• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Cadillac's Marketing Chief Admits the ELR Price Was A Bit Too Much


    • Uwe Ellinghaus Admits the ELR was priced too high

    You don't hear a lot of executives admit when they or their company has made a blunder. When they do, it comes as a bit of a shock and helps you realize they are somewhat human. Case in point is Cadillac's marketing chief Uwe Ellinghaus telling Bloomberg they bit off bit a more than they could chew with the ELR pricing.

     

    "The MSRP was, indeed, a mouthful. We overestimated that customers would realize our competitors were naked at that price," said Ellinghaus.

     

    So why did Cadillac price the ELR so high? Well product planners believed if the ELR was close to the price of the Chevrolet Volt, people would go for the Volt. Also, the high price was seen as to signal this was a special car from Cadillac.

     

    "We just wanted to make this a statement for the brand of how progressive we are," said Ellinghaus.

     

    Sadly it hasn't worked with just 1,835 ELRs being sold in North America within the past 18 months. Also, dealers have been piling on incentives to get them off their lot.

     

    Source: Bloomberg

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    "The MSRP was, indeed, a mouthful." 

     

    Um, I think potential buyers were more concerned with another bodily orifice when they saw the $75,000.00 price tag.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, dealers have been piling on incentives to get them off their lot.

     

     

    Seems we've heard & heard this before....

     

     

    Cort :) www.oldcarsstronghearts.com

    1979 & 1989 Caprice Classics | pigValve, paceMaker, cowValve
    "Promises mean everything" __ Everclear __ 'Wonderful'
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Call up all the GM, Cadillac, and EV haters because we gotta 'nother live one. Some people love to hear this kinda thing. Its actually a bit weird.

     

    ELR at $75K was fine IF Cadillac only wanted to sell them to niche buyers. They didn't. They FAILED to sell the intended 3000 (last year about 1/2 of that)  units annually because they did nothing to market this car after "Poolside" went viral and let's be honest, its a 2-seater (eff the back seat in any of these sports coupes/Verts from Cadillac to Benz), it has no sunroof, which is insane considering the market for this car would seemingly be the well-to-do, Silicon Valley, greenie types who love to show up in something sexy that lets their hair blow around in the wind. 

     
    This car.. THIS CAR.. should have been a sub-ATS sports car, with a convertible roof or sunroof having coupe, with a TT 2.0L 270HP and 350HP VSeries version, and ta hell with EV. The Voltec should have gone in the XTS. The XTS, with Voltec would have made sense. The XTS with Voltec would have added numbers in the realm of what Tesla sell because it would be in a car that could actually seat 5, maybe 6, with a trunk that could house a bunch of Golf Clubs.
     
    Anyway, the CT6 Hybrid rights this wrong. The ELR, will return in a proper form, and a different name. I'm thinking CT7. The CT6, with 335 hp and 432 lb-ft of torque, not to mention light weight will be pretty refreshing   

    And another thing I wish people would stop always bringing up the Tesla Model S. The comparison of the Tesla Model S to the Cadillac ELR was a dumb one created by idiots in the first place simply because of price and they both being EVs. 

     
    Tesla Model S is a 7-Seater. ELR is a 4 Seater. 
    Tesla Model S is a sedan. ELR is a Coupe
    Tesla Model S is a Full-Sizer. ELR is a Compact
    Tesla Model S is a 100% EV. ELR is a Plug-in Hybrid
     
     
    Lets start comparing Pick-ups to Dirt-Bikes.
    -1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To top it off, the Model S may sell in steadily, slightly increasing volume, but it still doesn't make the company one thin dime. They have to keep it going because it's the ONLY vehicle they have. Cadillac/GM, of course, have the room to speak on the ELR because it's one of a hundred vehicles built.

