Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    U.S. Is Planning To Hold Back On Issuing Car Tariffs

      The tariffs as high as 25% are on hold for the moment.

    Back i n May, the U.S. Commerce Department launched an investigation into car imports to determine the impact of car imports. The investigation falls under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 which states "whether imports of automobiles, including SUVs, vans and light trucks, and automotive parts into the United States threaten to impair the national security." This could allow the Trump administration to levy tariffs as high as 25 percent on foreign-built vehicles.

    Yesterday, the Commerce Department submitted their draft report into the investigation. The Trump administration has 90 days to determine whether or not to move forward on various measures such as implementing tariffs if the report concludes that imports are a security threat. But Bloomberg is reporting that the administration is holding off on imposing new tariffs. Two sources tell the publication that top officials are considering revising plans due to the report. The sources also said that the report "would be subject to further changes."

    President Trump has been using the threat of tariffs as leverage during negotiations with trade partners. Already, Trump has promised not to impose any auto tariffs on Europe while the two work on a new trade deal. But a number of foreign governments and companies have said the tariffs would cause more harm. The National Automobile Dealers Association estimates tariffs would add $2,270 to the cost of U.S.-built vehicles and $6,875 to the cost of imported vehicles.

    It doesn't help that many in Trump's senior economic team believe slapping tariffs on imported cars is a bad idea. According to a report from Axios yesterday, "about every member of his senior economic team besides Peter Navarro believes this is a terrible idea."

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    9 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    If US companies are charged to sell to X country, I believe it is fair to then charge X country's companies to sell their products here. 

    Could not agree more. Don't like the current administration in the least but like Chinese intellectual property theft even less.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    If US companies are charged to sell to X country, I believe it is fair to then charge X country's companies to sell their products here. 

    It's the customers who are charged in the end. 

    But China now charges a 15% tariff on imported cars.

    The US charges a 25% tariff on imported trucks and has since the Kennedy Administration. 

    Edit: Furthermore, it's not like there is some huge flood of Chinese cars in the US market. Two of the three models that were sold here have already been pulled from US sales (CT6 PHEV and S60 Inscription). 

    Japan doesn't have a tariff on imported cars, and S. Korea's is fairly low.

    That's why a 25% tariff on cars imported into the U.S. from these countries doesn't make sense even from a retaliatory perspective. 

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Personally, I don't care who or when. Point fingers at whoever you'd like. I just want it even for both parties. Charge 100% tariffs, charge 0% tariffs. Whatever it is, just be equal. 

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Personally, I don't care who or when. Point fingers at whoever you'd like. I just want it even for both parties. Charge 100% tariffs, charge 0% tariffs. Whatever it is, just be equal. 

    But that's why this 25% thing that Trump is going for makes no sense.  I agree with you that tariffs should be reciprocal... but that's not what he's doing. 25% on Japanese cars when they charge 0%? 

    It's hamfisted.  Had he come out with reciprocal tariffs, I think he would have gotten a lot more traction and agreements.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    But that's why this 25% thing that Trump is going for makes no sense.  I agree with you that tariffs should be reciprocal... but that's not what he's doing. 25% on Japanese cars when they charge 0%? 

    It's hamfisted.  Had he come out with reciprocal tariffs, I think he would have gotten a lot more traction and agreements.

    The idea is good, the implementation is terrible. 

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We don't benefit from a future where a majority of our cars come from China, like so many other products.  And over time that will likely be inevitable.  If we get to that point where 3/4 of all our cars are coming from Mexico and China, is what we want to avoid.  What that means for an effective tariff setup back and forth, I don't know.  I do know the 25% number is bantered about and maybe that is just put out there to believe at some point in the future it will settle in at 10-15%.  I don't know.

    We do really have to ask the question, why does GM need to make something like the Envision in China, and ship it over, or why do they have to make pickups that sticker for 60k in Mexico.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    It ain’t going to be the cars you should worry about guys-it’s the parts!

    Repair will go through the roof......

    The whole thing is designed to work like that. It moves the tax burden to the working classes. 

    6 hours ago, regfootball said:

     

    We do really have to ask the question, why does GM need to make something like the Envision in China, and ship it over, or why do they have to make pickups that sticker for 60k in Mexico.

    Agreed. 

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, regfootball said:

    We don't benefit from a future where a majority of our cars come from China, like so many other products.  And over time that will likely be inevitable.  If we get to that point where 3/4 of all our cars are coming from Mexico and China, is what we want to avoid.  What that means for an effective tariff setup back and forth, I don't know.  I do know the 25% number is bantered about and maybe that is just put out there to believe at some point in the future it will settle in at 10-15%.  I don't know.

