Jump to content
  • Blake Noble
    Blake Noble

    SLP Releases Teaser for New Buick GNX

    Sign in to follow this  

    G. Noble

    Editor/Reporter

    CheersandGears.com

    March 1, 2012

    Since Buick reintroduced the Regal to the North American market back in 2010, there has been some enthusiasm for the return of the big-daddy GNX, the famous performance car of the ‘80s which was based around the then-current Regal. Well, since it appears that New Jersey-based tuning firm SLP has secured the rights to the “GNX” name, some of you may just get your wish.

    SLP released the teaser sketch you’re viewing just recently, which reveals that the new GNX will use the current Regal GS as its starting point. From there, it appears SLP will beef up the bodywork with unique flared fender extensions and lower rocker panel extensions, a new lower front fascia, possibly a new set of rims, and a huge power bulge on the hood. While the GS is one of the more fairly handsome performance sedans on the market, SLP’s exterior changes make it look almost flaccid in comparison.

    SLP notes that their new GNX will pack over 300 horses, up from the 270 you get in a regular GS. There isn’t any word on what gearbox SLP plans to use, but there probably wouldn’t be any harm in assuming SLP may at least choose the GS’s manual transmission. SLP also hasn’t said if the new GNX will somehow be all-wheel drive — like the Regal GS’s related German counterpart, the Opel Insignia OPC — or remain front-wheel drive.

    If you want one, however, there isn’t much time to worry about all of the specifics. You’d better get in line as soon as you can because SLP only plans to build 500 of these. You hear that, Lord Vader?

    Source: Edmund's Inside Line

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Very cool in Deed, I wish them the best of luck.

    I do hope they have AWD with a massively massaged turbo'd engine and cold air induction that can get about 350HP or more. This need to then be Metallic black with the Grill, the rings around the three large air intacts in the lower facia and rims all BLACK CHROME. Windows all Tinted dark. This would be one bad ass ride! :P

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it is more likely licensing the trademarks from GM.

    I think you're right. I think it's going to be more like how they built the 4th-gen Camaro SS/WS6 Firebirds for GM.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Somehow, I think it should be called GSX though for some reason. Probably just because of the donor car's name.

    Edited by Turbojett

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Somehow, I think it should be called GSX though for some reason. Probably just because of the donor car's name.

    Well, SLP did actually build the last GSX around the old W-Body Regal.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I work with SLP on different things at work. I knew they were doing something with the Regal.

    Based on their latest work I only expect some body changes and the 300 HP as it is not hard to do, All you have to do is add a pair of 3 bar maps and and a flash of the computer. It is an easy mod. They could make some real money with this as long as GM does not offer the upgrade package like on the HHR, Cobalt and Kappas.

    I in no way see them doing AWD as the it would add so much to the price no one would buy it.

    SLP just did the ZL1 Camaro of their own at a big price and now Chevy has a better one at a lesser price. I expect theirs to fade away soon or make a bigger jump in power. I don't see many of theirs being sold.

    Ed has struggled to find his niche since they lost the deal to supply dealer cars with the 4th gens. They even resorted to Ford Rangers for a short while.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it is more likely licensing the trademarks from GM.

    And you'd be wrong.

    GM had to negotiate the rights to the ZL-1 moniker away from SLP who had claimed it and produced a Camaro package first.

    The article makes it clear that SLP has the rights to "GNX" as well.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it is more likely licensing the trademarks from GM.

    And you'd be wrong.

    GM had to negotiate the rights to the ZL-1 moniker away from SLP who had claimed it and produced a Camaro package first.

    The article makes it clear that SLP has the rights to "GNX" as well.

    So GM goofed and let the naming rights expire...those names should never have been owned by a 3rd party like SLP.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The funny thing is at the Barrett-Jackson show here in January, I saw the Z-L1 on display at the Chevy area and maybe 75 feet away at the SLP stand they had their fake ZL-1 on display...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "ZL-1" may never have been trademarked, as it was pretty much an option code, not a model name, IIRC.

    I would agree that every name EVER used should be retained- doesn't take much effort for a legal entity already set up & doing this sort of thing.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, no doubt there's SOME cost involved, and GM had HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of past names.

    That, and GM (and all the other manufacturers) pays very little attention to their pasts.

    I consider it High Fortune that there's a GM Historical and that all the paper/photo records weren't heaved into a plant furnace decades ago.

