Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...
  • David
    David

    2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV Reveal

      Chevrolet is growing its EV portfolio and driving Chevrolet into the heart of the growing midsize electric crossover segment.

    An available GM-estimated range of up to 320 miles on a full charge, the 2024 Blazer EV offers multiple distinct trims, multiple range options and a choice of FWD, RWD or AWD configurations giving customers more choices with a seamless EV experience designed to complement virtually any lifestyle.

    Snag_2109e3f8.png

    This was one very interesting press release as Chevrolet chose to use Inforgraphics to highlight the details of this affordable Mid-Size EV.

    Blazer EV highlights include:

    • Driving range options up to an available GM-estimated 320 miles on a full charge (depending on the trim)
    • 11.5 kW level 2 (AC) charging and standard DC public fast-charging capability of up to 190 kW, depending on the model, which enables approximately 78 miles of range to be added in 10 minutes, per GM estimates
    • Large, intuitive 17.7-inch-diagonal customizable infotainment touchscreen
    • Full LED exterior lighting, with choreographed walk-up/walk-away animation on RS and SS models
    • Beautiful, spacious and sustainably crafted cabin made with soft-touch materials
    • Available Super Cruise hands-free driving technology for compatible roads
    • Advanced safety features intended to inspire confidence, including Reverse Automatic Braking6 and Advanced Park Assist

    Blazer EV_SS inforgraphics.jpgBlazer EV_inforgraphics.jpg

    One interesting way of conveying information is in the Chevrolet B-Roll videos that they post on the Chevrolet Media center and that most news sources never show or point too. Here is the 12 minute and 55 second details on the Blazer EV.

     

    On top of this is the various images that Chevrolet released. Clearly, Chevrolet is planning on this Blazer to be used in far more ways than most might think about as just a consumer.

    The 2024 Blazer EV Police Pursuit Vehicle in Sterling Gray Metallic

    2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev_ppv-041.jpg

    Interiors seem to be a decent focus for Chevrolet, while the all black is still available, they do have a few two-tone interiors with a red/black two-tone at initial release.

    2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-004.jpg

    There has been much discussion on the balance of buttons versus all touch screen and here Chevrolet seems to have listened to the market in offering a balance of buttons for basic items from the steering wheel to the immediate dash so that one does not have to hunt into the menus to find how to turn on basic AC or Heat, etc.

    2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-036.jpg2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-033.jpg

    One thing that this writer has come to dislike in various cheap ICE auto's and especially in Tesla is the center stack only screen. GM from Cadillac down to Cheverolet seems to feel safety of a screen right in front of the driver is still the safest way to get instant info rather than looking down and to the right.

    2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-034.jpg

    17.7-inch-diagonal color touchscreen is the focal point of the cabin and the command center for the vehicle’s infotainment system and additional features. A large 11-inch-diagonal color Driver Information Center in the instrument cluster complements the central touchscreen.

    Additional interior highlights include:

    • Two-row layout with ample spaciousness and storage options, thanks to a flat floor enabled by packaging of the Ultium Platform
    • Standard ambient lighting with personalization function on RS and SS trims
    • Unique RS and SS trim and design cues, including blue and red contrasting stitching on the RS, and sueded microfiber seating on the SS, with Adrenaline Red seating surfaces and available Argon Orange accents
    • Heated and ventilated front seats on RS and SS, along with heated rear outboard seating positions that are standard on SS and available on RS

    Till today, we have only seen hints of the Blazer EV in the Radiant Red Tintcoat and now we have seen the Sterling Gray Metallic on the Police Pursuit vehicle so one can assume a solid white and black version will also be colors for the Blazer EV as well as another color they announced Iridescent Pearl Tricoat for the Blazer EV RS.

    2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-040.jpg

    The Chevrolet Blaser EV 2LT will have a Galaxy Gray Metallic paint color.

    2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-039.jpg

    Chevrolet seems to want to let the world in via their sky roof and also still keep decent space in the rear.