    We do really have to ask the question, why does GM need to make something like the Envision in China, and ship it over, or why do they have to make pickups that sticker for 60k in Mexico.

    Siimple answer-Wall Street-

    Make a major profit or die......

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, regfootball said:

    We don't benefit from a future where a majority of our cars come from China, like so many other products.  And over time that will likely be inevitable.  If we get to that point where 3/4 of all our cars are coming from Mexico and China, is what we want to avoid.  What that means for an effective tariff setup back and forth, I don't know.  I do know the 25% number is bantered about and maybe that is just put out there to believe at some point in the future it will settle in at 10-15%.  I don't know.

    We do really have to ask the question, why does GM need to make something like the Envision in China, and ship it over, or why do they have to make pickups that sticker for 60k in Mexico.

    GM makes the Envision in China because for every Buick that sells here, four are sold in China.  The Encore is already made in South Korea (the former Daewoo plants are now owned by GM); GM has them shipped to China or here in NA.  Whether it is parts or final assembly, the era where GM or Ford or FCA make virtually everything in the USA is long gone.  Supply chains are global and automakers are exploiting that.  If you want your next Chevy Trax to have MSRP to rival a Cadillac XT4, then the president should seek to have insanely high tariffs on cars AND car parts.  Consumers automatically lose when that happens.

    IOW, tariffs are still bad.  New car prices are quite high as they are.

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    GM makes the Envision in China because for every Buick that sells here, four are sold in China.  The Encore is already made in South Korea (the former Daewoo plants are now owned by GM); GM has them shipped to China or here in NA.  Whether it is parts or final assembly, the era where GM or Ford or FCA make virtually everything in the USA is long gone.  Supply chains are global and automakers are exploiting that.  If you want your next Chevy Trax to have MSRP to rival a Cadillac XT4, then the president should seek to have insanely high tariffs on cars AND car parts.  Consumers automatically lose when that happens.

    IOW, tariffs are still bad.  New car prices are quite high as they are.

    Quoted in its entirety for truth. 

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    part of the reason for low Envision sales is a price that does not mate up to the perceived public value.  With a better price (and not a 2012 design), it would have more volume.  The Encore makes more sense to bring from Korea because it is higher volume and exploiting cheaper wages there helps keep a small car sell for a small price in the US.

    I'd buy that logic 100% fully if it were just the Envision we were talking about here, but we all know they could produce this in an Equinox / Terrain plant if they wanted to, with the 45k sticker prices and such.  We also know the real intent of this was to be a big trojan horse to gain acceptance to producing GM cars in China and bringing them back here.  Its the first step towards GM producing 3/4 of their sales volume of the US outside the US, which is really unacceptable for a company that was kept alive by our own government, when Honda and Subaru etc seem to make a high percentage of the cars they sell in the US, here.

     

