQ crossover goes on sale. As far as China goes, Mercedes has passed BMW and is closing in on Audi. So they are doing pretty well there.
  24. smk4565
    Following AMG in product planning, as is BMW. In a couple years there will be M versions of X 2 through 7 and RS versions of Q 3 through 8. Performance crossover is the next hot market but you don't have to wait til 2019 for these guys to do it, AMG will sell you one today.
  25. smk4565
    Good point about the early 2000s Even can add the Celica and MR2 and Supra in that time frame and Camry Solara and Monte Carlo later. Honda S2000, Sky and Soltice all dead. 2 door cars are disappearing at an alarming rate the past 20 years. I think E-class coupe and convertible are safe, the E-class line does a lot of volume, and it sits right in the middle of their line up. What can keep the S-class convertible around is profit margin, those range $125-250,000, hard to cut something you can sell for that much money and potentially make $50,000 per car sold. What it comes down to is what does the consumer want? I think Dieter's point when they introduced the E-class convertible was if you buy them, we will keep building them. But if people only want crossovers, it becomes hard to justify building convertibles just because it is fun.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search