    2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-028.jpg2024-chevrolet-blazer-ev-032.jpg

    The Blazer EV is based on the Ultium Platform with performance cues inspired by the Camaro and Corvette. Where Cheverolet has in the past let folks down with their SS (Super Sport) badged autos, here the inspiration has come through as the AWD Blazer SS will live up to the performance of a legendary SS with 557 HP, 648 lb-ft of torque with the WOW (Wide Open Watts) mode engaged, delivering a 6-60 sprint of less than 4 seconds.

    As Scott Bell, VP of Chevrolet has stated:

     “Along with the all-new Silverado EV and Equinox EV coming next year, we are making great strides in offering more choices for zero tailpipe-emissions vehicles — choices that make switching to an EV easier than ever.”

    “The Blazer EV SS has the soul of a true sports car,” “And while it represents the pinnacle of performance for Chevy’s EV lineup, all models offer stirring capabilities that will surprise and delight true performance devotees.”

    Lifestyle Technology

    The 2024 Blazer EV brings in things that many have only dreamed about in watching the Jetson cartoon show.

    From the latest technology in charging, infotainment and driver-assistance technology, these work together holistically according to Chevrolet offering greater convenience, comfort and confidence to the customer as they transition to an all-electric future.

    Many have come to enjoy the push button start in GM auto's, with the Chevrolet Blazer EV, push button start is a thing of the past as driving starts with hands-free start. With the key fob in the auto with you via your pocket, purse, etc. all one has to do to start driving is push the brake pedal after closing the door, the 2024 Blazer EV is ready to go.

    Technology highlights include:

    • Powered-opening charge port door: It features a powered opening when the door is pushed
    • Navigation to charging stations and route planning: Through the MyChevy app, this feature helps locate and plot routes to charging stations
    • Regen Braking: This feature can convert the kinetic energy of the vehicle’s forward momentum into electricity that’s stored in the battery pack to maximize the driving range. It also includes One-Pedal Driving, which can slow the vehicle to a full stop, using only the accelerator pedal
    • Available presence-based liftgateFor convenience, the tailgate can open hands-free when the key fob is recognized by the sensors at the rear of the vehicle
    • Available Super Cruise: The industry’s first true hands-free driver-assistance technology, allowing drivers to travel hands-free on compatible roads across the U.S. and Canada
    • Safety Features: Reverse Automatic Braking and Advanced Park Assist are part of the standard Chevrolet Safety Assist suite that also include Automatic Emergency Braking, Forward Collision Alert, Front Pedestrian Braking, Following Distance Indicator, Lane Keep Assist with Lan Departure Warning and IntelliBeam.

    GM EV strategy is to keep your auto current from end to end with OTA updates on all hardware and software allowing owners to continue to upgrade and personalize their autos like never before.

    This technology continues with the Ultium Charge 360 system that starts by having an onboard 11.5 kW AC charging module for home charging and the ability to support public high-speed DC charging.

    Pricing

    Yes, the one thing many folks have stated over the last few years is that EVs are for the Rich, most cannot afford them. Here Chevrolet has placed the Mid-size Blazer EV to have a starting price of $47,595 for the 2LT and $51,995 for the RS. Both will go on sale at the start of summer of 2023. The SS will follow later in 2023 with a starting price of $65,995 followed by the lowest price version, the 1LT and the PPV fleet model both on sale Q1 of 2024. The 1LT will have a starting price of $44,995

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Looks good..very normal without the forced weird some EVs have...and I like that it appears to have normal door handles, rather than the non-standard door handles many EVs have.   A door handle is a door handle, doesn't need pointless complexity like on the Teslas or Mach-e..

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My initial thought is I prefer the Mach-E, EV6 and Ionic 5 to this.  Essentially Chevy next summer is offering price, performance, and range that the other guys have now and I think the Kia and Hyundai look better than this.  
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    42 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    My initial thought is I prefer the Mach-E, EV6 and Ionic 5 to this.  Essentially Chevy next summer is offering price, performance, and range that the other guys have now and I think the Kia and Hyundai look better than this.  
     