    There was a binder of Motorama car sketches & photos, unique views, tight renderings, found in a dumpster behind the Clark Ave Cadillac plant years ago- how that could have happened defies explanation/theory.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    um i say that unless its direct competition for the taurus SHO it shouldnt be titled a GNX. that moniker conjures up thoughts of dominance... when NA v6's are touting 300-315hp that is not very dominating. a GNX version should bring 400hp to this gun fight.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    um i say that unless its direct competition for the taurus SHO it shouldnt be titled a GNX. that moniker conjures up thoughts of dominance... when NA v6's are touting 300-315hp that is not very dominating. a GNX version should bring 400hp to this gun fight.

    The only possible advantage the SHO could hold over the SLP GNX is that it offers all-wheel drive.

    Otherwise, the SHO requires not one, but two turbochargers so that it's 3.5L V6 can develop 365 horsepower. The GNX will generate at least 300 horsepower out of a four-cylinder engine with only one turbo. The GNX really makes the SHO look like a garden plow here if I'm honest.

    That's also not to mention the SHO is a fat old cat that tips the scales north of 4300 pounds. The GNX should be a few hundred less than that.

    Edited by black-knight

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    hmm. i had forgotten that it was a 4cyl... still, a FWD GNX? i just wish it had a different badge affixed to it than that.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would rather see GM take this car and put more power to it. I know that the Eco Turbo can fo up to 500 HP in reliable power for a street car since they have already shown us this in several show cars. Imagine a 350-400 Version of the 2nd gen 2.0?

    Of all the complaints on the Regal the FWD has not been one of them. There have nit picks on other items but the torque steer and FWD has not been a complaint.

    The other key is untill they redo the Regal they need to keep the price down as while it is a great car it is not a car many will pay more than $40K for.. AWD would be nice but GM needs to find a way to keep the price down if they plan to use it in this car.

    As for the name.it mattlers little to me as long as it is a great car. The pocket of people it matters too is small and if anything a great car built on this name would only bring to light the past cars many forgot about or never knew.

    Buick could use the G as like how BMW uses the M. They could a do s G_X and change the middle letter for each. A Regal GRX would be nice.

