Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    LA Auto Show: Chevrolet Colorado Leaked

    November 19th, 2013

    Drew Dowdell

    Managing Editor - CheersandGears.com

    We've had relatively few leaks in the days and weeks leading up to the LA Auto Show, but some where bound to happen. Earlier today, Edmunds.com posted an LA Auto Show Preview to their YouTube channel that featured a picture of the 2015 Chevrolet Colorado. Woopsie!

    Update: Edmunds has since removed the video from Youtube.

    Update 2: More pictures have leaked out, check out the gallery below for an interior and rear view.

    2015 Chevrolet Colorado cropped

    For more LA Auto Show Coverage, you can follow along on our LA Auto Show Page

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    It may just be me, but I'm seeing a lot of the '98-'03 S-series (S10/Sonoma) pickup styling in this new Colorado. Now that's not a bad thing, as I dearly miss my 2001 GMC Sonoma SLS Highrider. I can't wait to see the GMC Canyon; hoping the rumors I've heard of a January debut (North American International Auto Show) are just that - rumors. I hope GMC doesn't make us ruby red fans wait too much longer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Very nice so far. I have reason to be disappointed in reported bodystyle availability and engine choices, but as far as looks go, this is hot.

    I feel your pain with regards to the [rumored] no regular cab, but your last Colorado was an extended cab remember! Of course the lack of a manual transmission is upsetting to many too (on other forums I visit). Are you disappointed that the diesel is [rumored] to be a 2015/2016 item? I'm disappointed that the new EcoTec3 4.3L V6 is not the truck-tuned engine in the new mid-size pickups - it seems more truck-oriented for the small pickups than the 3.6L V6 used in the sedans & crossovers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another forum has an interior shot (dash), additional frontal shot and a rear shot posted of the 2015 Colorado.

    Personally, I like the way the red extended cab Thailand-version Colorado looks, all off-road based (sort of like the old S-series ZR2/Highrider pickups):

    6597114727_17cc962fd0_b.jpg

    Though there are several differences in the styling of the Thailand Colorado and the N/A Colorado, I like the stance of the Thailand off-road version. Here's hoping that's what a production Z71 looks like.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the extra pictures, Drew. I'm liking the backend design too now that I can see more of it clearly.

    I see something in the bed (bed divider?), rear camera in the tailgate handle, and different rims from the other pictures posted all over the Internet. In the interior shot, I see that the full-size model's toggle switches have been shared with the Colorado. Many are saying that the steering wheel and gauge pod look very similar to the 2014 Impala's style/design.

    I will say that the 2015 Colorado has been receiving a lot of attention the past several hours since these leaks went out! I want to see the non-monochromatic versions; the all-painted models are nice, but I like my trucks with some tasteful chrome.

    Edited by GMTruckGuy74
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like it quite a lot, I think our front end is better than the global market Colorado's. Cab reminds me of the Tacoma with that upkick, but overall the exterior looks quite nice, and a lot better than the Silverado. Not feeling the interior though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It may just be me, but I'm seeing a lot of the '98-'03 S-series (S10/Sonoma) pickup styling in this new Colorado. Now that's not a bad thing, as I dearly miss my 2001 GMC Sonoma SLS Highrider. I can't wait to see the GMC Canyon; hoping the rumors I've heard of a January debut (North American International Auto Show) are just that - rumors. I hope GMC doesn't make us ruby red fans wait too much longer.