     

    Still, these guys don't understand marketing. It's one thing to (appear) candid in an interview, it's another to openly admit 'mistakes'. It gains you nothing.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No kidding Sherlock, where was the voice of reason when that came to that insane price to begin with.  They missed the opportunity to price it between $55k and $60k.  Cadillac needs to take a page from Lexus of the past and price their cars at a reasonable low price as not to be perceived as low rent.  Then work their way up and people would have been more tolerate of the pricing environment.  I love Gm and  Cadillac but there is a perception problem they have to work around and doing business as usual is not going to make it go away.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This car should have been $49,995 base price, but come fully loaded with no options.  It's a Volt, asking $50k is even stretching.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Perhaps there are some brains at GM, afterall. It was obvious from the beginning that the price was completely unjustified. The funny thing is... A lot of you guys tried to justify it in the beginning. Watching the backpedaling and further attempts of justification is about as good as any C&G movie gets. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This car should have been $49,995 base price, but come fully loaded with no options.  It's a Volt, asking $50k is even stretching.

     

     

    Agreed. It does not offer much more either.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    55-60 MSRP would have been fine. The interior is gorgeous as is the exterior. Based on style alone, it would have sold alright out of the box marketed that way.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The ELR interior should have been in the ATS.   Would have made the ATS more competitive.  The ELR wouldn't have sold at anything over $50k, the Volt is a slow seller, a luxury Volt was always going to be an even slower seller.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Perhaps there are some brains at GM, afterall. It was obvious from the beginning that the price was completely unjustified. The funny thing is... A lot of you guys tried to justify it in the beginning. Watching the backpedaling and further attempts of justification is about as good as any C&G movie gets. 

     

     

     

    Please. The technology is sound,.. the packaging was the issue. What exactly justifies the price of any luxury car over a competent mainstream competitor??? Can U really tell me why a 328i is justified in costing $20K more than a Camry???  

     

    I would have sold the ELR for $75K.. I just would have made the ELR a different, more substantial car for the main reason why going green makes since.. in all segments.. to be environmentally friendly. The configuration is wrong. Tesla had another model that was a failure because since when is a two seater environmentally friendly??? Must carry up to 4 Comfortably whether it be a Model S, ELR, or Chevy Tahoe. Yup.. Chevy Tahoe. Fill one up with people and it could be as fuel efficient as a Prius

    -1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The ELR interior should have been in the ATS.   Would have made the ATS more competitive.  The ELR wouldn't have sold at anything over $50k, the Volt is a slow seller, a luxury Volt was always going to be an even slower seller.

     

     

    No it shouldn't have been The ELR has an interior that features materials that make the S-Class seem overpriced. The ATS interior is not the reason for its sales issues. This price point now presented will go a nice way to getting more sales for the ELR. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The S-class isn't overpriced, if it were then people would stop buying it.  But it has been the global sales leader for about 40 years, people must think it is a good buy.  Unlike the ELR that will spend about 4 years on market with no sales and be killed off.

     

    The ATS interior doesn't drive away sales, but I don't think it is bringing people in either.  The ATS is a poor seller, it needs something that is a wow factor to bring in more buyers.

    -1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We've been over this : if the S-class weren't overpriced, it wouldn't need heavy incentives.

    Last gen was sometimes hitting $15 grand off sticker.

     

    ATS physically doesn't need anything glaring or major, it's not the product that's deficient.

    There's also no wow factor from the germans in this segment.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In most months the S-class outsells its closest 3 competitors COMBINED and at a higher transaction price.  It creates $1 billion a year in profit for Daimler, there are no problems in the cash making department with the S-class.

     

    There is a new A4 coming next year, along with the mild refresh the 3-series, and the Jag XE is coming.  Competition is only increasing.  The ATS doesn't sell now, and they have another 3-4 years in this life cycle.  Dressing up the interior an extra level would help.  I don't see a downside to taking much of the design and materials for the ELR interior and putting it into the ATS which is a similar sized car.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ATS= fix Cue, fix pricing and packages, new dash but most importantly, give the car some leg room in the back.  The ATS-L body should become the ATS sedan.  American lux car intenders have always wanted some room in their car and the ATS doesn't have enough and it would improve sales if it did.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In most months the S-class outsells its closest 3 competitors COMBINED and at a higher transaction price.  It creates $1 billion a year in profit for Daimler, there are no problems in the cash making department with the S-class.

