• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    GM Economist: Prices Are Making Young People Not Buy New Cars


    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    August 7, 2013

    Yesterday at at the Center for Automotive Research’s Management Briefing Seminars, General Motors' Chief Economist Mustafa Mohatarem told attendees that the reason young people aren't buying cars because they're not interested. It's more to do with economic reasons.

    Mohatarem downplayed the reason that young kids are more interested in the internet and what's the latest hot thing in tech, and pushed the rising costs of cars, repairs, and insurance as some of the reasons why young people aren't buying vehicles.

    “I don’t see any evidence that the young people are losing interest in cars," Mohatarem said.

    He says the biggest problem facing young people buying cars is they are having a challenging time finding jobs. Also, high student loan debt are causing many to skip buying a car.

    “Buying a car is less attainable for the young, but that quickly changes as they get older," he said.

    Source: The Detroit News

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    Cost of living, population shifting to urban centers, interest in smartphones, carbon footprints etc all contributing to this.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That is not seen around here except in the city. Greater Seattle area is very rural so a car is a requirement. I would say this really depends on where you live.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seattle has seen it's population decline and I believe that is due to the lack of quality housing, there is a huge building boom going on and it could change later this year once things finish up but for now the rural region is where peeps are at so car sales are pretty solid here.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i agree with reg. generally. are young people... under 25? as in maybe just out of college, maybe not a great amount of work experience, and trying to pay off other things they can't live w/o and "can't live w/o"....

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i agree with reg. generally. are young people... under 25? as in maybe just out of college, maybe not a great amount of work experience, and trying to pay off other things they can't live w/o and "can't live w/o"....

    Yes, saddled w/ student loans and the worst job market for recent grads in...decades? I remember 1992 when I graduated from college being considered a bad market...part of why I decided to go to grad school back then.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see quite a few young people who can barely afford a beater, let alone everything else...

    And it's not just the young people....I really wonder how people in MI can afford both the car payment and the car insurance together.

    I've watched mine double in the last few years....and I get all the discounts too! I'm waiting to see if they drop our rates here some, as I have no problem with the car payment, even repairs and such, but the insurance scares me.....

    My neighbor just got a new Focus, and his payment is 196 bucks a month, and his car insurance is 375 bucks a month. And he gets the discounts too....and is older than me!

    No wonder no one has insurance around here...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't buy his 'economic,' argument. I think he's saying that, only because it's a slightly easier pill for him and other auto-industry stakeholders to swallow, when the real reason IS because youth aren't interested in cars.

    Investments in cycling routes, mass transit and dense, 'town-square' development models are all starting to make car ownership a redundancy. In some cities, like mine, it's already happen(ed)ing.

    Cars used to be aspirational because they were a ticket to freedom, aka, keeping in touch with friends. With instant communication via smartphones, the aspirational quality becomes a moot point.

    Edited by Señor Ding Dong
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another possibility is that cars that interest young people are too out of reach for them and the ones that are in reach are too blah for them to bother. If my choice was between a Spark or Versa Note or Yaris.....

    I'd rather walk.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't buy his 'economic,' argument. I think he's saying that, only because it's a slightly easier pill for him and other auto-industry stakeholders to swallow, when the real reason IS because youth aren't interested in cars.

    Investments in cycling routes, mass transit and dense, 'town-square' development models are all starting to make car ownership a redundancy. In some cities, like mine, it's already happen(ed)ing.

    Cars used to be aspirational because they were a ticket to freedom, aka, keeping in touch with friends. With instant communication via smartphones, the aspirational quality becomes a moot point.

    While that is fine for those that want to live in Vancouver, for those of us that do not like living like a sardine it is hell to get in and out of your city. Living just south of you, I would not think twice about heading north to shop and enjoy the parks of Vancouver. Yet with limited parking, congested streets and a tough time getting in and out of the general area if you do not already live there, the desire to turn the city into a walk / bike city does not work for those not living in it.

    Seattle has been drinking the stupid cool-aid of the Cascade Bike club and take away street parking and street lanes to convert them to bikes and yet bike riders seem to still not want to follow the rules as if the rules of the road to bikes is a double standard. Bike riding is fine for those living in the downtown city and they do need them to be separate from the cars on the road as well as the walkers on the sidewalk. Yet they also need to charge these bike riders and make sure they have a license and know how to handle their bike.

