Drew Dowdell

Doesn't that mean there is now an incentive for the banks to make as big of a cock up as they can of things so they can get government money? The banks are being GIVEN this money. For GM it's a LOAN..... and lest we forget, it's been done before with Chrysler with great results. (financially)

I agree with you on the Cutlass. I picked the Eighty Eight because it was around longer. Much. ......and was practically synonymous with Rocket 8. I'm mostly responding to the picks of the H/O and 442s as "most important". Great halo cars, but not "most important"

The Eighty Eight. You don't get much more ubiquitous than a B-body or H-body from GM. But in reality, it's a shorter list of which Oldsmobiles were unimportant. With the exception of it's final years, Olds regularly dominated the sales charts. Sure they sold a ton of A-body Cutlass Cierras..... but that just mean it was important that they get done right. Important to Olds does NOT mean some rare Hurst 442 Cutlass Calias FE3 Broughm Holiday Coupe' Pace Car convertible driven by William Shatner or something. Important to Olds was the meat and potatoes of the division.

It's not a minor issue. It's just another example of the media bias that it out there.

Fixed that up there for ya.

I could understand putting it on hold till more money becomes available, but canning it all together is a super dumb move.

I think the issue here would be not doing it half assed. The Catera and Saturn LS had lots of reliability problems. The Astra wasn't advertised. The GTO was profitable. The G8 is one of the few cars that is increasing in sales at GM. The Regal is on an established platform using engines that have literally millions of miles combined of real world use. I think, as long as it's advertised appropriately, the Regal will do just fine.

If it's the original HP power adapter, you'll be fine. Shame you just left Toronto. I'll be up there next month.

Are you sure your adapter doesn't accept a voltage range? Flip the adapter over and look for the input. Most likely it will accept anything from 100v to 240v. The original part, as listed, does accept 220v. You'll just need the part of the cord that plugs into the wall. This isn't an HP one, but see "Input" right under the model number? That's what you're looking for.

He's going to be a glutton for punishment somewhere else if he keeps it up. Isn't there a Jaguar forum for you to troll? Edit: There is! Here you go SMK!

X-Type. S-Type. Why is Jaguar abandoning the 29k-49k market??!!?!! Jaguar is a shrinking brand. Do I really have to post my MKS/XF overlay again? I don't care that they are on a different platform. That I had to go look it up to make sure the XF wasn't on the MKS platform should say enough in of itself. With the CTS, I get a car that out handles the XF, has all the luxury appointments except laser cruise control (which I don't want anyway, I'm buying the car so I can drive, not the computer), has a manual transmission, an optional 556hp V8 that even BMW doesn't top, I spend 20k less, and I have a car that will turn more heads than the jellybean XF. With the engine note on the CTS-V, I'll turn heads just by turning the key. (note: I don't give a rat's ass about push button start)

I have no problem with Saturn itself. I like most of the cars..... but that doesn't mean it was a good idea. GM's idea was that it wanted to compete with the import brands... so it created Saturn. The problem with that idea is that you don't compete with import brands by disguising yourself as one. You compete with import brands by building superior domestic product. In many ways the S-cars were better than the J-bodies. The S-cars should have replaced the J-bodies entirely. If the money spent on creating Saturn had been invested into just the S-cars for Chevy and Pontiac to have GM would be in a very different position right now. Even the L-series, with minimal additional investment, would have made a better Malibu or Cutlibu than what was being offered at the time. The Vue would have slotted in great under the Bravada at Olds. The Sky should have been a Cadillac. Everything Saturn has ever sold, would have sold better or for more money at a different brand and likely made that brand more complete and more competitive. And yea, I'm bitter about not being able to buy a better styled Envoy with a rocket ship, or an STS light, or the best W-body ever made..... but I sure am glad I can buy a G6 with Saturn rings or an Acadia with a decontented Enclave interior or a Chevy Captiva or, be still my heart, a Chevy Uplander with leftover IKEA wood. Best way to improve Aura sales? Rename it Cutlass and sell it at all the dealerships that used to sell Oldsmobile.

What kind of laptop do you have? Make and Model. I may be able to help you with the transformer issue.

You can get a 556hp V8, pop up NAV, manual transmission, 40 gig hard drive, better handling, more interesting styling. "Better wood, carpeting, headliner" are just red herrings. What you don't get in the CTS is Jaguar reliability. The XF is nothing more than a MKS Vanden Plas..... and looks it too.

The S-type, which the XF is based on, was never a reliability queen. They had, what 6 years, to sort the platform out? The XF's price is it's disadvantage. It offers nothing you can't get in the Benz or Cadillac except maybe that turny button thingy for the transmission and James Bond HVAC vents.

ah there he is..... like a moth to a flame....

I haven't seen many Bond movies, but the line that stands out as my favorite is John Clease saying: "Ah! The famous Bond wit! ....or half wit, as the case may be."

Not in base 8. FAIL!

I have no idea what you're talking about.....

Cutlass Classic

Quality problems plaguing the new XF Link to AutoBlog Few would argue that the Jaguar XF is a great looking car and those who have driven it admire its dynamic characteristics. Unfortunately, as soon as you get in and press the start button, you can't help but wonder if the disastrous quality reputation that British cars have seemingly carefully nurtured for decades will afflict this car as well. The gear selector knob that rises out of the center console and the vents that roll over to expose themselves seem like bits that are destined to fail in time. If the results seen by Automobile Magazine and respondents to TrueDelta's Car Reliability Survey are any indication, those fears are likely to come true. Automobile's long-term XF has been afflicted by a litany of issues ranging from faulty window regulators and bad rear axles to a failed power steering system. TrueDelta surveys owners and has found the XF requires far more trips to the dealer than competing models such as the BMW 5 Series, Cadillac CTS and Mercedes-Benz C-Class. While the other models range from 33 to 97 dealer visits per year for every 100 cars, XF owners ended up back in the service bay 141 annually per 100 cars. Hopefully these are just first year production glitches, but this sort of news does not inspire confidence. Thanks for the tip, Leo!

What cars? The w-body Cutlass having it's original interior too long without major refreshing. Renaming Cutlass to Intrigue and not offering a two door. The Achieva. What actions? Killing the 88 and expecting the Aurora to pick up the slack. The Aurora was the "New Olds!" replacement for the 98, not the 88. Continuing to produce the Cutlass Ciera past 1987. Being late to get the 3.5DOHC into the Intrigue. First year came with the 3800. Putting Quad-4s in W-bodies.

Show of hands. How many here are fine with the J-Body?

BV, get yourself a UPS Account, and start E-baying that stuff out!

I could see James Bond driving this car. It's sexy without being garish.