• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Rumorpile: ATS-V Packing A 425 Horsepower Twin-Turbo V6


    • The long-awaited Cadillac ATS is just around the corner, packing twin-turbo V6 power.

    It seems with every passing moment, the rumorpile churns more information out on the upcoming Cadillac ATS-V. Case in point is a report from Motor Trend this week which says the ATS-V will utilize the 3.6L Twin-Turbo V6 engine with 425 horsepower under the hood. Even better is that the ATS-V will also come with a a seven-speed manual gearbox option.

    Now this is very different from our last report in November when it was said that the ATS-V would be packing a turbocharged 3.2L V6, capable of 500 plus horsepower.

    There is more to Motor Trend's ATS rumor as well. There is plans for a more extreme version of the ATS-V possibly named ATS-V+. The V+ is expected to get a much powerful V8 engine of some kind (Z06 maybe?) and come out around 2017 at the earliest. There is also talk of an eight-speed automatic and a dual-clutch gearbox coming in the future.

    Source: Motor Trend

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    How about the ATS-V uses the 425hp 3.6L Turbo with the 7-speed manual and the updated CTS-V shares the new ZO6 drivetrain. That will be a big + IMHO.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just my opinion, but wouldn't it be smarter in this scenario to make the 3.6TT the Vsport and then the actual V the other higher performance option?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am still of the opinion that none of these publications actually know what's under the hood of the ATS-V. Unlike the Z06 there had been no actual credible leaks, just rumors. To me, it's still 50/50 between the LT1 V8 and the 3.6TT. Here's why...

    Case for the LT1 V8

    • This maintains the Cadillac V-car tradition of using Corvette motors and makes the V-car powertrain philosophy consistent if they use the 625+ bhp LT4 in the CTS-V (which I am quite sure will be the case)
    • While the 211 kg LT1 is 28kg heavier than the LS3, this is by far the lighter, more compact, more powerful and more torquey motor (compared to the LF3 V6 which weighs 220kg)
    • That LT1 is also somewhat cheaper than the LF3 allowing for money to be put into other performance equipment
    • Fuel Economy will be 1~2 mpg worse than in the lighter & sleeker Corvette, but 16/27 mpg is more than competitive in a 455 bhp car

    Case for the LF3 V6TT

    • The XTS and CTS already use this motor, using it adds fewer discrete engines to the Cadillac lineup
    • There are those who believe that Cadillac should do what the Europeans do, the BMW M3 is now a turbo 6
    • For markets with a displacement tax, the 3.6 liter powerplant may have a tax advantage over the 6.2 liter
    • I project the 3.6TT beating the 6.2 V8 by 1 mpg in the City, although it remains to be seen if there is any advantage on the Freeway. Given the ATS's lighter mass over the CTS Vsport, expect 1~2mpg better mileage -- at least 17/26 mpg, perhaps 17/27. Again, very good numbers, but not clearly superior to the pushrod V8.

    As far as the Alfa Romeo 3.2 based TT? I don't know where that came from. That was and is never in the cards.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wouldn't there also be the push to make Cadillac more distinct from the rest of GM? You want the Camaros and ATS Coupes to be sold well without being seen as the same car if they share the same engines.

    The Turbo V6 is in the XTS exclusively and the Impala only gets the regular 3.6L V6.

    The same may apply with the high-performance models of each brand. The ATS-V will get the turbo V6 and the next-gen Camaro will get the LT1.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the CTS V-sport powertrain is the ATS-V powertrain. It keeps that set up as Cadillac only and the work is already done and they have some economies of scale there. The 3-series is what Cadillac is going for and the M3 has a turbo 6, I just feel like that decision on a turbo V6 was made long ago.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ocn stop stealing my Syclone and Typhoon line! ;)

    A modern Syclone and Typhoon would be cool...even cooler would be an Escalade V series w/ the CTS-V engine.

    An Escalade V was considered as they had mules running around with the Supercharged V8, but was killed due to the depression and the killing of the old GM and move to the new GM. 3rd party Superchargers on the escalades are amazing. Have a friend that like me has a 2006 Escalade ESV Platinum that he supercharged and while it requires Premium, it is freakin amazing to drive.

    I agree with you that they need a V series in all their auto lines.

    Escalade V

    SRX V

    XTS V

    CTS V

    ATS V

    :metal:

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2013 M3 4L V8 414HP @ 8300 rpm; 295 lb-ft of torque @ 3900 rpm

    2015 M3/M4 3L I-6 425hp @ 7600 rpm; 406 lb-ft of torque @ 1800 rpm plus 170lbs lighter than the previous version.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6.2L V8 (L86) with Overhead Valve, two valves per cylinder, variable valve timing, Direct Fuel injection, 11.5:1 compression and regular fuel, max RPM 6000, 420 HP @ 5600 rpm, 450 lb-ft @ 4100 rpm.