     

    There is a new A4 coming next year, along with the mild refresh the 3-series, and the Jag XE is coming.  Competition is only increasing.  The ATS doesn't sell now, and they have another 3-4 years in this life cycle.  Dressing up the interior an extra level would help.  I don't see a downside to taking much of the design and materials for the ELR interior and putting it into the ATS which is a similar sized car.

     

     

     

    U really are delusional. Your argument of sales is ridiculous.. as the Camry outsells several cars in its segment 3:1. The fact that with its numbers.. it generates $1 Billion in profit.. proves my original, and Balthazar's supporting assertion about it being overpriced. That is.. essentially how U make profit. Only a fool would pay full price for an S-Class... when U can get one for about $30K off a year later. I can find U a '13 S550 with 23K miles for under $60K. That's a fact

    Edited by Cmicasa the Great
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ATS= fix Cue, fix pricing and packages, new dash but most importantly, give the car some leg room in the back.  The ATS-L body should become the ATS sedan.  American lux car intenders have always wanted some room in their car and the ATS doesn't have enough and it would improve sales if it did.

     

     

     

    I agree about the legroom. Not because I would ever have anymore than 2 people in my sport sedan or hate the idea of chauffeuring anyone... but because apparently more and more people are buying small compact luxury sedans and trying to squeeze their lazy ass friends in the rear to be chauffeured, when they could have just bought a larger CTS..

    Edited by Cmicasa the Great
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In most months the S-class outsells its closest 3 competitors COMBINED and at a higher transaction price.  It creates $1 billion a year in profit for Daimler, there are no problems in the cash making department with the S-class.

     

    There is a new A4 coming next year, along with the mild refresh the 3-series, and the Jag XE is coming.  Competition is only increasing.  The ATS doesn't sell now, and they have another 3-4 years in this life cycle.  Dressing up the interior an extra level would help.  I don't see a downside to taking much of the design and materials for the ELR interior and putting it into the ATS which is a similar sized car.

     

     

     

    U really are delusional. Your argument of sales is ridiculous.. as the Camry outsells several cars in its segment 3:1. The fact that with its numbers.. it generates $1 Billion in profit.. proves my original, and Balthazar's supporting assertion about it being overpriced. That is.. essentially how U make profit. Only a fool would pay full price for an S-Class... when U can get one for about $30K off a year later. I can find U a '13 S550 with 23K miles for under $60K. That's a fact

     

    But the Camry doesn't outsell the Accord, Altima and Fusion combined, and cost 20% more than those 3.  If buyers thought the S-class was over priced or a rip off then it wouldn't sell.  S-class has over 40 years on top of the mountain, no one has knocked it off yet.   They have sold about 3 million S-classes since 1972 when they actually started using the S-class name.  There must have been a lot of fools walking into Mercedes dealerships since then.

     

    I am sure the bean counters at GM would have loved if the ELR sold 1,000 units a month at their $75,000 price tag so they turned a profit.   Rather than having almost no sales and having to kill the product off as another one and done.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jag XE is competition for nobody; no one buys Jags in this country.  

    True, hardly anyone buys a Jag, but they'll sell like 1,000 a month, they will have to steal that off someone.  People bought the X-type and it was terrible.  I don't think it is a big threat either, but it might take 200 cars a month away from Cadillac, BMW, Lexus and Mercedes. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They barely sell 1000 /mnth now with multiple models. XE isn't going to reach anywhere near 1000/mn- there's just no "wow factor" and no one is clamoring for any more Jags. Niche brand, not competition.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Popular Now

