Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Jaguar Hastens Internal Combustion's Demise by Killing all Gas Cars This Year

      Gas Jaguars, exit stage right. Jaguar promised to be all-electric by 2025, and it looks like they mean to keep that promise.

    In February of 2021, Jaguar announced that it would become an all-electric brand by 2025, a feat that, if achieved, would make it the first legacy brand to make that transition.  Later this year, the last three gas-powered Jaguar models (E-Pace, F-Pace, and XF Sedan) will end production well before the electric replacements are ready.  Jaguar is building up some inventory to carry it through the production crunch, but it is only able to do that because the brand's sales have fallen from 179,000 units in 2017 to 43,000 units globally.

    The first of three new EVs arrives in mid-2025 with a followup model later that year and the final of the trio in 2026. All three will be based on Jaguar's new JEA (Jaguar Electric Architecture) platform, unrelated to the current Jaguar I-Pace. Starting with a high-dollar grand touring sedan, Jaguar intends to take aim at competitors like the Porsche Taycan and Audi e-tron GT.  And while Jaguar does claim the new four-door GT will be the most powerful Jaguar ever (that crown is currently held by the top F-type with 575 horsepower), they are aiming for a more generous range than the direct competition with 430 miles on the WLTP test or roughly 400 miles when the EPA gets their hands on it.

    Unfortunately, the full-size Jaguar XJ has been killed again before it got resurrected. When the gasoline XJ went out of production, Jaguar said the XJ would return as an EV, but that plan was scuttled back in 2021 and no XJ is forthcoming.

    By the end of the year, even the I-Pace crossover will end production, potentially leaving Jaguar with zero vehicles in production if there are delays with the four-door GT. The I-Pace never made a mark on the market with a $73,000+ starting price and a 246 mile range.

    Related:
    Jaguar I-Pace Gets More Range From Software Update
    Rumorpile: F-Type Could Offer An Electric Powertrain
     

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    46 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    This seems, at least, five years too early. 

    I mean... is anyone going to notice? Jaguar sold like 8,000 cars in the US last year and 43,000 globally.  It sounds like they're building up a couple of years of inventory to cover it. I think even Alfa Romeo would laugh at that.

    For comparison, they sold 280,000 Land Rover / Range Rover / Defenders globally.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I mean... is anyone going to notice? Jaguar sold like 8,000 cars in the US last year and 43,000 globally.  It sounds like they're building up a couple of years of inventory to cover it. I think even Alfa Romeo would laugh at that.

    For comparison, they sold 280,000 Land Rover / Range Rover / Defenders globally.

    Hahaha fair point. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jaguar is dead, I don't know how the dealers go 1 year with just the I-Pace in production even if they have old stock of ICE cars lingering around a while.  And I feel like EV launches are always delayed, so mid-2025 could be fall 2025, and a GT car like the Taycan probably won't sell because no one wants a big Jaguar sedan and it will probably cost twice as much as a Tesla Model S and half half the range and performance.  I just think the product planners are Jaguar are clueless and the brand hasn't really been relevant for 10 years.    They brand will be gone in 5 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tesla aside, what car marque has been successful being an all-EV carmaker?  Also, since Jaguar's greatest weakness has been poor reliability (especially in electronics!), how will any of this work out for them?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/8/2024 at 10:07 PM, riviera74 said:

    Tesla aside, what car marque has been successful being an all-EV carmaker?  Also, since Jaguar's greatest weakness has been poor reliability (especially in electronics!), how will any of this work out for them?

    Rivian seems to be gaining. They have over 70,000 reservations on the R2 already and there's still a backlog of R1S and R1T.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Warren Buffer I believe owns a good bit of stock in BYD....interesting. Going to try to verify this.
    • Exactly why the myth of totally free markets is just that, a myth.
    • Honestly, that's probably around when I'd buy again, too. I'm in no rush. I'd love a large EV SUV or truck, but I don't have the monies for an R1S, Lightning, Sierra EV or whenever the Scouts show up. 
    • That's every car company out there. Toyota and Honda only exist today because of the US government getting Japan back on its feet and then later the Japanese government supporting them with currency manipulation and socialized pensions and medicine. Subaru was originally Fiji Heavy Industries which built busses, trains, heavy construction machinery, and was a major supplier of airplanes. FHI is still a major aerospace company who supplies parts for the Airbus 380 and just about every model Boeing makes or has made that starts with a 7. They also make military helicopters and both military and commercial drones. Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and VW are all here today because of the Marshall Plan and later their countries' social medicine and pension programs. Mercedes makes a lot of military and construction equipment purchased by governments. BYD (and others) is where it is because the Chinese government spent loads on battery development and incentives to its citizens to by EVs. Prior to that, BYD built their industrial might on building busses and other heavy machinery for the Chinese government and local governments all over the world. GM and Ford had major defense contracts during WWII, the 2008 bailouts, the Biden EV tax credits, the Obama cash-for-clunkers incentives, and much more. However, they famously have always had to manage their own healthcare and pensions systems which are what put them at a competitive disadvantage throughout the 80's and 90's. Stellantis's ownership timeline is too convoluted to even tackle, but Chrysler was bailed out in 1979, then they bought AMC/Jeep which had been kept afloat by the military, then they were bailed out again in 2008 by both the US and Italian governments. Fiat is/was a major equipment and bus supplier in Europe. The French government has always supported Peugeot and Citroen... the list goes on.
    • Nor would BYD. The Chinese government has dumped a metric crap ton of cash into auto development.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search