    As for what gets tossed at MFG I can tell you stories. Everything from production based Plastic Fiero GT wheels to historic Blimp parts to Mercury/Gemini Space Suits and Space Shuttle tires some with brakes and landing gear parts. . I have see it all.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Can we go back and start at the beginning with Genesis?
    • Yes we have. We've seen worse. A whole lot worse.  And there are people still alive and still remember those bad bad times... We are a weak society as compared to prior generations... The bombs were not dropped and exploded on North American turf, but the effects of the war on the economy side of things affected North Americans. RATIONS And Im not even talking about Europe and how Europe was devastated by bombs and lack of food and disease on the streets along with dead bodies from war and internal in fighting and sabotaging and back stabbing and soldiers murdering innocent civilians and the list goes on and on and on.  Not to mention self isolation when the bombs hit and Europeans prayed it was not their house exploding Im talking about America. The war effort in America had a severe economic impact.  Detroit produced war machines. Not cars for about 3 years. It wasnt the boys who made them. It was the girls. The boys were off to war.  The girls, the married ones, prayed that they didnt get a certain letter from Uncle Sam.....  Many boys came back home in body bags... The only thing is, there was no self isolation in America during WW2 as there was in Japan, Europe and in today's situation. But there was no internet and no TV either back then...no video games.  Some places in America barely had electricity and lights...even in 1942... Not everybody had a job prior to 1939  either(start of WW2 for everybody else other than the US) so buying consumer products was not a thing...like we do today....even in a Covid19 lockdown.  We could still go to Wallmart and buy a Playstation 4, or workout equipment  because our favorite gym is closed...  We could still order take-out.  That kind of consumerism was not even dreamt of back in 1939...    Hell...even after the war in 1945...that concept wasnt even conceived.   Drive thrus though in the 1950s? maybe? We also have credit today...unless of course those of us who over consume and are maxed out from buying too many Starbucks coffees and useless contraptions...   But even then... the US household does have on average 3-4 TVs and at least 2 computers and 2 smart phones at their disposal during this crisis with unlimited internet... We also have 2-3 cars in our Average Joe homes...   Jobs? Yeah...those will be coming back after all this.   Businesses will re-open. Those that went away...will spawn new businesses. After all...American consumerism is a way of life.  That wont go away... And to those that will have a hard time getting back on their feet BECAUSE of overspending in the past... HOPEFULLY THIS will RESET THEIR mindset and we could get back to a much more simpler time and material objects are not coveted as much as we coveted them prior to this pandemic. Stay safe. Lets be careful on how we interact with our immediate environment and hopefully their is a solution around the corner soon. But we have faced much much tougher economic times than this.   Human Mortality is always grim,  so I wont downplay anything regarding that. THAT would be inhumane.  IN OTHER WORDS: We also have 2-3 cars in our Average Joe homes...   CASH FOR CLUNKERS IS NOT ALL THAT IMPORTANT RIGHT ABOUT NOW... To get the industry rolling again? In another thread...I was a major contributor in arguing for and against what constitutes a luxury vehicle... Well...all that is NOT IMPORTANT... ALL auto manufactures may now need to  go back into time and re-introduce back to basics automobiles...  Honda CVCCs,  BMW ISETTAs,  Ford Model Ts... Forget about Longhorn Laramies and AMG E Classes for the moment after this crisis is done with...and then maybe cash for clunkers could work out... 50 000 dollar pickup trucks with all the frills, bells and whistles is totally not what is important and needed. All the ApplePlay connectivity to tell us where to spend our money is not what is important and needed. The 20 inch rims and Brembo crossdrilled ceramic brakes are not what is important and needed... For our transportational needs going forward after this Coronavirus COVID19 thing gets resolved....           
    • It will fail. The big difference? There will be way, way more people out of work. At this stage, folks aren’t even sure that the world will end. Back during the Great Recession, you knew at least some point things would get better. And it did. But we’ve never seen damage done this bad. So even if the deals are good, people may still not jump on this.... Second- Automakers will adjust to demand this time around. They even have other things that they can build. For the first time- some profit (maybe) will not be from the cars. I would be surprised I’d sales of cars even touch 10 million this year. This all depends when people can get out again......
    • The COVID-19 pandemic has basically brought most of the world to halt. Orders to stay at home, businesses either having workers to their work from home or closing down, and unemployment skyrocketing is causing the economy to crater. There are efforts to try and jump-start the economy such as $1,200 stimulus checks. But an executive at Ford wants to see a return of a "cash for clunkers" like program. “We think some level of stimulus somewhere on the other side of this would help not only the auto industry and our dealers, which are a huge part of our overall economy, but will help the customers as well,” said Mark LaNeve, Ford’s vice president of U.S. marketing, sales and service to Bloomberg. “Cash for clunkers was very effective at that time. It would be nice to think we could have something equally as effective for 2020 when we get out of this because it was a great program.” According to LaNeve, internal discussions are taking place at Ford about doing a similar program and there are plans to bring the Government in to these talks. When asked by Automotive News about this, Ford spokeswoman Rachel McCleery said, "The auto industry is America’s economic engine.We are encouraging Congress to look at a variety of ways to drive job creation, increase demand, support customers and provide long-term stability for the entire auto ecosystem." A brief refresher on the Cash for Clunkers program. In 2009, the U.S. Government introduced a billion initiative called the Car Allowance Rebate System, which gave a voucher worth between $2,900 and $4,500 to anyone replacing a vehicle newer than 1984. Their old vehicle would be taken away and disposed of. The program was nicknamed Cash for Clunkers. On the surface, the program was a success. Within first month, all of the funds were exhausted. This prompted the U.S. congress infuse an addition two billion into the program, which would be all gone within 17 days. But begin to look deeper and the results are mixed. In 2012, a study published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics described the program as being a bit of a wash, "...the effect of the program on auto purchases is almost completely reversed by as early as March 2010 — only seven months after the program ended.” Other studies have come to the same conclusion. There's also the question of how many perfectly good used cars were taken off the road due to the program. Source: Bloomberg via Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Drive, The Truth About Cars View full article
    • G80 compares well to the lower and mid trim German midsizers but without the German or Tesla badge it will be overlooked like the CT6 was.  In Asia it might do well where badges are not quite as well entrenched..  Buick was for retirees here who wouldn't comarison shop anywhere else but still made a good run in China.      
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bdubsee
      bdubsee
      (47 years old)
    2. maticulus
      maticulus
      (54 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...