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I find first hand experience and facts more helpful than ignorance and unwarranted hysteria.  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/tesla-driver-details-survived-14-132951082.html
    • Latest News MADE IN MICHIGAN - GM Proud Investing $7 Billion in Manufacturing Mary Barra was excited to share the news of a $7 Billion Investment in the great state of Michigan as GM will retain 1,000 existing employees and create 4,000 new jobs. ---> Read More Desert-Racing, Rock-Crawling, Street-Legal 2022 FORD BRONCO RAPTOR is HERE Today Ford Motor Company released the most powerful street-legal Bronco ever, 2022 Ford Bronco Raptor. Check out the details and pictures. ---> Read More Something EXCITING Is Coming From Cadillac January 21, 2022 The Latest Excitement from Cadillac is to be unveiled on Friday January 21st, 2022. ---> Read More GM Next Gen Ultra Cruise to enable Door-to-Door Hands-Free Driving with New Compute Architecture GM's multi-cultural global engineering team with American Semiconductor company Qualcomm Technologies to usher in the next generation of Ultra Cruise with robust door-to-door hands-free driving in 95 percent of all driving scenarios. ---> Read More Consumer Reports Reliable Electric Vehicle Insights 2022 Consumer reports has released their latest reliable electric vehicle report. This report can be taken in many ways, but the data is great info for all auto companies as they make the move to EVs. ---> Read More Tesla CyberTruck 2021 Productions, Nope, 2022, Nope, now 2023 MAYBE????? Tesla Cybertruck that has been talked about as a crucial auto for their portfolio is delayed again as the legacy OEMs close in on shipping trucks behind Rivian who is building and delivering them now. Will they make it? ---> Read More VINFAST the Newest BEV Auto Maker from Vietnam! January 5th 2022 VinFast Automotive company from Vietnam introduced their global BEV Portfolio and anounced Factories in the U.S. and Germany. Is this the next HOT BEV company? ---> Read More Latest Reviews Quick Drive: 2021 Mazda CX-30 Premium AWD A premium subcompact crossover? ---> Read More Quick Drive: 2020 Volvo XC90 T8 and 2021 V90 T6 Two Ways to Carry People and their Stuff By Volvo ---> Read More Quick Drive: 2020 Lexus NX 300h & UX 250h Lexus' Hybrid Theory of Crossovers ---> Read More Quick Drive: 2020 Hyundai Venue SEL & Palisade Limited AWD Looking at the smallest and largest Hyundai crossovers ---> Read More Quick Drive: 2020 Toyota 4Runner Venture Edition and Land Cruiser Heritage Edition Driving around in Toyota's old school SUVs ---> Read More Click here to view our privacy policy CheersandGears.com - Established 2001  P.O. Box 17974, Pittsburgh, PA 15235 You can manage your subscription settings at the following link https://www.cheersandgears.com/settings/?area=newsletters
    • It Took 13 Years, But The Dodge Challenger Has Finally Won (jalopnik.com) In 2015 Ford Mustang hit it peak followed by the Chevrolet Camaro and every year since has dropped in sales. 2015 was also the year that Ford released the current Mustang that is still selling 7 years later. 2015 Ford Mustang sold 122,349 to 66,377 Challengers. 2021 Sales Ford Mustang 52,414 Chevrolet Camaro 21,893 Dodge Challenger 54,314      
    • It is.  And some stupid people are insufferable.  The "don't know how much they don't know" crowd can be more hostile and more argumentative because they don't have facts.  They don't want dialogue that involves exchanging information. We have an example of similar idiocy in my very family.  One uncle came over from Europe to visit us on the West Coast.  He is/was the biggest douche bag of the many siblings on one parental side.  When he got to California, he stated what he wanted to see and said that he wanted to see Niagara Falls.  That meant he had no concept of scale.  I told him that that was like going from Lisbon to Eastern Europe. My parents also picked up the tab for him, and his wife, to fly to the Pacific Northwest and to San Francisco during this trip.  He was a pill on both trips.  He wanted to see one of the bridges, so I took the rental car with all of us onto the Bay Bridge because it was cheaper.  He went ballistic.  First, you don't just "ascend" onto the bridge deck.  You have to find the on-ramps in S.F.  Then, when you get to the other side, you're in Oakland.  I didn't get off the freeway because I didn't know and didn't want to experiment with Oakland.  So I went further out to a nicer suburb with a full interchange to drive us back to the city.  During this prolongation, he kept yelling. Of the countries in Europe I keep up with, I knew Portugal leads in vaccination efforts.  That's impressive for a smaller and not particularly rich European country.  Spain (which I don't see on this graphic) would be behind them, and ahead of Italy and France.  France has seen their own "don't tread on me" demonstrations in their streets. It's not.  But some people make us shake our heads. On my homepage were some links about some guy named Doug Kuzma.  It turns out he has/had a podcast where he touted the typical packaging of the anti-vax crowd.  His platform was called FROG network.  I thought that maybe he liked amphibians ... or was poking fun at the French.  FROG means "Fully Rely On God."  A person from this group posted that Doug needed "heavy, heavy" prayers.  He was only 61 and now on a ventilator, unconscious.  The first thing that came to mind was the adage that "God helps those who helps themselves."  He was pushing those drugs we've heard about that start with "i" and "hydro" as an alternative to the vaccine.  If you heard this guy, I doubt his critical thinking skills in the realms of science and practical topics were that developed.  A few days later, I found out he didn't make it. You just shrug.
    • This is the source I referenced the first time, in case anyone wanted to see : https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/vaccination-rollout-and-access/ No vested interest, not promoting it, not saying it's the best, just posting a source. - - - - - It's actually Gibraltar who is apparently "leading the world" (whatever that outmoded concept may mean). They have a population of 33,675 and the BBC puts them at the top of the list with "121%" fully vaccinated".  Or - assuming there's something amiss with a percentage over 100 - it's Pitcairn, whom 100% of it's [67] people are vaccinated. If anyone thinks telling someone who doesn't want to get the vaccine that -say- 'Cuba had a higher rate than the U.S.' is going to do jack squat; boy are they going to be disappointed.
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...