    Back on subject, I agree with Drew that entry level auto's do NOT spark any passion for youth to want to own. At the same time the youth of today have become more of an entitlement crowd and do not seem to want to bother to learn how to repair or take care of anything. Disposable society is what I see today's youth being.

    My first auto was my dads clean but well used 76 Chevy Luv truck Series 5. Cost my dad $1675.00 new, I spent another $1K restoring it to like new condition. This included rebuilding the engine, transmission and differential on top of a new dash, interior and paint job. By the time I was done, it took care of me very well till I sold it in 89 $3500 to a lady that still has it today. Needs major work, but she still drives it. I took the time to learn to fix / repair things.

    The drive to learn, repair/fix and satisfaction of ownership / pride in what I had is what is missing from the Disposable youth of today IMHO.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with the GM economist for this reason: the median price of a new car is just above $30K. If automakers were to cut that by $7500 to $10,000 then younger buyers will show up in droves. Given that the average age of a car is now 11 years old, there should be a massive push by automakers to push prices down so that young people can buy used cars already exchanged for new cars at lower used car prices. Loosening credit standards help, but new cars could stand a price cut STAT.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I suppose the only way they can cut that median price is buy selling a lot more subcompact and compact appliances, since that is what the sub-30k model mix primarily is, along w/ some midsizers.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I believe its both a lack of interest in cars, especially the "affordable" ones, and an issue of money. The US economy is still in the $h!ter, if it weren't I certainly be working where I am right now.

    Cars are expensive to not only buy, but maintain.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the GOV did not require all the stupid Nanny devices and car companies had a reasonable 12-15K mini pickup truck, you would find plenty of buyers. The luxury of owning a car is a privilege one earns not a right and yet many think like cell phones and internet that they have a right to own one. Pricing has gotten crazy out of control.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    389a7129_vbattach220010.jpeg

    I like how this discussion always completely ignores the "rural" part of the equation, as well as the "used car" part of the equation. Or how about the whole "Mommy and Daddy buying Junior a car to go to college in or go to work in because he has no credit" part of the equation?

    If new car sales (especially new cars sold in large urban areas) are the only thing that equals "the youth's interest in cars," then ... well, yeah. I'll just let stupid speak for itself on that one.

    No one bothers to mention that this chicken little bull$h! mostly applies to new car sales where "expert industry analysts" are too goddamn stupid to read the fine print and carry the one in an equation. Someone shut these morons up, please. If I read another "Wah, wah, wah, kids hate cars!" article I'm going to puke blood. The discussion never changes. We know that new cars are outrageously priced if you want something that hasn't been fashioned out of two-by-fours and tin cans. We know insurance on a new car will cost you a kidney and ninety-nine cents after the insurance company is finished bending you over a barrel. So what? Better yet, what's the solution?

    Just for the record, I live in a rural town with yuppies and a liberal arts college. As a result, we have bike paths in town. In fact, we gave up the chance to have a nice, new grocery store to have them. We gave up the chance to have an alternative to the sin of Wal-Mart. No one uses them. No one. We also have one taxi company with a hodge-podge fleet of cars that includes a Buick Century and a Cadillac Deville. No one calls them, either, and I don't think it's because they have an odd taste in taxis.

    Edited by black-knight
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    where i sold vehicles, people would come in looking for their kid's first car, or college students needed a rig just to get around.

    A lot of people think it's still the days of thousand dollar beaters.

    the beaters, most of em that you can halfways trust are more like 3! nowadays with used its almost like you gotta spend 5 to get entry level.

    the cost of entry for beaters is as much or more of a barrier to new drivers than the rising costs of new, although they are a bit related.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    where i sold vehicles, people would come in looking for their kid's first car, or college students needed a rig just to get around.

    A lot of people think it's still the days of thousand dollar beaters.

    the beaters, most of em that you can halfways trust are more like 3! nowadays with used its almost like you gotta spend 5 to get entry level.

    the cost of entry for beaters is as much or more of a barrier to new drivers than the rising costs of new, although they are a bit related.

    I don't mean to be a complete douche here, but I'm not buying this either.

