Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    56,028
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    555

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. His attacks against me went far beyond any line that could be crossed. Oh he's here... I see his IP addresses in the logs. Every once in awhile I'll ban an IP.
  2. When you drive such a wide variety of vehicles like I do, you notice it. I am more forgiving to Turbo-V6es because they still have a baseline torque that comes on sooner. They aren't a true V8 replacement either, but they are more satisfactory than a Turbo-4.
  3. I gave Turbo-4s a chance.... I really did believe they were a decent replacement for a larger displacement V6. But the power delivery just isn't as good. Too long to wait to spool up... even on the light duty ones. Are turbo-4s an improvement over non-turbo-4s? Absolutely... but they are still no V6. A V6 still has a baseline level of torque there that a that a turbo-4 doesn't. V6es have a level of refinement that 4s cannot match. I also want to be clear. This is not just GM products I'm objecting to. I'd rather have a V6 explorer than a 2.3T Explorer. As far as CAFE, GM can turn their V6es into 4-cylinders and back in less than a single revolution of the crank. Much less lag than a turbo.
  4. The Eagle Vision was the ChryCO competitor to the Bonneville at the time and was probably the best of the early LH cars. There was supposed to be a second generation...It was rebranded into the 300M.
  5. Apparently I'm not allowed a preference. I find the experience behind the 3.6 V6 to be much more satisfying than a 2.0t in nearly all situations. The same holds true for similar situations in other brands. And I am in fact quite stupid and have never driven any of these cars.
  6. Monaco/Premier? That's the only sedan I can think of that was shared between Dodge and and AMC brand...
  7. ..... Once the torque kicks in.... Like I said. I'd rather have the lag free version. NO turbo has no lag... It's physically impossible.
  8. Some of us have tried many turbo 4s. I used to be sold on the technology.... Northstar like power from a 4 cylinder sounds great on paper, but in practice it is a much less satisfying drive. And yes, I know that the Northstar is no longer the state of the art in V8s, but they do still provide a satisfactory power delivery. Even the old/current regal could have taken the HF V6, Buick just decided not to sell it that way. The Insignia was sold with a Turbo 2.8 V6 that has the same external engine dimensions as the current HF V6. The engineering effort from GM would have effectively been zero. By that measure, the Malibu could have a V6 also. There are no platform constraints.
  9. I guess I'll call the credit union and find out their requirements first. I want to privately purchase another vehicle I've found. I'd need minimal financing on that.
  10. What's the best way to sell a financed car without trading in? I'm not upside down.
  11. The regal is much smaller than the lacrosse and impala. The V6 version should be just about as quick as an ATS V6
  12. Not Pittsburgh though? The only permaban went to wings who verbally attacked me and continues to do so via email from time to time.
  13. I'll take the lag free option thanks.
  14. Server doesn't show any blips since I rebooted it for updates last night. Apache and MySQL have both been running for 23 hours.
  15. It didn't hit me till tonight why I'm so "meh" about this car. A 1996 Eagle Talon, a car a mere 5 years away from being eligible for classic plates, had 210 HP and 220 lb-ft of torque with only half a liter more displacement. It also could come with AWD and was lighter This is progress? For a more modern perspective, the Verano Turbo or Cobalt SS blow away the Civic SI on power for about the same price. I guess I just expected something more special.
  16. Not digging the look in white, but I'll do that 6.2 twice on Sundays.
  17. Explorer yes. New Acadia... eh. Old Lambda, no. Just get yourself a Tahoe/Yukon, it's just about the same size and you don't have to beat the crap out of the engine just to get the thing to move. MPG is better too.
  18. I'd probably aim for the Durango myself because Hemi. This reminds me too much of a Grand Cherokee, so might as well get the real thing... plus... Hemi.
  19. I see Buick found a place to sell surplus waterfall grilles from 2008 Lucernes.....
  20. I don't mind the cladding, they're going for a very specific demographic with that. I think I could sell the sportback at home. Wagons, as a rule, are a no-go.
  21. A Turbo 4 should still have the torque low in the RPM band. Even my weak 1.4T gets all of its 138 ft-lb at around 1700 rpm.... but that's all the torque you ever get. If the Civic 1.5T gets it's peak torque anywhere near that, it should feel plenty fast.
  22. I like the concept from the sound of it. Sleek and ultra luxury rather than the giant cars of Rolls and Bentley
  23. I like the looks of the new Equinox, but like @ocnblu I fear that GM is going to get to ambitious with pricing and it will hurt sales. A fully loaded CR-V Touring with AWD, sunroof, NAV, and Driving Autotronics is $33,695. A Chevrolet Equinox Premier AWD similarly equipped (but active cruise control doesn't appear to be available) is $37,900. The outgoing CX-5 is $34,600.... A completely loaded Cherokee Trailhawk V6 is still slightly less money than the Equinox So I see Chevy having to rebate these down a bit to keep them moving.
  24. Well we don't know what the one they tossed looks like.
  25. Well that explains why they extended the previous generation by 2 years with that lackluster facelift.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search