Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

ocnblu

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    35,458

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    57

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ocnblu

  1. ocnblu
    Maybe it is because the Trax is a snore compared to the Renegade.
  2. ocnblu
    Spring has been sprung from its chains, and it's running wild! All the cool cars are coming out of hibernation. Post your sightings here, folks!
  3. ocnblu
    spectacles
  4. ocnblu
    I am guessing the small aluminum V8 from Buick does not count then? Perhaps because it was a single shot deal and not a family of "smallblocks"? If that is the case, then I will say Chevrolet only, as I believe all BOP V8 engines were variations on the same basic architecture. And we know Cadillac only used big mamas. On the speedometer question, I am going to guess Chrysler 300, 1955. Wild guess. Maybe it was a Kaiser Darrin or something more obscure like dat.
  5. ocnblu
  6. ocnblu
    Excuse me check timestamps on the comments again regarding Chrysler engines in European brands.
  7. ocnblu
    I find the driving position to be fine. I have one concern that could not be remedied with a 6-way adjuster: the width of the seat cushion is too narrow. I need to keep my legs spread because of my balls, I'm a man, and the way the seat is bolstered, my left thigh feels the pressure from the bolster. If the cushion were a little wider or bolstered differently, it would bring relief. I find myself adjusting my left leg while driving.
  8. ocnblu
    The WT comes with the same power seat adjuster.
  9. ocnblu
    Exceptionally classy signage.
  10. ocnblu
    *crickets chirping*
  11. ocnblu
    This tank: 420.5 miles, 18.544 gallons. 22.675798 MPG.
  12. ocnblu
    If you want to see what's new at GM for 2016: http://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NASApp/domestic/brandsel.jsp?year=2016&regionID=1&lang=1
  13. ocnblu
    Well I can see the root of your problem, right there.
  14. ocnblu
    Ugh... the prototype in camo belies its 2005 Ford Five Hundred roots. Very close to sticking a fork in Lincoln if that holds true. This car needed no less than a RWD chassis to return the brand to relevance.
  15. ocnblu
    Yeah, avatars aren't right and I see ghost text in a few spots.
  16. ocnblu
    meh, nothing will ever compare to the authoritative mechanical music of a V8 engine. when is that version coming out? soon i hope, before cadillac loses any more credibility.
  17. ocnblu
    On the way home from work this evening, a Valiant 4 door, in the usual 70's mustard color with off-white vinyl roof. Later model (mid-70's) front clip gelling perfectly with older (early 70's) body. Leveled, lowered slightly, on torque thrust wheels. Very clean and tasteful.
  18. ocnblu
  19. ocnblu
    New look took less study to get used to than Haze, which made me feel like I was in one for a few days.
  20. ocnblu
    If I think about it, I can list ways that GM has hurt, compromised, and whored the very bedrock brand of the company in recent years. And it sickens me.
  21. ocnblu
    stainless
  22. ocnblu
    Well the first one is a VW prototype to replace the original Beetle. Didn't work out. Second one, I always think of Cugnot as the true inventor of the automobile. Number three for Chrysler, was it Jensen and Facel Vega?
  23. ocnblu
    It's like an overpowering oval theme with tiny wheels and an incomplete Sweepspear situation. Lack of eyebrows over taillamps lends it a generic Asian look.
  24. ocnblu
    Darn it, I wanted to like this.
  25. ocnblu
    yes
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search