Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    GM Could Make a Full-Scale Return to Europe

      Europe isn't fully gone from General Motors

    Despite General Motors mostly leaving the European market with the sale of Opel and Vauxhall to PSA Group earlier this year, the automaker isn't ruling out a full-scale return.

    During a recent meeting of the Automotive Press Association in Detroit, GM CEO Mary Barra said the company would "absolutely" consider a return to the European market, adding that "nothing keeps us from going back." But it will be some time before GM decides to go back. According to Barra, the company would need to build out a lineup of "transformative products" like electric or self-driving vehicles to make it worthwhile.

    General Motors does have a small presence in Europe with Cadillacs being sold by 45 dealers - most of them in Germany and Switzerland. The Chevrolet Camaro and Corvette are also sold in small numbers.

    Source: Motor1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Wait... did Chevy leave entirely? I thought they were still selling Cruze, Sonic, and Spark there.

    I won't be convinced by GM's Europe intentions until they actually put money into the dealership network. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, William Maley said:

    Yes, GM withdrew Chevrolet back in 2015 --> https://www.topgear.com/car-news/usa/chevrolet-dead-europe

    They'll have an exceedingly hard time regaining the trust of Europeans so soon after that.  They'd almost need to start a new brand or maybe sell there as Holden.

    It's not like Peugeot here which has been gone for 2 decades and no one remembers.......

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting, at Least GM can focus on building up a war chest of money, pay off debt and get prepped to make a full global push once they have the right pieces in place. Totally agree with this. Biggest mistake was them buying Opel to begin with I always thought versus building out a focus dealership network.

    I agree with Drew, GM needs to build out a proper network rather than rely on old Opel or other brand locations to sell a few cars.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    They'll have an exceedingly hard time regaining the trust of Europeans so soon after that.  They'd almost need to start a new brand or maybe sell there as Holden.

    It's not like Peugeot here which has been gone for 2 decades and no one remembers.......

    GM Daewoo making a triumphant return!

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/19/2017 at 11:59 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    Wait... did Chevy leave entirely? I thought they were still selling Cruze, Sonic, and Spark there.

    I won't be convinced by GM's Europe intentions until they actually put money into the dealership network. 

    That would be just the start....

    My friends in Europe don't have much nice to say about GM right now....

    On top of the china invading with their cheap cars......

    On 12/19/2017 at 2:27 PM, dfelt said:

    That is one sharp station wagon! :metal: 

    Love it in that Maroon!

    CHEVROLET-Cruze-Wagon-4521_16.jpg

    BRing Back WaGOns!!!

    Edited by daves87rs
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    My friends in Europe don't have much nice to say about GM right now....

    When did Europeans ever say anything nice about GM?

    For those Europeans in Europe that actually knew about GM, they ALWAYS had something negative to say about GM. Including GM's heydays of the 1960s and 1970s... and during those times, the majority of European cars were not so good....oh the irony!!!

    When European cars got better and GM cars got worse...the negative comments got intensified. Because now...even the folk that did NOT know of GM were now all of a sudden experts on GM cars...

    Ill tell you...with great confidence but admittedly an assumption, but I will stand by my statement 1000%... BEFORE the 2009 meltdown and GM's world recognition of going bankrupt and the US (and Canadian) government bailing them out...MOST Europeans did NOT know that Opel was GM owned. And in fact....MOST Americans did NOT know that either.

    In fact...to THIS day...many Americans think the J-Platform car was solely an American car offering, Cavalier, Sunbird, Firenza, Cimarron... 

    In fact...to this day...many Americans think that the Chevy Monza and Vega and all other GM variants were soley American offerings...

    In fact...many Europeans praised these Opel variants of those cars on those platforms...but stupidly...had negative things to say about GM... 

    That English buffoon Jeremy Clarkson hated the Opel Vectra...only because he knew it was a GM product...

    Yet...the many Greek friends I knew in Greece in the 1990s all LOVED the Vectra...had some negative shyte to say about GM at that time....yet were OBLIVIOUS to the fact that the Vectra...was a GM product...