    I much prefer the styling of those three over this but the non-SS trims look a hell of a lot cleaner and better looking than the SS. 

    Yeah, it doesn't really seem ground breaking in any way outside of maybe SuperCruise. The rest of this segment already has most of what this offers.  I'm curious about the FWD, RWD, and AWD available configurations and why that's even a thing. Not saying the option is a bad thing, just curious why it is a thing. 

    Is FWD cheaper than RWD? Is RWD cheaper than FWD? Are people actively choosing FWD over RWD without going AWD? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    I much prefer the styling of those three over this but the non-SS trims look a hell of a lot cleaner and better looking than the SS. 

    Yeah, it doesn't really seem ground breaking in any way outside of maybe SuperCruise. The rest of this segment already has most of what this offers.  I'm curious about the FWD, RWD, and AWD available configurations and why that's even a thing. Not saying the option is a bad thing, just curious why it is a thing. 

    Is FWD cheaper than RWD? Is RWD cheaper than FWD? Are people actively choosing FWD over RWD without going AWD? 

    While there is no answer in the press release or the reveal last night, I also was asking myself on this and the only thing that made sense to me was geographical location and cost. In the south, a RWD might be more preferred where a FWD in the North with occasional snow would make more sense for those that could not afford AWD.

    The Ultium system seems to be very flexible in regard to which end of the auto the motor is on.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, David said:

    In the south, a RWD might be more preferred where a FWD in the North with occasional snow would make more sense for those that could not afford AWD.

    I get that but...why...? Why would they spend the money doing R&D for something they could have done just FWD and AWD? Enthusiasts are such a small market that it seems weird to possibly cater to us here? While it is probably a simple thing to add, it just seems weird. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    I get that but...why...? Why would they spend the money doing R&D for something they could have done just FWD and AWD? Enthusiasts are such a small market that it seems weird to possibly cater to us here? While it is probably a simple thing to add, it just seems weird. 

    Gives them a marketing advantage over all the other FWD appliances out there. 

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    I get that but...why...? Why would they spend the money doing R&D for something they could have done just FWD and AWD? Enthusiasts are such a small market that it seems weird to possibly cater to us here? While it is probably a simple thing to add, it just seems weird. 

    There is no R&D for it if the AWD part is already done.  It's more of a delete than an addition.  Maybe they'll use FWD for those who want more cargo space in the back? *shrug*

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    There is no R&D for it if the AWD part is already done.  It's more of a delete than an addition.  Maybe they'll use FWD for those who want more cargo space in the back? *shrug*

    If FWD has more space in the rear, then that is research and development to redo the hatch area. I doubt those dimensions change per motor configuration though. 

    And yes, there is R&D to, at the bare minimum, for the software side for FWD vs RWD. And, am I reading it correctly (or incorrectly), you can get the small or large motor as FWD or RWD? 

    "RS: Choice of standard FWD with a midsize battery pack or RWD with the larger motor and medium battery pack—you choose where you want the motor—with optional dual motors for AWD."

    While the consumer always wins with more options, I just don't understand it from their point of view because it may not cost a ton, but it costs money to do it this way. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, ccap41 said:

    If FWD has more space in the rear, then that is research and development to redo the hatch area. I doubt those dimensions change per motor configuration though. 

    And yes, there is R&D to, at the bare minimum, for the software side for FWD vs RWD. And, am I reading it correctly (or incorrectly), you can get the small or large motor as FWD or RWD? 

    "RS: Choice of standard FWD with a midsize battery pack or RWD with the larger motor and medium battery pack—you choose where you want the motor—with optional dual motors for AWD."

    While the consumer always wins with more options, I just don't understand it from their point of view because it may not cost a ton, but it costs money to do it this way. 