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. gmcbob
      gmcbob
      (42 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Big November Gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac Keep GM the Fastest Growing Automaker
      November U.S. retail market share highest since 2009 Year to Date U.S. Retail Share up 0.5 Percentage Points November Commercial sales were highest since 2008 DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) sold 197,609 vehicles in November to individual or “retail” customers in the U.S., up 8 percent from last year. Based on initial estimates, GM once again outperformed all full-line manufacturers, led by strong retail sales gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac. GM’s November retail sales performance drove GM’s U.S. retail share to its highest November level since 2009.
      Based on initial estimates, GM’s retail market share jumped 0.3 percentage points in November to 16.8 percent.  GM has gained retail market share in 17 of the past 20 months.
      GM’s four U.S. brands posted strong retail sales results in November compared to last year.
      Chevrolet — up 5 percent for its best November since 2004 Buick — up 22 percent for its best November since 2003 GMC — up 9 percent for its best November since 2001 Cadillac — up 17 percent for its best November since 2013 GM’s total U.S. sales in November were 252,644 vehicles, up more than 10 percent from last year.   All four brands outperformed the industry in November with Buick, Cadillac and GMC posting double-digit gains.
      “GM’s November performance reflects the continued strength of our U.S. business.  We gained profitable retail share, commercial and small business deliveries were strong and we commanded the industry’s best average transaction prices,” said Kurt McNeil, GM’s vice president of U.S. Sales Operations. “We are ahead of plan selling down our 2016 model year inventory and we expect to close out December with more retail share growth. GM is heading into 2017 in a position of strength with the planned launch of key new products, like the all-new Chevrolet Equinox, into the heart of the market.” 
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average and ahead of last November. 

      Through the first 11 months of the year, GM’s U.S. retail sales were up nearly 2 percent compared to last year. GM gained 0.5 percentage points of U.S. retail market share during that timeframe, the largest retail share gain of any full-line automaker. Year to date, Chevrolet U.S. retail sales are up nearly 3 percent and the brand’s retail share has grown 0.5 percentage points to 11.1 percent. Chevrolet continues to be the U.S. industry’s fastest-growing brand.
      Year to date, Buick retail deliveries have grown more than 5 percent and Buick has gained 0.1 percentage points of retail share.
      GM continues to benefit from a strong U.S. economy and strong retail demand for its products.
      “All economic indicators show significantly improved optimism about the U.S. economy including consumer and business sentiment, which continue to drive a very healthy U.S. auto industry,” said Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist. “We believe the U.S. auto industry is well-positioned for sales to continue at or near record levels into 2017.”
      November 2016 Retail Sales and Business Highlights vs. November 2015 (except as noted)

