Jump to content
Create New...
  • Blake Noble
    Blake Noble

    No Foolin’ Around: Dodge May Delay Dart Launch Date

    G. Noble

    Editor/Reporter

    CheersandGears.com

    March 12, 2012

    Recently at the Geneva Auto Show, Fiat/Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne expressed that the upcoming Dodge Dart compact sedan may have its release date rescheduled. Why? Well, Marchionne says the production launch will be moved around for no other reason except — and we’re not making this up — “to avoid being jinxed.” Previously the Dart was on track to hit dealers on April Fools Day, April 1st.

    So when should you expect to be able to drive the Alfa Romeo-based small Mopar? While hopeful minds might wish for a March 31st launch date, perhaps April 2nd could be the targeted day since it is, after all, the day proceeding April 1st. Since Marchionne didn’t specify when, it’s really anyone’s guess.

    Marchionne went on to say the Dart is “a huge step forward in terms of moving the brand into the American heartland.” With the promise of some class-leading features and very good fuel economy, who’s to argue with that?

    Source: USA Today

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Honestly if they are worried about a feaking day jinx their product, then they do not have much faith in the quality of the product.

    April 1st is a sunday what moron releases a new product on a sunday. If they wanted to do this rightl, they should have it on Friday March 30th to drive people into the show room over the weekend.

    Clearly someone was not thinking with their big head in Marketing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I walked by the Dart on the display at the autoshow this weekend and thought... "Neon 2.0" the exact same time some kid was commenting to his buddy on how it reminded him of the Neon...... me thinks the public in general will probably say that a lot...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Reg, have to disagree with you as I do NOT get the Neon 2.0 feeling from the design at all. I was no fan of the neon but the SRT4 neon was not bad. Yet this is totally dfferent in my eyes and has far better looking design cues.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In the general shape of the body I see a bit of resemblance. The front ends both have fenders that follow the contours of the headlights, with hoods that dip below the peaks to to grilles. They both have wide grilles that run all the way between the headlights. They both have straight character lines that run from the top of the front wheel arch above the rear one. And they both have very arch-like greenhouses.

    However, I always thought the Neon's most distinctive features were its big, round, friendly headlights, and the Dart's mug is not at all friendly. And the extravagant taillights clearly establish it in the same family as the Charger. In my eyes the Dart holds its stylistic ground just fine against all the others in its class.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Many dealers in the US are not allowed to be open on Sundays by state law. Step 1 of picking a release date of an anticipated product is making sure your stores will be open to sell said product on said day.

    This was just a stupid flub on Chrysler's part, that's all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I saw one today on my way home from work (one perk of living in metro Detroit is you see pre-prod cars all the time). I have to say I really don't see Neon from any angle. I guess its just me?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Recently at the Geneva Auto Show, Fiat/Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne expressed that the upcoming Dodge Dart compact sedan may have its release date rescheduled. Why? Well, Marchionne says the production launch will be moved around for no other reason except — and we’re not making this up — “to avoid being jinxed.” Previously the Dart was on track to hit dealers on April Fools Day, April 1st."

    This was just a stupid flub on Chrysler's part, that's all.

    Isn't this old news by now. When this quote was first mentioned in the news, it was mentioned that the reporters were too dense to GET THE JOKE! Marchionne wasn't serious...at no time were they planning to launch production on April 1. C'mon, guys...I expected more from you.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Stupif flub by marketing as you should always release on a thursday or friday so you can drive traffic and sales into the floorroom for sales.

    It's the start of production, not sales.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Ditto to both ... I have heard one person make the comparison to the Lambo and it was during the time I had the rental. It's not very upright and I had my issue with the height of the door opening when entering and exiting the car.  It initially was VERY upright and kind of frumpy looking.
    • MECHANICAL PHOTOS This is an overall view of the engine bay This is the placard describing conformance to emission requirements Yep, count 'em ... there are 4 - - - - -  END OF PHOTOS
    • INTERIOR PHOTOS View of the front of the cabin from the driver's door ... this gives a clearer view of how the 2 main screens are placed on the dashboard View of the front of the cabin from the passenger's door This is the main instrument pod and, around the speed readout, the distribution of important data is clear (which seems to be how many pods are now organized, which is appreciated because setting up Bluetooth and all the controls takes a slight amount of time).  There are also green indicators for "ready" and "EV" mode At times, I did not care for the race car type vantage point from where seated and it took adjustment of the seat and the tilt steering wheel to get it closer to one's comfort level The console is clean and simple in its layout It's a tug to the left and forward for reverse ... and a tug to the left and rearward for drive This is the rear seating area of the passenger cabin I do like the roofline and the gullwing feature in the rear door ... this shows what over the shoulder visibility looks like The rear storage area is respectable and, with the roofline, it seems a little more vertical, so it was advantageous to put luggage on its sides Thankfully, there is this cover over the rear and its texture and attachment is similar to other cars ... and, in Toyota, it was similar to the one in their economy car Aygo that they sell in Europe
    • EXTERIOR PHOTOS Side view ... and some palm trees Angled front view Angled rear view ... note the interesting taillamp arrangement Low-slung, sports car appearance, yet it's a practical small HEV sedan that's come a long way
    • This is not good for them and continues to show how terribly run Tesla is. Oil and gas supplier says Tesla is ‘refusing to pay’ $2 million in past-due bills – and that chaotic staffing has only made it worse
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search