    I would imagine the software changes are minimal.  Now, I have zero insight on what GM is actually doing, but I can tell you that dual-motor Teslas run primarily in FWD mode when driving normally and not in any of the various sport modes they offer. In Tesla's case, it is because the front motor is smaller and more efficient. The ECU will change the distribution of power dynamically to find the most efficient blend, and sometimes at cruising speed that means a trickle of juice to each motor.

    The FWD 1LT is the cost leader, designed to keep the entry price down (Range 247).  It is similarly designed to the 2LT which gets you a second motor and AWD, BUT there is more than one battery pack size available here, so I'm guessing the 293 range is an "up to" depending on if you get the bigger battery.

    The RS is the sportesque model with FWD being the base, and RWD or AWD being optional.  My guess is that the RWD version will also be paired with a larger battery pack and offer more power than the FWD.  The AWD will naturally be the most powerful version, but also possibly the version with the longest range just as the AWD LR Teslas are.  The SS will naturally be the most powerful and likely gives up some of its range to have a larger front motor.  The charts don't say which versions get which size batteries, so it is a bit of a guess on my part.

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    I get that but...why...? Why would they spend the money doing R&D for something they could have done just FWD and AWD? Enthusiasts are such a small market that it seems weird to possibly cater to us here? While it is probably a simple thing to add, it just seems weird. 

    Agree that it seems weird, but then I think @Robert Hall nailed it as a Marketing move and I will say that many dinge the Chevrolet Bolt due to being FWD only when there is room in the rear area for another motor for AWD or RWD.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, David said:

    Agree that it seems weird, but then I think @Robert Hall nailed it as a Marketing move and I will say that many dinge the Chevrolet Bolt due to being FWS only when there is room in the rear area for another motor for AWD or RWD.

    I completely understand FWD & AWD OR RWD & AWD. It's the FWD, RWD, or AWD that's confusing. 

    Interesting marketing tactic, imo. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    I completely understand FWD & AWD OR RWD & AWD. It's the FWD, RWD, or AWD that's confusing. 

    Interesting marketing tactic, imo. 

    FWD is simpler for the rental spec and lower trims, probably.  And since they have an AWD version, doing a version that is RWD only probably is straight forward and not a large cost.  

    I have no idea what the dirty bits are like on a FWD or AWD EV--but I assume AWD in this context is simpler than in an FWD/AWD or RWD/AWD ICE vehicle since you don't have a transverse engine/transmission  or longitudinal engine/transmission to deal with..

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    FWD is simpler for the rental spec and lower trims, probably.  And since they have an AWD version, doing a version that is RWD only probably is straight forward and not a large cost.  

    I have no idea what the dirty bits are like on a FWD or AWD EV--but I assume AWD in this context is simpler than in an FWD/AWD or RWD/AWD ICE vehicle since you don't have a transverse engine/transmission or longitudinal engine/transmission to deal with.

    Yes, in this regard, GM has been very clear on how the Software control of FWD/AWD/RWD is very simple to enable or disable as the code base is one.

    🤔 This does make me wonder how easy it might be down the road once they are very common to pick up a wrecked Blazer SS, buy a cheap 1LT Blazer and add the additional motor and anything else off the SS to your 1LT and then update the software on the control board.

    SLEEPER BLAZER 😛

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ just wondering out loud, will their be availability of used or wrecked EVs down the road to customize like that, or will EV makers want to buy them back to recycle and control access to parts and maintenance...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This vehicle inside or out isn't too far off the gasoline Blazer, but the EV is $10k more.  The Blazer as it is, isn't very popular sales down 17% YTD,  33,104 units sold YTD.  Venza is down 48% this year and still sold 35k units, but Toyota sold 70k 4Runners, Hyundai sold 58k Santa Fe, Jeep sold 134k Grand Cherokees, 99k Wranglers, Ford Edge 51k, Kia Sorrento 39k.  The Blazer is kind of a back of the pack seller in the mid-size SUV $35-50k segment.  I think they either needed a bigger departure from the current model or lower price.  The Hyundai Ionic 5 starts at $39,950, that's probably where the Blazer should have been.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    This vehicle inside or out isn't too far off the gasoline Blazer, but the EV is $10k more.