      Chevrolet
      Malibu and Volt were up 24 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Silverado and Colorado were up 5 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Suburban, Tahoe, Equinox and Trax were up 6 percent, 12 percent, 7 percent and 47 percent, respectively. Malibu had its best November since 1997. Silverado had its best November since 2003. Colorado had its best November since 2004. Trax, Volt and Equinox had their best November ever. Tahoe and Suburban had their best November since 2007. 17th straight month of year over year gains for Chevrolet full-size utilities. GMC
      Sierra and Canyon were up 14 percent and 43 percent, respectively. Acadia, Yukon and Yukon XL were up 4 percent, 22 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Brand ATP was at $43,887, the highest November on record. Highest November ever for Denali penetration, at 27.8 percent. Best November ever for Canyon and ninth month of year over year increases. Yukon and Yukon XL had their best November since 2007. Buick
      Regal and Encore were up 41 percent and 35 percent, respectively. 68 percent of sales were crossovers. Best year to date retail performance since 2005. Cadillac
      Escalade was up 24 percent and had its best month of the year. Escalade had its best November since 2007. XT5 had its best month since launch with sales up 12 percent over last month and up 27 percent over the SRX last November, the vehicle it replaced. Year to date ATP was $53,690, the highest ever in Cadillac history Average Transaction Prices (ATP)/Incentives (based on JD Power PIN estimates)
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average. In November, GM’s incentive spending as a percent of ATP was 13.7 percent, above the industry average of 12.4 percent. However, year to date, GM’s incentive spending was 11.7 percent, slightly above the industry average of 11.4 percent and well below the incentive spending of its domestic competitors and many of its global competitors. Fleet and Commercial
      Automotive Fleet magazine named Malibu “Fleet Car of the Year”. GM Fleet sales were up 19 percent versus last November. Fleet sales were 22 percent of GM’s sales for the month. Commercial deliveries were up 11 percent for the month and it was the best November Commercial sales since 2008. Malibu Commercial deliveries were up 170 percent versus last November. Small Business deliveries were up 15 percent for the month versus last November, driven by large vans, which were up 93 percent and large pickups, which were up 16 percent versus last November. Federal government sales were up 9 percent versus last November. Rental sales were up 27 percent versus last November but are down 25 percent CYTD, according to plan. GM’s outlook on its daily rental sales mix remains in the 11 percent range of total U.S. sales for 2016 and daily rental sales for the year are expected to be down about 75,000 vehicles. Industry Sales
      GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in November was approximately 17.9 million units. On a calendar year-to-date basis, GM estimates the light-vehicle SAAR was 17.5 million units.
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA
    • By ccap41
      " It's a golden autumn morning in rural upstate New York. Backpacked kids wait by mailboxes for the school bus. I'm driving through pockets of valley mist to New York state's most famous racing circuit, to witness the shakedown testing of a race car so top-secret, it's still wrapped in camouflage.
      After a 14-year absence, Cadillac is readying its return to endurance racing. The last time the American automaker competed in top-level prototype racing was 2002, when the ill-fated Northstar LMP finished 9th at Le Mans. Audi's dominant R8 prototype notched its third consecutive victory at the Circuit de la Sarthe that year.
      Wayne Taylor and Max Angelelli were co-drivers in that final Cadillac attempt at Le Mans. They'll both be at the track today. Taylor, 60, has graduated from the driver's seat to run Wayne Taylor Racing, the principal team partner in Cadillac's new motorsports endeavor; Angelelli, 49, shares co-driving duties with Taylor's sons Ricky, 26, and Jordan, 24.
      All four will be responsible for the imminent future of Cadillac endurance racing, in a program that tasks itself with making top-level sports car racing engaging and relatable again. I'm here to learn if Cadillac, and the series itself, can cut it.
      The camouflaged Caddy you see here is officially known as the DPi-V.R. It's built to IMSA's new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) formula, to compete in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship starting in 2017.
      Think of DPi as an effort to make top-level prototype racing a little more interesting, and relatable, for casual race fans. The cars share a chassis with the LMP2 prototypes that compete in the FIA World Endurance Championship and the 24 Hours of Le Mans, built by one of four approved constructors—Dallara, Onroak Automotive, ORECA or Riley/Multimatic. ..."
      http://www.roadandtrack.com/motorsports/news/a31697/cadillac-dpi-v-r-exclusive-photos/
       




    • By William Maley
      In light of the fatal crash involving a Tesla Model S and Autopilot back in May, automakers are reconsidering their plans for rolling out their autonomous technologies. General Motors was planning to introduce Super Cruise on the Cadillac CT6 sometime next year. But in light of Tesla crash, GM is rethinking their plans.
      “We aren’t putting a specific date on it,” said GM CEO Mary Barra at a cybersecurity conference.
      Officials told The Detroit Bureau later on that the feature would still appear next year. This would be corroborated by a Cadillac spokesman to Motor Trend.
      “Right now, the plan continues to be that we will introduce [super Cruise] in the Cadillac CT6 in calendar year 2017,” said Cadillac spokesman Donny Nordlicht.
      “We want to make sure it is safe for our customers to use and we’ll launch it when we’re confident in the technology,” Nordlicht said. “Our engineers have been testing and validating the technology for the past several years to make sure all of our systems are focused on providing the customer among the most intuitive and safe solutions. We’re not driven by a deadline, we’re driven to make the system customer-friendly and safe so the exact month of introduction cannot be announced at this time.”
      Insiders at GM believe that Super Cruise should be able to avoid some of the problems that plague Tesla's Autopilot. Like Autopilot, Super Cruise blends information from radar and cameras. But Super Cruise will also use a high-definition map that provides more details than what you can get on a current navigation system. This map will help the system determine where the vehicle is and whether it is safe to engage the system. There is also a retina detection system that monitors the driver and will switch off Super Cruise if it detects if the driver isn't paying attention.
      Source: The Detroit Bureau, Motor Trend

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)