Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Detroit Auto Show News: Chevy Showing Concept Bolt EV with 200 Mile Range

      Chevrolet will take the wraps off a concept electric car called the Bolt that will have a 200 mile range and a $30,000 price tag aimed squarely between the Nissan Leaf and Tesla Model 3.

    On Monday, Chevrolet will be unveiling the next generation Chevrolet Volt. That car's powertrain will have the familiar Volt setup of an on-board regenerator. In addition to that, Chevrolet will be unveiling a concept car called the Bolt that can travel up to 200 miles on a single charge and has an initial price point of $30,000.

    Though the Bolt is a concept, it is set to go into production for the 2017 model year, so we could see it on the road in as little as 18 months.

    Chevrolet already builds a pure electric version of the Chevrolet Spark. It starts at around $20,000, has a range of 82 miles, and more pound-ft of torque than some full-size pickups, but it is currently only sold in California and Oregon for the sake of complying with those states' zero-emissions laws.

    The Bolt will be different though; General Motors is planning on offering the Bolt nationwide and globally with a particular eye on China with its smog problems. For domestic consumption at least, the Bolt will be built in the US at one of GM's existing plants.

    The $30,000 price point is no accident either. General Motors is targeting two prime targets, the Nissan Leaf which starts at $29,010 and has a 100 mile range, and the coming Tesla Model 3 which is said to be aiming for a $35,000 price point with a 200 mile range. If GM can meet both its price point and range target, the Bolt could become the Goldilocks electric vehicle offering both anxiety-free range and attainable price point.

    The speculation out there says that the Bolt will be a crossover hatchback, but beyond that, technical details are scarce.

    The Bolt will be revealed at a press conference that starts at 7:35am on Monday, January 12th. We will be on hand to bring you updates and pictures from the show floor.

    *Chevrolet Spark EV charge port shown in picture above courtesy of General Motors.

    You can sign up to follow all the stories from Detroit here, or follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Google+

    Source: Green Car Reports and The Verge

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    EXCITEMENT, This is what I have been thinking GM needs to do. Hopefully they will also move this over to a CUV style. The cars and hatchback will of course be popular but not everyone likes to give up their higher riding line of vision that you get from a CUV or SUV. Still either way you look at it, this is a step in the right direction.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well I have expected this but just did not know how soon.

    The Volt could easily be made into a full EV car if they wanted too and the new platform looks to have been the right time to do this.


    It will be interesting to see what all they present. The fact is anyone can build a $100K large EV sedan but Tesla showed that people would buy it. Now the hard part is selling a cheaper model that more people can buy and sell it in numbers where it will make money.

    Also how long to charge this. If it is less than 10-8 hours they will have a good chance at a very land mark car if prices as speculated.


    Having a Volt and Bolt will be an advantage to GM. EV cars just do not fit all and the Volt plays that middle ground that may attract those who resist the full EV for practical reasons.

    Now I just hope we do not end up with screw balls like some of the Tesla followers. They often take a good thing and scare people off with their Zealot actions.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In research I have been doing on EV auto's and Charging times, most people are only aware of the 110 or Type 1 charging (8-14hrs) and 220 or Type 2 charging (2-6hrs). 


    The Future lies in the New DC Quick chargers for Electric Auto's. They can be used on current EV's where you get 80% of the battery pack recharged in 30 min.


    EATON DC Quick Chargers


    Technical Specifications
    Incoming voltage and connections - 208 Vac three-phase, three-wire (Line 1, Line 2, Line 3 and earth ground)
    Input amperage - 156A (any power configuration)
    Input frequency - 50/60 Hz
    Integral overcurrent and GFI protection - 200A with 300 mA earth leakage for 40–50 kW configurations or 100A with 500 mA earth leakage for 20–30 kW configurations
    Upstream protection - Per NFPA 70 National Electrical Code, Article 625.14
    Output amperage - maximum continuous - Up to 125A DC
    Output voltage - Up to 400V DC
    Interlocked power output -  Yes
    Ground fault - 13 mA (UL 2231-1 / UL 2231-2 personnel protection)
    De-energization on breakaway - Yes
    Surge withstand - Up to 6 kV at 3000A
    Conduit entry - Front, rear, side, bottom
    Blink Dual Quick DC Chargers are also starting to get installed around.
    Seems the next generation of EV's auto's will get the quick charging capability.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    But that isn't something you'd install at home.