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Europeans tended to like the European focused GM vehicles (likewise at Ford).  Attempts to sell American focused vehicles in the EU have largely failed.  Europeans bought a load of the old Mondeo which was sold here as the Contour.  But when it was unified and upsized to American standards, sales fell.   In Cologne, which is a Ford town, you can't swing a dead cat without hitting a Fiesta or Focus.  Both of those models sell poorly here with the Fiesta on death's door.

    American cars are largely viewed as too big and too inefficient by Europeans.... the theory behind trying to make a unified product that fits the needs of US / China / EU sounds good on paper, but doesn't take into account cultural differences. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes. And the Escort MK whatever that was also hot rodded by Cosworth along with the Ford GT40 are still revered by Europeans.

    But all we both did was mention Ford of Europe cars. Ford.  What you said is true that American cars that were Eurocentric were respected by the Europeans in general, the thing with that is, even Corvettes were blasted by them.  I find Ford does much better than GM does in terms of respectability in Europe. 

    The C5R raced and won and yet only then were the wheels SLOWLY turning for respectability. The C6R came and even then, some blasted it for being cheap. Talking about not wanted to let go some of the unwarranted stereotypes. 

    The French LOVE the Corvette. I guess the wheels of respectability for the Corvette starts in French and goes from there.

    The French also loved the Vipers racing. 

    I will not talk about Cadillac in Europe with the STS as that was a fail for obvious reasons. The reasons you stated. Too big for European roads in general and not in the least fuel efficient or compliant for displacement taxes European countries impose. A 4.6 liter V8 might be a small V8 by American standards, but 4.6 liters is HUGE displacement for Europe even today, never you mind what it was in the 1990s. 

    So while there was and still is reasons to hate on GM in Europe, sometimes the hatred is unwarranted. Harsh criticisms sometimes could be too harsh. The STS was not a bad vehicle. But the way Europeans blasted it, you would think it was the worst thing ever. Yet quality and reliability of Mercedes Benz cars of the 1990s and Jaguars were not exactly um....stellar.  The STS problem for Europe was that it was too big of a car for Europe...not that it wasnt reliable...(OK...Northstar V8 gasket leaks were a big enough deterrent...but M-B and Jaguar were just as self-destructive...but Europeans loved those unconditionally...) 

    Which leads us to another discussion.

    Why did Americans dump on American cars while Europeans will NEVER dump on their own industry. 
    Germans will dump on French cars, but will never do the same for German cars.

    The French will dump on German cars, but will never do that for their industry...

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We need to send a bill to all of Europe for the rebuild and the saving of their butts from WWI and WWII. Even my relatives in Germany need to send us Money, so much would not be achieved if not for what America has given the world over and the lack of respect back.

    Also time to stop trying to be a world cop and just focus on rebuilding America with a focus on Multicultural all encompassing respect for each other.

    Course that would require truly draining the swamp and dumping the morons off in some other country.

    But I digress and back to the topic in hand of Europe not liking America. Fact is that except for the Autobahn, most of Europe is not able to handle the size of auto's that GM, Ford or FCA America makes.