    Sure. Not too far off. It's 9.1" longer than the ICE Blazer, has FWD, AWD, AND RWD configurations, and a much better and roomier interior with much better features than the ICE Blazer but yeah, "not far off" lol. Sorry but other than a few design cues from the ICE version, this is a whole other beast from top to bottom and shares not one piece from its ICE counterpart. Also missing in the $10K price difference is the fact that the entry line EV has many features that the 10K less ICE entry line version does not.

     

    Apples to freakin apples folks.

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    I wonder if the ICE Blazer will continue as is or if this replaces it completely..

    According to GM as they release EV versions, their ICE version will be phased out. The question I have which GM has not provided is how long of a phase out period will it be on the ICE?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, David said:

    According to GM as they release EV versions, their ICE version will be phased out. The question I have which GM has not provided is how long of a phase out period will it be on the ICE?

    My guess is that they are using estimates for future EV sales against what ends up happening. I am betting that if they feel that EV sales are not quite there yet (from an economic standpoint for them), they will stretch out the ICE for another year or two. Probably a 3 to 5 year window on the ICE once the EV is in full production. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    styling is good, a little too much going on in the front fender, but that's ok.  interior is a knockout, homerun, especially the red option.  Overall proportions more wagony than CUV but its got a bit of a street wagon vibe.  Kinda of new and interesting.

    I like all the powertrain options.  It is a geographical thing.  Those who don't want to pop for AWD in many markets prefer the FWD, now that is decades of market selection with ICE vehicles and weight on the front wheels.  I am not sure how a FWD electric drives but many folks in northern climes will simply look at the monroney and if they see RWD only will immediately hard pass, logic wrong or not.  Chevy has all powertrain options covered here, for once a good thing from the general.

    Now i just want to know when i can get the same styling and interior / vehicle with ICE 3.6 twin turbo six.  I am not against electrics but coal powered cars are just fact of life for electrics until we get more states to give it up and get some new nuclear plants built.  So called renewables are a long way from even reaching powering 25% of our current and future needs.  Like wind, gotta find ways to dispose of the used blades and windmill parts that are no longer of use.

    Energy policy needs to be "ALL of the above".  ICE's will be in demands for many years yet as infrastructure won't support electrics only anytime soon or in our lifetimes.  ICE, hybrid, EV all should be allowed to coexist.

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    How? If it's as simple as @Drew Dowdell is  saying, it's no different at all. 

     

    20 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

    Then maybe it is.  I don't know how the dirty bits are configured on something like this.

    Manufacturing is no different, but there is a value difference.  Except on the SS, the front motor is smaller and less powerful than the rear motor.  To relate it to ICEs, there is nearly zero manufacturing cost difference between a 1.5T and a 2.0T, just an ever so slight increase in raw materials. But GM puts a big upcharge on the 2.0T because it produces a lot more power.   Same goes for the 5.3 and 6.2 liter V8, the cost differences are minuscule, but the value differences are big.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cool to see comparisons based on the stated info to date for this EV compared to Tesla and Ford.

    The Chevy Blazer EV SS Compared to the Tesla Model Y Performance and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT (thedrive.com)

    image.png

    Have to say that to me, both the Ford and GM look way better than the Tesla.

    Base info from the story:

    Ford Mach-e GT

    • Base price: $63,095 | $67,995 for GT Performance Edition
    • Powertrain: 88 kWh battery | 1-speed transmission | all-wheel drive
    • Horsepower: 480
    • Torque: 600 lb-ft | 634 lb-ft for GT Performance Edition
    • 0-60: 3.8 seconds | 3.5 GT seconds for GT Performance Edition
    • Seating capacity: 5
    • Range (EPA-certified): 270 miles | 260 miles for GT Performance Edition