    Actually they do have Home versions. Even Nissan is now selling a home DC Quick Charger 480V, 44kW max for the Nissan Leaf, stating 80% charged in 30 min.


    Technical Spec


    480V, 3 Phase 50/60Hz

    44kW power output

    1yr warranty.




    Most of the DC Quick Charger solutions can be installed at home, mostly I think it will be the price that keeps people from doing it.


    Nissan DC Quick Charge unit is $15,500.


    The DC Quick charge units as they move to 100kW capable will then start making it truly possible to take an EV on a road trip and cover 500-600 miles in a day.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is going to be cool, I can feel it.  I could drive it to work all week on a single charge, plug it in on Friday night, run around on the weekend silently, then top it off for the work week on Sunday night!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is going to be cool, I can feel it.  I could drive it to work all week on a single charge, plug it in on Friday night, run around on the weekend silently, then top it off for the work week on Sunday night!


    Did the sun rise in the west?

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    This is going to be cool, I can feel it.  I could drive it to work all week on a single charge, plug it in on Friday night, run around on the weekend silently, then top it off for the work week on Sunday night!


    Did the sun rise in the west?



    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • @smk4565 @surreal1272 @oldshurst442 Let's not forgot an important point, Mercedes has AMG! AMG SUVs, AMG cars, AMG Performance! SMK you like to point out that they have performance on every model and lead the world in performance. We do not know for sure if GM will do a Virtual Direct sell of a Corvette family which is not covered by state dealerships or more likely keep it at the Chevrolet dealership level. What we do know is that Chevrolet has had varied success with their performance SS lineup.  From a business standpoint, it makes sense to have Chevrolet have a complete lineup of trucks, SUVs, CUVs, cars from base entry level to platinum or High Country and various LT/LTZ levels in between. RST is the current performance level for their full-size SUV/Trucks. This would be no different than Mercedes is doing with cars and SUVs, they have only failed to figure out a lineup of trucks. Now, Corvette is a well-known history of Performance at a common man's affordable price based on each person's viewpoint. Corvette has performance head-to-head with the Italian supercars, German Supercars, etc. without the crazy 300,000 dollar price and above. What is wrong with making it clear that Corvette is Chevrolet's Top Performance level of autos! Corvette EV (2 door Ultimate Sports Car) Corvette EV Sedan (4 door Ultimate Sports Car) Corvette EV SUV (2 and 4 door Ultimate Sports SUV) Corvette EV Truck (4 door Ultimate Sports Truck) This is a 4-product family or 5 depending on the doors of the top performance performing auto in Cheverolet. The Corvette EV family would not have any low-level versions that would be in price point with Chevrolet badged autos.  How is this any different than what Mercedes has done across the entire product portfolio! I call it what I see it as, FEAR!!! @smk4565 You fear your beloved brand will lose out even more when folks see a performance family of autos that outperform German Performance autos at a much lower price point. Everyone knows I love Performance but due to my size, a traditional 2 door corvette sports car is DOA for me. Give me a Corvette 4 door EV SUV and Truck that would be the top end of Performance for GM and I am there to buy! END OF LINE
    • Now...to the Corvette http://www.superiorglassworks.com/v/vspfiles/assets/images/side-by-side%20web%20size.jpg   The Corvette, BEFORE it was dreamt up to be a mid-engined affair, and THAT was in 1959...  It was also dreamt up to be a snazzy people haulin' station wagon.  And THAT was in 1954.  Corvette ultimately did not spawn that trim, it did however, have factory backed hatched to emulate station wagon-ess. http://www.stingray.nu/aften/16.jpg   People obviously have spent money converting their Corvettes this way.   So...again, while YOU dont think so, many others do and while GM is in the business of making money,  and IF GM succeeds in engineering PROPER Corvette models into a Corvette brand making sure these other models fit in a Corvette kinda way, there is really nothing to add here. Not form me, not from you.  Corvette is what makes it Corvette. And THAT is up to the engineering team alongside the marketing team.   And THAT all there is to it!  Good Bye.  