    For example, I've driven a good handful of XJ Cherokees that cost double what I paid for mine (in other words, we're punching that three-grand mark you mentioned smack dab on the forehead) that needed just as much reconditioning with fewer miles and weren't any more trustworthy. Inexpensive cars are out there if you know how to look, and that really isn't difficult.

    Edited by black-knight
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yet most kids and their parents have grown up with the disposable attitude and are clueless about what to look for in a used auto. They also seem to not be aware that you can request a compression test on the engine to make sure it is solid just like having an inspection on the whole auto.

    As has been stated, if you are willing to do a little research and learn what to look for, you can find a reliable beater, but then many feel entitled to the best and would not accept the beater even when told to look at it as a tool for college and then move onto your first new car once you have a steady job and income.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Eh no, we have not lost interest in cars (at least not me). Though I moved on to bikes, I hear alot of my friends complaining about how hard it isto find a stylish affordable vehicle that returns a very decent gas milage. I pointed them towards a Prius.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    what is classified as very decent? city / hwy...

    No idea..depends on the individual and their budget...16/18 is decent for me, as that is what I've been used to for ages....

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I pointed them towards a Prius.

    And I'll point you to ...

    door1.jpg

    I really don't mean to be a complete a-hole, but ... seriously, though, a Prius? You can't be much older than I am, dude, and I wouldn't wish that sort of punishment on anyone.

    Edited by black-knight
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 2005 EquinoxLS
      2005 EquinoxLS
      (41 years old)
    2. Shaula
      Shaula
      (36 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      America. The land of opportunity. Various automakers around the world want to get in on this very lucrative marketplace. But as Automotive News notes, trying to break into the U.S. marketplace is close to mission impossible.
      Automakers who don't compete in the U.S. see numbers like "16-million-plus sales volume of new cars and trucks" and "average transaction price of $30,665, according to J.D. Power" and want a piece of this. But the U.S. is an unforgiving place.
      "People around the world look at the sales volumes going on here, and they look at the fortunes being made here, and they look at what the outlook is in other parts of the world -- and they want to be here," said Charlie Hughes, owner of the brand-consulting firm Brand Rules.
      "But the plain truth is that unless you're coming in with something truly unique, it is just not plausible that you're going to get anywhere in this market."
      (Author's note: Also, having a bit of luck isn't a bad thing to have either. -WM)
      Hughes isn't wrong. Automotive News says there are 42 automotive brands that sell 283 nameplates in various models and configurations. Trying to get the attention of a consumer, let alone a large number is a difficult task. Just ask Alfa Romeo and Fiat who are currently struggling in the U.S.
      One only needs to look at the list of automakers that have packed up left in the past 20 years - Daewoo, Isuzu, and Suzuki. Others haven't even made it to the shore - China's Chery and India's Mahindra.
      But that isn't deterring a large number of automakers to give it a shot. Here is the current list of automakers that are currently planning entry to the U.S.
      PSA Group - parent company of Citroën, DS, and Peugeot - has announced plans for a U.S. launch. But it will be a slow rollout beginning with ride sharing service. The company will also conduct a research project to see if it is viable for them to make a launch. Skoda - a brand under the Volkswagen Group umbrella - is reportedly going to make a decision on whether to come in the U.S. next year. Ssangyong Motor Co., a South Korean builder of crossovers has announced that it will enter the U.S. in 2020 Geely Automobile is planning to launch a new brand known as Lynk & Co with the possibility of entering the U.S. No word on a possible date. Alkane Truck Co., a company based in South Carolina plans on building the Dominator, a truck using the chassis of a Brazilian army truck and various components from the U.S. CEO Bob Smith believes this vehicle will fill a niche left by the Hummer H1. "If all you're going to do is enter this market offering the same thing everyone else is already offering, you might as well save your money. The U.S. auto industry is a very expensive place to do business," said Hughes.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      America. The land of opportunity. Various automakers around the world want to get in on this very lucrative marketplace. But as Automotive News notes, trying to break into the U.S. marketplace is close to mission impossible.
      Automakers who don't compete in the U.S. see numbers like "16-million-plus sales volume of new cars and trucks" and "average transaction price of $30,665, according to J.D. Power" and want a piece of this. But the U.S. is an unforgiving place.
      "People around the world look at the sales volumes going on here, and they look at the fortunes being made here, and they look at what the outlook is in other parts of the world -- and they want to be here," said Charlie Hughes, owner of the brand-consulting firm Brand Rules.
      "But the plain truth is that unless you're coming in with something truly unique, it is just not plausible that you're going to get anywhere in this market."
      (Author's note: Also, having a bit of luck isn't a bad thing to have either. -WM)
      Hughes isn't wrong. Automotive News says there are 42 automotive brands that sell 283 nameplates in various models and configurations. Trying to get the attention of a consumer, let alone a large number is a difficult task. Just ask Alfa Romeo and Fiat who are currently struggling in the U.S.
      One only needs to look at the list of automakers that have packed up left in the past 20 years - Daewoo, Isuzu, and Suzuki. Others haven't even made it to the shore - China's Chery and India's Mahindra.
      But that isn't deterring a large number of automakers to give it a shot. Here is the current list of automakers that are currently planning entry to the U.S.
      PSA Group - parent company of Citroën, DS, and Peugeot - has announced plans for a U.S. launch. But it will be a slow rollout beginning with ride sharing service. The company will also conduct a research project to see if it is viable for them to make a launch. Skoda - a brand under the Volkswagen Group umbrella - is reportedly going to make a decision on whether to come in the U.S. next year. Ssangyong Motor Co., a South Korean builder of crossovers has announced that it will enter the U.S. in 2020 Geely Automobile is planning to launch a new brand known as Lynk & Co with the possibility of entering the U.S. No word on a possible date. Alkane Truck Co., a company based in South Carolina plans on building the Dominator, a truck using the chassis of a Brazilian army truck and various components from the U.S. CEO Bob Smith believes this vehicle will fill a niche left by the Hummer H1. "If all you're going to do is enter this market offering the same thing everyone else is already offering, you might as well save your money. The U.S. auto industry is a very expensive place to do business," said Hughes.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      May was a horrible month for automakers as many reported sales drops. Part of this can be attributed sales of cars (especially sedans) imploding. According to Automotive News, the 15 largest automakers all posted lower car sales. Overall car sales dropped 16 percent.
       