    Tesla Model Y Performance

    • Base price: $71,190
    • Powertrain: 75 kWh battery | 1-speed transmission | all-wheel drive
    • Horsepower: 460-500 (see note below specs)
    • Torque: N/A
    • 0-60: 3.5 seconds
    • Seating capacity: 5 (7 with third row installed)
    • Range (EPA-certified): 303 miles

    Chevrolet Blazer SS

    • Base price: $65,995
    • Powertrain: Battery size TBA | 1-speed transmission | all-wheel drive
    • Horsepower: 557
    • Torque: 648 lb-ft
    • 0-60: "Under 4 seconds"
    • Seating capacity: 5
    • Range (manufacturer estimate): 290 miles
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    42 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    I am not against electrics, but coal powered cars are just fact of life for electrics until we get more states to give it up and get some new nuclear plants built. 

    Actually, you have that wrong as Coal Powered cars is not that common now. Coal power generation continues to drop of the total U.S. power generation.

    Coal generated about 22% of the electricity at utility-scale facilities in the United States in 2021, down from 39% in 2014. Coal supplied 9.5 quadrillion British thermal units (2,800 TWh) of primary energy to electric power plants in 2021, which made up 90% of coal's contribution to U.S. energy supply. Utilities buy more than 90% of the coal consumed in the United States. In 2019 there were 241 coal powered units across the United States. Coal plants have been closing since the 2010s due to cheaper and cleaner natural gas and renewables.

    image.png

    • U.S. coal power generation by state 2021 | Statista

    Coal power in the United States - Wikipedia

    Electricity in the U.S. - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    image.pngimage.png

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    This vehicle inside or out isn't too far off the gasoline Blazer, but the EV is $10k more.

    It's worth noting this from an MT article about it.

     

    Blazer EV Is Whole Different Animal From Current Blazer

    For starters, the Blazer EV sprang from a clean sheet. It may share the Blazer name and spirit, but does not share architecture, panels or components with the conventional Blazer with an internal combustion engine, says vice president of Chevy Marketing Steve Majoros. The wheelbase was extended by 231 mm (9.1 inches) to fit the largest battery size in, making it the longest entry in the midsize-SUV segment.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    ^ interesting…it will have a wheelbase longer than the Traverse. 

    Excited as I am truly hoping it really delivers on interior space as EVs should.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    It's worth noting this from an MT article about it.

     

    Blazer EV Is Whole Different Animal From Current Blazer

    For starters, the Blazer EV sprang from a clean sheet. It may share the Blazer name and spirit, but does not share architecture, panels or components with the conventional Blazer with an internal combustion engine, says vice president of Chevy Marketing Steve Majoros. The wheelbase was extended by 231 mm (9.1 inches) to fit the largest battery size in, making it the longest entry in the midsize-SUV segment.

    I get that the vehicle is all new, but it looks similar to the current Blazer, just a little lower and longer and more wagon like.  Aside from the fact that the Blazer should be a Wrangler/Bronco competitor (which would instantly double sales), I think GM went with a similar formula for the EV that they use now.  And GM crossovers aren't really class leading or top sellers in any segment.  The switch to EV is their chance to do something different and try to recapture market share.

    59 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    ^ interesting…it will have a wheelbase longer than the Traverse. 

    A lot of EV's have long wheelbase, the Hyundai Ionic 5 overall length is less than an Equinox, but the wheelbase is just 2 inches shorter than a Tahoe.  The Blazer EV wheelbase is longer than the Tahoe's.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I get that the vehicle is all new, but it looks similar to the current Blazer, just a little lower and longer and more wagon like.

    It literally looks nothing like it on the outside save for the similar headlamp treatment and the HVAC vent shapes are both round on the inside. Thats where it starts and ends, as evidenced by the actual facts from the quote above. It's better in every way, speaking on metrics alone.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    I get that the vehicle is all new, but it looks similar to the current Blazer, just a little lower and longer and more wagon like.

    Not wrong here. While completely different vehicles, there's no denying they're "the same". They look a generation apart (which they are). One old, one new. 