    • And more talking out of your ass... Are you sure that a 911 is NOT an SUV? I WILL prove it wrong to you.... Much like the General purpose "Jeep" we like to talk about, the 911 has strange beginnings and endings. The 911 started out as a VW Beetle.  Hilter's and Nazi Germany's people's car.   Hence the name Volkswagen.  Porsche, the dude, designed the Beetle.  It had a different name when it was Nazi's people's car. But the Beetle was ALSO a troop carrier. It wasnt a 4x4 machine like the Jeep was, but it WAS an offroader troop carrier for the Geramn Army. Oh...it also floated   Why all this? Because the 911 was ultimately a Beetle.  After the war, Porsche for reasons, and for a long story short, the 911 was born from a troop carrrying off roaded military vehicle that was designed to also be used on the water, people's car.   The Jeep was truly a SUV while the Beetle had to be massaged into one, but it WAS sold to civilians AS a SUV. But THIS is where it gets interesting as a 911.  Forget about VW dune buggies, Porsche 911s raced in the dunes   But most phoqued up thing is that Porsche...just released, by their OWN engineering a 911 offroader...   And THAT is as close to a 911 SUV that we have.  So when you say that 911 is NOT an SUV...well,  STOP talking out of your ass... A 911 is many a thing, and it was ALWAYS a SUV deep down inside.  Complete with 4x4.  Unlike the Kubelwagen/VW Thing before it.    
    • What double standard? The Escalade did NOT need a high performance version up until THIS year. The Escalade got one, THIS year.   So you mention Escalade as a sports car and not as a high performance model. You threw in a Tahoe for good measure. I gotcha I gotcha.  Problem is, Chevrolet tried the truck as a car based truck and as a muscle car and several times with several different body sizes across 5 decades.   With various degrees of success in each decade. With the last one actually replacing a legit sports car.  The SSR tried to replace the Camaro.  And in Australia, when the Camaro came back with the Zeta platform along with its platform mate the Pontiac G8, in Australia, the Maloo was born.  A true sports car as the Zeta platform sedan was a great sports sedan that the final version of it, the Chevy SS that we got here, is considered by MANY Eurosnobs to be the REAL spiritual successor to the E39 BMW M5.  Eurosnobs of all people think that... And some Australians even swapped the front end for a Camaro nose... Chevrolet done this Tahoe sports car you say plenty of times...  So...yet again, you just talk out of your ass... And...more talking out of your ass The phoque are you talking about? Jeep was a fast way condensed made up word that WW2 American G.I.s used to call their troop carrier. It was a general purpose vehicle affectionectly known as JEEP.  General purpose became Jeep.   Which became a phoquing brand. Which begat station wagons Which branched out to    But...this also And had AMC NOT gone bankrupt, a legit JEEP platform mate to that Eagle would have been sold side by side in that time frame. But ultimatley, it DID lead to this eventually.  and this but was ALWAYS there, though.  BUT became a BRAND    But... it DID start out ONLY as a MILITARY troop transport and support vehicle.  General purpose was its name.  and AFTER the war was sold to civilian farmers http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/aaa527894a8a41c93d8ce192d1488018c3d414d7/r=500x326/local/-/media/2018/06/03/YorkDailyRecord/wp-PPYR-Yorkspast-8806-FarmJeepB.jpg?width=660&disable=upscale&format=pjpg&auto=webp     You dont get it...  But I showed you with the Jeep.  It dont matter if YOU dont like it.    It only matters if OTHERS, MANY others like it.  And with the Mustang, PLENTY of others LOVE it. To the tune of 50 000 untis per year sold.   And with the Mustang, the Mach-E is NOT just an SUV, its an ELECTRIC SUV.   And a very EXPENSIVE EV at that. Starting price of 47 thousand US dollars.  A FAR cry from the secretary straight line 6,  two door coupe based on an econobox Falcon waaaaaaaaaaay back in Nineteen Sixty Four (and a half).      
    • And I showed you, using actual history here, that your Escalade reference was dumb in comparison. You remark about the Mach-E but clearly it has not hurt the Mustang brand at all, which is NOW your main issue with the Vette name. The Mustang is still a top seller in its class and they keep upgrading it with every passing year. Clearly adding the Mach-E Mustang to its stable has done ZERO to hurt it. Thank you for providing a real world example, although I don't think you meant for it to be used against you lol. All you have shown here is that it is your "opinion" that they are not right and that you don't like them. None of that suggests failure of the brands in question whatsoever.    And I am sorry but you, of ALL people, don't get to talk about names and brand equity. If GM doesn't use a name for a car, it is wrong to you. If they over use a name, it is wrong to you. Sorry, but you do not get to have it both ways here. Just skip the fact that these types of "stipulations" of yours have NEVER been extended to your favorite brand. Again, you really want to bring up double standards here?
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search