    3.6L v6 TT (LF3) with dual overhead cam, four valves per cylinder, variable valve timing, Direct Fuel injection, 9.5:1 compression and premium fuel required, max RPM 6500, 420 HP @ 5750 rpm, 430 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6.2L V8 (L86) with Overhead Valve, two valves per cylinder, variable valve timing, Direct Fuel injection, 11.5:1 compression and regular fuel, max RPM 6000, 420 HP @ 5600 rpm, 450 lb-ft @ 4100 rpm.

    3.6L v6 TT (LF3) with dual overhead cam, four valves per cylinder, variable valve timing, Direct Fuel injection, 9.5:1 compression and premium fuel required, max RPM 6500, 420 HP @ 5750 rpm, 430 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm.

    Three things...

    (1) The L86 is used in the Silverado pickup truck. If the ATS uses the V8, it'll much more likely be the LT1 used in the Corvette. The LT1 makes 460 hp @ 6000 rpm / 465 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm.

    (2) The LF3 3.6L TT V6 actually has 10.2:1 compression (not 9.5) -- per GM official statistics.

    (3) Contrary to what many people think, the Twin Turbo V6 is the heavier engine. The 6.2L LT1 V8 weighs 465 lbs vs the 3.6L LF3 V6's 485 lbs -- both GM's official numbers. For comparison, BMW's S65 4.0L DOHC V8 weighs 445 lbs whereas the previous generation LS3 port injected pushrod V8 weighed 403 lbs.

    BTW, the ATS is only very slightly lighter than the F30 3-series. The ATS 2.0T weighs 3,373 lbs equipped with the Hydramtic 6L45 6-speed auto. The BMW 328i 2.0T weighs 3,410 lbs equipped with the ZF 8HP 8-speed transmission. Still, it's the first time a GM platform has a weigh advatnage over Bavarian and Stuttgart stuff.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Northstar
      Northstar
      (29 years old)
    2. redfox
      redfox
      (74 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Last week, we reported on comments made by Volkswagen NA CEO Hinrich Woebcken on wanting to expand the number of crossovers in their lineup. It seems there is another crossover possible destined for the U.S.
      According to a source, Volkswagen is planning to launch the T-Roc compact crossover for the U.S. beginning in 2019. First shown as a concept back at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show, the production model will launch this summer in Europe. The decision was made by Volkswagen once dealers in the U.S. gave a firm commitment to the company they would be able to sell enough T-Rocs to make a profit. It also appears this decision was made only last week judging from a comment made by VW brand chief Herbert Diess.
      "It was only yesterday that we decided on an additional SUV for 2019," Diess told reporters when asked about product strategy for the U.S.
      There are still a number of items up in the air, however. For one, Volkswagen needs to decide where it will build the T-Roc. It could import the model from Volkswagen's Portugal plant, build it in Puebla, Mexico, or have it in the same assembly plant as the Atlas in Chattanooga, TN.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: Newspress

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Last week, we reported on comments made by Volkswagen NA CEO Hinrich Woebcken on wanting to expand the number of crossovers in their lineup. It seems there is another crossover possible destined for the U.S.
      According to a source, Volkswagen is planning to launch the T-Roc compact crossover for the U.S. beginning in 2019. First shown as a concept back at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show, the production model will launch this summer in Europe. The decision was made by Volkswagen once dealers in the U.S. gave a firm commitment to the company they would be able to sell enough T-Rocs to make a profit. It also appears this decision was made only last week judging from a comment made by VW brand chief Herbert Diess.
      "It was only yesterday that we decided on an additional SUV for 2019," Diess told reporters when asked about product strategy for the U.S.
      There are still a number of items up in the air, however. For one, Volkswagen needs to decide where it will build the T-Roc. It could import the model from Volkswagen's Portugal plant, build it in Puebla, Mexico, or have it in the same assembly plant as the Atlas in Chattanooga, TN.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: Newspress
    • By William Maley
      We have been wondering what kind of impact the Mitsubishi and Nissan alliance would bring to the table. According to a report from Automotive News, it looks like delays for a couple of key products for the diamond star brand.
      Speaking with supplier sources, Mitsubishi has pushed back the redesigns of the Outlander and Outlander Sport crossovers. Originally, Mitsubishi was planning to launch the next Outlander "in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019", while the Outlander Sport would follow a year later. Now, the Outlander has been pushed back to late 2019 or 2020 and the Sport to after 2020.
      The delay is due to a review being undertaken by Mitsubishi and Nissan to search for a way to share architecture and parts with the Rogue and Rogue Sport. According to sources, the goal is to "commonize underpinnings and components" to save money while keeping an outer identity distinct to each brand.
      Mitsubishi confirmed the review but declined to comment on any delays.
      This delay could be a big blow for Mitsubishi's dealers in the U.S. who have been clamoring for new products. Joe Bizzarro, chairman of Mitsubishi's national dealer advisory board told Automotive News that no such delay was discussed during a meeting with dealers earlier this year - leading us to suspect this delay has come up recently. Dealers have yet to be notified about this delay.
      Right now, the only new product destined for Mitsubishi's U.S. dealers is the upcoming Eclipse Sport due in early 2018.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online