    I kinda see it, but I'm not as sure with the angles here. Not a fan of the 4 door, rather have an extended cab, as long as my son can fit in back there! Really need to get a closer look at this truck......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • 100% correct. They did it to make money, not to appease the 1% of enthusiasts.  One of my best friends' mom has a BMW 540i M Sport and she claims it's an M. Their marketing is 100% working. 
    • Which is what he doesn't get. He thinks the two examples are equal, hence his double standard accusation, when they are beyond apples to oranges in comparison. History of the two models alone prove this.
    • There is no reason to doubt a succesful transition for Corvette to be its own brand. Like @Robert Hall said, the Corvette has been a sub-brand of Chevrolet SINCE 1953 actually.  Its built a reputation of it BEING a sub-brand for 70 years.  Its been not only the halo car for Chevrolet, BUT for General Motors. GM had Oldsmobile technology (automotic transmissions) and Cadillac luxury and technology to be GM's halo cars, but Corvette too with the go fast goodies.  Since the 1980s with the C4, the  Corvette fast became practically the SOLE GM halo car.    And although @smk4565 doesnt think the Corvette is benchmarked by other car companies such as Ferrari and Porsche and Mercedes, he would be sadly mistaken.   Corvette as a brand, is recognized the world over.  Its a brand that has NEVER diluted itself. If the new models are engineered as Corvettes, then there is no problems. Ferrari resisted the temptation to do an SUV.  They got one now.   Lamborghini has made one in the 1980s/1990s.  It only failed in the market place because it was too radical of an idea back then. The Urus seems to do well in the market place. And it IS a fine Lamborghini at that.  Not MY vision of what a Lamborghini should be, but I dont like SUVs to begin with...   But then again, I prefer the LM002 as MY vision of SUVs mean off road.  The LM002 does have that sweet sweet V12 under the hood... But then again, Lamborghini also expanded on their image, with an off road Huracan   How crazy is that?   Their LM002 off road SUV never to be revisited again. Made a sportscar SUV Urus and took their sportscar Huracan to do an offroader with it?  And ALL of those dont cheapen out Lamborghini at all.  How really phoqued up is that?  With that Huracan, there are now 2 entries in this niche.  The 911 Dakar and the Huracan Sterrato.  Can one picture a Corvette C8 version? I CAN!!!     
    • But...if engineering had a BIGGER role to play in making an AMG, M and S-Line rather than the marketing department, those that you mentioned would be so-called REAL AMGs, M cars and S-Line cars.  That is what I said.  And its true for Mercedes and their AMG line, BMW with their M cars and Audi with their S-Line. Ford with Mustang and the Mach-E etc. The reason why Jeep was succesful in becoming a a brand, why the Mach-E is succesful in BEING a Mustang is that engineering took what made the General Purpose military vehicle and Ford the Mustang and engineered the elements into the new models.  Marketing took the emotions that evoke those vehicles and told the engineers to built that into the new models and then proceeded to sell the new vehicles this way. A Jeep commercial from 1994. It features the Grand Cherokee   But the Grand Cherokee, not only did it replace the very very of road capable Cherokee of the previous gen And the Cherokee was just another new model in the 1980s to wear the Jeep badge following in the footsteps of the Civilian CJ Jeep, but the GRAND Cherokee was now part of the start of the SUV craze that folks used to haul their families in replacing the minivan. Like I said, the engineers over at Corvette have to engineer Corvette-ness into the new models, marketers have to identify what emotions a Corvette makes us humans feel, and then engineer additonal emotional Corvette-ness into the new models and then let marketing sell it to people. Mercedes, Audi and BMW just wanted to cash in easy money with the fake models with the badges. GM did that too in the past. Chevrolet glued SS badges unto everything.   Oldsmobile called everything a Cutlass in the 1980s. In 1988 there was the RWD Cutlass Supreme which was the original Cutlass that had lineage to the first Cutlass in the 1960s.   The 2 door G Body.  The FWD Cutlass Cierra. The  FWD Cutlass Calais.    And the more confusing part, AT THE SAMT TIME TIME AS THE 2 Door G-Body,  was the first year of the W-Body, FWD Cutlass Supreme (again-same name as the 2 door RWD G-Body)... So...while SMK has the right idea of being skeptical about a Corvette being its own brand because there have been many many examples of that kind of thing failing, there has been just as many examples of that kind of thing being succesful. And lets be honest too while we are at it. Mercedes, BMW and Audi plastering AMG, M and S-Lines badges on everything, even if some of those models do NOT represent the proper essence of those particular performance badges, in the market place, these fake models ARE succesful.   The thing that bugs me about SMK is that he will NEVER acknowledge that some of those AMG badges do NOT represent what a so called real AMG is supposed to be while he disses a Mustang Mach-E. And the very core of that Mustang Mach-E is a vehicle that is a very very true Mustang underneath and NOT just some cheap marketing  gimmick slapping a prancing Mustang on the front grill and calling it the day.    
    • It may technically be a double standard but I've never heard anybody ask for an Escalade car, that's what the CT-line of Cadillacs are.  People DO ask for high performance SUVs, which GM doesn't have. Yes, they could just make a standalone Chevy (whatever name you want here) performance SUV but by adding in the Corvette brand equity and performance, it will get a lot more attention, just like the Mustang Mach-e did. Even if people complain about the name, it will get waaaay more press than a Chevy/GMC/Cadillac version of the same exact thing, just by being a Corvette branded SUV. 
  • Social Stream

×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search