      "We don't get a lot of ups on cars right now, as far as people even wanting a price on them," said Gary Uftring, president of Uftring Auto Group in Peoria, Ill.
       
      "Styling has changed, and what people want to be seen in is a crossover or a sport utility."
       
      Case in point, light-truck sales rose 2.4 percent in May.
       
      Sedans were the hardest hit for May. Here's a rundown of the big losers,
      Toyota Camry and Prius saw a decrease of about 7,000 models when compared to sales last May BMW 5-Series, Ford Focus, and Ford Fusion all saw a drop of over 20 percent Worst month of any kind for the Chevrolet Impala, down 54 percent.

      Barclays Capital analyst Brian Johnson says the U.S. has gone into a 'sedan recession,' and could hurt sales down the road.
       
      "Excess supply and weak demand for sedans is likely to yield added price pressures. One trend that may accelerate the sedan recession is weakness in deep subprime credit, which largely supports used car values -- especially for sedans."
       
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By dfelt
      Kicking off since I did not see an April Car spotting thread.
       
      Was over picking up my Durango as the Trans needed rebuilding. I got 223,000 miles on it before I had to rebuild it. 
       
      Saw this Cherry of a Buick at the shop.
       

    • By dfelt
      Came across this, the Auto Insurance Industry released their list of the top most ticketed auto's. The winner is. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
       
      LEXUS ES 300
       
      CARS WITH THE MOST TICKETS
      (car, percentage of drivers ticketed)
      Lexus ES 300, 33% Nissan 350Z, 33% Dodge Charger SE/SXT, 32% Volkswagen Jetta GL, 31 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS/LT, 31% Mazda 3S, 30% Volkswagen GTI, 30% Dodge Stratus SXT, 30% Acura 3.0s, 30% Toyota Tacoma, 30% Mazda Tribute, 30% Subaru Impreza WRX, 30% Lexus LS 400 Series, 30% Subaru Impreza 2.5i, 30% Mercedes-Benz C300 4 Matic, 30% Chevrolet Malibu 2LT, 29% Lincoln LS, 29% Ford Fusion S, 29% Mazda 3i, 29% Chevrolet Tahoe K1500, 29% http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/18/drive-a-lexus-it-may-be-the-most-ticketed-car.html
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)