    I think I agree with who ever said GM needs to go into Europe using the Holden Name for all auto's along with Corvette and Cadillac and call it a day.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On the "Chevy Life"  (IIRC) page on FB, which focuses on Chevy's tinier vehicles, every thread has multiple comments in broken English, begging for Chevrolet to return to wherever they pulled out of.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Happy Birthday!!! Cheers!!!  
    • Yes. Ferrari was always a company selling towards the top tier rich.  I am not sure about Porsche's marketing after 1945, but I do know that Porsche wanted to go up market, really up market,  to sell to the rich in the late 1990s.    Rolex watches were always expensive.  But not always being a  chic jewellery accessory.  Rolex watches were expensive time pieces because they were highly precise time pieces meant for professions that required time pieces that were precise in time telling. Also, Rolexes were also engineered to be tough and not break in those job environments. Therefore the high price tags of them were because the high standard of engineering that went into them.  The value of the brand went up because of the people that bought them praised them. It was after the quartz movement of the 1960s and 1970s that Rolex needed to re-invent themselves as battery powered watches were MORE precise ate their lunch. So...like many other "swiss" automatic watch makers launched their new image as luxury time pieces. It was easy for Rolex to do as Rolex was coveted as a great engineered watch to begin with.   Like I said...its a boys club that they want to be known as and bought by (rich) people that have bought into that boys club mentality.  It aint for you or for @ccap41.   Even if you or @ccap41 had the money, its obvious that you guys have not fallen for this marketing gimmick.  Its barely for me either.  1. I cant afford Ferraris, Porsches or Rolexes. 2. I do not want to be in a Porsche Boys club.  I like Porsches and all, but Im not in their camp.  Not because of the boys club marketing schemes. Its just that I am not a rabid Porsche guy fanatic.  3. If I had 1% money, I am not sure Id be a Ferrari guy either.  After deep thought, I am more of a Ferrari guy than I am a Porsche guy.  But maybe not enough for me to fall for this kind of sales scheme either. 4.  Rolex...   I do like a Rolex.  But I am not one to boast about what kind of time piece Im wearing. So...nix me on that club as well. 5. It looks like I am aligned with you and @ccap41's take on this, but with me, I shrug it off.  I see why the companies want to go down this road. And I see why there are some people...rich people...that do not mind giving their monies away to these companies. And at the end of the day, its what makes them happy and superior to the rest of us as we do not have the time or money or will to buy into any of this. And kudos for them for buying into that lifestyle.    At the end of the day, whether we are talking about Ferrari or Porsche or Rolex, some of their product, past and present, have been REALLY REALLY EXCELLENT product. Whether we are talking about looks and style or engineering and technology, all 3 have styled and engineered awesomeness.  We could talk about their products that were failures, but wouldnt that signal some sort of sour grapes analogy on our part? Its a company's right to mold their brand image as they wish.   Whether we agree to it as individuals is irrelevant. What is relevant though is how collectively we ALL feel about it.  In Ferraris case its a huge success. Porsche and Rolex have to work on it just a tad more. But I feels its successful.  If there is a downfall for Porsche, I think it has more to do with their decisions to being a sports car maker ALONGSIDE being a (rich) family grocery getter/soccer mom SUV maker.  The failure of having two opposing identities is killing Porsche.  And it is a double edged sword.  On the one hand, if not for the SUVs, Porsche would have been gone by the early 2000s.  The inevitable was prolonged?  Rolex... Too many boutique time piece makers have propped up in the last 15 years that took their place in some areas of the really expensive realm.  Quartz time pieces keep on being a nuisance to them. This time around its the fashion watch trend. The name brand watch sellers like Michael Korrs and Hugo Boss and even Porsche that have taken some of Rolexes market share.  The advent of smart watches also hurts them.  So they decided to change it up in the sales realm.  Are there enough Rolex worshippers out there that will buy cheaper Rolexes or older models just to get that one highly anticipated limited edition time piece? Well...although watches are strictly fashion devices today, there are more than enough fashionable time pieces around for people to by-pass Rolex fandom.  Some have their own unique look to them and are sought after and some just emulate Rolex but watch brand snobs are too few today so Rolex has a steep hill to climb because most people that wear watches dont give a shyte what kind of watch you wear.  Unlike cars, car snobbery actually still exits...  Hence why Ferrari is still king of the douchiness and going on strong. Stronger than ever Id say.    
    • Happy (belated) Birthday @G. David Felt!
    • Oh yeah, I forgot to even mention the wireless charging! That is also a game changer. It eliminates yet another thing people are afraid to change, plugging in. Yes, i realize it is EXTREMELY easy to do, but the anti-EV people love to point out "I don't want to have to plug in every night". It's just another thing to check off the list. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search