    141219402_ICEBlazer.thumb.jpg.e8376f6208e5413c7f199e5b0bc92db7.jpg1767570497_EVBlazer.jpg.9d8bd59ae2d09a9348270879d4da84a5.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    Not wrong here. While completely different vehicles, there's no denying they're "the same". They look a generation apart (which they are). One old, one new. 

    141219402_ICEBlazer.thumb.jpg.e8376f6208e5413c7f199e5b0bc92db7.jpg1767570497_EVBlazer.jpg.9d8bd59ae2d09a9348270879d4da84a5.jpg

    I would say this is intentional to try and keep EVs looking like normal autos rather than weird specialty autos. I think the Leaf was a winner for standing out when it came out, but now even in the most current form is just weird looking and I think as has been stated here by others including the owner @Drew Dowdell if memory serves me correct, people will not care what the power train is as long as it is a normal looking auto to them and they like it.

    Personally, I think the Blazer EV is way better looking than the Blazer ICE.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/20/2022 at 1:28 PM, David said:

    Actually, you have that wrong as Coal Powered cars is not that common now. Coal power generation continues to drop of the total U.S. power generation.

    Coal generated about 22% of the electricity at utility-scale facilities in the United States in 2021, down from 39% in 2014. Coal supplied 9.5 quadrillion British thermal units (2,800 TWh) of primary energy to electric power plants in 2021, which made up 90% of coal's contribution to U.S. energy supply. Utilities buy more than 90% of the coal consumed in the United States. In 2019 there were 241 coal powered units across the United States. Coal plants have been closing since the 2010s due to cheaper and cleaner natural gas and renewables.

    image.png

    • U.S. coal power generation by state 2021 | Statista

    Coal power in the United States - Wikipedia

    Electricity in the U.S. - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    image.pngimage.png

    natural gas may be cheaper.  you can't say renewables are cheaper yet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, David said:

    I would say this is intentional to try and keep EVs looking like normal autos rather than weird specialty autos.

    I 100% agree. They should have because the EV is replacing the ICE one anyway. 

    17 minutes ago, David said:

    Personally, I think the Blazer EV is way better looking than the Blazer ICE.

    I think the non-SS one looks really good with a MUCH cleaner front end. I agree that the EV one looks better and I think a lot of that is the drastically changed proportions with the extra long wheelbase. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Par for the course for SUV styling.  Which will always be 'meh' at best.

    But it does one styling thing well that I actually like.   The beltline has a coke bottle effect that is kinda sexy to me.  Along with the roofline mimicking a Landrover start high and sloop low effect.  That kinda roofline sometimes excites me, and other days bores me. 

    2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV | Electric Mid-Size SUV | Chevrolet Canada

     I like the Blazer EV inside and out.  Range and speed for all trims are par for the course, which is good.   RWD  and (surprise surprise) FWD is a GREAT option to include.  Why the phoque not? 

    Why with EV motors and software when AWD is also offered, why would a vehicle be either/or?  EVs are not limited to what powers the wheels like a a chunky ICE does with the transmission....  

    GREAT engineering and marketing thought process for the Ultium gang from gm!!!

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
    • The two big things you need to know are How Acidic and how well it drains or not. I took a class last year on how to grow the American Chestnut. American Chestnuts like to be high on hilltops with very well-drained soils. There's a geomapping tool in Pennsylvania that uses known land and altitude data to populate the best places for Chestnut plantings, and my property is one of the best in the county.  What I used was a mix of planter soil and something called Pittmoss, better than Peatmoss. Its manufactured here and is mostly recycled newspaper. It's good for containers because it holds moisture better than peat.  Just put them in some 5-gallon buckets and let them go.  I need to move them around a bit soon. True genetic American Chestnuts are very hard to find. If you find them online, they are most likely crossbred with something else that is blight-resistant. I got my seeds directly from the Pennsylvania Chapter of the American Chestnut Foundation at one of their research centers at Penn State.
    • They look like sticks right now, lol. Their leaves are just starting to come back. But here's what they looked like going in.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings